|
sounds similar to mine but im running amd gfx 
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 13:49 |
|
|
echinopsis posted:nvidia lol he just likes getting something for his money (contrary to what his purchase history might say)
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 04:04
|
|
|
I got gigabit fiber to my house by my Asus RT-N16 can only handle 110mbit on the NAT before the CPU falls over and top reads 1.8. Are there consumer routers that can reliably push gigabit speeds through a NAT or should I just bite the bullet and run a mini pc for router duties and have it double as a NAS?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 05:47
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I got gigabit fiber to my house by my Asus RT-N16 can only handle 110mbit on the NAT before the CPU falls over and top reads 1.8. Are there consumer routers that can reliably push gigabit speeds through a NAT or should I just bite the bullet and run a mini pc for router duties and have it double as a NAS? im gonna say an airport extreme or something ubiquity will be hte best you will prolly do before hitting legit routers?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
ubiquiti will have something. that or go mikrotik
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
obstipator posted:i dont get linux, so idk which parts are vague. You would need to give www-data at least execute rights on all directories in between because it needs to traverse them all. (don't do this) don't install stuff in root's homedir that is really dumb, put stuff like that under /opt and then make it world-readable and executable (or just for www-data if you need to limit the use of node to the webserver on that system but I dont see why)
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 08:01
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I got gigabit fiber to my house by my Asus RT-N16 can only handle 110mbit on the NAT before the CPU falls over and top reads 1.8. Are there consumer routers that can reliably push gigabit speeds through a NAT or should I just bite the bullet and run a mini pc for router duties and have it double as a NAS? my asus ac56u does 800-900 something, good enough imo
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 09:32
|
|
|
also if you've flashed something like ddwrt or tomato you may lose hardware acceleration due to the driver depending on the manufacture which can severely gently caress your NAT speeds
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 10:15
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:You would need to give www-data at least execute rights on all directories in between because it needs to traverse them all. (don't do this) sweet, this helps a bunch for a linux idiot like me. thanks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 15:34
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:also if you've flashed something like ddwrt or tomato you may lose hardware acceleration due to the driver depending on the manufacture which can severely gently caress your NAT speeds Yeah, I'm reverting it to the asus firmware since tomato apparently kills cut through forwarding. This unit doesn't do true hardware offload, so apparently the best I can expect from what others have said is it will push about 250mbit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 16:36
|
|
|
Maximum Leader posted:my asus ac56u does 800-900 something, good enough imo $85? Sold.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 16:37
|
|
|
I went with the Linksys EA6900 after messing around on the smallnetbuilder site for way too long. Seems like the best all-arounder for wifi peformance while maintaining gigabit throughput on the wan. Computer are dumb as poo poo and this was too difficult.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:sounds similar to mine but im running amd gfx Take a look at me
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I went with the Linksys EA6900 after messing around on the smallnetbuilder site for way too long. Seems like the best all-arounder for wifi peformance while maintaining gigabit throughput on the wan. Computer are dumb as poo poo and this was too difficult.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
You Am I posted:I'm Mr Bad Example eh honestly people keep saying it's poo poo but I have no idea why
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 08:23
|
|
|
UBNT is good
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2015 15:26
|
|
|
youtube buffers really slowly in chrome, but if I switch to firefox it loads fast as gently caress. anyone know what might cause this? i uninstalled all my extensiopns except for linkclump, tampermonkey and ublock and honestly if one of those is causing it i' m just going to switch to firefox
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
also i just got a really good new computer so it isn't a hardware issue probably
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:youtube buffers really slowly in chrome, but if I switch to firefox it loads fast as gently caress. anyone know what might cause this? this is a dumb aside but i had this problem in linux and it turned out they were both using html5 but firefox out of the box on linux can't play anything above 480p without manual about :config changes and so was just very quickly loading 480p
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:youtube buffers really slowly in chrome, but if I switch to firefox it loads fast as gently caress. anyone know what might cause this? chome is a goog product and goog only wants you to load the ad. also the buffering indicator in youtube is a lie
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 05:18
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:youtube buffers really slowly in chrome, but if I switch to firefox it loads fast as gently caress. anyone know what might cause this? chrome will try to use its UDP based QUIC protocol instead of regular TCP. maybe your ISP is doing something that is causing that kind of traffic to slow down. You can disable QUIC in chrome://flags to see if that changes anything.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 05:23
|
|
|
the bufferring graphic i'm sure is bullshit but lately chrome has been reaching the end of the buffer before the video is over a lot i just disabled QUIC and it seems better but only time will tell ty
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
ive been getting a feeling that my latops screen darkens/lightens (idk) in a weird way depending on whether if i browse yospos or grey forums, and it is very distracting. any ideas if that could be actual monitor problem?
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 20:16
|
|
|
kalstrams posted:ive been getting a feeling that my latops screen darkens/lightens (idk) in a weird way depending on whether if i browse yospos or grey forums, and it is very distracting. any ideas if that could be actual monitor problem? this, maybe? http://www.howtogeek.com/107173/disable-windows-8s-adaptive-brightness-to-fix-dark-screen-problems/
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 20:18
|
|
|
no, unfortunately
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 20:41
|
|
|
kalstrams posted:ive been getting a feeling that my latops screen darkens/lightens (idk) in a weird way depending on whether if i browse yospos or grey forums, and it is very distracting. any ideas if that could be actual monitor problem? my tv deffo adjusts the backlighting depending on how dark the onscreen image is, it's really noticeable at night i've never heard of a computer doing this but it's possible
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 22:05
|
|
|
syscall girl posted:my tv deffo adjusts the backlighting depending on how dark the onscreen image is, it's really noticeable at night
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
yah but strangely enough i didnt notice it until recent. otoh i have theory that actually sleeping should help with this issue 
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
the light emitted from the display trips the light sensor which causes the display to get brighter. repeat until max brightness.
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
wolffenstein posted:the light emitted from the display trips the light sensor which causes the display to get brighter. repeat until max brightness. never understood the appeal best is when it's bright out and you go to the menu and it's all black and it dims to near invisibility thank you teleputer
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
im doing some poo poo telnetting into devices and running commands programmatically. is there a correct way to know when the response has been fully sent? right now i just check for the shell prompt string and assume its done sending output at that point, but a lotof these devices just use "#" for shell prompt, which has been coming up a lot in the response outputs from the commands im running, giving false positives
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
obstipator posted:im doing some poo poo telnetting into devices and running commands programmatically. is there a correct way to know when the response has been fully sent? right now i just check for the shell prompt string and assume its done sending output at that point, but a lotof these devices just use "#" for shell prompt, which has been coming up a lot in the response outputs from the commands im running, giving false positives i might be misunderstanding what you mean but i know && is a thing you can do that says "execute this command after the previous command completes successfully" like code:
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:33
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i might be misunderstanding what you mean but i know && is a thing you can do that says "execute this command after the previous command completes successfully" like if you're at the # prompt you don't need sudo 
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i might be misunderstanding what you mean but i know && is a thing you can do that says "execute this command after the previous command completes successfully" like you are a genius. thanks!
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
obstipator posted:you are a genius. thanks! if you want to see the exit code of the last thing you ran, do 'echo $?'
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:if you're at the # prompt you don't need sudo 
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
don't use telnet ever, if a device doesn't support ssh and only supports telnet throw it away
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 19:38
|
|
|
is there any vpn/vps yospos recommends for low latency stuff? my TWC net is having routing issues where some servers have terrible routes and others are fine, so i'm thinking of using a vpn just for the improved routing. but all the vpns I know of are poo poo i've done this before using a nearby low-end vps for browsing but they tend to randomly disconnect
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
Broken Machine posted:don't use telnet ever, if a device doesn't support ssh and only supports telnet throw it away RIP a shitload of networking, telecom, medical, etc. equipment
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 13:49 |
|
|
ahmeni posted:RIP a shitload of networking, telecom, medical, etc. equipment
|
|
#
?
Nov 15, 2015 03:13
|
|