|
RareAcumen posted:So, would anyone recommend watching the videos at all? She's not really doing a let's play of the game so much as she is just playing the game like anybody would, but live. She did react with appropriate awe when she was face to face with herself during the intro sequence though. I don't think she's gotten to the part of the game where you actually face off against/recruit Quiet yet.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2015 02:04 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 04:18 |
|
ChaosArgate posted:It really depends. Most of my MGS3 stuff goes up untouched, but every so often, Konami realizes I'm putting up MGS3 and claims one or all parts of one of my updates. They're also super dilligent about claiming every Secret Theater video I post. I actually just got an episode claimed a few minutes ago, looks like I tempted fate
|
# ? Sep 23, 2015 02:11 |
|
Jsor posted:I tuned in for a few minutes and it's was honestly pretty boring. Mostly dead air, when the commentary happened it wasn't that entertaining or inspired. There wasn't much appeal other than "actor from the game playing the game". It's possible she has some interesting things to say when her character shows up but I'd wait for someone to just post links to the highlights or make a highlights video, she is not the most engaging LPer. Sounds about right for someone playing a mute character who never got even like, a PDA or pager or a notepad and pencil or something to communicate with people. Shame about the chat inevitably being poo poo. CJacobs posted:She's not really doing a let's play of the game so much as she is just playing the game like anybody would, but live. She did react with appropriate awe when she was face to face with herself during the intro sequence though. I don't think she's gotten to the part of the game where you actually face off against/recruit Quiet yet. Well that's fair but I was really just asking if it was entertaining and if anyone else would recommend watching it or not.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2015 02:42 |
|
RareAcumen posted:Well that's fair but I was really just asking if it was entertaining and if anyone else would recommend watching it or not. That was my answer to the question! If you're looking to chill out and watch someone just playing the game as they normally would and/or like Stefanie Joosten, go for it. It's as entertaining as any bog-standard MGS 5 gameplay is, really.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2015 02:47 |
|
If you're a fan of Two/Super Best Friends though, their MGS5 playthrough has been pretty fun so far. Next video they're heading into Africa finally
|
# ? Sep 23, 2015 03:23 |
|
On a non-MGS5 related note, I found this Tumblr post from a couple days back:warfpower posted:PSA: DO NOT WRITE FANFICTION ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED On one hand, I'm glad that most people realize that this sort of thing isn't okay. On the other hand, the fact that this disclaimer was necessary at all implies a lot about his fans.
|
# ? Sep 24, 2015 01:38 |
Here's something kind of different - Ross Scott, of Freeman's Mind fame, tries his hand at something he describes as sort of like a Let's Play, but with all the dead air edited out. What this essentially comes down to is that he took a pretty lovely game, got together with Heisanevilgenius, of Weird Video Games fame, recorded a full playthrough with commentary, then abridged the gently caress out of it to cut it down to what he considered to be interesting to see. It's a kind of interesting concept, and I'm a fan of Heisanevilgenius, so that's a plus, but overall, the reaction has been very negative. There's a poll going on on Ross's website asking whether he should continue this, and it's currently 423 votes for "no" versus 237 for "yes". By the way, if you're not a fan of facecams, best stay away. Faces visible aplenty here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kybGu9_8acU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya5RIKJ3N8g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_2amP8lNJc I dunno, I liked it, but apparently, I'm in the minority there. Oh well.
|
|
# ? Sep 24, 2015 03:28 |
The most offensive part is how Ross has styled himself like a 90s Norwegian black metal guitarist.
|
|
# ? Sep 24, 2015 04:50 |
|
The thing is, Ross already has two "sorta like an LP series" Freeman's Mind (which is done, but could move onto HL2) which is just a narrative VLP which is all the better for sneakily using cheats to edit out boring bits. And Ross' Game Dungeons which, while technically being more of a review show, usually provides a super compressed informative LP of the game as well. Hell, in his BipBop 2 one he actually got a bunch of amateur voice actors together and voice acted all the cutscenes. And it somehow made it even more entertaining! I haven't watched the new show, when I saw the thumbnail I figured it was just a stream he decided to put up and skipped the video, but if it's what you say it is it's basically just filling a niche he's already filled twice in much better ways.
Linear Zoetrope fucked around with this message at 05:14 on Sep 24, 2015 |
# ? Sep 24, 2015 05:10 |
|
So I guess YouTube is doing...something, regarding a paywall and requiring content creators to either sign on, or their videos will be automatically placed as "Private". http://recode.net/2015/09/25/youtube-is-prepping-its-subscription-launch-two-services-one-price/ From what I have read, unless you're a huge name on there this isn't going to matter much. Seems like they're just going to start charging a month (optional) for an "Ad free Service" (wondering how long the inevitable code block for ad blocker will take), and...something about music. People are supposedly getting blast emails from YT telling them to either sign up by Oct. 22 to get in line with having their videos available for adless (YT is supposedly going to pay these people 55% of the revenue brought in from the subscriptions to the service, that watch their videos.), or face having them defaulted to private viewing only. YouTube posted:“What happens if I do not want to participate in new paid offerings?" So what they're basically saying is unless you're a big namer that they're actually willing to negotiate with, either sign up or go host your poo poo on another site if you don't like it.....bitches. Honestly I don't see a big problem here if I'm understanding this right, and it might actually reduce the sheer overload of people that upload anything and everything (good bulk of LP's included), just trying to shill some internet money. Now if they'd only start charging $10 per comment they might actually be headed in the right direction...... Anyway, how long until YT starts charging people to watch videos period? Any wagers? You know it's coming. Going to have to hope all my favorite News Bloopers videos get ported to Dailymotion. Also, here's the blast email that's been sent out to some video uploaders (Still haven't gotten one here! my name ain't big enough!) quote:For years, YouTube’s fans have been telling us they want more — more choice when watching their favorite content, more ways to support their favorite creators and, above all, the option to watch their favorite videos uninterrupted.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 20:05 |
|
Assuming someone changed accounts or doesn't use theirs anymore, would all the videos on those accounts be set to private?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 20:42 |
|
How does this affect people who don't monetise their videos? (well, other than "probably not much")
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 21:09 |
|
BMS posted:an "Ad free Service" (wondering how long the inevitable code block for ad blocker will take), https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/adblock-sold-reportedly-allowing-companies-030215711.html
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 21:27 |
|
judge reinhold posted:https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/adblock-sold-reportedly-allowing-companies-030215711.html That's why you use uBlock.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 21:30 |
|
Andrast posted:That's why you use uBlock. That like that uTorrent what done installed the bitcoin miner?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 21:52 |
|
BMS posted:Also, here's the blast email that's been sent out to some video uploaders (Still haven't gotten one here! my name ain't big enough!) Holy gently caress it reads like a mafia boss making an offer you can't refuse.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 21:55 |
|
Paul.Power posted:How does this affect people who don't monetise their videos? (well, other than "probably not much") Probably not at all.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 22:15 |
|
Dabir posted:Holy gently caress it reads like a mafia boss making an offer you can't refuse. "It would be such a tragedy if you... "lost" your fans you've worked for all these years, don't you agree?" Never put all your chips in one platform-holder's basket. Apple/Google/Whoever just need one major change to mess you up. Although this deal doesn't sound that bad? I don't understand the drawbacks of signing up exactly?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 22:32 |
|
The drawback would be that if you make more money in ad revenue than what your cut of the ad-free subscriptions that watch your video turns out to be, you get less money. It's hard to imagine anyone watching enough Youtube videos to generate more than ten dollars of ad revenue as it is, let alone enough people to decrease the total in the face of so many people who are contributing more with their subscription fee than they could ever generate in ads. The question is how much Google's ad revenue will decrease, because advertisers aren't going to pay nearly as much to advertise to the people who are too cheap to pay $10 a month not to watch their ads. I expect the ad payouts are going to decrease as well, which makes this deal more or less required to continue making money unless you've got a few viral videos or a subscriber base in the top hundred or so.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 22:40 |
|
BMS posted:Also, here's the blast email that's been sent out to some video uploaders (Still haven't gotten one here! my name ain't big enough!) This is seriously disturbing to me. I'm not a part of it and it won't affect me at all but the fact that this email is worded as a threat toward you re: your account/subscribers/videos is genuinely unnerving. quote:If you haven’t signed by that date, your videos will no longer be available for public display or monetization in the United States. That outcome would be a loss for YouTube, a loss for the thriving presence you’ve built on the platform, and above all, a loss for your fans. We remain committed to working with you, as we always have. And of course, at any time, you can accept the updated terms which will make your videos public and monetizable again. Look at this poo poo. They are actually, for real threatening you. What the gently caress. CJacobs fucked around with this message at 23:02 on Sep 27, 2015 |
# ? Sep 27, 2015 22:57 |
|
To play devil's advocate, they could pretty easily say "this is the new system, enjoy" without allowing any sort of 'input'. Amazon does it all the time. At least this gives the vague impression of a choice. \/ it sounds like this is only going to to the most special of snowflakes (ie the big money producers) Roar fucked around with this message at 23:24 on Sep 27, 2015 |
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:02 |
|
So if I don't sign up for this vague thing (which I haven't gotten emailed about) I can no longer effectively use YouTube, and all of my videos will be permanently blacklisted and I'm basically over as a content creator? I'm sure that everyone wanted this paid service. I'm sure AdBlock was really killing you. I'm sure AdFly was putting that extra spoon of peanut butter on their desks.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:19 |
|
It's basically a ToS update. Not sure why everyone's so up in arms about it.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:27 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:It's basically a ToS update. Not sure why everyone's so up in arms about it. Because it's worded like they're dangling your fuckin account over your head and being like "jump! jump for it! ha ha ha you can't reach it loser"
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:29 |
|
Roar posted:To play devil's advocate, they could pretty easily say "this is the new system, enjoy" without allowing any sort of 'input'. Amazon does it all the time. At least this gives the vague impression of a choice. Yeah I'm not sure Don Corleone explaining how you're hosed with an arm around your shoulder while a couple of thugs brandish pipes in the background is preferable to the bank manager calmly denying you a loan, if you follow that metaphor.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:31 |
|
Lunethex posted:So if I don't sign up for this vague thing (which I haven't gotten emailed about) I can no longer effectively use YouTube, and all of my videos will be permanently blacklisted and I'm basically over as a content creator? I'm sure that everyone wanted this paid service. I'm sure AdBlock was really killing you. I'm sure AdFly was putting that extra spoon of peanut butter on their desks. That's what I'm curious about. From the article, I'm gathering that it's ONLY people that monetize their stuff that will have it blacklisted if they don't sign up. But then again, I'm not 100% on that. Very possible that it goes for EVERYBODY. But it's not a big deal if it is for everybody. If you're some little guy, just sign up for the thing and you should be fine, I think. As for AdBlock, here, let's all learn how Adblock people are SCUM, while watching Call of Duty! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UekRvQ283eg Also, this guy as now become a "Casual", since he doesn't do YouTube for a job now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9J79VTVJfYY PLEASE tell me that this is how people who do the YouTube thing as a hobby are referred to as......YOUTUBE CASUALS. hahahaha
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:37 |
|
I monetize my videos and didn't get an email. They probably put people on the register automatically based on their channel's analytics and whether or not both parties stand to gain anything from it. My videos for example don't earn me enough for that service to earn Youtube any money, so they didn't put me on it.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:47 |
|
the only difference is that some people can subscribe and you get a cut of that instead of ad revenue cut, and apparently it's more money i don't see any reason not to accept
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:52 |
|
BMS posted:Also, this guy as now become a "Casual", since he doesn't do YouTube for a job now.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 23:54 |
|
That's how all game developers live because everyone pirates their games
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 00:00 |
|
I don't know what to make of those changes. So if I monetize videos, but never got the email which means I can't sign off on it, I just get outright blocked from making any video uploads non-"Private Only"? Even if I'm a small rinky dink channel?
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 02:07 |
|
Unfunny Poster posted:I don't know what to make of those changes. So if I monetize videos, but never got the email which means I can't sign off on it, I just get outright blocked from making any video uploads non-"Private Only"? Even if I'm a small rinky dink channel? I really doubt they're that mean.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 03:30 |
|
I think the reason why big names are being sent a letter about this is for copyright reasons. They've given Google the right to display their video with ads on it and give them a cut of ad revenue, but they haven't given Google the right to display their video ad-free for a subscription fee and give them a cut of subscription revenue. Google doesn't want to have a ton of videos still showing ads to people who shell out for a subscription, but can't legally assume everyone is okay with the new arrangement, and they've decided they'd rather make videos private if people who've monetized their videos don't want to agree to show them to subscribers without ads than show subscribers ads. I think it's safe to assume if you haven't gotten an email about this that either you'll get one eventually or monetization will be turned off rather than making your videos private. Or you'll just get the prompts to agree to the new contract the next time you log in after some point anyway.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 04:16 |
|
BMS posted:As for AdBlock, here, let's all learn how Adblock people are SCUM, while watching Call of Duty! "This isn't my opinion anymore, it's factual!" Yup, this is gonna be a promising video. EDIT: Wow, the second video is even better. I love how he got crazy good at so many games, there are no more games left to become crazy good at. RealSovietBear fucked around with this message at 08:20 on Sep 28, 2015 |
# ? Sep 28, 2015 08:11 |
|
So there has been some talk about youtube and their subscription service. I thought I would bring up that this kind of system already does exist. It's called Twitch Turbo and essentially works the same way youtube wants theirs to work. For simple $9.99 a month you get the ability to watch streams ad free and it pays for invisible ads which basically means that even though you don't see the ad as a turbo user, twitch will still treat it like you have. If you don't have have turbo you still get the ads. Of course channel subscriptions are a different beast and aren't covered by turbo. But it's a good model that seems to be working for them and it may be what youtube is trying to achieve. Doseku fucked around with this message at 23:56 on Sep 28, 2015 |
# ? Sep 28, 2015 23:26 |
|
Doseku posted:So there has been some talk about youtube and their subscription service. Difference is, when Twitch rolled out their subscription changes in 2013 they said this: quote:Subscription Partners added to the Subscription program prior to May 2013 will continue to provide an ad-free experience, and this includes any new subscriptions purchased for those channels even after May 2013. They didn't say: quote:If you haven’t signed by that date, your videos will no longer be available for public display or monetization in the United States.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 02:12 |
|
So DSP just uploaded what is probably the fastest ragequit he has ever done, with a whopping seven parts of Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5, going as far to claim it is the worst game he has ever played.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 02:15 |
|
TaurusOxford posted:So DSP just uploaded what is probably the fastest ragequit he has ever done, with a whopping seven parts of Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5, going as far to claim it is the worst game he has ever played. Judging from what I've seen of the game, huge props to him for making it to seven parts.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 02:18 |
|
TaurusOxford posted:So DSP just uploaded what is probably the fastest ragequit he has ever done, with a whopping seven parts of Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5, going as far to claim it is the worst game he has ever played. But did he sing the great MGS Tune "Kojima's 12 Inch Dong"? And of course, Kojima is aware of DSP.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 02:32 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 04:18 |
|
dreezy posted:Judging from what I've seen of the game, huge props to him for making it to seven parts. Yeah, from what I've seen of it, this is the first time we could say DSP is...righ...ugh, my fingers are resisting when I try to type DSP is corre
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 02:44 |