Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Are you a
This poll is closed.
homeowner 39 22.41%
renter 69 39.66%
stupid peace of poo poo 66 37.93%
Total: 174 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

Do you say you've "done wees"?

to my kids I would I gue ss

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Varkk
Apr 17, 2004

Butt Wizard posted:

Rugby players don't have a monopoly on being complete turds to women though, and talking about it like it's a causal connection is overlooking the fact it's a very big problem in a bunch of different communities that have gently caress all to do with rugby. Like yea, I get it, the old 50s stereotypes are entrenched, but there's a bunch of kids and women regularly getting the bash from partners who have never stepped foot in a rugby clubroom in their life.

Yes, but it seems that people who are good at sport, or peripherally connected to it, especially rugby, seem to get preferential treatment if they ever see the inside of a courtroom.

whiter than a Wilco show
Mar 30, 2011

by FactsAreUseless

Butt Wizard posted:

Rugby players don't have a monopoly on being complete turds to women though, and talking about it like it's a causal connection is overlooking the fact it's a very big problem in a bunch of different communities that have gently caress all to do with rugby. Like yea, I get it, the old 50s stereotypes are entrenched, but there's a bunch of kids and women regularly getting the bash from partners who have never stepped foot in a rugby clubroom in their life.

I can name a rugby player who got away with shooting an endangered seal in the face, can you name a non rugby player who did the same? Or any human being who broke a woman's back and received no jail time, retained a high paying job, and had dozens of strangers leaping to their defense? This whole "you nerds just don't like ruggers cause you got bullied" bullshit you love to drag out is a massive part of the problem. New Zealander's meat head culture inherently links sports, violence, and dislike of the 'weak'

whiter than a Wilco show
Mar 30, 2011

by FactsAreUseless

Varkk posted:

Yes, but it seems that people who are good at sport, or peripherally connected to it, especially rugby, seem to get preferential treatment if they ever see the inside of a courtroom.

This is way more succinct and eloquent

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!

SurreptitiousMuffin posted:

We could try democratic elections. Look, apparently untouchable right-wing shitheads who were on a ridiculous winning streak can get taken down:

http://globalnews.ca/news/2286815/trudeau-wins-heres-what-hes-promised-and-what-hes-set-to-face/

I appreciate that, mate. But this is feeling more and more like "Exception proves the rule" every passing week.

Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

Infotainment! posted:

I can name a rugby player who got away with shooting an endangered seal in the face, can you name a non rugby player who did the same? Or any human being who broke a woman's back and received no jail time, retained a high paying job, and had dozens of strangers leaping to their defense? This whole "you nerds just don't like ruggers cause you got bullied" bullshit you love to drag out is a massive part of the problem. New Zealander's meat head culture inherently links sports, violence, and dislike of the 'weak'

Can you point out to me where I said it was a case of nerds not liking rugby because they have a chip on their shoulder about being bullied?

Varkk posted:

Yes, but it seems that people who are good at sport, or peripherally connected to it, especially rugby, seem to get preferential treatment if they ever see the inside of a courtroom.

Yea, I agree and it fucks me off immensely when people who are on $120K contracts at the age of 20 get light slaps on the wrist for beating someone who doesn't have the strength of a professional athlete into a bloody pulp in a nightclub.

But there's also businessmen who get name suppression or light sentences for drunk driving or discharged because a conviction would mean they can't travel where as a person of a lower socioeconomic persuasion has a much lower chance of getting anything near a comparable amount of leniency.

My point is more the rugby stereotype is there for some very good reasons and it's why the 'It's Not OK' stuff has a bunch of sporting tie-ins, but just putting the 'meathead' label doesn't do anything but put a label on it - at some point you have to start looking at why you're creating so many shitheads who buy into it in the first place.

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



Varkk posted:

Yes, but it seems that people who are good at sport, or peripherally connected to it, especially rugby, seem to get preferential treatment if they ever see the inside of a courtroom.
Because a conviction ends their professional career due to the necessity of overseas travel.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/65532499/tevita-li-discharged-without-conviction-for-drink-driving-offence posted:

Super Rugby player Tevita Li has been discharged without conviction for driving with excess blood alcohol the morning after he had been drinking.
...
Today Judge Andree Wiltens described Li as having a "stellar" career that could eventually lead to place in the All Blacks.

"A conviction against your name would have consequences in the sense that people who are involved in the recruitment of rugby players look with disdain on people with convictions, regardless of what they're for," he said.

http://www.3news.co.nz/sport/george-moala-avoids-conviction-for-auckland-assault-2015050615#axzz3p69ndgU0 posted:

Blues rugby star George Moala has been discharged without conviction for assaulting a man in a boozy Auckland bar attack in 2012.
...
Mr Wicks QC told the Judge Moala's rugby contract stated he must be able to travel overseas for games – something a conviction could prevent.

"This is his career," he told the court.
...
Judge Ronayne said if Moala lost his job it would be "devastating" for his immediate young family.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11372289 posted:

The victim, according to police, made disparaging remarks about McDowall's Taieri Rugby Football Club, which boasts former All Blacks Arran Pene and John Timu as old boys. Otago under-19 player McDowall was angered and punched the man in his mouth.

The victim suffered a fractured jaw, cuts, and lost a tooth.

At Dunedin District Court this week, Judge Kevin Phillips said a conviction would end any possibility of a professional rugby career for amateur colts player McDowall.

Instead, he granted a discharge without conviction and ordered him to pay $3000 in emotional harm reparation.
I'm personally happy with someone losing their career of professional sports playing because they assaulted someone, but there's at least a reason beyond "rugby's great" even if that reason is "having rugby as a career will almost certainly get you off anything below manslaughter due to judges' aversion to removing a person's ability to earn, even if only speculatively".

klen dool
May 7, 2007

Okay well me being wrong in some limited situations doesn't change my overall point.
I, personally, have avoided conviction (much to the disappointment of the cop) for an offence because of the damage it would do to my career which was just starting at the time.

Granted, it was a non-violent offence, I broke a bottle on the street across the road from about 10 cops. But it wouldn't have been justice for me to loose a job because of something dumb. If I had been convicted, I may have not gotten the job, but I would have gotten another eventually.

As much as I hate double standards, and ruggers, for someone to loose a 10-20 year career (which would happen to an all black because they couldn't go overseas) for drink driving wouldn't be justice either.

This line of reasoning leads me to an uncomfortable conclusion though. It leads to saying its justice for someone who works as a farm hand or freezing worker to get a conviction because it won't harm their career - because careers immune to convictions are often "poor people jobs" the effect is discriminatory. I dunno.

But gently caress Tony Veitch.

Somfin
Oct 25, 2010

In my🦚 experience🛠️ the big things🌑 don't teach you anything🤷‍♀️.

Nap Ghost

Exclamation Marx posted:

This morning Key said he had not yet been invited to appear on Oliver's show, despite the British comedian's apparent "fascination" with his utterings.

"He is describing that as the greatest political interview of all time. And I reckon if he enjoys it so much he should come down and be part of the post-Cabinet press conference."

:pray: please let him respond

Oliver let him off easy, he didn't even show the j/o question

Oliver would have a loving field day with him if he went for it. It'd be a slaughter. Oliver would probably just start with the ponytail thing and let Key fumble for an answer before asking about the TPP, and then just call him out every time he said "at the end of the day."

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

klen dool posted:

This line of reasoning leads me to an uncomfortable conclusion though. It leads to saying its justice for someone who works as a farm hand or freezing worker to get a conviction because it won't harm their career - because careers immune to convictions are often "poor people jobs" the effect is discriminatory. I dunno.

It's almost as if criminal justice is an incredibly murky and grey area and not really a black and white issue resolvable through death by guillotine for everyone we don't like.

If it weren't rugby it'd be something else, rugby just happens to be particularly popular here. In the US it's NFL/NBA, in europe it's soccer and so on, and that's not mentioning entertainers. Any high profile, high paying career that turns someone into a 'star' inevitably leads to perversions of justice so that the sweaty masses get to see their heroes on stage/screen/field without having pesky prison sentences get in the way.

Fame and wealth, not sports, are the catalyst for the system breaking down for certain individuals.

As usual it's just plain ol' gently caress the poors and has little to do with violent sports or athletic worship or any of that other poo poo people get so wound up about.

whiter than a Wilco show
Mar 30, 2011

by FactsAreUseless
I dunno, I can't seem to find any examples of visual artists or authors in the same position?

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Lol if you think visual artists and authors are famous stars like sports players and actors are.

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free
I'm pretty sure constantly letting these high profile (or might-be-because-rugby) people off with no conviction is the reason it keeps happening.

Seeing someone lose their high profile career over beating their partner might at least show these fuckheads that this poo poo will ruin your life as bad as you ruin the person you pummel.

But then One News wouldn't get to have an interview with them after The Big Game so no can do.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

I don't have any interest in rugby whatsoever (the marketing barrage is loving infuriating tbh) but the butthurt pent-up anti-sport rage in this thread is pretty incredible. You can't just will causation into existence just because there's correlation between something bad and something you don't like.

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free

Slavvy posted:

I don't have any interest in rugby whatsoever (the marketing barrage is loving infuriating tbh) but the butthurt pent-up anti-sport rage in this thread is pretty incredible. You can't just will causation into existence just because there's correlation between something bad and something you don't like.

Yes there's certainly no link between high profile rugby players getting let off serious crimes due to them being high profile rugby players.





:psyduck:

swampland
Oct 16, 2007

Dear Mr Cave, if you do not release the bats we will be forced to take legal action
If I get my own radio show am I allowed to cripple tony veitch

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

Yes there's certainly no link between high profile rugby playersfamous rich cunts getting let off serious crimes due to them being high profile rugby players.famous rich cunts.

FTFY.

Moongrave
Jun 19, 2004

Finally Living Rent Free

swampland posted:

If I get my own radio show am I allowed to cripple tony veitch

Yes but only if you date him and talk about how his spine is a game of two halves.

swampland
Oct 16, 2007

Dear Mr Cave, if you do not release the bats we will be forced to take legal action

BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:

Yes but only if you date him and talk about how his spine is a game of two halves.

Oh good. Proposed Goon Project: Let's Get Famous Enough to Break Tony Veitch's Spine with Impunity

SurreptitiousMuffin
Mar 21, 2010
I dunno why goons are so worried about Veitchy. We're protected on stairs after all.

Butt Wizard
Nov 3, 2005

It was a pornography store. I was buying pornography.

Infotainment! posted:

I dunno, I can't seem to find any examples of visual artists or authors in the same position?

People cut Barry Crump a bunch of slack for beating the poo poo out of his partner(s) when it first came out but I'm guessing it's also a big reason why you don't hear much about Barry Crump any more (that and being dead). Other than Margaret Mahy being convicted for drunk-driving, I'm drawing a blank too.

whiter than a Wilco show
Mar 30, 2011

by FactsAreUseless

swampland posted:

Oh good. Proposed Goon Project: Let's Get Famous Enough to Break Tony Veitch's Spine with Impunity

In all seriousness someone should challenge him to a celebrity boxing match with the proceeds going to women's refuge.

And then kick him down some stairs.

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

Butt Wizard posted:

People cut Barry Crump a bunch of slack for beating the poo poo out of his partner(s) when it first came out but I'm guessing it's also a big reason why you don't hear much about Barry Crump any more (that and being dead). Other than Margaret Mahy being convicted for drunk-driving, I'm drawing a blank too.

It's probably because intellectuals aren't considered public figures to the same extent that sports and entertainment personalities are in this country. That doesn't mean rugby players are somehow more prone to violence or get more slack, it just means that what makes people famous in NZ is the same as what makes people famous in every other country: dumb poo poo that doesn't matter.

Comrade Blyatlov
Aug 4, 2007


should have picked four fingers





Butt Wizard posted:

People cut Barry Crump a bunch of slack for beating the poo poo out of his partner(s) when it first came out but I'm guessing it's also a big reason why you don't hear much about Barry Crump any more (that and being dead). Other than Margaret Mahy being convicted for drunk-driving, I'm drawing a blank too.

eh i've said to people barry crump sums up new zealand perfectly, both the good and the bad
on the one hand, he did some really cool poo poo and was a lot of things nz values - hardworking, independent, outdoorsy, etc
on the other, here's a direct quote
actually it's gonna be a series of quotes from crocodile country

barry crump posted:

I'm always having to pull her into gear over giving cheek like that.

She was getting cheekier than ever. It was about time a joker showed her who was boss of this outfit.
i can't find the exact passage right now but he says something about a joker had to give her one every now and then, straight out says he hits her

guy could spin a pretty good yarn and had clearly done a lot of living, but unfortunately he was also a wife beater

Brain In A Jar
Apr 21, 2008

SurreptitiousMuffin posted:

I dunno why goons are so worried about Veitchy. We're protected on stairs after all.

I am emphatically not.

bobbilljim
May 29, 2013

this christmas feels like the very first christmas to me
:shittydog::shittydog::shittydog:
Veitch is mentally ill

Ghostlight
Sep 25, 2009

maybe for one second you can pause; try to step into another person's perspective, and understand that a watermelon is cursing me



I hope his mental illness is chronic depression.

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

the problem isnt that rugby players get let off domestic violence charges, the problem is that in general our justice system is poo poo at dealing with domestic violence. The rugby players just happen to be the ones in the news because "barry from down the road's" case isn't newsworthy

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
yes

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy
there's probably still a decent chunk that thinks minor domestic violence is a bit like menstruation, as in no one likes it, but it's life and just should be tolerated dont make a fuss

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
So like School shootings in the States? I dunno if we wanna let things slide that far.

voiceless anal fricative
May 6, 2007

WarpedNaba posted:

So like School shootings in the States? I dunno if we wanna let things slide that far.

no because that implies its a new problem and its not

whiter than a Wilco show
Mar 30, 2011

by FactsAreUseless
Lol, just lol if you think rugby players are actually new zealand's most famous celebrities. Somehow Karl Urban, Peter Jackson, Lucy Lawless et al manage not to assault people on the reg.

Comrade Blyatlov
Aug 4, 2007


should have picked four fingers





echinopsis posted:

there's probably still a decent chunk that thinks minor domestic violence is a bit like menstruation, as in no one likes it, but it's life and just should be tolerated dont make a fuss

There's no probably about it. This is more or less the exact reason why domestic violence can exist. It is a massive problem.

Varkk
Apr 17, 2004

echinopsis posted:

there's probably still a decent chunk that thinks minor domestic violence is a bit like menstruation, as in no one likes it, but it's life and just should be tolerated dont make a fuss

Going back to Barry Crump. He comes from a time when a man hitting his wife if she stepped out of line was considered the good and proper thing to do. Just like hitting kids who misbehaved. Fortunately we have moved on from then but there are still a lot who cling to that mindset and are violently resistant to change.

exmarx
Feb 18, 2012


The experience over the years
of nothing getting better
only worse.


Butt Wizard posted:

People cut Barry Crump a bunch of slack for beating the poo poo out of his partner(s) when it first came out but I'm guessing it's also a big reason why you don't hear much about Barry Crump any more (that and being dead). Other than Margaret Mahy being convicted for drunk-driving, I'm drawing a blank too.

There was also Graham Brazier, but maybe musicians are closer to sportspeople in terms of apologist fans

echinopsis
Apr 13, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Varkk posted:

Just like hitting kids who misbehaved.

This brings in an interesting angle, to an extent. I was smacked as a child, and I don't really want to defend it as such but there is a chasm of difference between being smacked and being beaten. A large grey difficult to define chasm. I bet a lot of people see domestic violence the same way. Once were warriors style beatdowns are a definite no no but a slap? Not saying it's ok but it's very different and there is a lot of undiscussed psychological abuse going on which is significantly worse but doesn't get the same attention

Of course you can't have a reasonable discussion down those lines because most people like their poo poo black and white...

Comrade Blyatlov
Aug 4, 2007


should have picked four fingers





echinopsis posted:

This brings in an interesting angle, to an extent. I was smacked as a child, and I don't really want to defend it as such but there is a chasm of difference between being smacked and being beaten. A large grey difficult to define chasm. I bet a lot of people see domestic violence the same way. Once were warriors style beatdowns are a definite no no but a slap? Not saying it's ok but it's very different and there is a lot of undiscussed psychological abuse going on which is significantly worse but doesn't get the same attention

Of course you can't have a reasonable discussion down those lines because most people like their poo poo black and white...

The way crump describes it is like disciplining a dog basically - give it a smack to keep it in line. I don't think he beat the poo poo out of her - or he doesn't want it to be seen that way - but I really don't think that was too far out of the ordinary back then.

I do remember my stepmother telling me that her mother had said to count herself lucky if she finds a man who doesn't hit her.

Ratios and Tendency
Apr 23, 2010

:swoon: MURALI :swoon:


Infotainment! posted:

Lol, just lol if you think rugby players are actually new zealand's most famous celebrities. Somehow Karl Urban, Peter Jackson, Lucy Lawless et al manage not to assault people on the reg.

You haven't seen the Hobbit films I take it?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
They made me want to assault Peter Jackson, but I'unno if that's on the same level.

  • Locked thread