|
Joementum posted:Your perpetual turgidity for the clearly absurd classification rules never ceases to amuse. My employers have apparently rather effectively hammered into me over the years that is a thing you don't gently caress with. And I've seen brilliant, great people lose their careers over it.
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 19:08 |
|
|
mlmp08 posted:My employers have apparently rather effectively hammered into me over the years that is a thing you don't gently caress with. And I've seen brilliant, great people lose their careers over it. That too bad that people are fired over what's been proven time and time again to be ridiculous.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
Obama please criminalize Star Wars
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
Joementum posted:That too bad that people are fired over what's been proven time and time again to be ridiculous. Probly yeah.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
Obama please weaponize bad posting
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
AlternateNu posted:How have I not seen these before? Check out West Wing Week as well, its decent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq6dv4cJm0Q
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:39
|
|
Bless you, Joementum!
|
mlmp08 posted:Hearing reports of clearly marked as classified stuff sent/received by HRC from Politico with right-wing sites claiming to have screenshots. I'm hearing reports that HRC is incredibly bad at technology. HRC posted:From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com] Phil Reines posted:From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
I apologize if somebody already said something like this, but it struck me how funny the optics between last week's big news item compares to this week's debate. Hillary Clinton is grilled for 11 hours by a mostly hostile congressional panel: "She's shady and inscrutable." 10 GOP candidates get lobbed softballs for an hour and a half: "The liberal media is too focused on 'gotcha' journalism and is engaging in bad faith." That combined with a couple of the GOP candidates (I remember Christie and Fiorina, not sure if more) specifically calling Hillary out and saying they could beat her in a general election debate was really funny to me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
Tobermory posted:I'm hearing reports that HRC is incredibly bad at technology. Clinton has stated she wants the majority of the emails released to the public. Who's responsible for slowly leaking them out in a dribble in order to cause controversy?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
computer parts posted:Nope, because Qui-Gon is still "part of the system". The Jedi Order created the prophecy in the first place, and his goal is to fulfill it. You can get away with this if he players the Reverend Mother Mohiam (or Hera for that matter) role, bit it still needs to be a bullshit test that the chosen one overcomes actively. Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 00:50 on Oct 31, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
Mitt Romney posted:Clinton has stated she wants the majority of the emails released to the public. Who's responsible for slowly leaking them out in a dribble in order to cause controversy? I'm not sure whether that's dumb GOP politics or the FBI clearing Emails for release piecemeal so classified info can be redacted. Or both.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
saltylopez posted:I apologize if somebody already said something like this, but it struck me how funny the optics between last week's big news item compares to this week's debate. That's because they're grooming the debate crowd for when Hillary takes the gloves off and beats the GOP candidate up and down the stage.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
DemeaninDemon posted:That's because they're grooming the debate crowd for when Hillary takes the gloves off and beats the GOP candidate up and down the stage. Y'all overthunkin it. It's because the Republicans are whiny baby candidates and Hillary isn't.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
In case you're feeling too happy on this fine All Hallows Eve, here is an article on the racist history of the candy industry.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
Tobermory posted:I'm hearing reports that HRC is incredibly bad at technology. Is it weird that knowing H is basically my grandma that posts to my Facebook wall asking for printer tech support humanizes her in my mind more than anything else she's ever done?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:In case you're feeling too happy on this fine All Hallows Eve, here is an article on the racist history of the candy industry. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:01
|
|
|
Tobermory posted:I'm hearing reports that HRC is incredibly bad at technology. Yes, grandma. They're called emoticons, grandma. You can type them out and sometimes you have buttons for them. Yes, I know some of them are cute. Emojis are kind of the same thing. Okay, grandma. Mom will call you later this week. Good Citizen posted:Is it weird that knowing H is basically my grandma that posts to my Facebook wall asking for printer tech support humanizes her in my mind more than anything else she's ever done? It reminds me of the cute elderly ladies I work with. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:01
|
|
|
Good Citizen posted:Is it weird that knowing H is basically my grandma that posts to my Facebook wall asking for printer tech support humanizes her in my mind more than anything else she's ever done? thc is leaking 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:04
|
|
|
dtaquote:However, 41% said that from what they heard about or saw in the debate, Trump would be the best candidate to lead the U.S. economy. Another 14% named Ted Cruz and 11% named Ben Carson as best able to handle the nation's economy. Overall, Jeb Bush fared worst in Wednesday's debate, scoring a -36 for his debate performance, and just 4% saying he would handle the economy best.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:04
|
|
|
Berke Negri posted:What do you all think Debbie Wasserman Schultz favorite Star Wars movie is. The Undiscovered Country
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:07
|
|
|
mlmp08 posted:Hearing reports of clearly marked as classified stuff sent/received by HRC from Politico with right-wing sites claiming to have screenshots. You don't claim to have screenshots if you're a right wing post if you actually have screenshots, you post the screenshots. They're screenshots, you've got them, you can censor them in five minutes with paint, and you're rushing to be the first one to break the story so you can be the next Drudge.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:08
|
|
|
fukkin rekked
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:12
|
|
|
mlmp08 posted:Hearing reports of clearly marked as classified stuff sent/received by HRC from Politico with right-wing sites claiming to have screenshots. Seems like bernie supporters are more pumped over her stumbling on BLM and buzzfeed going through thousands of bill admin. records and finding nothing regarding DOMA that fits the "there was a worse amendment DOMA pre-empted" narrative if this is true it sounds pretty juicy, though
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:12
|
|
|
Neurolimal posted:Seems like bernie supporters are more pumped over her stumbling on BLM and buzzfeed going through thousands of bill admin. records and finding nothing regarding DOMA that fits the "there was a worse amendment DOMA pre-empted" narrative The Republicans literally were saying we needed a constitutional amendment against gay marriage and who knows what else they'd throw in. Just because they weren't retarded enough to actually write the amendment doesn't mean there wasn't a very real climate of 'if DOMA doesn't work they're going to parlay that into a bigger thing using 'SEE CLINTON WON'T LET US DO OUR JOBS AND FIGHT THE QUEERS FOR YOU'.' Far be it from me to doubt the journalistic integrity of Buzzfeed of course, but this sounds like the same kind of argument the 'act of terror' vs 'terrorist attack' was.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:The Republicans literally were saying we needed a constitutional amendment against gay marriage and who knows what else they'd throw in. Just because they weren't retarded enough to actually write the amendment doesn't mean there wasn't a very real climate of 'if DOMA doesn't work they're going to parlay that into a bigger thing using 'SEE CLINTON WON'T LET US DO OUR JOBS AND FIGHT THE QUEERS FOR YOU'.' Gawker and sister sites have actually adopted a pretty interesting formula where sensationalist articles are used to allow financial leeway for more in-depth investigative articles. Here's the article in question so you can decide for yourself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
So is there any history of Presidential candidates trying to score points off of debate moderators instead of their opponents, prior to Newt Gingrich, and now the CRUZ MISSILE and company?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:32
|
|
|
Fojar38 posted:I would really really like to see the GOP debates hosted by Twitch. "That's a really good point Mr. Trump but I'm going to interrupt you for a moment because Roxie just ran up into my lap and I'm going to shuffle this ferret. Loot at her, so rubbery! Shuffle that ferret!" -Twitch GOP debate moderator LethalFrag (I know Frag would never moderate such a debate no matter how much they paid him despite being one of Twitch's biggest streamers but I could totally see him being more interested in his pets than the candidates)
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
Neurolimal posted:Gawker and sister sights have actually adopted a pretty interesting formula where sensationalist articles are used to allow financial leeway for more in-depth investigative articles. I phrased that too smugly, I'm not saying they're like, LYING, I just think they're misrepresenting the climate and using 'well we didn't find any MEMOS about it so, ya know' as a way to dismiss what plenty of actual gay rights historians can tell you was a genuinely very scary time for the movement. Like, no one's saying DOMA was awesome, but it was less of a poo poo sandwich that had mechanisms in it to be challenged much easier than something like an amendment could ever be.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
Zwabu posted:So is there any history of Presidential candidates trying to score points off of debate moderators instead of their opponents, prior to Newt Gingrich, and now the CRUZ MISSILE and company? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2_49TycdE
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
Reagan was a California anarchist - the kids loved him!
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
Its 1am my time here, is it too early for USPOL Nov Titles? USPOL Nov: There are still 11 GoP debates to go
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:Y'all overthunkin it. It's because the Republicans are whiny baby candidates and Hillary isn't. Please don't Boehner shame the entire GOP please. #NotAllGOPCries  ^  I forgot that the eagle does that. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:52
|
|
|
Lovin the new thread title 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:Its 1am my time here, is it too early for USPOL Nov Titles? October has 31 days. So it's not November yet even where you are. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:October has 31 days. Thanks, Obama. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:You don't claim to have screenshots if you're a right wing post if you actually have screenshots, you post the screenshots. They're screenshots, you've got them, you can censor them in five minutes with paint, and you're rushing to be the first one to break the story so you can be the next Drudge. I should have said "I saw screenshots but do not know if they were doctored." The screenshot was of the super fancy classification of "confidential" which is pretty loving small fry.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 02:27
|
|
|
At the risk looking stupid, can someone explain the joke behind calling the HFC the Tortilla Coasters or whatever? VVV Thanks Internet Kraken fucked around with this message at 02:35 on Oct 31, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
Internet Kraken posted:At the risk looking stupid, can someone explain the joke behind calling the HFC the Tortilla Coasters or whatever? They regularly book the basement of Washington D.C. Tex-Mex restaurant The Tortilla Coast for their meetings.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
Sharpened by the fact that TC is not a very good restaurant (Source: been there)
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 02:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 19:08 |
|
|
TheQat posted:Sharpened by the fact that TC is not a very good restaurant Also been there. Checks out. Decent free chips.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2015 03:04
|
|
