|
he has Kurds in his way
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 12:24 |
|
|
Harald posted:he has Kurds in his way I'm laughing too hard at this
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 05:32
|
|
|
Is Trump jesus?
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 07:15
|
|
|
No, he wouldn't let himself be crucified like some kind of low-energy loser if Trump was Jesus then Jesus would have been made emperor of the romans by popular acclaim
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 14:52
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:No, he wouldn't let himself be crucified like some kind of low-energy loser Ave Trump Invictus!
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 15:48
|
|
|
What do y'all think is the RNC's plan to destroy Trump in the next three months?
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 17:30
|
|
|
Ramrod Hotshot posted:What do y'all think is the RNC's plan to destroy Trump in the next three months? They're hoping that he simply loses interest in being president or that his campaign runs out of money. Or that he has a spiritual awakening and realizes he needs to fall in line with the RNC's wishes for the good of the party he's spent (at least) the last decade hosting very successful fundraisers for.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 17:42
|
|
|
Ramrod Hotshot posted:What do y'all think is the RNC's plan to destroy Trump in the next three months? Pretty much the Roman Empire's plan for Attila.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
Ramrod Hotshot posted:What do y'all think is the RNC's plan to destroy Trump in the next three months? Trump faces near-back-to-back debates on 10/28 and 11/10. Trump had plenty of time to recover from his last one, but they'd hope having two in quick succession will give twice the chance of a stumping.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 18:18
|
|
|
If tweets were punches.... I don't even know how 2020 can possibly top this year.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Trump faces near-back-to-back debates on 10/28 and 11/10. Trump had plenty of time to recover from his last one, but they'd hope having two in quick succession will give twice the chance of a stumping. the chance of stumping a trump is zero
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Trump faces near-back-to-back debates on 10/28 and 11/10. Trump had plenty of time to recover from his last one, but they'd hope having two in quick succession will give twice the chance of a stumping. Trump said he was really unhappy about the last one. What if he really nails these two?
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
Trump could hold a livestream that was just him speaking to camera or being interviewed at the same time as the republican debates if he refused to attend and he would get more ratings than them
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
Ramrod Hotshot posted:What do y'all think is the RNC's plan to destroy Trump in the next three months? tactical nukular hairpiece
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:Ave Trump Invictus! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:
I'm listening to trump on fox now and he's just owning them left and right he loving rules.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
 Also this makes me want to make a set where they let Trump dictate what he wanted but he didn't really get the rules and wanted all expensive gold cards and that when they asked what colours he wanted to use he said "all of them." But I'll probably just stop here. e2: A theme deck would be pretty funny though. Hodgepodge has issued a correction as of 20:13 on Oct 20, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
^^^^^ a deck thats half walls, half un
InsanityIsCrazy has issued a correction as of 20:20 on Oct 20, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
he is killing everyone in the polls, everyone and when he is elected he will kill everyone.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 20:33
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:he is killing everyone in the polls, everyone and when he is elected he will kill everyone. I want the Bernie Trump debates so bad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 20:35
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:he is killing everyone in the polls, everyone and when he is elected he will kill everyone. About god-damned time. Trumpocalypse Now!
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 20:38
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:he is killing everyone in the polls, everyone and when he is elected he will kill everyone. That would be Trump's flavour text on his card, which would be yoouge and glorious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
Murder me, Trump.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 21:01
|
|
|
Ramrod Hotshot posted:What do y'all think is the RNC's plan to destroy Trump in the next three months? Serious answer: Massive negative ad buys in primary states. Comedy answer: prayer and drinking.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
 DO U WANT TO DIE?!!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 21:33
|
|
|
Massive negative ad buys are not going to work at all. Trump will get tons of chances to respond in the media, can point out the obvious telegraphing of the attacks by the Establishment, and use social media to defeat any ad campaign. The only way to defeat Trump is to ignore him or join him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 21:37
|
|
|
Grand Theft Autobot posted:Massive negative ad buys are not going to work at all. Trump will get tons of chances to respond in the media, can point out the obvious telegraphing of the attacks by the Establishment, and use social media to defeat any ad campaign. I think you'll see that according to this statistical model our attacks will work just fine 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 21:39
|
|
|
Trump is no 'real' conservative, which is why Bush can't beat him to the middle. Poor far right does not even realize that they are ones being shut out. That is also why Trump can get elected. Go Trump, you wonderful RINO! No Party politics gonna shut him down. The Populist Trump is in this for himself, and that may just be how someone gets us out of this mess without the stupid Blane game! W. Haters and Clinton haters take note: you have no more power.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Trump faces near-back-to-back debates on 10/28 and 11/10. Trump had plenty of time to recover from his last one, but they'd hope having two in quick succession will give twice the chance of a stumping. Great. Trump can rock everyone on the 28th and then KO them 2 weeks later while they're still wobbly.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 00:31
|
|
|
I don't think it's controversial to say that, not only are ad buys still effective, but Trump is not immune to all negative ads. I haven't seen an effective attack ad against Trump but that doesn't mean that one doesn't exist. I think people are throwing the towel in on this way too easily, considering the last few election cycles.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 01:01
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:I don't think it's controversial to say that, not only are ad buys still effective, but Trump is not immune to all negative ads. I haven't seen an effective attack ad against Trump but that doesn't mean that one doesn't exist. I think people are throwing the towel in on this way too easily, considering the last few election cycles. You can attack Trump on Trump university because it was ridiculous and is in ongoing litigation. Everything else is a waste. He has been a luxurious dick-head, air-horn since before I was born. We all know everything about him. His loud, obnoxious behavior is his inoculation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
By the way, the 11/10 debate is on Fox Business, Fox News' nerdy kid brother. Since pretty much nobody knows Fox Business even exists, you can bet the moderators will be desperate to make a name for themselves. The moderators might try to Stump the Trump too. Trump beat Fox News, but Fox Business will come seeking vengeance.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:I don't think it's controversial to say that, not only are ad buys still effective, but Trump is not immune to all negative ads. I haven't seen an effective attack ad against Trump but that doesn't mean that one doesn't exist. I think people are throwing the towel in on this way too easily, considering the last few election cycles. Whoever comes up with the way to take the offensive against Trump, well, they're a much cleverer wordsmith than I am.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
How do negative attack ads work against Trump when not a single one of the other candidates is worth voting for? People aren't going to swing from Trump to Jeb or whichever other nameless establishment nobody is running. why does the republican party have such an incredible dearth of talent?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 02:40
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:I don't think it's controversial to say that, not only are ad buys still effective, but Trump is not immune to all negative ads. I haven't seen an effective attack ad against Trump but that doesn't mean that one doesn't exist. I think people are throwing the towel in on this way too easily, considering the last few election cycles. If it bleeds, you can kill it. Trump doesn't bleed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:How do negative attack ads work against Trump when not a single one of the other candidates is worth voting for? People aren't going to swing from Trump to Jeb or whichever other nameless establishment nobody is running. Worse, stumping Trump could send the bulk of his followers to the other anti-Establishment candidate, Dr. Ben Carson M.D.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:How do negative attack ads work against Trump when not a single one of the other candidates is worth voting for? People aren't going to swing from Trump to Jeb or whichever other nameless establishment nobody is running. republican lizardmen masters require good soldiers not intelligent people as candidates 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
The Saurus posted:why does the republican party have such an incredible dearth of talent? this is the question that keeps coming to my mind. I mean, I was happy to vote for Obama or Hillary in 2008. I will be more than happy to vote for Sanders or Hillary or Biden in 2016. I like them all a lot, actually. But I don't know anyone who's excited/happy about Trump/Carson/Bush/Rubio/whoever, or who was excited about Romney. And it's not like the Republican party is some small segment of America. Where are the likable competent fucks? Hanging out with Huntsman?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 04:01
|
|
|
Xenophon posted:this is the question that keeps coming to my mind. I mean, I was happy to vote for Obama or Hillary in 2008. I will be more than happy to vote for Sanders or Hillary or Biden in 2016. I like them all a lot, actually. But I don't know anyone who's excited/happy about Trump/Carson/Bush/Rubio/whoever, or who was excited about Romney. And it's not like the Republican party is some small segment of America. Where are the likable competent fucks? Hanging out with Huntsman? I absolutely know at least one person excited about Trump. He's otherwise a decent fellow. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 04:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 12:24 |
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:I absolutely know at least one person excited about Trump. He's otherwise a decent fellow. Everyone is excited about Trump.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 04:15
|
|