Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
awesmoe
Nov 30, 2005

Pillbug

mlmp08 posted:

If you think US military actions aren't held accountable, don't look up the actions of the US intelligence agencies that aren't beholden to US military rules. It's pretty loving absurd.
I'm trying really hard to not let my anger about the situation colour my responses here, so I'll just agree with you that yes the US armed forces could be worse, and also agree that some of your other government agencies are worse.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bob Ojeda
Apr 15, 2008

I AM A WHINY LITTLE EMOTIONAL BITCH BABY WITH NO SENSE OF HUMOR

IF YOU SEE ME POSTING REMIND ME TO SHUT THE FUCK UP

Nonsense posted:

The establishment GOP is literally collapsing.

It's still there, it's just unable to command a majority of the House anymore. You have two basically distinct groups within the party.

E: Like, more and more, I'm kind of thinking that the people who were predicting the disintegration of the GOP after 2008 weren't wrong. It's just that, in the American political system, it's really not possible to actually have a successful third party and so everyone stayed under the name of the Republican Party because that's where the structure leads you.

Bob Ojeda fucked around with this message at 20:57 on Oct 4, 2015

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Bob Ojeda posted:

It's still there, it's just unable to command a majority of the House anymore. You have two basically distinct groups within the party.

I know it's there, I'm just pretending the walls are collapsing around Boehner, his staff screaming, and praying while Cruz cackles in the foreground.

Bolow
Feb 27, 2007

Hooded Reptile posted:

I don't blame them, I wouldn't want to be anywhere where "LOOK TERRISTS LETS BOMB IT REPEATEDLY" are either. It was a hospital ffs. theres video of people burning alive in hospital beds, you won't sweep this one under the rug.

If they were taking fire from the Hospital it loses its protected status.

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx

Nonsense posted:

I know it's there, I'm just pretending the walls are collapsing around Boehner, his staff screaming, and praying while Cruz cackles in the foreground.

Ted Cruz's laughs probably cause people to spontaneously lose control of their rectums.

Hooded Reptile
Aug 31, 2015

Lumberjack Bonanza posted:

You want to bet?

what you gonna do, take liveleak and worldstar down?

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Bolow posted:

If they were taking fire from the Hospital it loses its protected status.
/

Hooded Reptile
Aug 31, 2015

Bolow posted:

If they were taking fire from the Hospital it loses its protected status.

it was bases on intel from a afghan tribal lord. Hey man, this hospital seems suspect blow it up, USA is like ok,

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007


Let Freedom Ring.

Hooded Reptile
Aug 31, 2015

Nonsense posted:

Let Freedom Ring.

like a bell

Arsonist Daria
Feb 27, 2011

Requiescat in pace.

Hooded Reptile posted:

what you gonna do, take liveleak and worldstar down?

The fact that you think they'd need to even do that speaks to your idealism.

Do you forget when the US military gunned down AP reporters and children with a gunship? The only person who got put in jail was the one who leaked it.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Fojar38 posted:

What might this mean for the debt ceiling?


When Boehner announced his resignation, it was expected that the debt ceiling would come into play right around Christmas. As it turns out, the deadline will arrive November 5th, less than a week after Boehner leaves office. If there is no coherent leadership in the Majority by that time, it raises serious questions about the House's ability to function. It puts pressure on moderates to use extreme measures to resolve the leadership crisis if it continues.

The real test will be the actual Speaker vote. The more ballots there are, the more inflexible and immobile the House is gong to be.

Also, say goodbye to any grand deals that might have been in the works. That ship has sailed for the foreseeable future.

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Nobody will care about the hospital thing in a week because we live in a world of piss.

Hooded Reptile
Aug 31, 2015

Lumberjack Bonanza posted:

The fact that you think they'd need to even do that speaks to your idealism.

Do you forget when the US military gunned down AP reporters and children with a gunship? The only person who got put in jail was the one who leaked it.

a camera tripod is an rpg

Hooded Reptile
Aug 31, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0cctmtWjxA

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

QuoProQuid posted:

When Boehner announced his resignation, it was expected that the debt ceiling would come into play right around Christmas. As it turns out, the deadline will arrive November 5th, less than a week after Boehner leaves office. If there is no coherent leadership in the Majority by that time, it raises serious questions about the House's ability to function. It puts pressure on moderates to use extreme measures to resolve the leadership crisis if it continues.

The real test will be the actual Speaker vote. The more ballots there are, the more inflexible and immobile the House is gong to be.

Also, say goodbye to any grand deals that might have been in the works. That ship has sailed for the foreseeable future.

I knew about that, I just figured Boehner would force it through in October because he's leaving anyway and doesn't have to worry about backlash from the wingnuts.

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"

QuoProQuid posted:

When Boehner announced his resignation, it was expected that the debt ceiling would come into play right around Christmas. As it turns out, the deadline will arrive November 5th, less than a week after Boehner leaves office. If there is no coherent leadership in the Majority by that time, it raises serious questions about the House's ability to function. It puts pressure on moderates to use extreme measures to resolve the leadership crisis if it continues.

The real test will be the actual Speaker vote. The more ballots there are, the more inflexible and immobile the House is gong to be.

Also, say goodbye to any grand deals that might have been in the works. That ship has sailed for the foreseeable future.

I just heard. November 5th. Obama better have the trillion dollar coin already made.

Arsonist Daria
Feb 27, 2011

Requiescat in pace.

William Bear posted:

I just heard. November 5th. Obama better have the trillion dollar coin already made.

I hope we all get one.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Fojar38 posted:

I knew about that, I just figured Boehner would force it through in October because he's leaving anyway and doesn't have to worry about backlash from the wingnuts.

Boehner is still likely to get an increase of the debt ceiling before he leaves office. He only needs a handful of moderate Republican votes to make sure it succeeds.The February 2014 debt ceiling increase had only 28 Republicans on board.

It would represent a failure at every level if Boehner left office without securing an increase to the debt limit. I don't think the Republican Party is collapsing (which is really one of the worst things about this situation) but if Boehner failed, it would represent a total neutering of the Republican Party's moderate wing.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice
Wouldn't Boehner forcing through actual governance legislation come at a cost of enraging and stiffening the resolve of the Wing Nuts? Possibly make moderates vulnerable at primary season?

I see a lot of people assuming Boehner can do anything now that he doesn't care but there's bound to be a cost to the moderate wing and his successor in particular.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Raenir Salazar posted:

Wouldn't Boehner forcing through actual governance legislation come at a cost of enraging and stiffening the resolve of the Wing Nuts? Possibly make moderates vulnerable at primary season?

When the alternative is a default that's probably a risk that should be taken.

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

Bob Ojeda posted:

It's still there, it's just unable to command a majority of the House anymore. You have two basically distinct groups within the party.

E: Like, more and more, I'm kind of thinking that the people who were predicting the disintegration of the GOP after 2008 weren't wrong. It's just that, in the American political system, it's really not possible to actually have a successful third party and so everyone stayed under the name of the Republican Party because that's where the structure leads you.

Subsidiaries of a conservative monopoly. All rivals, but supposedly together, like the way that Rand worshipping CEO of Sears ran/runs things.

Mister Facetious fucked around with this message at 21:24 on Oct 4, 2015

Jackson Taus
Oct 19, 2011

Raenir Salazar posted:

Wouldn't Boehner forcing through actual governance legislation come at a cost of enraging and stiffening the resolve of the Wing Nuts? Possibly make moderates vulnerable at primary season?

I see a lot of people assuming Boehner can do anything now that he doesn't care but there's bound to be a cost to the moderate wing and his successor in particular.

He only needs something like 30 Republicans, including himself. There are that many moderates (plus Republicans with major gov/mil/contractor offices/bases in their district), so Kevin McCarthy and even most of the moderates can scream about it all they want.

Ideally they can push the debt cliff off to mid-2016, but odds are good the smart(ish) Republicans will want a 2-year deal because they realize it'll hurt them in 2016.

Trabisnikof posted:

Does NGP/VAN not have an app?

Cause they basically have a near monopoly.

NGP/VAN has an app. It basically mimics the printed sheets on a clipboard - you literally put in a list number that corresponds to a turf that would otherwise be printed out and put on a clipboard.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Raenir Salazar posted:

Wouldn't Boehner forcing through actual governance legislation come at a cost of enraging and stiffening the resolve of the Wing Nuts? Possibly make moderates vulnerable at primary season?

I see a lot of people assuming Boehner can do anything now that he doesn't care but there's bound to be a cost to the moderate wing and his successor in particular.
While it is possible, there are several parliamentary moves that Boehner can take to clamp down on right-wing dissent. For example, if it looks like he won't get enough "yes" votes, he can try convincing members not to show up. He could also ask members to log themselves as "present" instead of "present and voting" during the roll call. These moves both lower the number of votes needed to raise the ceiling.

EDIT: One vote that Boehner can probably not depend on is McCarthy. In 2014, McCarthy was one of the 28 Republicans who voted to raise the ceiling. If he is concerned about his conservative credentials, he might defect to secure the Freedom Caucus's loyalty.

QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 21:30 on Oct 4, 2015

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Bob Ojeda posted:

It's still there, it's just unable to command a majority of the House anymore. You have two basically distinct groups within the party.

E: Like, more and more, I'm kind of thinking that the people who were predicting the disintegration of the GOP after 2008 weren't wrong. It's just that, in the American political system, it's really not possible to actually have a successful third party and so everyone stayed under the name of the Republican Party because that's where the structure leads you.

More specifically, you will see a disintegration (at least I think so), but there's a significant lag effect compared with Europe or other systems where a party might just cease to exist in the span of 4 years.

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Lotka Volterra posted:

Why would you lie about something like that? Doesn't sit right imo.

Dude shut the gently caress up, this is Something Awful and he made a ridiculous post that he doesn't literally mean. Quit being a sanctimonious prick

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.
http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/trump-middle-east-would-be-more-stable-hussein-gadhafi-n438156
hmm. what do you all think.

hakkart
Jul 22, 2011

by exmarx
Edit because I got involved in the primary in the wrong thread.

Seriously though, I highly doubt that they cant find 30 Republicans willing to save the world economy. It's not like it'll cost an Alabama house member his guaranteed reelection.

hakkart fucked around with this message at 22:06 on Oct 4, 2015

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Stable, sure. That's the benefit of being brutal dictators, you tend to keep poo poo on lock until someone kicks your door in with a rifle and shoves a knife up your rear end.

That means nothing, though, if the stability is in a brutal and repressive regime, doesn't it?

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

bone shaking.
soul baking.

Tatum Girlparts posted:

Stable, sure. That's the benefit of being brutal dictators, you tend to keep poo poo on lock until someone kicks your door in with a rifle and shoves a knife up your rear end.

That means nothing, though, if the stability is in a brutal and repressive regime, doesn't it?

There isn't going to be any kind of government in the middle east or places like afghanistan without a brutal dictator of some sort. No one has the ability to unify all the warring tribal factions across the region peacefully.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



I hope you're all ready for the election-season appearance of a finalized Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) having to go through this dysfunctional Congress.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/05/b...v=top-news&_r=0

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Mr. Nice! posted:

There isn't going to be any kind of government in the middle east or places like afghanistan without a brutal dictator of some sort. No one has the ability to unify all the warring tribal factions across the region peacefully.

Well yea wasn't claiming we magically fixed that, just taking issue with the use of 'stability' as the be all end all of 'how's this country doing'. We for sure made it oppressive and unstable as opposed to oppressive and stable.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Bolow posted:

If they were taking fire from the Hospital it loses its protected status.

Not necessarily. We'll see how this pans out but just because you took fire from a location doesn't mean you can blow it to hell, even by US military standards.

fknlo
Jul 6, 2009


Fun Shoe
Boehner pushing the funding CR and possibly pushing a debt ceiling raise through will be decent ammo for dems when it happens again in a few months. They'll have proof that if they put them on the floor to a vote that they'd pass. Not like it will make any real difference.

How rare do you think people who are Bernie Sanders supporters but also very anti-black lives matter as well as being Sandy Hook truthers are? Because it seems I used to work with one...

esto es malo
Aug 3, 2006

Don't want to end up a cartoon

In a cartoon graveyard

Hooded Reptile posted:

Sheriff that Laughed about Flash Banging a Toddler, Was Just Shot By Murderous Rogue Cop
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/karma-sheriff-maimed-toddler-shot-murderous-rogue-cop/#ywjblvYzigtp1Jm0.99

Good.

takes a good guy with a gun

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

fknlo posted:

Boehner pushing the funding CR and possibly pushing a debt ceiling raise through will be decent ammo for dems when it happens again in a few months. They'll have proof that if they put them on the floor to a vote that they'd pass. Not like it will make any real difference.

How rare do you think people who are Bernie Sanders supporters but also very anti-black lives matter as well as being Sandy Hook truthers are? Because it seems I used to work with one...

Obama said he won't sign any short term spending bill and I heard that the moderates want to push it through to 2017 to dodge the election entirely.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

fknlo posted:

How rare do you think people who are Bernie Sanders supporters but also very anti-black lives matter as well as being Sandy Hook truthers are? Because it seems I used to work with one...

The first two? Not rare at all. Remember all the "UPPITY BLACKS REALLY SHAMED THE RACE BY DARING TO INTERRUPT BERNIE-SAN" poo poo? Plus the whole 'uh BLM, have you forgotten he marched with MLK? So shut up' habit his supporters still have.

The third one? No idea there.

Aves Maria!
Jul 26, 2008

Maybe I'll drown

Boon posted:

Dude shut the gently caress up, this is Something Awful and he made a ridiculous post that he doesn't literally mean. Quit being a sanctimonious prick

You're not very bright, are you?

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Tatum Girlparts posted:

The first two? Not rare at all. Remember all the "UPPITY BLACKS REALLY SHAMED THE RACE BY DARING TO INTERRUPT BERNIE-SAN" poo poo? Plus the whole 'uh BLM, have you forgotten he marched with MLK? So shut up' habit his supporters still have.

The third one? No idea there.

Maybe not conspiracy theorists specifically but there's a pretty large crossover with guns.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Lotka Volterra posted:

You're not very bright, are you?

Eh, either you're literal or you're trolling in D&D, either way get hosed.

  • Locked thread