|
Nonsense posted:Just looked up a news story on Google. It's McCain questioning his competence as CiC, and that "Harry Truman is spinning in his grave." Because an American died saving brown people, and the Democrats aren't allowed to be good at any sort of military thing.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:32 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 11:51 |
|
Nonsense posted:Isn't this a good thing? Why are they blaming Obama for a successful rescue operation? Because he pulled it off successfully.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:32 |
|
I mean why not honor the SF guy who died? He's a dude who helped other guys accomplish a feat most people thought was impossible. loving Republicans.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:34 |
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Because he pulled it off successfully. Tell that to the brave soldier that Obummer sacrificed to his islamic horde brethren.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:34 |
|
Nonsense posted:Just looked up a news story on Google. It's McCain questioning his competence as CiC, and that "Harry Truman is spinning in his grave." Presumably, President McCain would have followed Truman's lead and nuked the hostage camp.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:34 |
|
Joementum posted:Presumably, President McCain would have followed Truman's lead and nuked the hostage camp. Well at least he's thinking big, for christ sake.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:35 |
|
Joementum posted:Presumably, President McCain would have followed Truman's lead and nuked the hostage camp. Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Daesh.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:35 |
|
Joementum posted:Presumably, President McCain would have followed Truman's lead and nuked the hostage camp. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBJZmI1O2T4
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:38 |
|
Zeroisanumber posted:They can play that game for a while, but they're eventually going to have to issue a report that clears her of any wrongdoing. I dunno man; they've been running on fumes for like what two years now?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:38 |
|
Logikv9 posted:Obama is responsible for the death of a Special Forces soldier is going to be the new Benghazi isn't it? Support Are Troops, never send them into a combat zone!
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:38 |
|
Greatbacon posted:Support Are Troops, never send them into a combat zone! No, don't you see? He has to be strong enough to send our troops in when someone's rear end needs kicking, but God help him if any of our troops die the blood will be on his hands!
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:39 |
|
Can I get a link to this SF soldier death outrage, sorry if one was posted, but I didn't see it.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:41 |
|
Greatbacon posted:Support Are Troops, never send them into a combat zone! this but unironically
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:41 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:this but unironically This is what we have special forces for.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:43 |
|
Zoran posted:Big gummint! Fixed that for you.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:46 |
|
Where's the story about the senate hearing, twitter ain't helpin.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:47 |
|
fade5 posted:I mean after we rescued all the hostages/prisoners from the prison that's basically what we did: Starting to wonder if you just have a big playlist of all your favorite Daesh-directed explosions.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:48 |
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Where's the story about the senate hearing, twitter ain't helpin. Obama Bad Leader, pee pee, doo doo.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:48 |
|
Wait are they seriously mad at Obama for losing one man in 14 rounds of Counter Strike?
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:48 |
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Wait are they seriously mad at Obama for losing one man in 14 rounds of Counter Strike? I'm waiting to see an article on it first.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:49 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Bin Laden won. Could you elaborate? I seem to recall some prophetic statement he made waaay back before the Iraq invasion, but I don't recall what it was. Mister Facetious fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Oct 27, 2015 |
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:49 |
|
FAUXTON posted:I wonder if there's some interplay between Carson's soft-spoken persona, Trump's boisterous shitheelery, and the disparate Fav/Unfav numbers of both causing Carson to gain support as Trump turns up the volume and increases his attacks. The sense that I've been getting about Iowa, specifically, is that it's largely about faith and perceived hypocrisy. Iowan caucus voters of both parties tend to be more religious than the respective averages on both sides of the aisle (see 2008/2012 primaries, etc.) and it's pretty apparent from the polling/interviews that a lot of Christian voters don't buy Trump's lip service to Presbyterianism. Throw in some Carson sound bites about cracking down on professors who say mean things about Jesus and his performance shouldn't be surprising at all. It's surging Santorum all over again. Kro-Bar posted:I was homeschooled with cult-ish fundie textbooks, so my sex ed consisted of my mom pushing a book called "You're almost 12" or some poo poo at me, blushing and leaving the room. Thank literal gently caress for the internet. Lowtax and his merry band of misfits raised you better than your mother ever could. zoux posted:Watching the video I was surprised how many of the kids were just acting like nothing was going on at all. Nobody is better at internalizing and normalizing institutionalized racism than the children who suffer its brunt the most. My girlfriend's M.Ed program emphasized a focus on educational inequality and she completed her teaching practicum at a 75% Latino/20% black inner city high school. She probably spent about as much time trying to undo the years' worth of baggage that these poor kids were trucking around as she did actually teaching them academic subjects.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:50 |
|
size1one posted:Why do people think this? He may be just doing this for book sales and a speaking fees, but wouldn't being nominated or elected help towards that goal? No? He's currently plowing all his campaigns money into consultant groups to raise more money, which has better grift returns than paying for staff or voter rolls. He's not actually campaigning, and thus won't win.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:52 |
|
Rygar201 posted:No? He's currently plowing all his campaigns money into consultant groups to raise more money, which has better grift returns than paying for staff or voter rolls. He's not actually campaigning, and thus won't win. That he's leading in the polls is, imo, more of a reaction to all the other guys. He's the empty cipher that a GOP voter can project their ideal candidate upon.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:54 |
|
The party of white supremacists is not going to nominate a black man, period. Also trying to criticize Obama for the successful raid on ISIS is not surprising anything and everything is bad and his fault in the eyes of Republicans. If he cured cancer tomorrow they would complain that he hurt the bottom line of pharmaceutical companies. I'm not exaggerating in the slightest.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:55 |
|
Rygar201 posted:No? He's currently plowing all his campaigns money into consultant groups to raise more money, which has better grift returns than paying for staff or voter rolls. He's not actually campaigning, and thus won't win. I think the escaped mental patient who has kidnapped Dr Ben Carson and is keeping him tied up in a basement while he's using Dr Carson's remarkable career to make steal cash from 73 year old conservatives, might actually believe he has a chance to win...
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:55 |
|
fade5 posted:I mean after we rescued all the hostages/prisoners from the prison that's basically what we did: I got bored and skipped like 5 seconds and the camp went from sitting there to just nothing. God drat we're good at murder and mayhem.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:55 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:surging Santorum
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:56 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:Throw in some Carson sound bites about cracking down on professors who say mean things about Jesus and his performance shouldn't be surprising at all. It's surging Santorum all over again. Actually, the general feeling I've gotten living in Iowa is that the rural Iowans really hate the Universities here in general. They seem to be applauding the funding cuts that Branstad is bypassing the (bi-partisan) legislature to do.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:57 |
|
The house has filed papers of impeachment. Against IRS commissioner Koskinen edit, the charges: quote:The first charge provides the facts of Mr. Koskinen’s failure to comply with subpoenas. In February 2014 Congress instructed Mr. Koskinen to supply all emails related to Lois Lerner, who ran the IRS Exempt Organizations division during the targeting. We now know Mr. Koskinen made little or no effort to preserve or track these communications and that, only a few weeks after the subpoena, IRS employees in West Virginia erased 422 backup tapes, destroying up to 24,000 Lerner emails. You tired of hearing about e-mails? WELL gently caress YOU - Sincerely, the House. pathetic little tramp fucked around with this message at 21:03 on Oct 27, 2015 |
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:57 |
|
Axetrain posted:The party of white supremacists is not going to nominate a black man, period. "He's one of the good ones." - GOP
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:57 |
|
I've googled everything I can think of and I still can't find an article about Congress holding hearings on the death of Joshua Wheeler.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 20:59 |
|
Axetrain posted:The party of white supremacists is not going to nominate a black man, period. It'd hardly be the first time they've done that sort of thing. I swear we've had this very exchange at least once already, or at least I've posted the Mike Brown (FEMA, not Ferguson) story recently.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:01 |
|
zoux posted:I've googled everything I can think of and I still can't find an article about Congress holding hearings on the death of Joshua Wheeler. I got suckered by a wingnut rag. It was the standard "Obama bad! I nuke Middle East!" hearing.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:02 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:I got suckered by a wingnut rag. It was the standard "Obama bad! I nuke Middle East!" hearing. Hrmph. Always demand attribution in your USPol posts people!
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:03 |
|
Mister Macys posted:Could you elaborate? I seem to recall some prophetic statement he made waaay back before the Iraq invasion, but I don't recall what it was. Whether or not we killed or capture Osama was irrelevant--the moment we congealed into a quivering mass of nationalism, started revoking personal freedoms and spending trillions of dollars destabilizing a region, he won. The subsequent divisiveness, xenophobia, erosion of due process, obstructionism....all just gravy. 17 hijackers and a small terrorist organization managed to bring a world power to its knees in more ways than one--socially, financially, ethically. The fact that we are still putting boots on the ground in the middle east is further proof.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:05 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Whether or not we killed or capture Osama was irrelevant--the moment we congealed into a quivering mass of nationalism, started revoking personal freedoms and spending trillions of dollars destabilizing a region, he won. The subsequent divisiveness, xenophobia, erosion of due process, obstructionism....all just gravy. I remember reading that his whole goal was to goad the West into such unconscionable brutality against the Mideast that the whole Muslim world would unite in response and usher in the global Caliphate but that's my fuzzy recollection.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:09 |
|
pathetic little tramp posted:The house has filed papers of impeachment. Against IRS commissioner Koskinen If the investigations find no wrongdoing, you gotta find your win some other way.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:11 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:I got suckered by a wingnut rag. It was the standard "Obama bad! I nuke Middle East!" hearing. zoux posted:Hrmph.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:11 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 11:51 |
|
How about an actual Thing: Obama says on Twitter that we must support our
|
# ? Oct 27, 2015 21:12 |