Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
DarklyDreaming
Apr 4, 2009

Fun scary

Cingulate posted:

If what the contemporary reaction is afraid of is no longer e.g. a violent uprising of the proletariat, the massacre of bankers, and the beginning of a classless, nationless, godless age, but just that some chubby dude with a creepy foot fetish doesn't feel welcome to post on Twitter anymore, that should be a cause for concern on the left. It seems we missed a critical window somewhen between 1900 and 1990.

I would definitely say reactionaries no longer fear violent uprising, but instead they fear that a violent uprising would be unnecessary. Where once they feared an army of undesirables showing up at their doorstep to take their poo poo and redistribute their wealth at gunpoint, they now fear a world where their neighbors, friends, and family willingly hand over everything to those that need it more and call them assholes for not doing it too. Put simply, the fears of the neoreactionary movement are irrelevance, that no one will care if they go Galt and gently caress off to an island somewhere

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Munin
Nov 14, 2004


Cingulate posted:

Well you won't see me putting up a defense of Randianism and Tea Party-style libertarianism any time soon.

Yup, that is pretty clear and never implied otherwise.

The only point I was making is that it's usage in modern discourse is very much divorced from its historical roots. It's basically saying: "These different people with a totally different philosophy used the same term." It is correct but not really pertinent. Not to mention that modern day libertarians have much, much less institutional and philosophical connections to the people you mention than the Soviets have with Marx which was my example.

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Bioware has been putting lovely romance storylines into their games as far back as Baldur's Gate, long before "Cultural Marxism" was ever conceived by reactionary nerds.

Baldur's Gate 2 even had mods to add more romantic interests to the game, and spoiler alert: those modders weren't women.

That said that game had a larger female fanbase than many other traditional RPGs (or at least a more vocally self identified one) and that was in part due to the more prominent romance/relationship elements. It was also a reason why there was a certain controversy about Anomen being the only male romanceable character and who was, let's say, not universally beloved by the fanbase.

Not to say that there were also a ssubset of creepsters but you have that for practically any bit of media.

Munin has a new favorite as of 20:07 on Oct 24, 2015

Curvature of Earth
Sep 9, 2011

Projected cost of
invading Canada:
$900

Cingulate posted:

The philosophy of libertarianism - not Ayn Rand, but e.g. Nozick, Hayek, whatever - is a direct and radical consequence of classical liberalism, and very much about freedom in at least one philosophically justifiable sense.

Not that I think it's shown itself to lead to good outcomes wrt. freedom in any way whatsoever, but to deny that its foundational texts are liberal in intent and context is just a display of ignorance.

And in all honesty, we don't need to make up or exaggerate libertarian beliefs. They do a fine job of that themselves:

I can't believe Murray Rothbard is a deathist posted:

the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die. The law, therefore, may not properly compel the parent to feed a child or to keep it alive. ...should a parent have the right to allow a deformed baby to die (e.g., by not feeding it)? The answer is of course yes, following a fortiori from the larger right to allow any baby, whether deformed or not, to die.
...
the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children. Superficially, this sounds monstrous and inhuman. But closer thought will reveal the superior humanism of such a market. For we must realize that there is a market for children now, but that since the government prohibits sale of children at a price, the parents may now only give their children away to a licensed adoption agency free of charge. This means that we now indeed have a child-market, but that the government enforces a maximum price control of zero, and restricts the market to a few privileged and therefore monopolistic agencies. The result has been a typical market where the price of the commodity is held by government far below the free-market price: an enormous "shortage" of the good...

Allowing a free market in children would eliminate this imbalance, and would allow for an allocation of babies and children away from parents who dislike or do not care for their children, and toward foster parents who deeply desire such children. Everyone involved: the natural parents, the children, and the foster parents purchasing the children, would be better off in this sort of society.

Of course, the proper libertarian paradise will feature, not just free baby markets, but also free child porn markets:




Listen, once we privatize consent, the free market will reach equilibrium and we'll all possess optimal freedom.

Curvature of Earth has a new favorite as of 22:42 on Oct 24, 2015

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



It would certainly increase the street value of a stolen white infant such as Ric Flair.

Annointed
Mar 2, 2013

Libertarianism my rights are greater than yours

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

Curvature of Earth posted:

Of course, the proper libertarian paradise will feature, not just free baby markets, but also free child porn markets:




Listen, once we privatize consent, the free market will reach equilibrium and we'll all possess optimal freedom.

ah, I see you're getting properly into the "delineate the ephebotarians" assignment

(you poor bastard)

sub supau
Aug 28, 2007

quote:

In short, it is for role-playing the ideal masculine character who must confront difficult situations that brings out the best of his masculine virtues.
Who the hell is "he", Shepard is clearly a woman.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

DarklyDreaming posted:

I would definitely say reactionaries no longer fear violent uprising, but instead they fear that a violent uprising would be unnecessary. Where once they feared an army of undesirables showing up at their doorstep to take their poo poo and redistribute their wealth at gunpoint, they now fear a world where their neighbors, friends, and family willingly hand over everything to those that need it more and call them assholes for not doing it too. Put simply, the fears of the neoreactionary movement are irrelevance, that no one will care if they go Galt and gently caress off to an island somewhere
My honest impression is rather that they somehow feel there is a direct path from PC society > thought crimes > gulags.
Where PC society = a society which disapproves of n-wording your way through your justification for why you don't hire black people, thought crimes = laws against hate speech as you have in European countries, and gulags = prison camps for reactionaries and suspected reactionaries in Siberia with mortality rates approaching that of a concentration camp.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

Cingulate posted:

My honest impression is rather that they somehow feel there is a direct path from PC society > thought crimes > gulags.
Where PC society = a society which disapproves of n-wording your way through your justification for why you don't hire black people, thought crimes = laws against hate speech as you have in European countries, and gulags = prison camps for reactionaries and suspected reactionaries in Siberia with mortality rates approaching that of a concentration camp.

The Vosgian Beast posted:

Randall Munroe author of XKCD is an evil thought police abuser

Incidentally here's the same person who wrote the above article, several months earlier, talking about how social justice warriors will probably soon purge Randall Munroe. https://twitter.com/sarahdoingthing/status/462476654191734785

Relevant

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Kunster posted:

Part of the telling offs involved making Hydra a good guy organization, as in "Yeah we're The Nazis all but in name" org. And then having Black Widow's Roma origins whitewashed. And the whole thing with killing off the concept of Wasp and clearing up Ant Man's legacy to the point of making sure she wasn't a meaningful character.

wasp's only meaningful contribution to ant-man was the time an artist hosed up reading a script and drew hank as hitting her, thus shackling him with that poo poo for forever

U.T. Raptor
May 11, 2010

Are you a pack of imbeciles!?

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Bioware has been putting lovely romance storylines into their games as far back as Baldur's Gate, long before "Cultural Marxism" was ever conceived by reactionary nerds.

Baldur's Gate 2 even had mods to add more romantic interests to the game, and spoiler alert: those modders weren't women.
Bioware games have pretty much always had romances, but they started really emphasizing them after Dragon Age because that game drew in a lot of the tumblr crowd for some reason. That's largely how we got the dumpster fire that was Dragon Age 2.

sub supau
Aug 28, 2007

U.T. Raptor posted:

Bioware games have pretty much always had romances, but they started really emphasizing them after Dragon Age because that game drew in a lot of the tumblr crowd for some reason. That's largely how we got the dumpster fire that was Dragon Age 2.
I think you overestimate Tumblr.

Twerkteam Pizza
Sep 26, 2015

Grimey Drawer
Some explain to me what "Crimethink" is, because these articles are pretty funny.

http://atavisionary.com/the-kite-runner/

'Neo'-reactionary posted:

To generalize Muslim culture in Afghanistan as if it were a world wide issue for every group of people is inaccurate and absurd. This is as much crimethink as I dared to inject into the situation, but I think the point was taken and will be considered by the student. In my head, I thought facetiously that the human rights issue he should write about is forcing young children in schools across the country to read and write about progressive propaganda

Woolie Wool
Jun 2, 2006


Has anyone yet written a long-form article about basically how the nerd culture that's latched onto J.R.R. Tolkien's works (including many of the Dark Enlightenment) is, embraces, and represents basically everything Tolkien hated in life?

Twerkteam Pizza
Sep 26, 2015

Grimey Drawer

Woolie Wool posted:

Has anyone yet written a long-form article about basically how the nerd culture that's latched onto J.R.R. Tolkien's works (including many of the Dark Enlightenment) is, embraces, and represents basically everything Tolkien hated in life?

not that I know of, but tell Parsons to do it.

DarklyDreaming
Apr 4, 2009

Fun scary

Woolie Wool posted:

Has anyone yet written a long-form article about basically how the nerd culture that's latched onto J.R.R. Tolkien's works (including many of the Dark Enlightenment) is, embraces, and represents basically everything Tolkien hated in life?

I don't need to write a long-form article:

Tolkien and his contemporaries wrote about an idealized medieval Europe to escape the mid-20th century world because there were Nazis in it. Dark Enlightment people write about an idealized medieval Europe to escape the modern world because it kills Nazis.

Terrible Opinions
Oct 18, 2013



I could see the value of a long-form article because it wasn't just Nazis they were trying to escape, but literally every other movement and activity that Dark Enlightenment idealizes. Runaway capitalism, non-Nazi fascists, industrialization specifically the industrialization of war, futurists, military monarchs, etc were all things specifically pointed to as absolute evils in early twentieth century romanticism because it was all inspired by WW1 and its immediate aftermath.

ArchangeI
Jul 15, 2010

Twerkteam Pizza posted:

Some explain to me what "Crimethink" is, because these articles are pretty funny.

http://atavisionary.com/the-kite-runner/

The act of thinking something progressives don't like. Calling it crimethink instantly puts the reactionary on the moral highground because he declares himself prosecuted before anything happens. It's a classic tactic. See also "99% of you won't be brave enough to share this horribly racist article on facebook!!!!!"

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Twerkteam Pizza posted:

Some explain to me what "Crimethink" is, because these articles are pretty funny.

http://atavisionary.com/the-kite-runner/
It's a term out of 1984 referring to "bad thoughts" in the book's fictional clipped "Newspeak." These dudes love quoting 1984.

Isaac Asimov wrote an essay on 1984 basically saying: This is Orwell being pissed off at Stalin and his life. If we are constantly guarding against 1984 happening, to the exclusion of what's actually going on, bad poo poo will hit us in the rear end.

Terrible Opinions posted:

I could see the value of a long-form article because it wasn't just Nazis they were trying to escape, but literally every other movement and activity that Dark Enlightenment idealizes. Runaway capitalism, non-Nazi fascists, industrialization specifically the industrialization of war, futurists, military monarchs, etc were all things specifically pointed to as absolute evils in early twentieth century romanticism because it was all inspired by WW1 and its immediate aftermath.
Ol' JRR was even more progressive on them with women, with infrequent but reasonably well realized female character). Let that one sink in for a moment.

Nessus has a new favorite as of 20:35 on Oct 25, 2015

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
Whatever Tolkien has articulated in his reflections, the story itself is deeply reactionary.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Nessus posted:

It's a term out of 1984 referring to "bad thoughts" in the book's fictional clipped "Newspeak." These dudes love quoting 1984.

Isaac Asimov wrote an essay on 1984 basically saying: This is Orwell being pissed off at Stalin and his life. If we are constantly guarding against 1984 happening, to the exclusion of what's actually going on, bad poo poo will hit us in the rear end.
Also, the best way to get the left in the West to stop worrying about "soft" leftist totalitarianism is to make it a right-wing topic. As experience shows (e.g. 1984 written by a socialist after all), we're very much better at this than them.

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD
Sep 14, 2007

everything is yours

Terrible Opinions posted:

I could see the value of a long-form article because it wasn't just Nazis they were trying to escape, but literally every other movement and activity that Dark Enlightenment idealizes. Runaway capitalism, non-Nazi fascists, industrialization specifically the industrialization of war, futurists, military monarchs, etc were all things specifically pointed to as absolute evils in early twentieth century romanticism because it was all inspired by WW1 and its immediate aftermath.

All of these things have some beginning in romatic utopianism of the authoritarians, especially the imagined past of a harmonious social body without class tension(remember where 'holism' comes from), idyllic communities free of want, and childlike people blissfully unaware of their inferiority to the elite.

I think the autocritique of Simarillion tries to deal with this, or at least some of the assumptions surrounding the Aryanisms of the elves. Poor reading can just exacerbate these tendencies in LOTR trilogy.

David Brin has written on this:
http://www.salon.com/2002/12/17/tolkien_brin/

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD has a new favorite as of 21:38 on Oct 25, 2015

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:

All of these things have some beginning in romatic utopianism of the authoritarians, especially the imagined past of a harmonious social body without class tension(remember where 'holism' comes from), idyllic communities free of want, and childlike people blissfully unaware of their inferiority to the elite.

I think the autocritique of Simarillion tries to deal with this, or at least some of the assumptions surrounding the Aryanisms of the elves. Poor reading can just exacerbate these tendencies in LOTR trilogy.

David Brin has written on this:
http://www.salon.com/2002/12/17/tolkien_brin/

This article isn't entirely wrong, or even mostly wrong, but it does kind of resort to easy "us vs them" categories way too easily.

Assepoester
Jul 18, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
Melman v2

Onmi posted:

Yes but the majority of those people with access to a twitter and tumblr account use to draw or write or masturbate to high anime drawings of Kyle and Stan loving. It's why you see some jumping through 100 hoops to go "No no they're actually using this to attack people who are against PC culture" That was a literal thing that happened after the first episode.

There's less of them now as they realize no, Matt and Trey are just pissing on them, which is why they're turning to "South Park was never good/has gone to poo poo/hasn't advanced with the times/is still written by the same straight white dudes."

Because the idea of someone creating, owning and writing their own property and only having to answer to themselves is foreign to these people.

It's like those people so convinced of their 'ship' that they grab their ears and scream "BETRAYAL" because two fictional characters aren't loving.

EDIT: These are also the same people who'll put someone on a pedestal and sing their praise until they put a toe out of line upon which they'll be shat upon and treated like garbage. See Yahtzee with Monster Hunter/Smash Brothers, Whedon with Age of Ultron and recently James Roberts with More than Meets the Eye.

Race Realists posted:

:lol:

i could've swore this dude was in the GG thread
So was I. So was Bravest.

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

Yeah, this is pretty much equivalent to those GG conspiracy charts. "This person doesn't agree with me, they must be a GG nazi misogynist". I'm sure it's terrible that people were mean to you in that thread, but I think you've gotta face reality instead of hiding yourself from it.
Ordinarily yes, but in this case, well, we've covered this before:

Onmi posted:

Okay no, I'm actually jumping in and stopping this one. That's not what Sad Puppies was about and that's definitely not what Rabid Puppies was about.

So the short of it is Sad puppies came about because sci-fi writers noticed that, wait for it, it didn't really matter what you wrote, if you weren't in the clique, you wouldn't get an award. The idea was never to win an award or to stop others from winning. It was to prove that the presumed most prestigious award in sci-fi writing didn't actually consider your quality, just your politics.

As of the last Hugo's, before it, there had been 5, "No Awards" that had ever been awarded in the existence of the awards. This number doubled in one night, because 5 of them had only puppies nominees, these people nominated were men, women, varying politics, doesn't matter what they believed they were nominated for their quality. Which, for the record, is something that had been done for years in awards circles. It was not, as people would have you believe, something unprecedented and designed to kick the women and the gays out of the community.

The Sad Puppies existed to prove that if push came to shove, it didn't matter how good you are, only your politics, at the end of the night, they were proven 100% correct. They would rather deny a wonderful female editor that was well respected an award, then have someone not in the clique win. They burned down their own club house and called it a victory.

Vox is for Rabid Puppies, while the Sad Puppies just wants to point out the inherent cliquishness and see it gone, Rabid Puppies sees the awards as beyond saving and just wants to burn it down. Vox has a lot of politics and policies I personally don't agree with. But do not misrepresent what it was actually about.

I actually get loving annoyed with this, because I do write SF and Fantasy, so I'm actually aware of the poo poo that goes on. And I get really loving angry when people who don't know poo poo flap their gums and run their mouths about poo poo they have no clue about.

so your one paragraph summation.

Vox is a SF author with some pretty wonky politics who hates the inherent cliquishness of the SF community and wants to burn it to the ground so something new can be built. He wants to Senator Armstrong it. I don't personally agree with him on a lot of things, including that, but it has nothing to do about sci-fi with gays or women.

EDIT: and just for clarification, I don't vote at the Hugo's and I don't support either campaign, partially because I'm very lazy and partially because I just don't tend to enjoy conflict with people. I do like to keep myself informed of things going on in the community though.

Onmi posted:

See you can call it that but when you want to be an SF or Fantasy writer you get told over and over "The hugos are the most important thing, the most grand prize for you." So learning that, no, they aren't and no, it actually doesn't matter how good you are as a writer, it just matters how good a friend you are with everyone else. Kinda heartbreaking a little. I mean liberating because you realize "gently caress it, who cares what these people think?" But if you idolized that stuff growing up it can hurt if you made that your job.

I know a main problem people has is the clique tends to want to have its cake and eat it to. They want the Hugo's to be for them, so it's only for the participants of Worldcon, but they also still want it to be the most prestigious award in SF/F. Again, to me, it's liberating really, I never have to give a gently caress about these people because they proved to me that they don't care if I'm good or bad, only if I'm their friend. But I understand where the dislike is.

Like, this is from Brad Torgerson, who was apart of the 3rd Sad Puppies campaign (the one that just past, he both bowed out after it and refused to be nominated for the awards at the past campaign to prove that he wasn't lying when he said he wasn't interested in winning an award)

quote:

I would like this noted somewhere that a biased media hack or a vengeful troll can’t blot it out: 2,500 people from science fiction’s so-called True Fandom throws women under the bus.

Toni and Sheila are the two most-voted editors in the history of their category. Nobody has ever gotten 1,200+ and 700+ Best Editor votes, respectively. Not for short form. Not for long form. That’s historic. A win for women! Right? Wait, no. Its not. True Fandom ruined it with NO AWARD. Yup. The tolerant and inclusive True Fandom. The people who want science fiction to be a safe place for women. Until True Fandom throws those women under the bus.

Mark it in your minds, friends. Remember it. Know the truth of it. The people who parade their inclusiveness and their tolerance, threw THE MOST-TANGIBLY-SUPPORTED EDITORS IN THE HISTORY OF THE HUGO AWARDS, under the bus. By 2,500 people. To make a point. Women who have given decades to the business, got thrown beneath the wheels because people wanted to be right more than they love this field.

Deserving women. Under the bus. By True Fandom. The defenders of Hugo awards purity. Paragons of tolerance. Brave defenders of diversity. They threw women. Under the bus. Wheels. Under. By Trufen.

They cheered when it happened. They CHEERED when Toni and Sheila went beneath the bus.

And, just for clarity, Worldcon calls themselves the True Fandom. This is not some derogatory term that people have come up with for this group of cliquish people.

Gabriel Pope posted:

The fact that many of the nominees chosen strictly for their quality happened to be written or published by Vox Day himself is, of course, of no relevance whatsoever I suppose.

Considering Vox's slate was for people to vote "No Award" because he WANTED to see the awards be reduced to being meaningless? Yes, it has no drat relevance. He was happy to see the awards go the way they did. They gave him everything he wanted.

Onmi posted:

Nonsense posted:

GRRM is completely correct about that entire Hugo event and also his side won, which was the correct side. Also is this title cancelled yet? Otherwise the thread title is misleading and should be changed.
If by won you mean "Burned down their own club house and the Sad Puppies will be back for the next year so they didn't do anything but prove them right" then yeah, knocked it out of the park.

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD
Sep 14, 2007

everything is yours
He certainly has a point of view and isn't charitable to Tolkien, but I forgive that when a lot of these elements are commonly glossed over especially when defending Tolkien from lesser fantasy works. Or downplaying to what extent his influence has created these troublesome assumptions.

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD has a new favorite as of 22:42 on Oct 25, 2015

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:

He certainly has a point of view and isn't charitable to Tolkien, but I forgive that when a lot of these elements are commonly glossed over especially when defending Tolkien from lesser fantasy works. Or downplaying to what extent his influence has created these troublesome assumptions.

Sure, that's fair.

I will say most reactionaries are more Saruman than anything.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Cingulate posted:

Whatever Tolkien has articulated in his reflections, the story itself is deeply reactionary.
Certainly, although the context of what the reaction is aimed at is very different. To be fair of course, seeing your mates die in the trenches is as nothing compared to the agony of the friend zone.....

The Vosgian Beast posted:

Sure, that's fair.

I will say most reactionaries are more Saruman than anything.
Actually these guys are pretty much literally Saruman, seen in that perspective Saruman is like some precognitive takedown on their attitudes.

Thinky Whale
Aug 2, 2012

All that most maddens and torments; all that stirs up the lees of things; all truth with malice in it; all that cracks the sinews and cakes the brain; all the subtle demonisms of life and thought; all evil were visibly personified, and made practically assailable in Fry.

Nessus posted:

It's a term out of 1984 referring to "bad thoughts" in the book's fictional clipped "Newspeak." These dudes love quoting 1984.

I want a script like the one that follows every mention of Donald Trump's name with a quote from Donald Trump, except that every time one of these guys uses a word from 1984 it follows it with "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it."

Woolie Wool
Jun 2, 2006


The art and works of beings aligned with evil in Tolkien's works, I think, displays many of the aesthetics that neoreactionaries like to indulge in--it's loud, it's unsubtle, it's pompous, it's huge and tries to overshadow and loom over everything around it, but it's also superficial, crude, and lacking in actual beauty or artistic value. The description of Melkor's counter-themes during the Ainundalë (Tolkien's creation myth; basically God and the angels create the world with music but Lucifer, not yet fully fallen, is jealous of God and tries to gently caress everything up) sounds like a very unfavorable description of the sorts of music nerds like to listen to (loud, bombastic, repetitive, trying to drown out Eru's own themes by being bigger and more impressive sounding). I just feel like, for all his faults, Tolkien would have seen nerd fascists for what they are and despised them even more than they worship him.

On the other hand the Ainundalë is basically about how Melkor really just wanted to have a bit of the Holy Spirit Flame Imperishable to create his own things but Eru won't share and Melkor basically loses his poo poo bit by bit until he becomes Fantasy Satan, so it's indeed an affirmation of hierarchy. :shrug:

Woolie Wool has a new favorite as of 23:14 on Oct 25, 2015

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



I agree Tolkien would have probably been none too pleased with Dark Enlightenment people and would have likely told them to hie themselves to Mass, but I think if we're going to go deep on him we ought to move it to the Middle-earth thread over in the book barn.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
Out of Scott's last 4 real posts, 2 were good and the other two I didn't read because they were too long. :colbert:

Nessus posted:

Certainly, although the context of what the reaction is aimed at is very different. To be fair of course, seeing your mates die in the trenches is as nothing compared to the agony of the friend zone.....
But then, what is.

Silver2195
Apr 4, 2012

The Vosgian Beast posted:

Sure, that's fair.

I will say most reactionaries are more Saruman than anything.

Mencius Moldbug posted:

For I am to Carlyle, as Saruman to Morgoth. Enter the true palace of darkness! Join in my iron oath to the Master!

Seriously, that's a thing he actually wrote: http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/07/carlyle-in-20th-century-fascism-and.html

gentle pete
Feb 21, 2015

by Nyc_Tattoo

Cardboard Box A posted:

So was I. So was Bravest.

Ordinarily yes, but in this case, well, we've covered this before:



And, just for clarity, Worldcon calls themselves the True Fandom. This is not some derogatory term that people have come up with for this group of cliquish people.


Considering Vox's slate was for people to vote "No Award" because he WANTED to see the awards be reduced to being meaningless? Yes, it has no drat relevance. He was happy to see the awards go the way they did. They gave him everything he wanted.

If by won you mean "Burned down their own club house and the Sad Puppies will be back for the next year so they didn't do anything but prove them right" then yeah, knocked it out of the park.

What does any of this stuff mean? Are you ok?

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

NEO-REACTION: We are The DARK ENLIGHTENMENT! We come to subject all of these lesser FOOLS to our RUTHLESS SPACE LOGIC, and DOMINATE THE GALAXY as the STRONGEST RACE! FEAR OUR DEATH TROOPERS OF PURE LOGIC!!!!!!

LESS WRONG: I like your insights but ease up Emperor Palpatine.

SOME RANDOM TUMBLR PERSON: Uh, that first dude seems evil.

THE FIRST TWO PARTIES: What the gently caress is with your mad need to purge all innocent harmless beliefs you groundlessly dub evil, you prig prog puritan????????

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

Cingulate posted:

Out of Scott's last 4 real posts, 2 were good and the other two I didn't read because they were too long. :colbert:
But then, what is.

Nice try Scott's parachute account, but it's the same worthless garbage as always.

Assepoester
Jul 18, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
Melman v2

gentle pete posted:

What does any of this stuff mean? Are you ok?
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/won-science-fictions-hugo-awards-matters/

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

Vox Day, who neoreactionaries would largely agree with (and he has worn the term himself with pride, though he dismissed "Dark Enlightenment" as media hype) being a stupendous cock.

The only actual relevance to this thread is (a) neoreactionaries and gamergaters thought this might be a good banner to follow until it blew itself up spectacularly (b) Yudkowsky has told his followers to spam the nominations for the 2016 Hugo for Best Novel because he can so be a huge cock too.

For lulz, here's a gamergater on the progress of the culture war.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow
MY FUTURE GRANDSON: It must have been a great time to be involved in nerd culture back in the 2010s, grandad! Much better than now!

ME 50 YEARS FROM NOW: You might think that Billy, but it was actually a time when people demanded that you take the motives, ideas, and writing of a group of people who called themselves "The Sad Puppies" seriously, just because they had a friend of a friend of a friend who was into them and they didn't feel like telling their friend a movement run by a man who named himself after the voice of God and who said that marital rape didn't exist was pretty loving dumb.

MY FUTURE GRANDSON: Maybe I shouldn't have brought you that bourbon.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Anticheese
Feb 13, 2008

$60,000,000 sexbot
:rodimus:

divabot posted:

For lulz, here's a gamergater on the progress of the culture war.

Well, that's the dumbest thing I've read in a while.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply