|
http://crossfade.io/#!/qygge91exe This one works better imo
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 17:57 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 11:07 |
|
GotLag posted:http://crossfade.io/#!/qygge91exe
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 17:58 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Or we'll open up 3 new mines in North America (2 for Tesla alone). there's also a giant vein of it in afghanistan, but I don't think anyone has had much of a chance to mine it yet for obvious reasons
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 18:33 |
|
"Not only will this kill you, it will hurt the whole time you are dying."
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 19:43 |
|
GotLag posted:Now you've got me wondering how big a lead-acid battery you'd need to run a smartphone as long as a lithium cell. Back of the envelope calculation says a 5v 2Ah lead-acid cell would be about 20cm^3, so big but not huge. Lead-acid doesn't miniaturise well though, so it'd probably have to be bigger than that.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 19:59 |
|
As an aside from battchat, here's an article from the intersection of technology, workplaces, and conversations about animal sacrifice. Hint: rectal overpressure ends badly. http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/family-of-man-who-died-in-prank-alleges-hate-crime/
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 20:14 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:Back of the envelope calculation says a 5v 2Ah lead-acid cell would be about 20cm^3, so big but not huge. Lead-acid doesn't miniaturise well though, so it'd probably have to be bigger than that. So, about C cell sized?
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 21:04 |
|
About the size of the phone itself.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 21:11 |
|
WorldsStrongestNerd posted:About the size of the phone itself. 5cm x 2cm x 2cm (20 cubic cm) is a pretty small phone.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 21:14 |
|
flosofl posted:5cm x 2cm x 2cm (20 cubic cm) is a pretty small phone. idk I'm pretty glad my phone doesn't have a 2cm thick battery in it.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 21:19 |
|
My Samsung Galaxy S4 is 13.5cm x 7cm x 0.8cm for a volume of 75.6 cm3. Actually less than that because the corners are rounded. So about a third or less of the volume of a typical smartphone.
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 21:47 |
|
Leperflesh posted:My Samsung Galaxy S4 is 13.5cm x 7cm x 0.8cm for a volume of 75.6 cm3. Actually less than that because the corners are rounded. Which is more or less the proportion of the size of the battery in a typical smartphone. Like I say though, miniaturising lead-acid is a massive pain. Some quick Googling suggests that this is about as small as lead-acid batteries get, and that's almost 7 times the size for half the capacity of my theoretical battery. You get diminishing returns when you get smaller with lead-acid and when you get larger with lithium. (Mind you at both extremes there are way more considerations than packaging - we don't expect smartphone-size devices to be able to punt out their entire charge in a minute or two, and we don't really care what the massive rack of batteries connected to a UPS weighs)
|
# ? Oct 23, 2015 23:19 |
|
Pigsfeet on Rye posted:As an aside from battchat, here's an article from the intersection of technology, workplaces, and conversations about animal sacrifice. Hint: rectal overpressure ends badly. some say 'prank', others 'torturing someone to death'
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 02:10 |
|
GotLag posted:Now you've got me wondering how big a lead-acid battery you'd need to run a smartphone as long as a lithium cell.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 02:19 |
|
Getting too old for this poo poo.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 04:20 |
|
ReagaNOMNOMicks posted:Those are gas hornets. Don't disturb them if you want your gas, poster. Also ask a professionnal oil harvester for help with those. DO NOT TRY THE "FORK TRICK" IT DOESN'T WORK. Those aren't tubes for carrying oil/gasoline, those are electrical cables. That box is probably about 4' by 4' or so.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 19:50 |
|
Overwined posted:Not to mention that Lithium demand already far outstrips mining supply and since every-loving-thing is now carrying a Lithium battery that already large gap is due to get exponentially larger real real soon. Lithium is literally dirt-cheap, it's the cobalt/nickel that're the problem. LiFePo cathodes are an attempt to solve that problem, with a bonus of being less toxic and slightly less prone to spontaneous combustion, but they don't get the charge density of mixed metal cathodes. e: I amend myself, but it's not a resource we're going to run out of, we're just going to pay a few dollars more because they can't shovel it off the salt flats fast enough. ArcMage fucked around with this message at 23:34 on Oct 24, 2015 |
# ? Oct 24, 2015 23:29 |
|
Get some febreeze or something!
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 06:17 |
|
How about being cryogenically frozen to death at work after being locked in a -150C pseudo-science therapy chamber for 10 hours? No jpg, but that's probably for the best... source quote:A salon manager in the US state of Nevada has frozen to death inside a cryogenic chamber, where the temperature plunges below -150C (-238F). The "therapy" should be in this thread too. Any cryogenic system that you can lock yourself into and turn on is not "operator error" if they lock themselves into it and turn it on; it's peak
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 02:47 |
|
Surely there are easier ways to give you hypothermia.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 02:50 |
Burn 800 calories by being cold for a few minutes.
|
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 03:03 |
|
The summit of Mt. Everest (excluding windchill) only gets to around -40C/F.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 03:27 |
|
I have a jpg of her alive face
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 03:37 |
|
If it wasn't murder, I wonder if it was suicide. Seems like a fairly fast and painless way to go, no?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 03:48 |
|
The coldest temperatures on record for anywhere on the Earth's surface are down in the -70 range (Celsius of course). I have personally experienced as low as -47, for around 15 seconds and wearing shorts (I was younger and foolish-er back then). Several minutes at much colder temperatures would be either intensely painful or you'd be instantly numb. I can't imagine it would do anything actually beneficial health-wise, but warming up again would be quite an experience. Kind of like how it feels good when someone stops beating you.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 03:53 |
|
I have a jpg of her frozen face
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 04:15 |
|
She'll be fine as long as they keep her frozen until medical science figures out how to unfreeze her body without damaging it.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 04:53 |
Uthor posted:She'll be fine as long as they keep her frozen until medical science figures out how to unfreeze her body without damaging it. Too late, damage is done. RIP.
|
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 05:25 |
|
Real life Thomas the Tank Engine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoSt93IbH6w&t=349s
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 05:28 |
|
Captain Postal posted:How about being cryogenically frozen to death at work after being locked in a -150C pseudo-science therapy chamber for 10 hours? No jpg, but that's probably for the best...
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 06:06 |
|
deviler posted:
What the hell was this for, edible cluster bombs?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 06:19 |
|
WarpedNaba posted:What the hell was this for, edible cluster bombs? White Phosphor-O's
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 06:27 |
|
WarpedNaba posted:What the hell was this for, edible cluster bombs? beef weldington
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 06:28 |
|
Wedemeyer posted:If it wasn't murder, I wonder if it was suicide. Seems like a fairly fast and painless way to go, no? No
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 07:05 |
A core body temperature of less than 30 C is going to be severe hypothermia, where your skin turns blue and you start to lose higher brain functions until major organ failure. How quickly does body temperature drop in those cryogenic chambers? I can see even 3 to 6 minutes at such cold temperatures bringing you to the brink of permanent damage. It feels like the equivalent of trying to make yourself tougher by shooting yourself in a non-vital area.
|
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 07:32 |
|
I've actually done it before, and it really wasn't particularly cold. You had on insulated shoes, mittens, and a hat, and were instructed to cover your mouth/nose with your hand. Given that you weren't in direct contact with any cold surfaces and there was no humidity/air movement, you were essentially only losing heat via radiation. It was a bit chilly on your skin, but you are in it for such a short time, and still, dry air is scrub-tier conductor that you were really in minimal discomfort. Not worth the 35 euros imo. Unless you managed to lock yourself in, then you get your money's worth.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 08:35 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:A core body temperature of less than 30 C is going to be severe hypothermia, where your skin turns blue and you start to lose higher brain functions until major organ failure. How quickly does body temperature drop in those cryogenic chambers? I can see even 3 to 6 minutes at such cold temperatures bringing you to the brink of permanent damage. It's dry air so you'd last a lot longer than you would in much higher temperatures with humidity - strange but true fact, the most dangerous temperature for hypothermia is between -4 to +4 centigrade, because there's still enough moisture in the air to make it much more efficient at lowering your core temperature. Of course there's a lot more confounding factors, and you're still going to die if you spend any decent amount of time at -150, but the scenario suggested (that she suffocated rather than froze) is also possible if it's a small chamber (the ones I've seen are like shower-stall sized).
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 08:42 |
|
Well this looks safe
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 09:00 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:It's dry air so you'd last a lot longer than you would in much higher temperatures with humidity - strange but true fact, the most dangerous temperature for hypothermia is between -4 to +4 centigrade, because there's still enough moisture in the air to make it much more efficient at lowering your core temperature. Of course there's a lot more confounding factors, and you're still going to die if you spend any decent amount of time at -150, but the scenario suggested (that she suffocated rather than froze) is also possible if it's a small chamber (the ones I've seen are like shower-stall sized). Removing things from a - 120 laboratory chest freezer with just my hands was cold enough for me, I can't imagine having your whole body in that sort of temperature.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 10:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 11:07 |
|
It's not bad at all for short periods?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2015 11:04 |