|
So from the more streaming side, I've been watching a lot of New Legacy inc. Mostly their wrestling stuff where they manage to break games that were apparently held together with the coding equivilent of pritt stick. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AweVxT1aKY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAxun1iIvVs
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 03:57 |
|
|
Jamesman posted:Nah they're just gonna do three episodes and abandon it like they do all their playthroughs. To be fair, Arin seems to like the Metal Gear series so he'll probably stick it out. On the other hand, they didn't even finish the intro in their first video soooooo...
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Suzy's also been talking on her twitter about how she's extremely excited to play it so who knows, they might stick it out. v vedit: vvv he did excellent at Bloodborne, I dunno, man. He's played MGS 5 a fair bit since its release as with Bloodborne so I have more faith in his ability than usual. CJacobs fucked around with this message at 00:32 on Sep 15, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
Roman Reigns posted:To be fair, Arin seems to like the Metal Gear series so he'll probably stick it out. The intro is like 30 min to an hour long, be fair. But MGSV is not a very easy game and while Egoraptor has a history with the series, he is absolutely poo poo at games. My bet is they won't make it past mission 9.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 00:30
|
|
|
dreezy posted:The intro is like 30 min to an hour long, be fair. But MGSV is not a very easy game and while Egoraptor has a history with the series, he is absolutely poo poo at games. My bet is they won't make it past mission 9. I've timed it and the intro really is almost exactly an hour long, assuming you don't gently caress up and die along the way. And that's just escaping the hospital; you spend another hour rescuing Miller, which is what actually unlocks Mother Base. It takes longer to get the open world really going on and you're still gradually unlocking content and abilities after the point when you'd have beaten a typical FPS.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
dreezy posted:The intro is like 30 min to an hour long, be fair. But MGSV is not a very easy game and while Egoraptor has a history with the series, he is absolutely poo poo at games. My bet is they won't make it past mission 9. Arin isn't exactly poo poo at games, he just doesn't have any observational skills whatsoever. I mean, fucker beat Ninja Gaiden.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 02:37
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:Nah they're just gonna do three episodes and abandon it like they do all their playthroughs. ^^^^ chitoryu12 posted:Do Chip & Ironicus count as a cute couple? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 06:21
|
|
|
Leal posted:^^^^ I am so gullible. I totally thought mission j frog was for real. I totally believed General Ironicus was black. I totally fell for Chips whole "I'm working for volition" bit. Man am I a sucker!
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 06:31
|
|
|
Best JoBros 
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2015 06:43
|
|
|
This strikes me as relevant: https://www.eff.org/press/releases/important-win-fair-use-dancing-baby-lawsuit quote:Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that copyright holders like Universal must consider fair use before trying to remove content from the Internet. It also rejected Universal’s claim that a victim of takedown abuse cannot vindicate her rights if she cannot show actual monetary loss.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:02
|
|
|
Keeshhound posted:This strikes me as relevant: Welp, Nintendo's reign of terror over romhack videos is over. If you don't know, some videos have been actually taken down.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:07
|
|
|
So what does fair use actually cover? Because I've always been annoyed by the fact that I don't monetize my videos but I still get strikes and notices as if I was; wouldn't it only make sense to do checks for videos that are making money off these rather than random mom with dancing babies?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:12
|
|
|
Niggurath posted:So what does fair use actually cover? You're not going to get a good answer about fair use jurisprudence, especially its relation to yelling at mega man, in this thread.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Niggurath posted:So what does fair use actually cover? Because I've always been annoyed by the fact that I don't monetize my videos but I still get strikes and notices as if I was; wouldn't it only make sense to do checks for videos that are making money off these rather than random mom with dancing babies? All you really need to know is that YouTube's copyright system gives absolutely zero fucks about Fair Use. It literally does not factor in at all.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:All you really need to know is that YouTube's copyright system gives absolutely zero fucks about Fair Use. It literally does not factor in at all.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
Niggurath posted:So what does fair use actually cover? Because I've always been annoyed by the fact that I don't monetize my videos but I still get strikes and notices as if I was; wouldn't it only make sense to do checks for videos that are making money off these rather than random mom with dancing babies? Was it used in the context of: 1. Schoolwork and education 2. News reporting 3. Criticizing or commenting 4. Comedy and parody and did that user: 1. Rework and use it in a different way 2. Add new meaning and make it original 3. Use it for a nonprofit purpose 4. Only use a small amount If the answer is yes, then it was fair use.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
Hooray, then I'm fair use! Take that Akira Yamaoka and your screechy metal background noises.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:All you really need to know is that YouTube's copyright system gives absolutely zero fucks about Fair Use. It literally does not factor in at all. Yeah, you'll more than likely still get strikes (corporations will just claim that they "considered" fair use before auto-DMCAing), this just makes it easier to push back if you decide you've had enough of their poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
EricFate posted:If the answer is yes, then it was fair use. "Fair use is a defense" meaning it's never quite "yes it is, no it isn't" until it goes to court and a judge says that. And this is all case-by-case and judges aren't great with technology so it's kind of a crapshoot.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:All you really need to know is that YouTube's copyright system gives absolutely zero fucks about Fair Use. It literally does not factor in at all. I have successfully defended a student video under Fair Use on YouTube before. They may not literally factor in the legal doctrine but the concept is considered.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
Manic_Misanthrope posted:So from the more streaming side, I've been watching a lot of New Legacy inc. Mostly their wrestling stuff where they manage to break games that were apparently held together with the coding equivilent of pritt stick. Their charity streams are pretty great and they raised a lot of money in their last two ones for the Canadian Cancer Society & Beyond Blue respectively. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI5v8vsEPqM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48pMojpW9tw Probably my favourite moments from their charity streams
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
Jazerus posted:I have successfully defended a student video under Fair Use on YouTube before. They may not literally factor in the legal doctrine but the concept is considered. Their only criteria is "if we put ads on this, will they make us any money according to the video/channel analytics" 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
Jazerus posted:I have successfully defended a student video under Fair Use on YouTube before. They may not literally factor in the legal doctrine but the concept is considered. Could you elaborate on this? Like, YouTube agreed with you and said "we're removing this strike" themselves?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
When you battle a YouTube copyright strike, there's a radio button for "I believe this was under fair use". It, obviously, doesn't summon a supreme court judge, so they have their own policy of "fair use" which they apply with their own set of internal reviewers. If they then get a DMCA strike after they thought it was OK, they let the copyright owner and poster battle it out. They've done their part of DMCA safe harbor provisions.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
Too bad that there's no option saying "this claim is just wrong", all options suggest in one way or another that you are the bad person for stealing someone's stuff.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
Yeah, even after all these years I believe there is still somehow no "this claim is for the wrong thing" or "this claim is for something not in the video" option which I find very funny and at the same time very sad.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 03:54
|
|
|
If they implemented that radio button, then everybody would actually go through and submit the form, and they'd actually have some videos to manually review, because ContentID never pegs anything correctly.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
Iirc there isn't even an option for "this claim was not made by the actual copyright holder" which the person who has the claim imposed on them can find out very easily on their own by just looking up who owns whatever the strike is for. Any ol' dickhead can still file a claim on a video- several of my Max Payne 3 videos have copyright claims from some unrelated Brazilian company pretending to own the cutscenes on lots of different Max Payne 3 vids on Youtube.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
I sent the folks over at torrentfreak (a copyright/filesharing news blog) a mail about this court case. They replied saying "there's still some gaping holes in the decision, but we'll keep an eye on it and might write an article on it when the case reaches its conclusion." Not sure what to take from that. We'll see.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 07:49
|
|
|
It's cool that we're now closer than ever to achieving a world where Antonin Scalia has to watch a PewDiePie video.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:36
|
|
|
If you had to show to the world at large one Let's Play video in an effort to make a good impression, which LPer would you pick?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
CJacobs
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
Darksydephil
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
paradoxGentleman posted:If you had to show to the world at large one Let's Play video in an effort to make a good impression, which LPer would you pick?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:51
|
|
|
Darksydephil
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
paradoxGentleman posted:If you had to show to the world at large one Let's Play video in an effort to make a good impression, which LPer would you pick? Chip Cheezum
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
British Mario 64 guy from retsupurae
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
GNU Order posted:British Mario 64 guy from retsupurae ElectricalBeast, yeah
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
judge reinhold posted:It's cool that we're now closer than ever to achieving a world where Antonin Scalia has to watch a PewDiePie video.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 03:57 |
|
|
paradoxGentleman posted:If you had to show to the world at large one Let's Play video in an effort to make a good impression, which LPer would you pick? Unironically, SirRonLionheart.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 22:16
|
|