|
Sniping stops today - Tony Abbott Australia is still fukt, please remember to eat your onions. edit: Here is a link to the last months OP if you want to learn more about Australia than the fact that Tony Abbott hosed a dead onion. Birb Katter fucked around with this message at 03:38 on Oct 1, 2015 |
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:08 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 19:34 |
You've given us the thread we deserve
|
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:09 |
|
good one
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:09 |
|
gas thread ban op
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:10 |
|
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:11 |
gas op ban thread
|
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:11 |
|
It should also be noted that Hockey is managing to come out of this whole thing quite well considering how well he did in his actual job.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:12 |
|
gas op ban thread
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:12 |
|
Birb Katter posted:It should also be noted that Hockey is managing to come out of this whole thing quite well considering how well he did in his actual job. In that he's completely disappeared off the face of the earth?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:13 |
|
Tony Abbott ate a raw onion
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:15 |
|
Q: I am a single, 73-year-old pensioner. I am thinking about buying a second house to allow my relatives live in it rent free. They kindly did the same for my family many years ago and are now struggling to pay their rent. Is it a requirement of Centrelink to charge them rent? A: Net income from real estate (after allowable deductions) is assessable income for social security purposes. However, there is no requirement that a person use their property to produce income. If no money is received from a property, then no income is taken into account. However, the net value of the property would be included in the customer’s assets test. If they gave the property to somebody else, then the value (less up to $10,000) would be assessed as a deemed asset for five years and would fall under both the income test and the assets test. http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/money/ask-an-expert/can-i-buy-my-reloes-a-home-20150922-gjsk3s.html
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:16 |
|
QUACKTASTIC posted:In that he's completely disappeared off the face of the earth? He's going to Washington as our ambassador so off the face of our side of the earth but not where he won't do harm.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:17 |
|
This is the best OP so far, by a mile
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:17 |
|
ewe2 posted:gas op ban thread ban ewe2
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:17 |
|
Goood afternoon fellow shitlords
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:23 |
|
Tokamak posted:Tony Abbott ate a raw onion x2 ---------------- Re-posting from previous thread in case anyone missed it: Turnbull government shelves controversial university reforms in major departure from Abbott era http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...930-gjynlt.html
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:26 |
|
Election soon, stalker
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:31 |
voted 5
|
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:33 |
|
Birb Katter posted:Sniping stops today - Tony Abbott Quoting to appreciate, and preserve. I'm sure some idiot mod will edit it to include such trenchant information as "the irc channel where you can talk to the worst posters" or "party affiliations for each individual poster, for some reason"
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:34 |
|
Tony's Aussie radio tour continues! Tony Abbott pleads the Fifth Amendment when asked if he's forgiven Malcolm Turnbull http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...001-gjypw9.html quote:Former prime minister Tony Abbott has returned to the airwaves and revealed he never trusted Malcolm Turnbull, believing he was always intent on seizing the leadership.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:41 |
|
Tokamak posted:Tony Abbott ate a raw onion Its kind of lost its lusture after #baeofpigs
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:43 |
|
SynthOrange posted:Its kind of lost its lusture after #baeofpigs you mean #swine11?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:44 |
|
#baeofpigs is better
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:46 |
|
So what if Tony Abbott ate an onion? See how quickly the left falls back on mainstream perceptions of "normality" when it suits them. You shall eat vegetables only in the approved manner, comrade!
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:47 |
|
Our gently caress up of a leader cant even get a scandal right. all he did was eat some onions. DCam went the whole hog.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:48 |
|
freebooter posted:Hang on. 10 million is nearly 50% our current population and would be completely unprecedented. I don't know about it lowering our own standard of living, but we certainly wouldn't be able to adequately house 10 million refugees in any kind of decent standard. Here let me Google that for you: "Completely unprecedented" Complete bollocks more like it. http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/changing-face-of-modern-australia-1950s-to-1970s quote:After the Second World War (1939–45) the Australian government committed to a vigorous and sustained immigration program. The purpose of this ambitious program was to meet labour shortages, protect Australia from external threat and create prosperity. As a result, from 1945 to 1975 Australia's population almost doubled from 7˝ million to 13 million. About 3 million migrants and refugees arrived. http://www.sbs.com.au/gold/story.php?storyid=49 quote:n March 1851, Victoria’s population was 80,000, not including Aborigines. By 1854 the population tripled to 237,000 and by 1861 it had doubled again to 540,000. The New South Wales gold fields were poorer but the state’s population increased from 200,000 in 1851 to 357,000 in 1861. General educational information http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-21/carvalho-why-migrants-may-be-our-greatest-economic-asset/6409042 Now what a total sustainable population for Australia is, what a sensible rate of population growth is and what immigration level is necessary to continue the consumerist poo poo pool we all know and love are all interesting questions. The proposition that more immigration is bad for the disadvantaged is not well founded and would probably only be possible if we kept doing socially regressive things like this current mob of substantially white male clowns are. Cartoon fucked around with this message at 03:51 on Oct 1, 2015 |
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:49 |
|
Negligent posted:So what if Tony Abbott ate an onion? Tony Abbott eating an onion was extremely funny
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 03:56 |
|
Is the thread title meant to be clever in a way I didn't get because the original quote is with a whimper T.S. Eliot 4lyfe
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:12 |
|
nyerf posted:Is the thread title meant to be clever in a way I didn't get because the original quote is with a whimper Auspol superstar ScreamingLlama likes whisper porn aka ASMR and also the Democrats.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:15 |
|
CROWS EVERYWHERE posted:Auspol superstar ScreamingLlama likes whisper porn aka ASMR and also the Democrats.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:20 |
|
Cartoon posted:And had planned on doing this OP. Clearly there weren't enough pixels in his CPU or the AEC prevented him out of spite. Oh yeah, and this too.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:21 |
|
I thought the title was to do with Abbot's downfall and transition into undermining Turnbull with leaks.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:21 |
|
http://www.theguardian.com/australi...-getting-bigger Paul Keating is a dickhead.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:22 |
|
Amoeba102 posted:I thought the title was to do with Abbot's downfall and transition into undermining Turnbull with leaks. Maybe. It is layered, like onions, which Tony Abbott ate raw, skin and all (twice).
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:23 |
|
Lid posted:http://www.theguardian.com/australi...-getting-bigger I walk past barangaroo every day and honestly, it's fine. it's just another part of the high rise cbd, and it make sense I wish it didn't have a loving casino though. gently caress casinos
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:24 |
Amethyst posted:I walk past barangaroo every day and honestly, it's fine. it's just another part of the high rise cbd, and it make sense https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bosouX_d8Y
|
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:42 |
|
Amethyst posted:i'm mellllttinggggggg In other crybaby news, big business is trying on the kidnap excuse for tax avoidance, but it's part of a bigger picture, says Jeffrey Knapp in a crosspost from The Conversation: quote:A proposal to exclude Australian-owned private companies from disclosing their income tax information is currently the subject of a Senate inquiry due to report on October 12. More at the link, but how blatant eh. Oh for a politician who would laugh them out of the hearing.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:49 |
|
It's the laziest journalism in the world to find a disgruntled architect and write down what he/she says. My special snowflake artistic vision was ruined
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:52 |
|
Cartoon posted:Well in the ten million example I believe the xenophobe in question was taking general immigration and trying to suggest it would reduce our social safety net. I claim (regardless of the numbers, and 10 million is probably a bit silly, again not my starting point) that this is dumb as poo poo and offered a google string to assist in gaining an understanding. I don't think there was a timeline included in the original claim however so don't conclude one year is in anyway related to the total number suggested. The xenophobe in question likes how you are conveniently ignoring the fact that in the time periods you mentioned we had not social safety net, but carry on. I'm in no way claiming the migration, even from poor countries, even in much larger numbers than what we currently have would be beneficial in the long term. I firmly believe that Germany will be reaping the benefits of its 1 million incoming migrants in about 10 years or so. But you muppets are advocating just throwing the borders open to anyone who wants to come. Cue lots of people from very poor countries immediately coming over, because why wouldn't you? If you think we could sustain our standard of living over the immediate thirty years or so if that happened, then you're as dumb as your posts suggest. Basically you've taken this extreme ideological anarchist position about how borders are evil and turned it into a dumb as gently caress policy head fart. But who cares what I think, clearly I hate foreign people so so much.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 19:34 |
|
http://www.brw.com.au/lists/rich-200/2015/ But what if people find out? Clearly the BRW are in league with the people
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 04:55 |