|
http://usuncut.com/world/today-saudi-arabia-will-crucify-teenager-protesting-government/quote:Saudi Arabia, which was just admitted to the UN’s Human Rights Council days ago, will imminently behead and then crucify Ali Mohammed al-Nimr — a young man who encouraged pro-democracy demonstrations during the Arab Spring in 2012, when he was just 17 years old. The great US ally does it again! quote:No prominent American official has spoken out against the Saudi government’s sentence. When press asked the US State Department’s spokesman for his thoughts on al-Nimr’s case, he claimed that he was “not aware of the trial” despite international outrage. When asked about Saudi Arabia’s controversial appointment to head a key UN human rights panel, the US spokesman replied, “We would welcome it. We’re close allies.” Hopefully the flags will be kept at half mast and great cries of condolence arrive from our government, as they did after the passing of the last fundamentalist dictator.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 08:14 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:04 |
|
It it just me or has no one seen this reported on mainstream news? ABC, MSNBC, Fox, NPR, NY Times, ect
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 09:06 |
|
I bet Jesus wished they beheaded him first.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 12:12 |
|
"the US has approved over $90 billion in weapons sales to Saudi Arabia since 2010. In 2014 alone, the US approved over $2.2 billion in weapons sales to Saudi Arabia." Sounds like arms sales to Saudi Arabia have massively declined recently despite the tone of this sentence. Anyway what is the point of this thread? Everyone knows the Saudi government is brutal and terrible and incredibly stupid, you can't change the fact that the U.S. will be close with them as long as they have stupid amounts of oil.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 12:18 |
|
And of course someone has to squeeze the U.S into a news item about the policy of a Bedouin monarchy
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 12:27 |
|
Arms deals are not, strictly speaking, government assistance. I'm sure the US collaborates with the Saudi government when it comes to Yemen and other military issues and that's probably a violation though.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 12:39 |
|
But you see, America is actually worse because... uh... I got nothing.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 12:47 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:But you see, America is actually worse because... uh... I got nothing. they support this poo poo?
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 12:56 |
|
The UK government also grovels in the most embarrassing manner in am attempt to win arms contracts with the Saudis. Check out the Corner House case if you're interested: the government suppressed investigation into bribery associated with a multi billion dollar arms deal as it would offend the Saudis (that was actually their argument). This has happened multiple times.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 13:17 |
|
Our Ministery of Justice is also selling consultancy services on how to run their prison system.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 13:18 |
|
Western nations supporting an oppressive autocracy in the Middle East? Bozhe moi!
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 13:19 |
|
"Man, why don't those Syrian refugees go to Saudi Arabia"
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 13:26 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:But you see, America is actually worse because... uh... I got nothing. Maybe the US is no better or worse than the other actors who support authoritarian and/or apartheid embracing governments who have no conjunction of using violence against their own or neighboring populations? Everyone just pretends their client-proxy relationship is somehow less horrendous than the other ones.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 13:42 |
|
The most egregious human rights violation you could come up with - in loving Saudi Arabia, of all countries - is the execution of an anti-government dissident? I honestly can't even tell what the fuss is about. Is it because they're executing a protester? Egypt's done that by the hundreds. Is it because he was a child when he committed the crime? There are 71 people sitting on death row in the US for crimes they committed as a juvenile. Is it because the manner of execution doesn't pretend to be civilized like the US practice of paralyzing people first so they can't express pain when we inject them with liquid agony? Is it because he alleged that he was tortured, like tens of thousands of other prisoners all over the world? What makes this case notable enough to be examined and objected to separately from the countless other instances of these things all over the world? I mean, other than "because it was done by Islamists instead of against Islamists"?
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:26 |
|
Shame it wasn't you. jk, gently caress the Saudis and the rest of their fundamentalist Islamic brethren.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:29 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:Egypt's done that by the hundreds Protesters are only human if they're cosmopolitan liberals hth
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:39 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:But you see, America is actually worse because... uh... I got nothing. Lethal injection is arguably more cruel and unsual that beheading. Given the choice I think I'd pick beheading.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 16:08 |
|
Egypt's coup government which carried out the executions you refer to is also a US ally
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 17:19 |
Salt Fish posted:Lethal injection is arguably more cruel and unsual that beheading. Given the choice I think I'd pick beheading. Beheading is by far the most humane form of execution. Although "most humane" in the context of murder is a rather ghoulish phrase. I suppose a high-caliber gunshot directly to the brainstem might be better, although that introduces some extremely small probability of failure.
|
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 17:48 |
|
What about an anti-aircraft round straight to the head? I'm guessing that's over pretty fast, and the brain is certainly not intact afterward so there's no chance you could be conscious for any period of time after it happens, whereas I believe it's something of an open question with beheading.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 17:52 |
PT6A posted:What about an anti-aircraft round straight to the head? I'm guessing that's over pretty fast, and the brain is certainly not intact afterward so there's no chance you could be conscious for any period of time after it happens, whereas I believe it's something of an open question with beheading. Well we could drop a small nuclear device on a guy, but I think cost-prohibitive measures are probably out of the running here.
|
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 17:53 |
|
mdemone posted:Well we could drop a small nuclear device on a guy, but I think cost-prohibitive measures are probably out of the running here. I doubt anti-aircraft rounds are that expensive, especially compared to due process in a country that isn't an rear end-backwards shithole like Saudi.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 18:00 |
|
Itt people display complete ignorance of weapon prices and the notion that you can drat Saudi Arabia and wilfull blindness without being a hypocrite.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 18:12 |
|
PT6A posted:I doubt anti-aircraft rounds are that expensive, especially compared to due process in a country that isn't an rear end-backwards shithole like Saudi. A JDAM would work pretty good, only cost about 25k each, and I bet you you sell the Saudis that poo poo along with the platforms that employ them. The accuracy is supposed to be about 13m, but I bet if you tie some fucker to a post out in the desert and have a really good GPS fix on him you could headshot them with one.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 18:31 |
|
Barbarians.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 18:32 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:The most egregious human rights violation you could come up with - in loving Saudi Arabia, of all countries - is the execution of an anti-government dissident? Not since 2005. Far too late but atleast that's stopped.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 18:35 |
|
mdemone posted:Beheading is by far the most humane form of execution. Although "most humane" in the context of murder is a rather ghoulish phrase nitrogen asphyxiation cheap, safe, effective, painless, nontoxic, no mess, no cleanup
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 18:41 |
|
Tezzor posted:Egypt's coup government which carried out the executions you refer to is also a US ally Sure, what's your point? Based on the title and very limited OP of this thread, I expected you to be criticizing Saudi Arabia's human rights record, not halfassedly calling out the US for supporting Bad People. Nckdictator posted:Not since 2005. Far too late but atleast that's stopped. The stoppage wasn't retroactive, though. Everyone who was sentenced to death for a juvenile crime before 2005 remained on death row after that decision, and will continue to remain there until they are executed or exonerated. There's 71 left.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:10 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:Sure, what's your point? Based on the title and very limited OP of this thread, I expected you to be criticizing Saudi Arabia's human rights record, not halfassedly calling out the US for supporting Bad People. It's the Chomsky school of moral criticism. Something is only worth criticizing if it can be Kevin Bacon'd back to the USA.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:15 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:Sure, what's your point? Based on the title and very limited OP of this thread, I expected you to be criticizing Saudi Arabia's human rights record, not halfassedly calling out the US for supporting Bad People. The point of underlining the hideousness of our close allies is to demonstrate that US foreign policy is actually not based in following any higher principles, which unfortunately many in this country still believe, and many in this forum claim to not believe until they see some atrocity on the news and start demanding a new war
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:16 |
|
Fojar38 posted:It's the Chomsky school of moral criticism. Something is only worth criticizing if it can be Kevin Bacon'd back to the USA. That we sell Saudi Arabia billions in weapons, support them in the UN, send our troops in to defend them when threatened, kiss their feet when their leaders travel here and release weeping official statements when their dictators die is hardly an obscure connection
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:19 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:Sure, what's your point? Based on the title and very limited OP of this thread, I expected you to be criticizing Saudi Arabia's human rights record, not halfassedly calling out the US for supporting Bad People. Just when I'm slightly optimistic about something...
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:25 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:nitrogen asphyxiation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2ItJe2Incs it's especially dangerous for the same reasons it's a humane execution method. you feel no pain, and quickly lose conciousness and die
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:36 |
Popular Thug Drink posted:nitrogen asphyxiation Yeah I should have been more clear; I meant the most humane of forms currently practiced.
|
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:39 |
|
Condiv posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2ItJe2Incs so are youo imaginiing we just lower the condemned into a concrete pipe or something because we've also mastered the exotic techology of "oxygen masks"
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:42 |
|
I can appreciate from a historical point that an ancient roman execution method is still used in 2015
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:48 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:so are youo imaginiing we just lower the condemned into a concrete pipe or something because we've also mastered the exotic techology of "oxygen masks" nah, it's just a cool video on nitrogen asphyxiation (also gently caress valero)
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:48 |
|
Saudi Arabia's is one of a large number of lovely governments that don't deserve the United States' support but get it anyway.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 19:57 |
|
StandardVC10 posted:Saudi Arabia's is one of a large number of lovely governments that don't deserve the United States' support but get it anyway. yeah but it's worse because it's the ME and the undermining of liberal democracy has turned the entire region into a hellscape warzone. like africa is already a shithole, it doesn't matter if the US supports a lovely dictator there. this is literally the reason why the ME is hosed up
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 20:00 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:04 |
|
icantfindaname posted:yeah but it's worse because it's the ME and the undermining of liberal democracy has turned the entire region into a hellscape warzone. like africa is already a shithole, it doesn't matter if the US supports a lovely dictator there. this is literally the reason why the ME is hosed up I wouldn't say it's specifically the undermining of democracy so much as general Western meddling in Middle Eastern affairs. The message the 20th century sent to the Middle East is that it doesn't matter whether the country is ruled by a long, a dictatorship, or a democracy - the only way the government will survive to the end of the year is if it is either intensely pro-Western or is able to suppress political opposition so thoroughly that the CIA can't find a rebel group or disloyal general to sponsor. Not just the Middle East, either. I'm not as familiar with African history, but in the early 20th century practically the entire continent was under Western influence or control. There's no way that isn't a major factor in Africa's issues, the same way it was in the Middle East.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 20:04 |