|
It's possible someone might want to continue to get emails from the Jindal campaign, just not ones begging for money.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 13, 2024 06:02 |
|
|
AARP LARPer fucked around with this message at 05:19 on Jan 22, 2016 |
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
Do Not Resuscitate posted:W-what? Am I reading Jindal's fundraising note right? Pay me $100 or I'll spam you?! Also a pledge to stop requesting money from his biggest backers. Clever.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
Do Not Resuscitate posted:W-what? Am I reading Jindal's fundraising note right? Pay me $100 or I'll spam you?! It gets better. That offer amounts to a three-day pause in emails. quote:"Pretty good, right?” Mr. Engle added.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
Soon Jindal will be showing up at people's homes and refusing to leave until they give him whatever cash they have in their wallet. "Look Jindal, $27 is all I have, please, just go!"
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
I now it sounds like a threat, because seriously, who wants to get an email from Bobby Jindal? but non-profit radio stations do the same thing during pledge drives "we just need 5 more callers then we'll shut the gently caress-up about donations until the 6 o'clock drive time block."
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
Do Not Resuscitate posted:W-what? Am I reading Jindal's fundraising note right? Pay me $100 or I'll spam you?! Is it spam if you asked him to send you mail first?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
$100 is actually a loving steal considering everything that money will get you: * A one-year subscription to Jindal All the Way, the magazine of all things Bobby Jindal; * That one photograph of Jindal in which he doesn't inspire pity or ridicule; * A signed copy of Bobby Jindal's book My Funniest Tweets; * A small vial of holy water, a crucifix and a thimbleful of chrism - all part of Bobby Jindal's Emergency Exorcism Kit; * A notepad (which is actually Bobby Jindal's book My Funniest Tweets, because the pages are all blank); * A chance to win a dinner with Bobby Jindal at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. ("Dinner" will be a roasted garlic & parmesan pretzel from the SeeSaw Pretzel Shoppe at the Quicken Loans Arena.) I am sending $300 right now! NotJesus fucked around with this message at 02:39 on Oct 2, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
Montasque posted:In other news: Ben Carson Jokes About Days Before Cops 'Would Shoot You' at Durham Speech, New Hampshire some youtube commenter posted:DrStrangel0ve2 2 hours ago
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
Doctor Butts posted:some youtube commenter posted: gently caress yeah carson is my new main dude. as an atheist, i assume this means i have to contribute $0/year of my income to the federal government with no downside right?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
homeless poster posted:gently caress yeah carson is my new main dude. as an atheist, i assume this means i have to contribute $0/year of my income to the federal government with no downside right? what percentage of republicans would publicly renounce all religions and be barred from attending religious services in exchange for paying 0 federal taxes?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 03:49
|
|
|
Malloreon posted:what percentage of republicans would publicly renounce all religions and be barred from attending religious services in exchange for paying 0 federal taxes? not many i suspect, but the fact that religious contributions are voluntary and basically untraceable means you'd see a groundswell of people withholding 0% of their income for federal income taxes in favor of religious contributions. churches are already tax free anyway, so it's not like they have anything to lose by fudging the amount of money their parishioners are contributing. or you'd get an organic outgrowth of theocratic fiefdoms where churches are able to strongarm people into contributing whatever amount they want or else they won't sign off on their annual religious contribution form. then you get the underground market of institutions that have qualified for religious/church status who are willing to "sell" their signature on their religious contribution forms. either way, this is much better than our current income tax system
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
homeless poster posted:then you get the underground market of institutions that have qualified for religious/church status who are willing to "sell" their signature on their religious contribution forms. Wouldn't there be enough competition in that market to drive the price down to the cost of supplying it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
Has anyone said anything surprising about guns yet?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
You know, Jesus was friends with tax collectors. Let's go back to the Roman system where we auction off the right to rob the people in a given area at swordpoint.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
lol Someone doesn't realize that Zakat is for giving directly to the poor, and not just tithing the church. Wait, gently caress is Islam friendly to the poor than Christianity!?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 04:58
|
|
|
Thump! posted:
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
Chamale posted:You know, Jesus was friends with tax collectors. Let's go back to the Roman system where we auction off the right to rob the people in a given area at swordpoint. Chuck Schumer puts a bill up for that every few years.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 05:26
|
|
|
Someone mentioned this earlier but Chris Christie did extremely well in his interview on the Daily Show. He knows how to play to his audience very well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 05:33
|
|
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:Someone mentioned this earlier but Chris Christie did extremely well in his interview on the Daily Show. Probably did him a lot of good with all the early-State Primaries Republican voters who watch TDS.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 05:39
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Probably did him a lot of good with all the early-State Primaries Republican voters who watch TDS. I get the feeling that you're being sarcastic, but the New Hampshire primary is known for a moderate/establishment voter base that probably does include quite a few TDS watchers (not that that could save Chris Christie).
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Probably did him a lot of good with all the early-State Primaries Republican voters who watch TDS. You know that video clips from TV shows get reposted to other websites later, right? The TV show doesn't go away if you missed it when it aired. Not anymore, thanks to this marvelous age of information.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 06:04
|
|
|
Robotnik Nudes posted:You know that video clips from TV shows get reposted to other websites later, right? The TV show doesn't go away if you missed it when it aired. Not anymore, thanks to this marvelous age of information. Probably did him a lot of good with all the early-states Republican primary voters who watch TV shows on websites.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Robotnik Nudes posted:You know that video clips from TV shows get reposted to other websites later, right? The TV show doesn't go away if you missed it when it aired. Not anymore, thanks to this marvelous age of information. Yeah, and I think the narrative is going to be "look at that RINO, feeling all comfortable at the LIEberal Daily Show, where he belongs."
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:Someone mentioned this earlier but Chris Christie did extremely well in his interview on the Daily Show. he did "extremely well" because he got to talk at a host who has been on the job for 3 days and has all of the interviewing chops of the editor of a middle school class news paper. regardless of how you feel about his jewishness, if that interview had been with stewart, it wouldn't have gone "extremely well" for christie
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
Golden Bee posted:Has anyone said anything surprising about guns yet? I'm genuinely curious about what would happen if Trump said something after the shootings today in the vein of 'We ought to at least keep track of who has guns, and deny them to actually insane people.'
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:06
|
|
|
Feral_Shofixti posted:I'm genuinely curious about what would happen if Trump said something after the shootings today in the vein of 'We ought to at least keep track of who has guns, and deny them to actually insane people.' Boosted would kill himself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:15
|
|
|
Mrit posted:Boosted would kill himself. It is not dead, which can forever post/ And in strange forums, even the toxxed may boast.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:18
|
|
|
Nazareth posted:We've been singing the swan song of the Republican Party to no avail since Obama was elected in '08. The thing is, the Republican Party is not going to die. It's going to shift and evolve as it and the Democratic Party has over the years. I wouldn't rule out the GOP just yet, even though outwardly it looks like a cocaine-fueled shitfest. Right. People have been predicting the death of the Republican Party for fifty years now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
Thinking about those posts from late 2008/early 2009 about how the Republican Party is going to break up and there's going to be decades of Democratic supermajorities is just hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
Lycus posted:Thinking about those posts from late 2008/early 2009 about how the Republican Party is going to break up and there's going to be decades of Democratic supermajorities is just hilarious. The same crap happened around 2004, there's at least a couple books published around then about how the GOP would dominate National politics for the foreseeable future the best is the one by Zell Miller who just comes off as a rambling incoherent old rear end in a top hat, which I guess he is
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:40
|
|
|
Lycus posted:Thinking about those posts from late 2008/early 2009 about how the Republican Party is going to break up and there's going to be decades of Democratic supermajorities is just hilarious. While those were dumb, that's kind of how it happens. One party loses support and goes into the wilderness for awhile until issues change and voting blocs shift. This generation, I think, is a little slower on the button because of more solidified politics and networks, plus gerrymandering making unequivocal immediate change unnecessary. But it's coming. It could literally be until 2032 if the Dems miss their wave in 2020, but it's coming. edit identity politics loving sucks, i really enjoy how fluid things were in the 50's and 60's
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:45
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:a young boy is waving the american flag. suddenly, it zooms on his face as the picture goes black and white. the boys face morphs into the grotesque melting visage of Ted Cruz, and the flag morphs into the canadian flag. "o canada" begins to play in reverse, revealing its satanic message. "make america great again, not canada" says donald trumps voice. Oh god yes
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:52
|
|
|
Lycus posted:Thinking about those posts from late 2008/early 2009 about how the Republican Party is going to break up and there's going to be decades of Democratic supermajorities is just hilarious. The Republicans infighting is actually good for them and is prepration for this, even if they themselves don't realize it. They're finding out what is going to get them elected in ten or so years, with the gerrymanderign and only a little over half of Americans sick of them they have all the time in the world to figure this poo poo out before it actually matters. Meanwhile the Democrats continue trends that are also making them unelectable, just at a much lesser rate.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 07:59
|
|
|
The coolest thing would be if both parties became populist, in the veins of Trump and Sanders respectively.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 08:08
|
|
|
some kind of national socialism or democratic socalism
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
Aliquid posted:edit identity politics loving sucks, i really enjoy how fluid things were in the 50's and 60's Ah yes, America in the 50s and 60s, when "Identity politics" were not a contentious issue.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 08:17
|
|
|
Aliquid posted:edit identity politics loving sucks, i really enjoy how fluid things were in the 50's and 60's Is this the latest Bernie supporter 'thing'? It keeps popping up, and it's really stupid.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 08:48
|
|
|
Mrit posted:Is this the latest Bernie supporter 'thing'? It keeps popping up, and it's really stupid. People saying "identity politics suck" has been happening pretty much since identity politics became a thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 09:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 13, 2024 06:02 |
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:It is not dead, which can forever post/ This post/username combo isn't get the love it deserves.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 09:30
|
|
