Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
reignonyourparade
Nov 15, 2012

Zarin posted:

How many people are we talking that want to burn everything down to maintain a veneer of ideological purity? I'm guessing most of the red side of the aisle actually understands the scope of this n,onsense, and only a vocal minority is pushing this ... right? :ohdear:

Well there are also presumably those who understand the scope of the nonsense but know that their constituents don't and will go on until the last minute hoping enough other republicans will eat the potential tea party challenge first that they won't have too.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!
Yeah, this has been brewing over the last year since the midterms.

Apparently at some big donor event in 2014, GOP reps actually said something like, "if you stick with us and we can give Boehner a functional majority to work with- even if it's with the Dems- then those crazies you hate so much will be essentially irrelevant."

Clearly that strategy has worked out great.

Kochs and their crusade against the Red menace aside, a lot of the money that drives the GOP doesn't care for conservatism beyond the "keep things at the status quo or at least make them a bit better for me" parts. The last thing they want is for the party to actually go on a rightist crusade or start a legit culture war over reproductive rights/gays/whatever, to say nothing of holding the economy hostage over it.

And a non-negligible fraction of these people wouldn't have an issue with backing a certain front-running Democrat with a center-Right approach to the economy if push came to shove.

trilobite terror fucked around with this message at 09:52 on Sep 26, 2015

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

Electric Bugaloo posted:

You'd get a dramatic increase of grassroots opposition and campaigning from women's health groups and on basically every single American campus except maybe Liberty or Bob Jones. That demographic still swings overwhelmingly Democratic so it's more an issue of getting people to vote than anything else, and getting people riled up about that would.

Hillary would ride that wave of support Obama '08-style.

Hillary's already been doing a number on that, referring to Planned Parenthood in terms of access to birth control rather than abortion. Abortion may be controversial at best, but women's access to birth control is less contentious, particularly among women voters.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos
The party of fossils and irresponsibility.

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug
Any one thought about how the new guy will attack McConnell more then the Democrats?
If they could get him out, its full speed to crazy town woop woop.

hhhat
Apr 29, 2008

Peztopiary posted:

That's explicitly the gamble contractors make though? Much more money up-front in return for less job security. Death to private enterprise doing public works imo.

Sure I'd rather be a full time fed but the kind of work I do is only done by contractors, and I think that's pretty consistent among multiple agencies. It's hardly our fault that the house is full of dipshits, though. I can handle my job security when it comes to a re-bid, but not when it comes to the redneck caucus playing in their own poop.

Kalman
Jan 17, 2010

Electric Bugaloo posted:

And a non-negligible fraction of these people wouldn't have an issue with backing a certain front-running Democrat with a center-Right approach to the economy if push came to shove.

No one is going to back Jim Webb.

TROIKA CURES GREEK
Jun 30, 2015

by R. Guyovich

Fojar38 posted:

People legitimately gave a poo poo about Obamacare.

Nobody actually gives a poo poo about Planned Parenthood and it's better to keep it around as a cudgel for easy votes in red states.

This is what people said about republicans anti-abortion positions for the longest time. But they've actually made true on their promises: in many states abortions are very hard to get if you are poor.

Peztopiary posted:

That's explicitly the gamble contractors make though? Much more money up-front in return for less job security. Death to private enterprise doing public works imo.

Contractors don't get more money up front- remember they have to pay for their own healthcare and the 7.5% of taxes that is usually paid by the employer.

TROIKA CURES GREEK fucked around with this message at 15:11 on Sep 26, 2015

CannonFodder
Jan 26, 2001

Passion’s Wrench

Not a Children posted:

I'm giggling at the idea of a bunch of wealthy dudes just lurking behind the podium, hands up and fingers flexing, waiting for the chance to be the first to snatch that drinking glass as the pope steps down

Gaze upon the following relics: Water glass of the Pope as an adult, Water glass of the Pope as a young boy

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Kalman posted:

No one is going to back Jim Webb.

don't get your conservadems mixed up

it's social issues Jim Webb is right-wing on

social issues like segregation and witch-burning

deoju
Jul 11, 2004

All the pieces matter.
Nap Ghost
Digging the thread title, but I'd add that this might be the only time the Pope convincing somebody to pull out is good for birth control.

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 198 days!
Reading the new thread title, I just realized the Freudian implications of "Right to Rise."

:awesome: PAC name there Jeb!

I wonder if his platform includes funding increases for both women and men's sexual heathcare. And pharmacare :laugh:

YOLOsubmarine
Oct 19, 2004

When asked which Pokemon he evolved into, Kamara pauses.

"Motherfucking, what's that big dragon shit? That orange motherfucker. Charizard."

TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:

This is what people said about republicans anti-abortion positions for the longest time. But they've actually made true on their promises: in many states abortions are very hard to get if you are poor.


Contractors don't get more money up front- remember they have to pay for their own healthcare and the 7.5% of taxes that is usually paid by the employer.

Most government contractors are w-2 employees of a contacting company like Northrup Grumman, Lockheed, GD, etc, or subbed to those guys through a another staffing agency. They aren't 1099 independent contractors.

A Man With A Plan
Mar 29, 2010
Fallen Rib

TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:

Contractors don't get more money up front- remember they have to pay for their own healthcare and the 7.5% of taxes that is usually paid by the employer.

This isn't really true for most govt contractors. Typically they are just normal salaried employees working for a company that bids on government contracts, provides healthcare and covers the employer share of payroll tax, etc. There are people who 1099 for the government, but in experience "contractors" generally means "works for a contracting firm", not "independent self-employed contractor".

efb; also meant 1099. Clearly I don't have to do it.

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"
Does Boehner's retirement make Francis the modern Pope Gregory the Great?

That is, the Pope met with some rear end in a top hat and somehow made him go away?

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich
It's weird to say given his position, but I never particularly disliked Boehner. He was conservative, sure, but not populist conservative.

Frankly, populists of any stripe are the worst.

Martin Random
Jul 18, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Electric Bugaloo posted:



And a non-negligible fraction of these people wouldn't have an issue with backing a certain front-running Democrat with a center-Right approach to the economy if push came to shove.


Donald Trump?

hhhat
Apr 29, 2008

NippleFloss posted:

Most government contractors are w-2 employees of a contacting company like Northrup Grumman, Lockheed, GD, etc, or subbed to those guys through a another staffing agency. They aren't 1099 independent contractors.

Correct. And what happened last shutdown is we were all furloughed because if we're not billing the fed hourly then the company is just losing by paying us. My company isn't into charity any more than any of the other ones.

sullat
Jan 9, 2012
Has there been any indication as to who is going to rise up after Boehner wilts away?

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!
Happy Saturday

Faustian Bargain
Apr 12, 2014


Put Reagan on the coin so they can twist themselves into knots :unsmigghh:

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

Grouchio posted:

...We're going to get another shutdown and possible debt default, aren't we? :shepicide:

Honestly if I were a betting man I would wager on it going down something like this. Boehner avoids a government shutdown as his final act by passing a clean CR that lasts until December 12th. The Tea Party treats this as a massive act of Dolchstoss and drives the party substantially further to the right. When December 12th rolls around the Government goes into shutdown with the debt ceiling ticking in the background, just like last time. In order to avoid a default and establish trust in the American system Obama is forced to defund PP. The government however remains shutdown for several months while the Tea Party tries to use the shutdown as leverage to re-fight the entire culture war

Junkyard Poodle
May 6, 2011


How would a $T coin be all that different than the silver certificate as far as issuance justification?

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Prester John posted:

Honestly if I were a betting man I would wager on it going down something like this. Boehner avoids a government shutdown as his final act by passing a clean CR that lasts until December 12th. The Tea Party treats this as a massive act of Dolchstoss and drives the party substantially further to the right. When December 12th rolls around the Government goes into shutdown with the debt ceiling ticking in the background, just like last time. In order to avoid a default and establish trust in the American system Obama is forced to defund PP. The government however remains shutdown for several months while the Tea Party tries to use the shutdown as leverage to re-fight the entire culture war

If you were a betting man you'd be a really lovely gambler.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Junkyard Poodle posted:

How would a $T coin be all that different than the silver certificate as far as issuance justification?

There are legal limits on just how big of a denomination the treasury can make except on platinum coins.

Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Not a single fucking olive in sight

Ron Elving for NPR posted:

A Modest Proposal: Donald Trump For Speaker

No, seriously. Bear with us a moment while we explain.

Donald Trump, the ultimate outsider, should be the new leader of the Republicans in the House when John Boehner steps down on Oct. 30. Trump should be elevated to the lofty perch of speaker and lead the conservative cause in its next confrontation with President Obama.

Think about it. This could be huge. Not just for the House, which would be great again, but for Trump — who would take a long step toward his announced goal of being president. Trump would pick up some on-the-job training in Washington ways, especially the intricacies of passing a budget in a shared-power system.

And we know his reputation for negotiating. He wrote a book called The Art of the Deal. He knows all about doing deals. He'll make everyone forget all about that last guy who had the job.

No, Trump is not a member of the House. But that doesn't matter. The Constitution does not actually require the speaker to be a member, only to be elected by a majority of those who are. (It's true! You can look it up: Article I, Section 2.)

Of course, it is more than a coincidence that all 53 speakers up to now have been members of the House. It turns out that lots of members of this club want to be its boss. (It's a little like the win streak that the College of Cardinals has going when it comes to electing the next pope.)

But every once in a while, at moments of crisis in the House, there have been serious flirtations with the idea of an outsider. They elected a freshman speaker for the 12th Congress, which convened in November 1811, eager to start the War of 1812. The outsider of that day was a Kentuckian named Henry Clay. He stuck around a while and definitely got to be huge.

And when Speaker Newt Gingrich was on his way out in the late 1990s you again heard talk of electing a figurehead speaker, someone who could class up the place just by being there. Retired U.S. Army Gen. Colin Powell was mentioned at the time. So was former Sen. Bob Dole, who had been the GOP nominee for president in 1996.

In the end, though, after much fumbling around and a couple of false starts, the House chose Dennis Hastert as speaker. But most people continued to regard Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, as the party's true leading man. Hastert stuck around in the speaker's chair for eight years, the longest time any Republican has had the Big Gavel. He retired in 2007 and became a lobbyist.

The truth is that it's been a while since any speaker had a lot of authority for very long. Nancy Pelosi, the first woman to lead either party in either chamber, ran a rather tight ship and pushed through a remarkable raft of Obama legislation. But her majority lasted only four years, 2007-2011. When she left, she handed the gavel to Boehner.

From his earliest months in office, Boehner was beset by a damnable dilemma. The so-called Tea Party election of 2010 had given him a majority, but it had also given him a sizable intraparty rebellion. Many of the Tea Party newcomers voted for Boehner for speaker but distrusted him. Soon enough, he was cutting deals with the Senate and with the Democrat in the White House.

Boehner saw that as doing his job, and he was still doing it this week, trying to keep the government functioning into a new fiscal year that starts Oct. 1.

But this time was different. This time, House Republicans felt ready to force a floor vote on Boehner's leadership.

Why now? House Republicans, since taking over the majority, had forced Congress to the brink: over Planned Parenthood, raising the debt ceiling, funding for Obamacare, spending levels for domestic programs, tax cuts, executive orders liberalizing immigration and, most recently, an international agreement regarding Iran's nuclear program. Several of these issues remained in the mix this month.

This time, the Freedom Caucus (formed earlier this year) and other elements of the right in the House were willing to force the showdown, not only with the White House but with their own leader as well. They came back from a five-week recess to tell Boehner they were unable to defend him back home any longer.

Boehner felt he could win that vote, and most Hill observers agreed the rebels did not have the votes to force him out or elect someone else. They would lose, Boehner would win and his battered speakership would stagger on.

But Boehner thought about it, prayed about it, and decided no. He did not want that ordeal, and he did not want to put the House through that ordeal. He had been planning to step down later this year anyway, he said.

Someone else can try to lead this majority in the House.

Why not someone like The Donald?

This is a joke right? Tell me this is a joke. The title starting with A Modest Proposal isn't enough to dissuade myself with the idea that at a minimum people will take it very seriously given that it has been published by NPR.

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

Raskolnikov38 posted:

There are legal limits on just how big of a denomination the treasury can make except on platinum coins.

I'm pretty sure there's another metal that's also unlimited, but platinum is the one they have large stocks of.

Otherkinsey Scale
Jul 17, 2012

Just a little bit of sunshine!

Three Olives posted:

This is a joke right? Tell me this is a joke. The title starting with A Modest Proposal isn't enough to dissuade myself with the idea that at a minimum people will take it very seriously given that it has been published by NPR.

If they were going for satire, they probably shouldn't have started with "No, seriously, bear with us". But if they weren't going for satire, they really should have chosen another title.

Either way, what I'm getting out of this is that putting Trump in a position of power is approximately as good an idea as eating babies.

Slow News Day
Jul 4, 2007

The accelerationist in me loves the idea. Destroy the system and rebuild from the ashes!!! And what better way to do the former than bring someone like Trump to power, especially in this time of turmoil??

I'm kidding

Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Not a single fucking olive in sight

enraged_camel posted:

The accelerationist in me loves the idea. Destroy the system and rebuild from the ashes!!! And what better way to do the former than bring someone like Trump to power, especially in this time of turmoil??

I'm kidding

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNUfDYGUueE

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Best part of that video? The Canadian border wall.

Onion clairvoyance strikes again.

Lote
Aug 5, 2001

Place your bets
In that future, it's not a wall to keep people out. But a wall to keep people in. Dun DUN DUNNNNN

Randalor
Sep 4, 2011



Of course it's a wall to keep people out. Do you honestly think Canadians want Americans flooding into the country when President Trump begins plundering entire states for their resources to build a gigantic tower/statue of himself that reaches into orbit?

Kafka Esq.
Jan 1, 2005

"If you ever even think about calling me anything but 'The Crab' I will go so fucking crab on your ass you won't even see what crab'd your crab" -The Crab(TM)
It's true, we don't.

nachos
Jun 27, 2004

Wario Chalmers! WAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Boehner's tell all book will be great

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

nachos posted:

Boehner's tell all book will be great

Pretty sure he already published the gist of it.

http://www.theonion.com/multiblogpost/the-republican-party-cannot-stand-by-and-let-obama-34074

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice
It'll be walls on top of walls. The yoogest most luxurious gold plated Trump brand wall on one side to keep Americans in, paid for by Canada of course, and then the Canadian wall to keep Americans out. Cold-Wall-War arms race will lead to fantastic new breakthroughs in wall related technology, revitalizing the manufacturing sector.

ProperGanderPusher
Jan 13, 2012




William Bear posted:

Does Boehner's retirement make Francis the modern Pope Gregory the Great?

That is, the Pope met with some rear end in a top hat and somehow made him go away?

Actually, it was Pope St. Leo the Great that convinced Attilla's horde to not attack Rome in 452 CE. :catholic:

Also, don't compare a military genius like Attilla to Boehner. It's insulting to the former's memory.

slicing up eyeballs
Oct 19, 2005

I got me two olives and a couple of limes


Lote posted:

In that future, it's not a wall to keep people out. But a wall to keep people in. Dun DUN DUNNNNN

America: Love it. or leave it

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
God bless America :unsmith:

quote:

Vitter and his wife, Wendy, arrived to find a man wearing a diaper outside the entrance to the Secretary of State's office in Baton Rouge. The diaper is a reference to Vitter's prostitution scandal. Rumors have swirled -- though they have not been confirmed -- that the Senator apparently asked a prostitute to incorporate diapers into her services.

  • Locked thread