|
Duro posted:How much time is he going to miss? Should I dump him or stash him? The injury has been clarified as a rib injury. Early indications are this is a short term, pain management issue. I wouldn't drop him until there's an indication he'll miss serious time.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 18:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 00:45 |
|
It looks like Joique Bell is out for Monday's game. It might be worth it to speculatively add Zenner in case the coaching staff still doesn't like Abdullah. Maybe only if you have someone on your bench that you feel comfortable dropping (like Taliaferro perhaps since the Ravens already played).
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 18:54 |
|
Duro posted:How much time is he going to miss? Should I dump him or stash him? He's "day to day" because Smiff. No idea.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 18:55 |
|
opposable thumbs.db posted:It looks like Joique Bell is out for Monday's game. It might be worth it to speculatively add Zenner in case the coaching staff still doesn't like Abdullah. Maybe only if you have someone on your bench that you feel comfortable dropping (like Taliaferro perhaps since the Ravens already played). What site do you play on where you can drop someone who already played that week before the week is over
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 18:59 |
|
Honore_De_Balzac posted:It is also collusion. It's only collusion if the other owner is in on it. Hard to prove. Sounds like this guy is either a Sith Lord or a Taco.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 19:01 |
|
Dren posted:What site do you play on where you can drop someone who already played that week before the week is over My work yahoo league is set up like that. No waivers, short bench. I hate it.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 19:02 |
|
Dren posted:What site do you play on where you can drop someone who already played that week before the week is over On Yahoo if someone is on your bench you can drop them whenever. e: you just can't pick up someone who has already played. It makes rotating handcuffs a sort-of-viable strategy, dropping them if the main back doesn't get hurt.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 19:05 |
|
opposable thumbs.db posted:On Yahoo if someone is on your bench you can drop them whenever. Which is A Good Thing because Thursday games are loving stupid.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 19:07 |
|
Zach Zenner worth a pickup with Joique out?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 19:56 |
|
365 Nog Hogger posted:Zach Zenner worth a pickup with Joique out? Your guess is as good as ours bud
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 19:58 |
|
365 Nog Hogger posted:Zach Zenner worth a pickup with Joique out? Depends on the type of league. Re-Draft, probably not, unless you are stashing him to see if he puts up numbers. In dynasty, I have him tucked away for the future on a 29-man roster.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 20:06 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Your guess is as good as ours bud My guesses are... bad.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 20:07 |
|
i just looked at espn stats and holy poo poo 20% of espn leagues had someone starting michael vick? hahahaha
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 20:19 |
|
cams posted:i just looked at espn stats and holy poo poo 20% of espn leagues had someone starting michael vick? hahahaha Well, with Ben, Brady, Romo, and Mariota all out and Brees looking iffy (and bad anyway), if you're in a 12 team league where people roster a backup QB, you'd be scraping the bottom of the barrel if you had Brees and Mariota or Brady and Romo or whatever.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 20:39 |
|
Is Terrence Williams worth anything at this point? I don't trust him after the goose egg last week. I'm thinking about swapping him out for a Brian Quick prospect. I could also drop Davante Adams, but I'm still hoping for a late season breakout. My WRs are not good.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 21:03 |
|
cams posted:i just looked at espn stats and holy poo poo 20% of espn leagues had someone starting michael vick? hahahaha I had Brady, no backup, and the next best QB available was Alex Smith. What would you do?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 21:21 |
|
headcase posted:Is Terrence Williams worth anything at this point? I don't trust him after the goose egg last week. I'm thinking about swapping him out for a Brian Quick prospect. I could also drop Davante Adams, but I'm still hoping for a late season breakout.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 21:27 |
|
365 Nog Hogger posted:Zach Zenner worth a pickup with Joique out? Absolutely. Detroit has a history under Caldwell of preferring two heavily involved RBs, not unlike New England or Cincinnati. Abdullah has been performing as the Reggie Bush replacement, so it's not entirely unreasonable to think Zenner, if effective, could supplant Bell for the "Joique Bell job".
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 21:50 |
|
Theo Riddick will be the beneficiary of bell not playing
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 21:51 |
|
Metapod posted:Theo Riddick will be the beneficiary of bell not playing At first, maybe (even probably). Caldwell is really conservative after all. That said: a) Zenner might get a few snaps, and if he runs like he did in the pre-season, that could parlay into more work going forward. b) Now that Joique is drifting down the depth chart, all it would take at this point to make Zenner fantasydefinitely relevant is one more injury, to either Riddick or Abdullah. The thing about RBs is, you need to be ahead of the curve. Go to where the puck is going to be, etc. etc. If you had waited for Arians to come out and explicitly say "Chris Johnson is my guy", or waited for Christine Michael to start his run up the depth chart, you'd be too late now.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 21:56 |
|
To be fair, and it remains to be seen after one game....Chris Johnson sucked last year as a Jet. So I was prepared to not touch him. Then you had the David Johnson hype train.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 22:01 |
|
Franks Happy Place posted:At first, maybe (even probably). Caldwell is really conservative after all. That said: What do we know about Zenner? There was a lot of preseason buzz about the Cowboys signing him as an UDFA, but is his skill set a direct replacement for Bell's? Also, what confidence do people have in the o-line to play better with Zenner than Bell? I'll confirm the Joe Lombardi school of running backs is to have a heavy rotation. Whoever replaces Bell could see an Ingram-like workload and TD upside (if the lions can get out of their poo poo-filled bed).
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 22:02 |
|
I think it's prudent to pump the brakes a bit on CJ?k. He had one good game after years of mediocrity. He's in a good spot but that's still a RBBC right now. And CMike hasn't done crap either. I get the "be ahead of the curve thing" and agree with it. We were talking about L. Murray about 6 weeks ahead of time last year so who knows.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 22:04 |
|
Joe Lombardi seems to have confidence in Zenner at least. Who dares wins. Going to drop Dunbar for Zenner and see for myself.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 22:47 |
|
Honore_De_Balzac posted:It is also collusion. Doesn't half to be. If it is it's really lovely, poorly executed collusion.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 22:57 |
|
Ayudo posted:Joe Lombardi seems to have confidence in Zenner at least. My RB2 options are Alfred Morris and Doug Martin, I am sorely tempted.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 23:00 |
|
Ayudo posted:Joe Lombardi seems to have confidence in Zenner at least. Surely you have someone better to drop than Dunbar. He'll slow down some almost surely, but he's in a fantastic situation and has already shown himself to be a great flex (RB28 in standard) or even high end RB2 with any PPR (RB12 in full, without yet scoring a TD ).
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 23:10 |
|
RVProfootballer posted:Surely you have someone better to drop than Dunbar. He'll slow down some almost surely, but he's in a fantastic situation and has already shown himself to be a great flex (RB28 in standard) or even high end RB2 with any PPR (RB12 in full, without yet scoring a TD ). I have plenty of potential lotto tickets to drop, but I feel Dunbar's ceiling is probably close to what we saw last week. If Zenner, Cmike, or Quick look especially bad I can pick him back up maybe. I don't have bye week issues until after week 6, and don't see him cracking my lineup until then. Whereas if someone breaks out they might contribute immediately. It's a calculated moonshot admittedly. Edited to add: Lance Dunbar has never scored a TD since entering the league. Ayudo fucked around with this message at 23:44 on Oct 3, 2015 |
# ? Oct 3, 2015 23:23 |
|
Can we ask for advice here? I never thought I would ask this but who should I play Peyton Manning or Dalton?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 23:47 |
|
Don't sit your studs
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 23:54 |
|
ZIGfried posted:Don't sit your studs Yeah play Dalton
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 23:56 |
|
Dalton has outscored Peyton every week and is going up against the Defense giving up the most points to fantasy QBs. I certainly wouldn't have a problem sitting Peyton for Dalton this week.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 23:57 |
|
Franks Happy Place posted:At first, maybe (even probably). Caldwell is really conservative after all. That said: I'm just saying bro, but you know the whole Charles Sims meme is due to you declaring how awesome he will be in a similar situation last year right?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:01 |
|
BigFactory posted:Doesn't half to be. If it is it's really lovely, poorly executed collusion. It isn't a big deal. I just dont see how two teams working together for the benefit of one team, while also cheating the waiver wire, isn't collusion. It could have been a mistake, but if he traded Bradford with the intent to not gain from it he is "cheating". It could be fine, I just consider skirting the waiver wire to be a form of cheating.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:03 |
|
Franks Happy Place posted:If you had waited for Arians to come out and explicitly say "Chris Johnson is my guy", or waited for Christine Michael to start his run up the depth chart, you'd be too late now. Except Michael is still available in like 95% of leagues and has yet to actually be active for a game?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:06 |
|
Honore_De_Balzac posted:It isn't a big deal. I just dont see how two teams working together for the benefit of one team, while also cheating the waiver wire, isn't collusion. It could have been a mistake, but if he traded Bradford with the intent to not gain from it he is "cheating". It could be fine, I just consider skirting the waiver wire to be a form of cheating.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:14 |
|
Honore_De_Balzac posted:It isn't a big deal. I just dont see how two teams working together for the benefit of one team, while also cheating the waiver wire, isn't collusion. It could have been a mistake, but if he traded Bradford with the intent to not gain from it he is "cheating". It could be fine, I just consider skirting the waiver wire to be a form of cheating. If only one side was in on it, it can't be collusion. The other side just got used.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:22 |
|
"There were some findings" in Marshawn Lynch's MRI. So that's not good. Rawls now becomes immediately relevant.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:23 |
|
BigFactory posted:If only one side was in on it, it can't be collusion. The other side just got used. This is what I think likely happened and is why I'm not even going to bother saying anything to the commish. Thanks for your input guys. Wasn't quite sure how to interpret what played out.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 00:45 |
|
Holy loving poo poo are we really talking about 4th string RB and special team specialist Zach Zenner again.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2015 00:29 |