|
pr0digal posted:
Says Giga too, is there such thing as Gigabit Hubs 
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 21:18
|
|
). Cause that would just be the frosting on top of the poo poo cake
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 01:52 |
|
|
Lightning Jim posted:Waiting for larches when the CE does implment wireless  I won't be here 
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 21:23
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:One of the offices is complaining that their internet is spotty and slow. Looks like it may be a switch issue, let's just take a look and-
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
Does he own stock in that company or something?
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:
No one will, because it'll never be implemented.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 21:49
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Network problems came in. Switching hub and a switch to cause a loop? What the gently caress?
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Network problems came in. Well there's the problem, it's filled it's data quota and crashed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
Migishu posted:Well there's the problem, it's filled it's data quota and crashed. More than 95% of ports in use.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Switching hub and a switch to cause a loop? I'm sure that someone who knows more about networking could explain what it really does, but I like to imagine it's basically a "Broadcast Storm ON/OFF" toggle.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:I'm sure that someone who knows more about networking could explain what it really does, but I like to imagine it's basically a
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
Roargasm posted:Pasture cables Cool, I'm doing the same after fighting with management to get the course approved. Two days in, I have already written a script that add and remove users from a group based off userid or employee ID. Soon, the snap in will be a distant memory.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Network problems came in. Can it survive an etherblast?
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 22:48
|
|
|
Wilford Cutlery posted:Can it survive an etherblast? The etherblast is coming from inside the network MJP posted:I haven't gotten to the end of the thread yet - what will you be doing income-wise in the meantime? I think I've got a pretty good in as a sysadmin at a particular factory in the area. Turns out a guy I work with has a wife who found a new job in another state. The job she is vacating happens to be the position I've applied to and she's going to drop my name to HR, so here's hoping. I've got a freelance project for a local business to do a massive infrastructure overhaul and they're paying me very well for the work. Enough to last me several months, so I've got a window, at least. A Frosty Witch fucked around with this message at 22:53 on Oct 27, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
So I work at a school in a larger campus, independent of our central IT which obviously manages the infrastructure among other things. My boss apparently left word that I was to hook up an ASUS Wifi router, which, as there's no way he told our networking people about it, would effectively be a rogue AP that would easily be traced back to me, as I'd have to whitelist the MAC address to hook it up. I am not going to do this thing. I'm going to go home instead.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
Just got in to the network of a sister company that is being decommissioned, we're gutting the infrastructure, bringing it to our site, and only keeping the core services online for future access. Their EMC navisphere web interface has no password, wide open on the network.  One domain controller. One. Doing windows server backup to an iscsi volume. One VM server with an essentials license. The dhcp scope is 10.0.2.0-10.0.254.0, with a one hour lease time. That's just the tip of the iceberg, this is gonna be fun ripping this horrible poo poo apart.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
devmd01 posted:The dhcp scope is 10.0.2.0-10.0.254.0, with a one hour lease time. As long as the lease time is longer than my bathroom breaks I don't have a problem with this.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2015 23:21
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:I'm sure that someone who knows more about networking could explain what it really does, but I like to imagine it's basically a So flipping the switch to On turns on a totally unconfigurable STP instance, and since the switch is so old there's a chance it wants to be the root bridge. What could possibly go wrong? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
devmd01 posted:The dhcp scope is 10.0.2.0-10.0.254.0, with a one hour lease time. That's a ridiculously big broadcast domain, right? I'm one of those "working on my CCNA" types and I'm just wondering if my initial reaction was right. That's aside from the weirdly short lease time. ...which would further exacerbate any issues caused by the broadcast domain, since the machines would be broadcasting for DHCP more often, right?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 00:53
|
|
|
Yes it's insane to have a subnet that large.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 00:57
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Yes it's insane to have a subnet that large. Some time ago:  : IP Address conflict! Make sure this NEVER happens again!
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Japanese Dating Sim posted:That's a ridiculously big broadcast domain, right? Yeah, /16 is an insanely large amount of address space, so much so the average business could probably turn lease time to max and never run out .
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Network problems came in.  "Hey boss, I got the new cables and wireless routers for the project!" 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
Ozz81 posted:
That isn't nearly enough antennas.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:It tickles me that people still remember that incident. Will you tell it again? For the noobs of course.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
quote:Hey, guys, me again with some more slightly less pesky DSL questions. :-) 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 08:52
|
|
|
Ozz81 posted:
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 09:32
|
|
|
No hands + wedding ring?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 11:08
|
|
|
Is... Is that larches' CE?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 12:28
|
|
|
You constructed a voodoo doll out of buffalo parts. It was a joke but then, when it became 95% full of itself...
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 12:33
|
|
|
I sent in an application, guys.
A Frosty Witch fucked around with this message at 15:46 on Oct 28, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 12:37
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:I sent in an application, guys. An application came in...
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 15:54
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:I sent in an application, guys. Not in .rtf, was rejected.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 16:20
|
|
|
In a final bit of irony, larchesdanrew's submission was lost when it was saved to a Buffalo NAS that was 95% full.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
Japanese Dating Sim posted:So I work at a school in a larger campus, independent of our central IT which obviously manages the infrastructure among other things. So my boss got super weird when I showed him a policy today that explicitly says that no one is allowed to plug in consumer-grade access points to extend access to our network. He was concerned that I take things "too seriously" and referenced a time a few weeks ago when I said that we should not actually be "testing" a cell phone jamming device (which they were). I tried to explain how it's generally a good idea to stay on your infrastructure group's good side and that, while I wouldn't get fired over it, I could very easily have my rights to our InfoBlox (necessary to whitelist devices so that they can receive DHCP addresses) revoked. Aside from the InfoBlox thing he said that I shouldn't be concerned with what they think of me "unless I'm thinking of working there eventually."
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
Japanese Dating Sim posted:So my boss got super weird when I showed him a policy today that explicitly says that no one is allowed to plug in consumer-grade access points to extend access to our network. He was concerned that I take things "too seriously" and referenced a time a few weeks ago when I said that we should not actually be "testing" a cell phone jamming device (which they were). Well, are you thinking of working there eventually? Sounds like you should.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Japanese Dating Sim posted:I said that we should not actually be "testing" a cell phone jamming device (which they were).
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
nexxai posted:Cell phone jammers are not only a bad idea, they're illegal. If your company is doing stuff like this regularly, you should really be starting to ensure that you have all of your objections on the record (e.g. in email, etc.) to protect yourself. I'm sure they have an exception from the FCC, they're probably developing equipment that they sell to the FCC to detect violations.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 19:59
|
|
|
A guy here is applying at another station as an assistant broadcast engineer. The CE there wants to talk to our CE, and apparently everyone has cooked up a plan to have that call forwarded to me to pretend I'm the CE, since the real one is a fuckwad. No one told me this until he called. That was a fun conversation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 20:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 01:52 |
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:A guy here is applying at another station as an assistant broadcast engineer. The CE there wants to talk to our CE, and apparently everyone has cooked up a plan to have that call forwarded to me to pretend I'm the CE, since the real one is a fuckwad. So did your coworker get the job?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2015 20:10
|
|
