Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Kalman posted:

How do you think FinCEN (which is part of Treasury, meaning they're probably the ones who actually talked to Toyota) figure out which individual dealers to talk to? Do you think maybe they ask Toyota about which dealer received specific VINs, and for other details of how vehicles are distributed?

There's a good chance it was OFAC rather than FinCEN talking to Toyota because FinCEN deals with financial crimes and not much in the way of goods being delivered. Once they determine how and where the vehicles are being purchased, FinCEN should be able to tack down who is doing the buying. The only unique information Toyota is probably going to be able to provide is regional at best, since collecting the records from regional dealers will be quicker and inclusive of more of the trail. They've [Toyota] even said the vehicle models seen in pictures all over social media are older, meaning if they even retained the original dealer delivery information after this long there's a fair chance the trail goes cold there. They're better off monitoring banks in Monterey Park and seizing any accounts sending and receiving wires larger than $40k with more than one beneficiary party.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe
If South Korea and Japan had America-loose gun laws there's no way their already high suicide rates wouldn't be even worse.

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.

lol

e: wrong thread, but my point still stands

exmarx fucked around with this message at 01:21 on Oct 8, 2015

Dead Reckoning
Sep 13, 2011

zoux posted:

As little as you think we know about guns, that's how little you know about the causes and prevention of suicide. You obviously haven't even bothered to google "suicide effectiveness by method" as poison is counted along with overdoses and still is less than 2% effective.
Depends on the poison. In the U.S., most attempts are made with pills. In other countries, particularly rural communities, ingestion of pesticides is more common. Parquat is over 60% effective.

esto es malo
Aug 3, 2006

Don't want to end up a cartoon

In a cartoon graveyard


lmao

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



Dead Reckoning posted:

Depends on the poison. In the U.S., most attempts are made with pills. In other countries, particularly rural communities, ingestion of pesticides is more common. Parquat is over 60% effective.

Well, considering this is the USPOL thread, and the conversation was regarding suicide method effectiveness in the US...

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Dead Reckoning posted:

Depends on the poison. In the U.S., most attempts are made with pills. In other countries, particularly rural communities, ingestion of pesticides is more common. Parquat is over 60% effective.

Okay, so you acknowledge that reducing gun access and prevalence would reduce the suicide rate?

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

icantfindaname posted:

Okay, so you acknowledge that reducing gun access and prevalence would reduce the suicide rate?

Rate of fatal suicide attempts.

Homura and Sickle
Apr 21, 2013

FAUXTON posted:

There's a good chance it was OFAC rather than FinCEN talking to Toyota because FinCEN deals with financial crimes and not much in the way of goods being delivered. Once they determine how and where the vehicles are being purchased, FinCEN should be able to tack down who is doing the buying. The only unique information Toyota is probably going to be able to provide is regional at best, since collecting the records from regional dealers will be quicker and inclusive of more of the trail. They've [Toyota] even said the vehicle models seen in pictures all over social media are older, meaning if they even retained the original dealer delivery information after this long there's a fair chance the trail goes cold there. They're better off monitoring banks in Monterey Park and seizing any accounts sending and receiving wires larger than $40k with more than one beneficiary party.

What even are you arguing, that they shouldn't talk to Toyota at all for uh, reasons, even though Toyota has produced the Hilux for decades well aware that it is a tool of insurgency and war? There's even a war called the Toyota War for fucks sake. Is an inquiry such a horrific burden they should just get hosed or what in God's name is your point

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Exclamation Marx posted:


lol

e: wrong thread, but my point still stands

Haha gently caress you Obam-

wait what?

duz
Jul 11, 2005

Come on Ilhan, lets go bag us a shitpost


Nintendo Kid posted:

If South Korea and Japan had America-loose gun laws there's no way their already high suicide rates wouldn't be even worse.

I like the story, probably from Freakanomics, about how the year after a popular movie in Japan that featured a suicide using a non-common method, the number of suicides increased by the number of people committing suicide by that method. Meaning these were people who wouldn't have (successfully) committed suicide otherwise.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Dead Reckoning posted:

Depends on the poison. In the U.S., most attempts are made with pills. In other countries, particularly rural communities, ingestion of pesticides is more common. Parquat is over 60% effective.

Thanks for bringing up a really good example

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128980

quote:

The annual suicide rate in South Korea is the highest among the developed countries. Paraquat is a highly lethal herbicide, commonly used in South Korea as a means for suicide. We have studied the effect of the 2011 paraquat prohibition on the national suicide rate and method of suicide in South Korea. We obtained the monthly suicide rate from 2005 to 2013 in South Korea. In our analyses, we adjusted for the effects of celebrity suicides, and economic, meteorological, and seasonal factors on suicide rate. We employed change point analysis to determine the effect of paraquat prohibition on suicide rate over time, and the results were verified by structural change analysis, an alternative statistical method. After the paraquat prohibition period in South Korea, there was a significant reduction in the total suicide rate and suicide rate by poisoning with herbicides or fungicides in all age groups and in both genders. The estimated suicide rates during this period decreased by 10.0% and 46.1% for total suicides and suicides by poisoning of herbicides or fungicides, respectively. In addition, method substitution effect of paraquat prohibition was found in suicide by poisoning by carbon monoxide, which did not exceed the reduction in the suicide rate of poisoning with herbicides or fungicides. In South Korea, paraquat prohibition led to a lower rate of suicide by paraquat poisoning, as well as a reduction in the overall suicide rate. Paraquat prohibition should be considered as a national suicide prevention strategy in developing and developed countries alongside careful observation for method substitution effects.

Tender Bender
Sep 17, 2004

Dead Reckoning posted:

Can you explain why Japan and South Korea have higher suicides rates than the U.S. then? Means of suicide are often culturally driven, but suicide itself exists across cultures. If you magic-wanded away all guns tomorrow, you'd probably see a dip, but it would trend back up as people moved on to insecticide or exit bags or whatever. More to the point, why focus on guns when more general suicide prevention strategies and mental health treatment are more likely to be effective and agnostic to method?


Because there's more than one factor at play here, no poo poo suicide can still happen without a gun. Jesus Christ. The knots you people will tie yourselves in to protect your killing toys are absurd.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006


Guns are different *waves hands in front of you mysteriously*

Proust Malone
Apr 4, 2008

A Winner is Jew posted:

You joke, but this is literally what a ton of preachers will tell you the punishment for Cain was since it was made popular in the 1800's and lasted up until about 70-80 years ago.

Until discriminatory practices threatened their tax exempt status. Then Jesus was totally cool with race mixing.

Tender Bender
Sep 17, 2004

Owning a gun is a very deep and important thing to me, that's why it's very important that I be able to walk to the store and buy one immediately with as little oversight and regulation as possible.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Dapper_Swindler posted:

whats webster's deal, other then i am assuming being a nutjob.

Edit: oh gently caress, he is a nutjob. like duggar style nutjob.

The Washington Post did a short bio on Webster in January, when Jim Jordan and Gowdy tried to use him in their coup against Boehner. Webster has some conservative credentials, including close involvement with the Terri Schiavo case, but he is very much not not a Tea Party candidate. Webster is known for hosting bipartisan dinners and lamenting the polarization in Congress. Heritage gives him just a 77 on its conservative scorecard. His pitch for the position is to get Congress working together by reorganizing it on district lines rather than party lines. His pitch also involves decentralization, but he very much wants to resolve the ongoing deadlock.

The Freedom Caucus's endorsement is very much a parliamentary move aimed at humiliating the establishment as opposed to an ideological pick. Webster's run was almost certainly motivated by a desire to give McCarthy some token opposition and to avoid allegations that Boehner was strong-arming the House into an establishment pick. Until today, Webster had no support whatsoever and was expected to get single-digit support on the House floor. He's a rank-and-file Congressman with no real leadership aspirations.

It's telling that the Freedom Caucus didn't endorse Chaffetz, who is considerably more conservative and is running an actual campaign. While Chaffetz has a long-shot at the Speaker's podium, it's still a shot and the Freedom Caucus's endorsement could have theoretically snowballed into a full coup. By endorsing Webster, the Freedom Caucus ensures that no one will have enough votes in the Republican Party's secret ballot.

I should also mention that all three candidates for Speaker met with the Freedom Caucus privately yesterday to give their pitch. I would suspect that McCarthy failed to offer enough concessions and the Caucus are using Webster to force McCarthy back to the negotiation table. McCarthy can concede to Freedom Caucus commands or watch his career explode brilliantly in front of the entire country.

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.
People generally don't really want to kill themselves, so even minor obstacles can have great effect. For example barriers on bridges, or changes in pill packaging:

quote:

The research, published in the British Medical Journal today, shows that suicidal deaths from paracetamol and aspirin fell by 22 percentage points in the year after pack sizes were reduced in September 1998. The reduction in suicides continued over the next two years.

Non-fatal overdoses were also reduced: by 20% for paracetamol and 39% for aspirin in three years. As a result, liver transplants and admissions to hospitals for paracetamol poisoning saw a 30% fall in the four years after the laws came into force.

But over the same period, overdoses from ibuprofen, which was not covered by the legislation, increased by 27% - although the number of deaths stayed the same.

The research showed that between 1996 and 1998, there were 364 deaths as a result of paracetamol or aspirin overdose. This had fallen to 274 in the years 1999 to 2001.

Deaths by aspirin saw a 46% fall, while paracetamol-induced deaths fell less sharply, by 29%. However, paracetamol overdoses are far more common.

The legislation, which came into effect in 1998, reduced the previously unrestricted sale limit for pharmacies to 32 tablets, and for other retail outlets from 24 to 16 tablets. They must be sold in blister packs, not bottles.

The aim was to reduce household stocks of analgesic drugs. Although there is nothing to stop someone buying two packs of painkillers, doctors say people usually attempt to commit suicide on impulse and use whatever they can find in the home.

Suicide rates overall fell during the period (a 12% fall for men and a seven-point fall for women), but these reductions were outstripped by the reductions in fatal painkiller overdoses.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

QuoProQuid posted:

The Washington Post did a short bio on Webster in January, when Jim Jordan and Gowdy tried to use him in their coup against Boehner. Webster has some conservative credentials, including close involvement with the Terri Schiavo case, but he is very much not not a Tea Party candidate. Webster is known for hosting bipartisan dinners and lamenting the polarization in Congress. Heritage gives him just a 77 on its conservative scorecard. His pitch for the position is to get Congress working together by reorganizing it on district lines rather than party lines. His pitch also involves decentralization, but he very much wants to resolve the ongoing deadlock.

The Freedom Caucus's endorsement is very much a parliamentary move aimed at humiliating the establishment as opposed to an ideological pick. Webster's run was almost certainly motivated by a desire to give McCarthy some token opposition and to avoid allegations that Boehner was strong-arming the House into an establishment pick. Until today, Webster had no support whatsoever and was expected to get single-digit support on the House floor. He's a rank-and-file Congressman with no real leadership aspirations.

It's telling that the Freedom Caucus didn't endorse Chaffetz, who is considerably more conservative and is running an actual campaign. While Chaffetz has a long-shot at the Speaker's podium, it's still a shot and the Freedom Caucus's endorsement could have theoretically snowballed into a full coup. By endorsing Webster, the Freedom Caucus ensures that no one will have enough votes in the Republican Party's secret ballot.

I should also mention that all three candidates for Speaker met with the Freedom Caucus privately yesterday to give their pitch. I would suspect that McCarthy failed to offer enough concessions and the Caucus are using Webster to force McCarthy back to the negotiation table. McCarthy can concede to Freedom Caucus commands or watch his career explode brilliantly in front of the entire country.

so basically it will now probably drag out for a stupid amount of time.

Spaceman Future!
Feb 9, 2007

Exclamation Marx posted:

People generally don't really want to kill themselves, so even minor obstacles can have great effect. For example barriers on bridges, or changes in pill packaging:

A little while back I was listening to interviews from some survivors of suicide attempts off the golden gate bridge and the one common element, without fail, was the immediate and irreversible regret they all had during the plunge. With the rare exception people would rather life just be better than be dead.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Dapper_Swindler posted:

so basically it will now probably drag out for a stupid amount of time.

p much.


Essentially, the Tea Party is playing chicken with the Establishment. We joke about how the Freedom Caucus is full of raving loons but many members have embraced that image as a bargaining tool. The Freedom Caucus is using Nixon's Madman Theory. By making themselves seem irrational and volatile, they can exert substantial influence on House politics and force McCarthy to make agreements he would otherwise dismiss to avoid political catastrophe.

The worst case scenario would be for McCarthy to call the Freedom Caucus's bluff and refuse to renegotiate. While the Freedom Caucus has endorsed Webster, actually voting for him is very different and the caucus might not be able to ensure discipline within its own ranks. If Webster calls their bluff and is wrong, then we'll see both McCarthy and the Freedom Caucus annihilate one another on the House floor.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

They aren't playing chicken because they really want to shut the government down. In fact the leader of the freedom Caucus said today they aren't playing chicken.

They are suicidal. Or a malignant cancer idk.

Franco Potente
Jul 9, 2010

QuoProQuid posted:

p much.


Essentially, the Tea Party is playing chicken with the Establishment. We joke about how the Freedom Caucus is full of raving loons but many members have embraced that image as a bargaining tool. The Freedom Caucus is using Nixon's Madman Theory. By making themselves seem irrational and volatile, they can exert substantial influence on House politics and force McCarthy to make agreements he would otherwise dismiss to avoid political catastrophe.

The worst case scenario would be for McCarthy to call the Freedom Caucus's bluff and refuse to renegotiate. While the Freedom Caucus has endorsed Webster, actually voting for him is very different and the caucus might not be able to ensure discipline within its own ranks. If Webster calls their bluff and is wrong, then we'll see both McCarthy and the Freedom Caucus annihilate one another on the House floor.

That'll separate the wheat....from the Chaff. :getin:

nachos
Jun 27, 2004

Wario Chalmers! WAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
They're stuck. They've cultivated this madman image and sold it to their voters and now they have to stick to it or someone more insane will primary them.

Filthy Hans
Jun 27, 2008

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 10 years!)

Nintendo Kid posted:

If South Korea and Japan had America-loose gun laws there's no way their already high suicide rates wouldn't be even worse.

Nah, I bet Seppuku is plenty effective

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Dead Reckoning posted:

Depends on the poison. In the U.S., most attempts are made with pills. In other countries, particularly rural communities, ingestion of pesticides is more common. Parquat is over 60% effective.

So if every person who attempts suicide with a gun instead uses a restricted availability pesticide, the survival rate will only more than double? Sounds great!

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

Filthy Hans posted:

Nah, I bet Seppuku is plenty effective

I thought hanging was the preferred method.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

icantfindaname posted:

Okay, so you acknowledge that reducing gun access and prevalence would reduce the suicide rate?

i think he acknowledges it, but sees an increased suicide rate as just the blood that waters the tree of freedom

it is well and good that veterans shoulder most of the burden of this effort, laying down their lives in the struggle against the national debt

e: it is odd to me though that the most vocal and stubborn pro-gun poster ITT is also the most pro-human death. no, what's the opposite of odd? it makes total sense actually

Gin and Juche
Apr 3, 2008

The Highest Judge of Paradise
Shiki Eiki
YAMAXANADU

Popular Thug Drink posted:

i think he acknowledges it, but sees an increased suicide rate as just the blood that waters the tree of freedom

it is well and good that veterans shoulder most of the burden of this effort, laying down their lives in the struggle against the national debt

e: it is odd to me though that the most vocal and stubborn pro-gun poster ITT is also the most pro-human death. no, what's the opposite of odd? it makes total sense actually

Isn't "those that live by the sword will die by the sword" a commandment?

Boon
Jun 21, 2005

by R. Guyovich

nachos posted:

They're stuck. They've cultivated this madman image and sold it to their voters and now they have to stick to it or someone more insane will primary them.

I bet that's pretty liberating.

ellie the beep
Jun 15, 2007

Vaginas, my subject.
Plane hulls, my medium.

Gravel Gravy posted:

Isn't "those that live by the sword will die by the sword" a commandment?

not a commandment, an observation. in the garden of gethsemane the sanhedrin guards rolled up after the bad judas (not thaddeus) frenched the christ and the first pope was not having this interruption of homo lust so he straight-up sliced off the ear of a guard. jesus (being famously forgiving) told him that was Not On and put the ear back on the guard with his god magic. jesus told off peter for being an idiot and said 'those who live by the sword, die by the sword'.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Boon posted:

I bet that's pretty liberating.

It'd be funny if we all weren't tied to the luggage rack.

McAlister
Nov 3, 2002

by exmarx

James Garfield posted:

So if every person who attempts suicide with a gun instead uses a restricted availability pesticide, the survival rate will only more than double? Sounds great!

We don't need to look at other countries. We have a natural experiment in the U.S. already. MRA's make a big deal that the male suicide rate is significantly higher than the female in the U.S.

They do not make a big deal of the fact that this statistic is because even though women are vastly more likely to attempt suicide we are conditioned socially to use ineffective methods like overdose and slitting ones wrists. Men, however, are vastly more likely to use guns to kill themselves. And guns are really effective, so they lead the body count even though they trail the attempts.

I attempted suicide at 15 and slitting your wrists first of all is hard to do and secondly you've got to just sit there for an extended time not binding them while your adrenaline spikes and releases happy cutting endorphins that make you feel like things aren't that bad.

If I'd had a gun I'd be dead.

Caros
May 14, 2008

McAlister posted:

We don't need to look at other countries. We have a natural experiment in the U.S. already. MRA's make a big deal that the male suicide rate is significantly higher than the female in the U.S.

They do not make a big deal of the fact that this statistic is because even though women are vastly more likely to attempt suicide we are conditioned socially to use ineffective methods like overdose and slitting ones wrists. Men, however, are vastly more likely to use guns to kill themselves. And guns are really effective, so they lead the body count even though they trail the attempts.

I attempted suicide at 15 and slitting your wrists first of all is hard to do and secondly you've got to just sit there for an extended time not binding them while your adrenaline spikes and releases happy cutting endorphins that make you feel like things aren't that bad.

If I'd had a gun I'd be dead.

:(:respek::(

Push El Burrito
May 9, 2006

Soiled Meat
Every time I see something about the high suicide number of veterans I like to point out that the military already investigated it and found that restricting their access to firearms worked pretty well.

It's fun to see if they really care about ARE TROOPS more than ARE GUNS.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

BUBBA GAY DUDLEY posted:

Every time I see something about the high suicide number of veterans I like to point out that the military already investigated it and found that restricting their access to firearms worked pretty well.

It's fun to see if they really care about ARE TROOPS more than ARE GUNS.

You got a link?

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
Wait so there may be a situation where no one get's elected speaker because of the Freedom Caucus or has the extreme right viewed this as their way to seize more power?

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

Hollismason posted:

Wait so there may be a situation where no one get's elected speaker because of the Freedom Caucus or has the extreme right viewed this as their way to seize more power?

Yes there are situations where no one gets elected on the first ballot. No, this doesn't mean we never have another speaker til next election, it just means the Democrats start to hold serious power

Push El Burrito
May 9, 2006

Soiled Meat

zoux posted:

You got a link?

http://www.stripes.com/news/experts-restricting-troops-access-to-firearms-is-necessary-to-reduce-rate-of-suicides-1.199216

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

foobardog
Apr 19, 2007

There, now I can tell when you're posting.

-- A friend :)

Nintendo Kid posted:

Yes there are situations where no one gets elected on the first ballot. No, this doesn't mean we never have another speaker til next election, it just means the Democrats start to hold serious power

Elect Keith Ellison as Speaker, all the idiots commit suicide in fear of him implementing Sharia law, Congress gets back to giving handjobs to the rich.

  • Locked thread