Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
SaltyJesus
Jun 2, 2011

Arf!

School Nickname posted:

"These colors don't run into my country" - Danish PM

:master: holy poo poo

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Aspergeoisie
Jun 6, 2009

by R. Guyovich
Probably asked and answered but what's stopping countries from denying asylum applications and deporting these people if they don't want them there? Like the EU can't actually force anyone into taking them, right?

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.

Aspergeoisie posted:

Probably asked and answered but what's stopping countries from denying asylum applications and deporting these people if they don't want them there? Like the EU can't actually force anyone into taking them, right?

Penalties. The Austrian chancellor proposed that the countries in favour of the quota system could pass it unilaterally (they would be enough to form a qualified majority) and cut EU spendings for those countries who won't participate. Since most of these countries are net recipients of EU money this would actually hurt them.

az
Dec 2, 2005

And then there's having a pissy Angy at the helm of Germany who may or may not remember your little rebellion next time something important comes up.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Honj Steak posted:

I stopped debating Hungarian politics with Hungarians long ago. You will either get someone who downplays the extent of far-right extremism in the country or someone who outright supports it. When I touched the topic of Jobbik using symbols of the fascist Arrow Cross Party you mostly heard something like "It's an old Hungarian tradition and it's good there are people who uphold it". When I said Jobbik and Fidesz politicians were openly talking about "the world's jewry destroying the integrity of our state" I heard "Well, there is some truth to that statement".

I know a Hungarian actually who has national pride but says he's despairing for Hungary because of its fascistic nationalism. He is proud of his country's cultural heritage and laments the diaspora of the annexation of Hungary by the surrounding countries, but he doesn't believe they should try and take back those areas and he hates Jobbik and the current government. He absolutely does not play down the far-right extremism.

Mind you he also doesn't have a knee-jerk reaction to communism/socialism despite having grown up in the Hungarian People's Republic. He's critical of the implementation as opposed to the ideals of communism. He's a nice fellow.

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.

Tesseraction posted:

I know a Hungarian actually who has national pride but says he's despairing for Hungary because of its fascistic nationalism. He is proud of his country's cultural heritage and laments the diaspora of the annexation of Hungary by the surrounding countries, but he doesn't believe they should try and take back those areas and he hates Jobbik and the current government. He absolutely does not play down the far-right extremism.

Mind you he also doesn't have a knee-jerk reaction to communism/socialism despite having grown up in the Hungarian People's Republic. He's critical of the implementation as opposed to the ideals of communism. He's a nice fellow.

Yeah I suppose there must be at least some people in Hungary opposed to their general madness. I only know a handful of them but my experiences were quite bad, unfortunately.

Well, actually I know another Hungarian who is a cool lad opposed to the political sentiments, but he's virtually a Jew that won't return into his native country because he fears persecution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A1s_Schiff

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Main Paineframe posted:

If a local strongman rolls up to the food truck with a bunch of armed men and says "The people who need this food aren't getting this food, because I think they should also die and also I like the sound of 'free food'" then that is absolutely an ideological problem. It's not physically, organizationally, or technologically impossible to get food to the people; the problem is that someone is interfering with the supply chain for ideological reasons.

But the reason for him denying the food isn't necessarily because of ideology, it's because hunger and control of food supply is a useful way to cement his own control over the region. He's acting out of material self interest because a food secure population is more likely to slip out of his control.

Starshark
Dec 22, 2005
Doctor Rope

Typo posted:

But the reason for him denying the food isn't necessarily because of ideology, it's because hunger and control of food supply is a useful way to cement his own control over the region. He's acting out of material self interest because a food secure population is more likely to slip out of his control.

Oh, stop nitpicking. The root of it is ideology.

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.
Austria just introduced border controls, too.

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Starshark posted:

Oh, stop nitpicking. The root of it is ideology.

No it's really not

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib

Typo posted:

No it's really not

There's nothing ideological about believing you should have power over other people? Good Lord.

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Effectronica posted:

There's nothing ideological about believing you should have power over other people? Good Lord.

If that's how you choose to define ideological then it's a useless definition.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

This is-it-ideology thing seems more like a cross-talk thing.

Typo says the problem is distribution channels as they can't account for assholes nicking all the stuff.

The others, I believe, are saying that the assholes nicking all the stuff are the problem which should be solved first.

Honj Steak posted:

Austria just introduced border controls, too.

Oh good. The sad thing is I have a feeling that when a crisis of this scale comes around again as it inevitably will, the same stupid mistakes will be made.

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.
German CDU starting talks with coalition partners about an "immigration law" that could open up legal ways of getting to Europe as a refugee without using smugglers.

Torrannor
Apr 27, 2013

---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE

Honj Steak posted:

German CDU starting talks with coalition partners about an "immigration law" that could open up legal ways of getting to Europe as a refugee without using smugglers.

It should also be noted that the refugees that are caught at the Austrian-German border are not sent back. Their traffickers are arrested and the refugees themselves are processed like all the other refugees that came to Germany in the last few weeks.

Yadoppsi
May 10, 2009
Does anyone care to comment on this article? Is this why Germany did its about face with its borders yesterday?

http://www.vox.com/2015/9/13/9319741/germany-borders-merkel

quote:

In a shocking development in the European migrant crisis, Germany is immediately introducing border controls in the south of the country, Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière announced on Sunday. The government of Chancellor Angela Merkel claimed "urgent security reasons."
The border controls are supposed to curb the influx of migrants. Currently, tens of thousands of refugees per day find their way to Germany, many of them from civil-war-torn Syria.
The announcement is in stark contradiction to the principle of open borders, to which most EU member states, including Germany, have committed. Apparently Germany wants to increase the pressure on the European Union to finally find an EU-wide solution to the refugee crisis.

The decision marks a surprising turnaround in Germany’s attitude toward the European refugee crisis

Germany is introducing temporary controls on its southern border with neighbor country Austria to cope with the influx of migrants, German interior minister Thomas de Maizière announced on Sunday. "The aim of this measure is to limit the current flow to Germany and to come back to an orderly process at entry," de Maizière said at a hastily called news conference. He also claimed "urgent security reasons".

The decision marks a surprising turnaround in Germany’s dealing with the current refugee crisis. The government of Chancellor Angela Merkel had recently followed a policy of open borders and taken a moral leadership role in the refugee crisis. For example, she had announced Germany’s intention to take up considerably more refugees and provided for six billion euros in emergency aid.

However, now Germany clearly wants to show that it’s not willing nor able to solve the refugee crisis alone. By closing the borders, the country increases the pressure on its EU partners tremendously to take their share of the burden.
Germany's controls at the borders apply until further notice

Questions from journalists were not admitted at the press conference with the interior minister on Sunday. He explained the details for the radical measure in under three minutes:

De Maizière pointed out the high number of refugees, who frequently first travel after escaping from their home countries to Austria and then start their way to Germany. On Saturday alone, 12,000 new refugees arrived in the Bavarian capital Munich. Germany expects a total of up to 800,000 refugees this year.
Until recently, Germany had these refugees granted free travel. Now, this no longer applies, and entering Germany is supposed to be possible with valid travel documents only.
The Federal Police is now sending all available police officers to Bavaria to close the borders. There are even considerations to use German soldiers to secure the borders. You can see consequences of the decision already: The Deutsche Bahn, Germany’s railway company, closed service between Austria and Germany for 12 hours Sunday at the government's request.

Germany is intensifying the pressure on less committed EU member states

As the interior minister pointed out, Germany's actions buy it some time to cope with the large crowds of people who have already entered Germany.

But the more important signal of the decision goes to the European Union: Up to this point and no further.

Some EU countries, such as Germany or Sweden, are currently taking on a lot of refugees. Other EU member states such as Britain, Poland or Slovakia, refuse to take in significantly higher numbers of refugees.

This is something Germany apparently no longer wants to accept.

On Monday, all 28 EU interior ministers will meet for an emergency summit to discuss the refugee crisis. Therefore, the timing of Germany´s decision is well considered to increase the pressure on less committed EU member states and urge them to make some concessions.

The interior minister made clear that the burden of incoming refugees from civil war countries like Syria would force action from every single EU member state. "I demand that all European member states stick to that in the future," he went on.
Angela Merkel is under pressure herself

Germany’s decision also is supposed to discourage refugees from rushing towards Germany. Most asylum seekers wish to stay in Germany when they arrive at EU borders. However, they must apply for asylum in the EU country in which they first arrive. Refugees could "not simply wish for her host country" emphasized Merkel’s interior minister.

The turnaround in asylum policy has domestic political reasons, too. While Merkel had received international praise for her open border strategy, the resistance from parts of her conservative party have grown immensely. For example, the chairman of the conservative sister party and coalition partner CSU, Horst Seehofer, accused Merkel of a "gross misjudgment" in the migrant crisis.

On a broader EU level, Germany’s radical measure is also remarkable. With closing parts of its borders, Germany temporarily revokes the so-called Schengen agreement, which provides free travels within the EU borders.

Most EU member states have committed themselves to the Schengen agreement. So this development is not a good sign for the state of the European Union, which defines itself as a group of cooperating and deeply tied partner countries.

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.

Yadoppsi posted:

Does anyone care to comment on this article? Is this why Germany did its about face with its borders yesterday?

http://www.vox.com/2015/9/13/9319741/germany-borders-merkel

Yeah seems about correct. De Maiziére personally said he wanted the measure "to be a statement", one could assume that means a statement towards other EU countries.

chessmaster13
Jan 10, 2015

Yadoppsi posted:

Does anyone care to comment on this article? Is this why Germany did its about face with its borders yesterday?

http://www.vox.com/2015/9/13/9319741/germany-borders-merkel

Finally somebody doing something about this. There is only so much strain that a social system can handle.

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.

chessmaster13 posted:

Finally somebody doing something about this. There is only so much strain that a social system can handle.

That's not what the article says. Money is no problem - the government just recently allocated an additional six billion Euros for refugee welfare in 2015. The problem is that in the last two weeks the influx was way too fast to deal with it in any orderly way. Also Merkel seemingly really wants the other EU countries to help.

chessmaster13
Jan 10, 2015

Honj Steak posted:

That's not what the article says. Money is no problem - the government just recently allocated an additional six billion Euros for refugee welfare in 2015. The problem is that in the last two weeks the influx was way too fast to deal with it in any orderly way. Also Merkel seemingly really wants the other EU countries to help.

Money is not the problem you say? Does this money come from thin air?
My prediction is, that many much needed things wont happen because of this crisis.
Our roads already look like poo poo and there not enough daycares (every child has claim to a place in a daycare here).

I not patriotic, in fact I see countrys like shared flats, and there is a limit on how many people can crash on the couch and take things from the fridge.

Sistergodiva
Jan 3, 2006

I'm like you,
I have no shame.

chessmaster13 posted:

Money is not the problem you say? Does this money come from thin air?
My prediction is, that many much needed things wont happen because of this crisis.
Our roads already look like poo poo and there not enough daycares (every child has claim to a place in a daycare here).

I not patriotic, in fact I see countrys like shared flats, and there is a limit on how many people can crash on the couch and take things from the fridge.

There are gunmen shooting up your apartment? Nah, sorry you can't crash here it could get crowded.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Money does come from thin air, actually, that's half the joy of fiat currency. How pulling money from thin air affects the economy is a different matter, although it's worth noting that some countries deliberately devalue their currency to increase trade (see: Switzerland).

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Also why do the people in this scenario 'take things' from fridge. You mean that initially the refugees won't be stocking your hypothetical fridge to make up for initial borrowing? Have you heard of 'return on investment'?

Honj Steak
May 31, 2013

Hi there.
Plus Germany is insanely rich. Maybe it's not the worst idea to tax the people who have a lot of money a bit more.

chessmaster13
Jan 10, 2015

Tesseraction posted:

Also why do the people in this scenario 'take things' from fridge. You mean that initially the refugees won't be stocking your hypothetical fridge to make up for initial borrowing? Have you heard of 'return on investment'?

I am familar with the concept of ROI. But if you consider that many of those people have no education which could be applied in our modern society that ROI will very likely be very negative.
Making other peoples problems your problems (without them being able to give you back more than you invested) seems like a bad deal for me.

my dad
Oct 17, 2012

this shall be humorous

chessmaster13 posted:

I am familar with the concept of ROI. But if you consider that many of those people have no education which could be applied in our modern society that ROI will very likely be very negative.
Making other peoples problems your problems (without them being able to give you back more than you invested) seems like a bad deal for me.

Err... What?

Freezer
Apr 20, 2001

The Earth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot stay in the cradle forever.
The border closing is aimed at other non-cooperative EU states, they've made this fairly clear. No one can realistically blame Germany for not stepping up to the occasion.

If anything, the EU has proven itself (both in the debt crises and migrant crisis) to be fair-weather alliance ruled by FYGM and NIMBY attitudes, and is due to either transform or collapse soon.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

chessmaster13 posted:

I am familar with the concept of ROI. But if you consider that many of those people have no education which could be applied in our modern society that ROI will very likely be very negative.
Making other peoples problems your problems (without them being able to give you back more than you invested) seems like a bad deal for me.

As bolded here:

my dad posted:

Err... What?

The refugees are overwhelming religiously moderate, educated people and their families. Germany in fact deliberately weighted the best-educated refugees towards their country. These people are probably smarter than the average citizen in several of the countries around Europe. I'm even tempted to say Britain included there.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Typo posted:

But the reason for him denying the food isn't necessarily because of ideology, it's because hunger and control of food supply is a useful way to cement his own control over the region. He's acting out of material self interest because a food secure population is more likely to slip out of his control.

"I want to starve out anyone who doesn't agree with me" is definitely an ideological problem. I'm saying that this isn't like a natural disaster zone or an 18th-century famine where technological, organizational, and physical limitations make it virtually impossible to get sufficient food into the area in time. If food supplies are failing to make it to starving people, then it's because someone decided that food shouldn't make it to those starving people. And "the local government/warlord/armed gang decided those people shouldn't get fed" is absolutely an ideological cause of logistical failures.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


chessmaster13 posted:

Money is not the problem you say? Does this money come from thin air?
My prediction is, that many much needed things wont happen because of this crisis.
Our roads already look like poo poo and there not enough daycares (every child has claim to a place in a daycare here).

I not patriotic, in fact I see countrys like shared flats, and there is a limit on how many people can crash on the couch and take things from the fridge.

literally MY TAX DOLLARS. glad to see european political economy progress to 1968. welcome to the future

sincx
Jul 13, 2012

furiously masturbating to anime titties
This goes back to the monetary union without fiscal/political union problem.

Germany's threats to withhold EU funds from countries not playing along with Merkel's refugee distribution plan only goes so far--not far enough to counter more conservative countries' instinctive fears regarding uncontrolled migration.

Smudgie Buggler
Feb 27, 2005

SET PHASERS TO "GRINDING TEDIUM"

icantfindaname posted:

literally MY TAX DOLLARS. glad to see european political economy progress to 1968. welcome to the future

What's the counterpoint, though? That countries are actually endowed with infinite resources or something?

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Did Denmark participate in the Iraq War?

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
Any chance that Oz will change attitudes towards refugees now that Abbott's out?

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib

Smudgie Buggler posted:

What's the counterpoint, though? That countries are actually endowed with infinite resources or something?

The counterpoint is that the amount of resources necessary to support refugees is far from bankrupting European countries, and this is so obvious that there's little point in explicitly stating this.

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011




chessmaster13 posted:

I am familar with the concept of ROI. But if you consider that many of those people have no education which could be applied in our modern society that ROI will very likely be very negative.
Making other peoples problems your problems (without them being able to give you back more than you invested) seems like a bad deal for me.

Syrians are likely to not only have an education but a good one though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Syria

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Apparently Swedish politicians want to put refugees on remote islands, and Swedes are saying refugees would be ungrateful to oppose this measure, and that they've already obtained a better life "without lifting a finger".

Racist Euros now have to pretend refugees all took a plane to Europe now.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Smudgie Buggler posted:

What's the counterpoint, though? That countries are actually endowed with infinite resources or something?

Not infinite but it's basically ignoring that resources are actually pretty abundant and economic metrics are mostly just there to gently caress the poor. Not only to do it, but mostly.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Smudgie Buggler posted:

What's the counterpoint, though? That countries are actually endowed with infinite resources or something?

They're endowed with enough resources to easily accomodate all the immigrants they are facing. Even more so because those immigrants themselves are in fact resources which contribute to the economy of their new countries

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Reminder the UK expenses scandal is probably all over Euro parliaments as well, so basically gently caress off with this "woe is us poor Europeans". They're all crooked bastards, squeeze 'em with taxes and get these people housed and fed. Also the United States should be looking at way way more than only 65,000.

  • Locked thread