Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

What the gently caress is a Worm fic.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

Dabir posted:

What the gently caress is a Worm fic.

I've rambled about this before. Worm by "Wildbow" is a 1.7 million word novel deconstructing superheroes. It also can reasonably claim to be a SF novel that doesn't cheat at providing SF underpinnings for the story mechanics. It has its problems (the pacing is all hosed up) but it's actually great and is my Favourite Thing. This is the thread about Wildbow's web serials (Worm, Pact, Twig).

So uh basically all the fiction I've read in the past year or so has been Worm fanfic. Because I am a sad nerd.

Still a better love story than HPMOR tho.

edit: of course I'm on tumblr.

divabot fucked around with this message at 23:26 on Sep 13, 2015

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Worm's explanations of everything pretty much immedately degrade into stupid nonsense the moment they get revealed.

The leviathan arc was the last section that actually could cash the checks wildbow was making.

Mazzletoff
Dec 17, 2012

wake me up
before you jojo

Tunicate posted:

Worm's explanations of everything pretty much immedately degrade into stupid nonsense the moment they get revealed.

The leviathan arc was the last section that actually could cash the checks wildbow was making.

Remember that time that the Worm powers (Massively stupid spoilers ahead) Were just actually given to everyone by giant alien corpses?

Worm is kind of a magical trainwreck in the second half, and experiencing it as it was updating at that point was pretty spectacular. You could watch people become disillusioned with it, week to week.

Fajita Queen
Jun 21, 2012

I think you misunderstood that bit. The powers were given by the alien to the human race like they'd been given to countless other races before, for the purposes of gathering data on them that the alien could incorporate into itself as a form of evolution. The dead one was harvested by Cauldron to give powers artificially by the same mechanism. It's really not any better of an explanation, to be fair. :v:

But I liked Worm for the character development and fun power usage and worldbuilding. The background plot wasn't really relevant for me.

I do agree that it peaked not long after Leviathan, but I think it was consistently good until the Behemoth bit and the timeskip, where it fell off a lot. Still one of my favorite pieces of literature.

Pavlov
Oct 21, 2012

I've long been fascinated with how the alt-right develops elaborate and obscure dog whistles to try to communicate their meaning without having to say it out loud
Stepan Andreyevich Bandera being the most prominent example of that

Mazzletoff posted:

Remember that time that the Worm powers (Massively stupid spoilers ahead) Were just actually given to everyone by giant alien corpses?

Worm is kind of a magical trainwreck in the second half, and experiencing it as it was updating at that point was pretty spectacular. You could watch people become disillusioned with it, week to week.

It was pretty funny yeah. The thing the guy's writing now has been consistently good though.

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

Mazzletoff posted:

You could watch people become disillusioned with it, week to week.

... you mean, the time period where it was accelerating massively in popularity by every available measure (page hits, webfiction ratings, comments, money thrown at author)?

Not that you're wrong on the pacing problems. Basically there's another one to three arcs (YES EVEN MORE) missing in the timeskip.

Mazzletoff
Dec 17, 2012

wake me up
before you jojo

divabot posted:

... you mean, the time period where it was accelerating massively in popularity by every available measure (page hits, webfiction ratings, comments, money thrown at author)?

Not that you're wrong on the pacing problems. Basically there's another one to three arcs (YES EVEN MORE) missing in the timeskip.

I frequented an IRC Chatroom with the author that had been running for months. More people finding it isn't what was interesting - longtime, diehard fans that had been following since Arc 18 becoming aggravated was the far more interesting thing.

chessmaster13
Jan 10, 2015

Mazzletoff posted:

I frequented an IRC Chatroom with the author that had been running for months. More people finding it isn't what was interesting - longtime, diehard fans that had been following since Arc 18 becoming aggravated was the far more interesting thing.

Basically you took a bath in the tear-filled tub that this channel is. I can understand you are delighted!

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

Mazzletoff posted:

I frequented an IRC Chatroom with the author that had been running for months. More people finding it isn't what was interesting - longtime, diehard fans that had been following since Arc 18 becoming aggravated was the far more interesting thing.

"I realise that in the objective measurable world people were actually throwing money at the author, but you have to understand - the chatroom I was in was really upset."

Scintilla
Aug 24, 2010

I BEAT HIGHFORT
and all I got was this
jackass monkey
To be fair people throwing money at terrible things isn't exactly uncommon.

Then again I haven't read Worm, just Pact, which while it had its own strengths and flaws definitely went downhill towards the end.

Mazzletoff
Dec 17, 2012

wake me up
before you jojo

divabot posted:

"I realise that in the objective measurable world people were actually throwing money at the author, but you have to understand - the chatroom I was in was really upset."

YggiDee
Sep 12, 2007

WASP CREW
For all that this thread is about discussing Harry Potter fanfiction, specifically a really bad one, someone earlier in the thread recommended Max Gladstone's Three Parts Dead, and I am super-glad they did. I read it and it was an excellent novel.

(Also, this is Harry Potter and the Eagle of Truthiness. People should read it. It's short.)

blastron
Dec 11, 2007

Don't doodle on it!


YggiDee posted:

(Also, this is Harry Potter and the Eagle of Truthiness. People should read it. It's short.)

Almost as good as the one where Harry was raised by a WWE Superstar.

chessmaster13
Jan 10, 2015

And I thought the world couldn't get weirder. Did you read it? Is it as funny as the title suggests?

Fajita Queen
Jun 21, 2012

It's great and amazing. Probably the best intentionally-humorous short story I've ever read.

Proteus Jones
Feb 28, 2013



The Shortest Path posted:

It's great and amazing. Probably the best intentionally-humorous short story I've ever read.

Trust this person. That is a pro-click.

JosephWongKS
Apr 4, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Chapter 15: Conscientiousness
Part Eight


quote:


"If I break any of these rules I will not further study Transfiguration during my time at Hogwarts."

"We will repeat these rules at the start of every class for the first month," said Professor McGonagall. "And now, we will begin with matches as subjects and needles as targets... put away your wands, thank you, by 'begin' I meant that you will begin taking notes."

Half an hour before the end of class, Professor McGonagall handed out the matches.

At the end of the class Hermione had a silvery-looking match and the entire rest of the class, Muggleborn or otherwise, had exactly what they'd started with.

Professor McGonagall awarded her another point for Ravenclaw.


This doesn’t bode well for Hermione, given what we have seen (from Eliezarry’s internal musings) of Eliezer’s spitefulness towards people who outshine him or his author-avatar.


quote:


After the Transfiguration class was dismissed, Hermione came over to Harry's desk as Harry was putting away his books into his pouch.

"You know," Hermione said with an innocent expression on her face, "I earned two points for Ravenclaw today."

"So you did," Harry said shortly.

"But that wasn't as good as your seven points," she said. "I guess I'm just not as intelligent as you."

Harry finished feeding his homework into the pouch and turned to Hermione with his eyes narrowed. He'd actually forgotten about that.

She batted her eyelashes at him. "We have lessons every day, though. I wonder how long it will take you to find some more Hufflepuffs to rescue? Today is Monday. So that gives you until Thursday."

The two of them stared into each other's eyes, unblinking.

Harry spoke first. "Of course you realise this means war."

"I didn't know we'd been at peace."

All of the other students were now watching with fascinated eyes. All of the other students, plus, unfortunately, Professor McGonagall.

"Oh, Mr. Potter," sang Professor McGonagall from the other side of the room, "I have some good news for you. Madam Pomfrey has approved your suggestion for preventing breakage in her Spimster wickets, and the plan is to finish the job by the end of next week. I'd say that deserves... let's call it ten points for Ravenclaw."

Hermione's face was gaping in betrayal and shock. Harry imagined his own face didn't look much different.

"Professor..." Harry hissed.

"Those ten points are unquestionably deserved, Mr. Potter. I would not hand out House points on a whim. To you it might have been a simple matter of seeing something fragile and suggesting a way to protect it, but Spimster wickets are expensive, and the Headmaster was not pleased the last time one broke." Professor McGonagall looked thoughtful. "My, I wonder if any other student has ever earned seventeen House points on his first day of lessons. I'll have to look it up, but I suspect that's a new record. Perhaps we should have an announcement at dinnertime?"

"PROFESSOR! " Harry shrieked. "This is our war! Stop meddling!"

"Now you have until Thursday of next week, Mr. Potter. Unless, of course, you engage in some sort of mischief and lose House points before then. Addressing a professor disrespectfully, for example." Professor McGonagall put a finger on her cheek and looked reflective. "I expect you'll hit negative numbers before the end of Friday."

Harry's mouth snapped shut. He sent his best Death Glare at McGonagall but she only seemed to find it amusing.

"Yes, definitely an announcement at dinner," Professor McGonagall mused. "But it wouldn't do to offend the Slytherins, so the announcement should be brief. Just the number of points and the fact of the record... and if anyone comes to you for help with their schoolwork and is disappointed that you haven't even started reading your textbooks, you can always refer them to Miss Granger."

"Professor! " said Hermione in a rather high-pitched voice.

Professor McGonagall ignored her. "My, I wonder how long it will take before Miss Granger does something deserving of a dinnertime announcement? I look forward to seeing it, whatever it may be."


McGonagall had always been portrayed and characterised in this story as a cool, measured, mature adult, so why is she suddenly deliberately goading on her students in their petty rivalry?

Death Bot
Mar 4, 2007

Binary killing machines, turning 1 into 0 since 0011000100111001 0011011100110110
It feels more like she's just trying to make them both feel like dumbasses for bickering,but who knows at this point.

i81icu812
Dec 5, 2006
This chapter is a series of bizarre tone shifts, one after another. This contest and McGonagall's reaction is completely inane.

McGonagall maintains no consistency from chapter to chapter.

Grace Baiting
Jul 20, 2012

Audi famam illius;
Cucurrit quaeque
Tetigit destruens.



i81icu812 posted:

This chapter is a series of bizarre tone shifts, one after another. This contest and McGonagall's reaction is completely inane.

McGonagall maintains no consistency from chapter to chapter.

The good Professor Hardcastle McCormick Minerva McGonagall is consistently characterized as the Second Female Character, and functions as Hariezer's foil and mom-away-from-mom: she gasps at his brilliance and daring and bravery, she ineffectually forbids him from performing dangerous and stupid tasks, and she gets copious quantities of Hard Facts And Hard Choices mansexplained to her by both Hariezer and Dumbledore (even though her inferior womanly intellect can scarcely comprehend such masculine majesties as are produced by their gigantic brains).

Maybe next time YOU should try writing the best and most popular Harry Potter fanfiction with lots of accurate science before you sneer again.

JosephWongKS
Apr 4, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Chapter 15: Conscientiousness
Part Nine


quote:


Harry and Hermione, by unspoken mutual consent, turned and stormed out of the classroom. They were followed by a trail of hypnotised Ravenclaws.

"Um," Harry said. "Are we still on for after dinner?"

"Of course," said Hermione. "I wouldn't want you to fall further behind on your studying."

"Why, thank you. And let me say that as brilliant as you are already, I can't help but wonder what you'll be like once you have some elementary training in rationality."

"Is it really that useful? It didn't seem to help you with Charms or Transfiguration."


You tell him, Hermione!


quote:


There was a slight pause.

"Well, I only got my schoolbooks four days ago. That's why I had to earn those seventeen House points without using my wand."


Eliezarry conveniently fails to mention that he earned seven of those points with a time machine.


quote:


"Four days ago? Maybe you can't read eight books in four days but you might have at least read one. How many days will it take to finish at that rate? You know all that mathematics, so can you tell me what's eight, times four, divided by zero?"

"I've got classes now, which you didn't, but weekends are free, so... limit of eight times four divided by epsilon as epsilon approaches zero plus... 10:47AM on Sunday."

"I did it in three days actually."

"2:47PM on Saturday it is, then. I'm sure I'll find the time somewhere."

And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.


These are the rules of Transfiguration which were disclosed by McGonagall in this chapter:

    Transfiguration is permanent.

    Non-food / drink items that are Transfigured into food / drinks / gas and consumed / breathed in will return to their original form after consumption and somehow damage your body from within.

    Sustaining a Transfiguration is a constant drain on the user’s magic which scales with the size of the target form.

    The goblins have ways of finding people who Transfigure things into other things that look like money.

    Transfiguration of living subjects (excluding Animagus transformations) will make you very sick and possibly dead, because “even inanimate objects undergo small internal changes over time. There would be no visible changes to your body afterwards, and for the first minute, you would notice nothing wrong. But in an hour you would be sick, and in a day you would be dead"

    Students are prohibited from Transfiguring anything into a liquid, a gas, anything that looks like food or anything else that goes inside a human body, or anything that is “to be burned”

    Students are prohibited from Transfiguring any living subject, especially themselves, unless specifically instructed to do so using a specialised Charm or potion.

Looking forward to reading about Eliezarry’s experiments to test the limits of these “rules” and/or get around them. For example:

(a) Students are prohibited from Transfiguring things into a liquid or a gas, but there is no prohibition against Transfiguring things into a plasma.

(b) The goblins have ways of finding people who Transfigure things into other things that look like money, but does this extend to things like gemstones which have high trade /barter value but are not themselves typically considered to be “money”?

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Yeah, you'd think that having a constant ongoing drain of magic scaling to the size of an object would be a wonderful way to quantify your magical strength. 'I can turn 4 cubic meters of wood into metal and sustain it for 10 minutes before running out of MP' or whatever.

Seraphic Neoman
Jul 19, 2011


Why is reading speed now a measurement of dick size?

Night10194
Feb 13, 2012

We'll start,
like many good things,
with a bear.

SSNeoman posted:

Why is reading speed now a measurement of dick size?

It's an intellectual contest and intellect is the only trait that measures the worth of a person in Yud's mind.

Also, he has a tremendously shallow view of what it means to be intelligent.

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Night10194 posted:

It's an intellectual contest and intellect is the only trait that measures the worth of a person in Yud's mind.

Also, he has a tremendously shallow view of what it means to be intelligent.

That's the same community that tries to maximize their productivity by setting text-to-speech to some insanely high WPM, to get more things read.

Night10194
Feb 13, 2012

We'll start,
like many good things,
with a bear.

Tunicate posted:

That's the same community that tries to maximize their productivity by setting text-to-speech to some insanely high WPM, to get more things read.

These people are idiots.

anilEhilated
Feb 17, 2014

But I say fuck the rain.

Grimey Drawer

SSNeoman posted:

Why is reading speed now a measurement of dick size?
If I were to hazard a guess, it's because Yud prides himself on it while skimming through the content.

Jazerus
May 24, 2011


JosephWongKS posted:

(b) The goblins have ways of finding people who Transfigure things into other things that look like money, but does this extend to things like gemstones which have high trade /barter value but are not themselves typically considered to be “money”? [/b]

Logically, they probably don't. Since Transfiguration is not permanent, counterfeit coins are dangerous because if they were to change back into their original form in a vault no one would know which coins had been counterfeit. The same scenario is much less likely with high value goods.

Hyper Crab Tank
Feb 10, 2014

The 16-bit retro-future of crustacean-based transportation
On one hand, I want to say a book reading speed-read-a-thon is just the kind of childish contest two nerdy eleven-year-olds would get up to.

anilEhilated posted:

If I were to hazard a guess, it's because Yud prides himself on it while skimming through the content.

On the other hand, this is exactly it. Yudkowsky does occasionally bring up how he can read 2000 words per minute or something like that.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
I can read up to 5 Shakespeare Sonnets or mathematical proofs per minute.

Deptfordx
Dec 23, 2013

Hmmm. I assume somebody must have tested this, and actual studies show that speed reading is basically skimming, and reading comprehension declines as reading speed increases.

Old Kentucky Shark
May 25, 2012

If you think you're gonna get sympathy from the shark, well then, you won't.


Deptfordx posted:

Hmmm. I assume somebody must have tested this, and actual studies show that speed reading is basically skimming, and reading comprehension declines as reading speed increases.

Not sure if this was a question or not, but it's exactly right. Speed reading is basically bunk. Reading comprehension has a fairly stiff upper limit and past that point the only way to increase reading speed. Is to omit words viewed.

The only actual way to increase useful reading speed is by enlarging your vocabulary; the more familiar a word is to you, the faster you comprehend it.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Old Kentucky Shark posted:

The only actual way to increase useful reading speed is by enlarging your vocabulary; the more familiar a word is to you, the faster you comprehend it.
I have never looked at the research, but if I asked my friends doing reading research about this claim, how confident are you these professionals would agree with you?

Cause for me, I'd be not especially confident.

Deptfordx posted:

Hmmm. I assume somebody must have tested this, and actual studies show that speed reading is basically skimming, and reading comprehension declines as reading speed increases.
I assume across readers, there is a positive correlation, but within readers, a negative correlation between comprehension and speed.

Curvature of Earth
Sep 9, 2011

Projected cost of
invading Canada:
$900

Cingulate posted:

I have never looked at the research, but if I asked my friends doing reading research about this claim, how confident are you these professionals would agree with you?

Cause for me, I'd be not especially confident.
I assume across readers, there is a positive correlation, but within readers, a negative correlation between comprehension and speed.

Ronald Carver. "Rauding Theory Predictions of Amount Comprehended under Different Purposes and Speed Reading Conditions". Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 19. 1984.

Carver, 1984 posted:

Rauding Theory makes precise predictions about the amount of passage comprehension; the accuracy of these predictions was investigated under different purpose conditions and differing rates of presentation. Passages at Grade 10 difficulty were presented to 102 college students at rates varying from 62.5 to 100,000 words per minute using motion picture film. The two purpose conditions were: (a) get the "gist," and (b) detect the missing verbs. Four different measurement techniques were sued and all indicated that the amount comprehended was not substantially affected by purpose. Comprehension was generally high at the low rates, but it was approximately zero at 1,000 words per minute and greater.. The amount of comprehension was accurately predicted from rauding theory. The data do not support the idea that individuals can read unfamiliar but relatively easy material at high rates with high accuracy of comprehension...
That's the best I could find with 10 minutes at Google Scholar.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
That is perfectly orthogonal to what I said. Neither does it prove increasing your vocabulary or - a completely different thing - further familiarizing yourself with already known words improves reading speed, nor does it prove there is no other way to increase reading speed.

Furia
Jul 26, 2015

Grimey Drawer

Cingulate posted:

That is perfectly orthogonal to what I said. Neither does it prove increasing your vocabulary or - a completely different thing - further familiarizing yourself with already known words improves reading speed, nor does it prove there is no other way to increase reading speed.

If I understand what you are saying correctly, that would tie in perfectly to what Yud believes. Since reading speed cannot be trained, only the intelligent can truly read quickly. Reading speed would therefore be the dick measuring contest of intelligence.

Old Kentucky Shark
May 25, 2012

If you think you're gonna get sympathy from the shark, well then, you won't.


Cingulate posted:

I have never looked at the research, but if I asked my friends doing reading research about this claim, how confident are you these professionals would agree with you?
Fairly confident.

The tl;dr version is that our ability to read is linked within our mind to verbal communication, to the point where all of us, even without realizing it, are engaged in subvocalization when we read; essentially, we sound the words out, whether we know it or not. Many people think subvocalization used to be more pronounced since there are passages in ancient and medieval texts noting the ability to read without whispering or moving one's lips in a way that suggests that this was considered noteworthy and uncommon, but modern teaching methods and increasingly earlier reading ages combined to push subvocalization down to the level where most people don't even know they are doing it. Scientists can still detect subvocalization, however, in the electrical impulses sent to the lips, tongue, and larynx. This turns out to form a sort of hard-cap on your ability to read quickly; if you attempt to read faster than your brain's ability to send the proper electrical impulses to the vocal chords, it, to use a technical term, totally fucks up your reading comprehension. Many speedreading courses claim to be able to eliminate subvocalization, but so far as anyone has ever been able to tell, you simply can't. It's hardwired at the most basic level.

One of the only methods to reduce subvocalization time, it turns out, lies through vocabulary; most people linger over words they are less familiar with -- unconsciously "sounding them out" in their heads and mouth -- and so the simplest functional method to increase reading speed without lowering comprehension is to make yourself familiar with more words. But that only takes you so far, and nowhere near the point most speedreaders claim. The gains are fairly modest; a very fast college-level reader is at best twice as fast as a very slow college-level reader of the same approximate reading comprehension.

The short version is that Yudkowski is an idiot; it isn't intelligence that makes you a faster reader, it's just practice and familiarity.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Is there some range with this? I apparently taught myself to read at some point to the point where I never remember not being able to read, and I read pretty quick, if not "ridiculous speed reader fast." Definitely "people occasionally don't believe I actually read that whole book" fast.

I'm pretty clever but I'd hardly call myself a genius. Perhaps white noise posting instead of shitposting. :v:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

blastron
Dec 11, 2007

Don't doodle on it!


There's a rather interesting technology called Spritz that purports to be able to massively improve your reading speed by dramatically changing how words are presented to you. Rather than dragging your eyes back and forth across the page, you keep your eye fixed on a single point and it blasts words directly at you. They claim that the words are positioned within the box so that your eye falls on the "optimal reading position" of the word, which is where your eyes apparently come to rest when you're reading traditionally. The sample on their front page goes up to 700 WPM, which I found to be still comprehensible, if only barely, and you better not blink. That's definitely faster than I can read normally, and I think of myself as a pretty quick reader.

Not that I'm saying Yud actually uses this technology, but it does exist.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply