|
I can't think of any language with a v or t with a dot under. Must be Latverian, I suppose.
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 17:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:50 |
|
|
goatface posted:I can't think of any language with a v or t with a dot under. It's an ellipses, nerdboy. Victor... is here!
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
There is like an 80% chance it's just a Doom-bot, as always.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 20:29
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:So is ~Pretty Doom~ basically so they can eventually do a FF movie that doesn't suck because they can't get Dr Doom right? pretty doom is for my yaoi fanfics
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 22:50
|
|
|
SirDan3k posted:There is like an 80% chance it's just a Doom-bot, as always. Or Doom from another Earth. His comments about the Wand of Watomb are a bit weird.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
RottenK posted:pretty doom is for my yaoi fanfics My Doom on Doom slashfic is one step closer to being published by Marvel.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 01:43
|
|
|
We already got Doom on Doom action in Winter Soldier. The good one, not the current one.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:We already got Doom on Doom action in Winter Soldier. The good one, not the current one. It's happened a few times. Byrne did it in his F4 run, it happened during Infinity War and another time that I'm blanking on.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 05:06
|
|
Yeah but Winter Soldier actually used the phrase "Doom on Doom action" 
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 05:10
|
|
|
I'm banking on convoluted long-con scheme to gently caress with everybody's heads, as DOOM do.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 06:46
|
|
|
Wapole Languray posted:I'm banking on convoluted long-con scheme to gently caress with everybody's heads, as DOOM do. He waited fifty years for his face turn just to gently caress with Reed's head.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
Dammit Who? posted:He waited fifty years for his face turn just to gently caress with Reed's head. Reed is gone off the earth and the only one around is evil, and he and Richards  can not be on the same side, so he has to be good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
Maybe if they'd waited to finish the big crossover reboot before launching all the new titles, we'd know what the gently caress was going on.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 20:51
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:Maybe if they'd waited to finish the big crossover reboot before launching all the new titles, we'd know what the gently caress was going on. Yes let's hold up 70 books because one is running late.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:Maybe if they'd waited to finish the big crossover reboot before launching all the new titles, we'd know what the gently caress was going on. We might but we might not. All titles have that time jump.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Fuego Fish posted:Maybe if they'd waited to finish the big crossover reboot before launching all the new titles, we'd know what the gently caress was going on. Reed fights Doom and maybe sacrifices his life in a deal with Molecule Man or becomes a Beyonder or some poo poo and the world resets to right before the impact and everything's fine but some stuff made it through from Battleworld. There ya go.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Yes let's hold up 70 books because one is running late. To be fair they only have to do this because of terrible planing on their part,
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:To be fair they only have to do this because of terrible planing on their part, I think Ribic has shouldered all the blame on this one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:I think Ribic has shouldered all the blame on this one. I'm cool with it--it's going to make a beautiful collection later.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 00:00
|
|
|
You aren't supposed to know what's up with Doom as evidenced by Tony not knowing what was up with Doom. When the main character of a book goes "huh-wha?" you the reader as a general rule aren't supposed to know either.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 04:05
|
|
|
redbackground posted:I'm cool with it--it's going to make a beautiful collection later. Agreed, it'll be a great capper to a shelf full of Hickman Marvel books. If they ever finish SHIELD that is.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
It seems like SHIELD is just being saved for when they decide they want to release the collection. Wait until Da Vinci shows up in Agents of SHIELD or some other thing they can vaguely tie it to. Is there a reading list for Hickman's Avengers in collected editions? I got the hardcover that collects 1-13, so I'm covered up to Infinity along with the collection of New Avengers 1-6.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 06:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 09:47
|
|
|
Spidey is onto her bullshit. Good job, Parker.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 12:15
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:Do they give an award at the Eisners for speech bubble arrangement? Maybe a special award for that effort. I agree. It is well laid out and paced and effective, but I also still like Bending snappy back and forth stuff. Current Marvel is really impressive and fun. Didn't think I could feel that way about this stuff again.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 15:20
|
|
|
An artists gets a memo from up top. He nervously unfolds it. BENDIS. gently caress yes, he thinks, as he kicks back, puts his feet on his drawing board, and turns on his cheapy radio to If You Like Piña Coladas.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2015 02:22
|
|
|
Malachite_Dragon posted:Spidey is onto her bullshit. Good job, Parker. It's also great for whenever people at Marvel use the Charlie Brown analogy for why Peter can't mature.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2015 13:22
|
|
|
That went a lot smoother than the time Ray Smuckles met Charlie Brown.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2015 18:25
|
|
Gavok posted:That went a lot smoother than the time Ray Smuckles met Charlie Brown. You'd think it'd be easier to give some bad news to Charlie Brown.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
I immediately heard Capcom's Spiderman theme when the web came in. Is that wrong?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
Yes because you should hear the 60s cartoon song at all times anytime Spider-man is in your field of view.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2015 14:34
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Yes because you should hear the 60s cartoon song at all times anytime Spider-man is in your field of view. SPIDER-BLOOD! SPIDER-BLOOD! RADIOACTIVE SPIDER-BLOOD!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
Bloodly posted:I immediately heard Capcom's Spiderman theme when the web came in. Is that wrong? Lurdiak posted:Yes because you should hear the 60s cartoon song at all times anytime Spider-man is in your field of view. Unmature posted:SPIDER-BLOOD! All three are acceptable answers. Also acceptable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ51514spHg YE-YEAH YEAAAAAH WOW! YE-YEAH YEAAAAAH WOW!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
Baba Yaga Fanboy posted:All three are acceptable answers. What about LOOK OUT (heavy panting) HERE COMES THE SPIDER-MAN
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Yes because you should hear the 60s cartoon song at all times anytime Spider-man is in your field of view. Still, Captain America's Capcom theme > Cap's 60's cartoon song. Similarly, "Streets of Desolation" from the NES game is the one true Batman theme as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2015 20:37
|
|
Gavok posted:Still, Captain America's Capcom theme > Cap's 60's cartoon song. That's a tough call for me. Those lyrics are just so on-point.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
Every once in a while I'll get the Spectacular Spider-Man theme stuck in my head. Man I miss that cartoon, doubly so since Ultimate is so poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:Every once in a while I'll get the Spectacular Spider-Man theme stuck in my head. Man I miss that cartoon, doubly so since Ultimate is so poo poo. Radioactive Spider-bider?
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:Every once in a while I'll get the Spectacular Spider-Man theme stuck in my head. Man I miss that cartoon, doubly so since Ultimate is so poo poo. Frankly, I've been singing it this whole page. It's catchy as hell. (and considering the competition, that's really saying something)
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:50 |
|
|
The only non-catchy Spider-man themes are these two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UM_Om0eH3A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qcJS_e2_hY Apparently Sam Raimi was really unhappy with Elfman's work on those movies. I guess he wanted him to do for Spidey what he did for Batman.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2015 01:45
|
|