Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Juul-Whip
Mar 10, 2008

M.McFly posted:

You held up the BC Liberals as an example of progressives in power:


They're not.

Those are all liberal parties though :confused:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
You've achieved the perfect intersection of smugness and whininess. Good job, we were all cheering for you to finally reach it eventually.

Oh, and pedantry, we mustn't forget that!

Juul-Whip
Mar 10, 2008

I'm sorry for not being as awesome, reasonable and pleasant as you are.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

THC posted:

I'm sorry for not being as awesome, reasonable and pleasant as you are.

As well you should be.

Coxswain Balls
Jun 4, 2001

PT6A posted:

Good, they obviously hate their staff as much as us poor bastards who have ever had to deal with their staff.

Bell Media is going to be CTV and the like, rather than the telecom side (unless you deal with Bell Media for ??? reasons). While I get pretty much all of my news media from the CBC, they seemed pretty decent with how they called out the Bell higher-ups earlier in the year when it came to reporting on CRTC rulings, so this is kinda crummy. I've got an old friend who works for CTV, so I hope she's doing alright.

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Ikantski posted:

I'm arguing that Liberal means taking the position that will get you into power while saying you're the most progressive. In BC, that meant a coalition with conservatives. Better than not being in power at all right? That's Liberal. The conservatives in BC have some power but really only as much as the Liberals give them.

I generally take your word for it on matters of Ontario politics, but you don't know much about BC. There is no liberal/conservative coalition here with only so much power being given to one side or the other. If you are in politics, and you are not NDP, and you are not a loon you are a BC Liberal.

The reason the BC Liberals are not progressives, is the previous union breaking conservative party that was mortally wounded by corruption bought membership cards in a not even laughably third place party and took it over from the inside. Now while I am sure there are actually liberals in the party, it is mostly because what other party would they work for.

quote:

“Our provincial housing strategy is the most progressive in this country’s history,” said Premier Clark.

The most progressive housing in the country is basically a mixture of trying to get any other level of government to deal with it, to housing the poor in actual literal prisons. The definition of progressive governance imo.

e: Oh yeah, and selling social housing to slum lords. Forgot that one.

ocrumsprug fucked around with this message at 04:51 on Nov 18, 2015

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Coxswain Balls posted:

Bell Media is going to be CTV and the like, rather than the telecom side (unless you deal with Bell Media for ??? reasons). While I get pretty much all of my news media from the CBC, they seemed pretty decent with how they called out the Bell higher-ups earlier in the year when it came to reporting on CRTC rulings, so this is kinda crummy. I've got an old friend who works for CTV, so I hope she's doing alright.

Which side handles ExpressVu? Mobility has actually been decent for me, but ExpressVu is an affront to god and man, as is everything associated with it.

Coxswain Balls
Jun 4, 2001

That's going to be Bell TV, not to be confused with the IPTV service Bell offers in areas where it has an internet footprint.

Melian Dialogue
Jan 9, 2015

NOT A RACIST
----

Melian Dialogue fucked around with this message at 05:22 on Feb 2, 2016

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost

Fine by me to contribute like that. Just don't want them staffing full bases and doing combat poo poo and whatnot.

Tighclops
Jan 23, 2008

Unable to deal with it


Grimey Drawer

sbaldrick posted:

So Bell Media has gone through their staff with a hatchit today.

They've been getting rid of everyone at the top of their pay grade for over a year now. Broadcast television is dying.

The Butcher
Apr 20, 2005

Well, at least we tried.
Nap Ghost

Tighclops posted:

They've been getting rid of everyone at the top of their pay grade for over a year now. Broadcast television is dying.

Good.

lovely about the jobs but gently caress cable TV.

Melian Dialogue
Jan 9, 2015

NOT A RACIST
--

Melian Dialogue fucked around with this message at 05:22 on Feb 2, 2016

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes

ocrumsprug posted:

I generally take your word for it on matters of Ontario politics, but you don't know much about BC. There is no liberal/conservative coalition here with only so much power being given to one side or the other. If you are in politics, and you are not NDP, and you are not a loon you are a BC Liberal.

The reason the BC Liberals are not progressives, is the previous union breaking conservative party that was mortally wounded by corruption bought membership cards in a not even laughably third place party and took it over from the inside. Now while I am sure there are actually liberals in the party, it is mostly because what other party would they work for.

Sorry, I was just going off the article that McFly linked, that said

quote:

Ms. Clark launched the review two years ago, when her party was struggling to renew that centre-right coalition. A year later, the B.C. Liberals won a fourth consecutive provincial election, effectively ending the question of whether the Liberal brand was a problem at the polling booth.

"It's a good brand," said Rich Coleman, a senior cabinet minister who represents the party's Conservative wing. "We can win in 2017 with the B.C. Liberal label."

I said before, I shouldn't have said that only progressives are in power. I should have said that conservative branded parties and, by extension the goofs that keep getting dragged here from facebook, have no voice at all right now. There's no minorities even that need PC party support. The ABC movement has won. The only way conservative people have any decision making power in Canada right now is to be in Saskatchewan or to brand themselves Liberals.

Femtosecond
Aug 2, 2003


Seems like a convenient excuse to quietly back out of a market where your product is clearly substandard and can't compete.

JohnnyCanuck
May 28, 2004

Strong And/Or Free

ocrumsprug posted:

I generally take your word for it on matters of Ontario politics

Why? Ikantski is an OPC booster who's whole shtick is painting both the ONDP and the OLP in the worst possible light. He's been going off like this since the Ontario election.

Furnaceface
Oct 21, 2004




Ikantski posted:

Sorry, I was just going off the article that McFly linked, that said


I said before, I shouldn't have said that only progressives are in power. I should have said that conservative branded parties and, by extension the goofs that keep getting dragged here from facebook, have no voice at all right now. There's no minorities even that need PC party support. The ABC movement has won. The only way conservative people have any decision making power in Canada right now is to be in Saskatchewan or to brand themselves Liberals.

And yet they seem to be doing a drat fine job despite all that "lack of voice". The conservative mindset has forced every single party to the right of where they previously were and we all took the middle and moved it with them.

JohnnyCanuck posted:

Why? Ikantski is an OPC booster who's whole shtick is painting both the ONDP and the OLP in the worst possible light. He's been going off like this since the Ontario election.

He is a coveted Job Creator small business owner and you shall not slander his righteous prophecy of Lord Brown of Barrie's coming.

Furnaceface fucked around with this message at 05:26 on Nov 18, 2015

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes

JohnnyCanuck posted:

Why? Ikantski is an OPC booster who's whole shtick is painting both the ONDP and the OLP in the worst possible light. He's been going off like this since the Ontario election.

I like the ONDP, I'd vote for them in a heartbeat if they had a chance of winning my riding and I voted NDP federally? My shtick is anyone but Liberal.

Furnaceface posted:

And yet they seem to be doing a drat fine job despite all that "lack of voice". The conservative mindset has forced every single party to the right of where they previously were and we all took the middle and moved it with them.

He is a coveted Job Creator small business owner and you shall not slander his righteous prophecy of Lord Brown of Barrie's coming.

So conservatives are to blame for the wrong things Liberals and NDP do, got it.

Beelzebufo
Mar 5, 2015

Frog puns are toadally awesome


Furnaceface posted:

And yet they seem to be doing a drat fine job despite all that "lack of voice". The conservative mindset has forced every single party to the right of where they previously were and we all took the middle and moved it with them.


He is a coveted Job Creator small business owner and you shall not slander his righteous prophecy of Lord Brown of Barrie's coming.

What are you talking about? They have a lack of voice now because a month ago they lost power federally. Did you even read what Ikantski wrote? He didn't say the conservatives have been on the outskirts forever, he's saying they're on the outskirts now

All these racists fearmongering on Facebook haven't changed the current government's stance on refugees or withdrawing air support at all. The Liberals are not the progressive messiahs people think they are, fine, but you and a whole lot of other posters are being extremly disingenuous when it comes to parroting the old canard of " they're all the same ". They demonstrably aren't, as the huge policy changes already in the works attest to. Try having some substance to your commentary instead of rehashing the same goddamn statements over and over.

E: All major parties in Canada still operate on a capitalist ideology of perpetual growth and development as there path to prosperity. True socialism isn't on the table. This is true. But it doesn't make them the same in any meaningful sense.

Beelzebufo fucked around with this message at 06:06 on Nov 18, 2015

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001
All of Canada can be seen as a historically specific order of rule, following a socio-political logic: liberalism.

(I think only Hand Knit will get this)

a primate
Jun 2, 2010

gently caress Bell Media hard. They're a bunch of corrupt bastards who are willing to bribe and intimidate anyone in order to ensure that their ratings are high. I hope they die a slow death and file for bankruptcy.

gently caress 90% of the Canadian television establishment while I'm at it, including the ratings lackey Numeris.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.
why are people still saying that Isis is slipping in with refugees, I think all or maybe all but 1 of the Paris attackers were French or Belgian nationals. They are demonstrably not slipping in with refugees, they are targeting dissaffected and marginalized youth already in the countries they strike in. I know the Internet is a cess pool of lies but it's all over the goddamn news right now, how can this many people be willing to believe oppositeofreality.txt

gently caress these shitheads, and gently caress their juvenile posting style with custy nicknames and self-censorship of swears, what the gently caress is that poo poo, that's like what freepers do

The Dark One
Aug 19, 2005

I'm your friend and I'm not going to just stand by and let you do this!
Who was that poster in the old CanPol threads who wished not for the pendulum swing of the Liberals and the Tories, but the benevolent rule of a philosopher king? I wish Ikantski had chosen a gimmick that amusing.

MagicCube
May 25, 2004

The Dark One posted:

Who was that poster in the old CanPol threads who wished not for the pendulum swing of the Liberals and the Tories, but the benevolent rule of a philosopher king? I wish Ikantski had chosen a gimmick that amusing.

Probably Fraternite, who thought that Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew was the model on which we should follow. It wasn't a gimmick though, that's for sure.

Stretch Marx
Apr 29, 2008

I'm ok with this.

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

why are people still saying that Isis is slipping in with refugees, I think all or maybe all but 1 of the Paris attackers were French or Belgian nationals. They are demonstrably not slipping in with refugees, they are targeting dissaffected and marginalized youth already in the countries they strike in. I know the Internet is a cess pool of lies but it's all over the goddamn news right now, how can this many people be willing to believe oppositeofreality.txt

gently caress these shitheads, and gently caress their juvenile posting style with custy nicknames and self-censorship of swears, what the gently caress is that poo poo, that's like what freepers do

Because they're cut from the same cloth. At least here in SJ my facebook has had 10 postive and shaming posts for every one where some nut goes off.

Tan Dumplord
Mar 9, 2005

by FactsAreUseless

vyelkin posted:

If you're going to write that script, at least go the whole hog and replace his posts with this:



code:
// ==UserScript==
// @name         SomethingAwful Ikantski Post Enhancer
// @version      LIBERALS!!!
// @description  Make Ikantski posts more succinct
// @author       sliderule
// @match        http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php*
// @grant        none
// @require http://code.jquery.com/jquery-latest.js
// ==/UserScript==

$('.userid-113727').each(function() {
    $(this).parent().find('.postbody').html('<img src="http://i.imgur.com/mu2n3vS.gif" alt="Liberals!!!!!">')
});

$(".quote_link:contains('Ikantski')").each(function() {
    $(this).parent().parent().find('blockquote').html('<img src="http://i.imgur.com/mu2n3vS.gif" alt="Liberals!!!!!">')
});

brucio
Nov 22, 2004
Fraternite/Nomenklatura slapfights were yesteryear's THC/PT6A slapfights. Thread never changes.

DariusLikewise
Oct 4, 2008

You wore that on Halloween?
Globe and Mail continues to show off opinion pieces as actual news

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/glob...&service=mobile

Jordan7hm
Feb 17, 2011




Lipstick Apathy

DariusLikewise posted:

Globe and Mail continues to show off opinion pieces as actual news

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/glob...&service=mobile

Uhhhh

It's in an "opinions" section called "Globe Debates - Canada’s leading forum for world-class opinion and debate".

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Ikantski posted:

Oh come on man, civil servants are dancing in the halls, we're fighting climate change, we're bringing peace to the middle east, legalizing weed and annoying legal gun owners. It's night and day and parliament hasn't even started yet. Look at this group of cabinet ministers and their values compared to the last group, I'd say there are major differences and that should lead to major differences in their decisions.

What values? I see a government that practices corporate boosterism, toleration of alternative lifestyles and immigrants, support of the state institutions that benefit it's core supporters, pro-American foreign policy and free trade. Their primary lever for effecting the economy are corporate handouts and boutique tax cuts for the middle class (which a minor adjustment to the tax code thrown in as an election-winning plank).

There are some key differences between them and the outgoing Conservatives but I wouldn't say it's like night and day.

quote:

Perhaps I should have said that conservative parties have virtually no power instead of progressives have all the power, that'd be less likely to offend you guys as progressives and still be accurate.

"Progressives" do make decisions. Progressive voters, people in this very thread who would describe themselves as progressive, made the decision to vote in the most progressive budget and party Ontario has ever seen in 2014 and that decision led to the progressive decision to sell off our public utility so that we could progress on building some light rail lines. That was a decision made by progressives that conservatives got absolutely no say in.

First, I find progressive to be such a meaningless term that it's barely a useful label. I certainly don't identify as a progressive myself, even if I occasionally slip into using the term out of sheer convenience.

Second, you're ignoring the extent to which the decisions of private businesses, banks, media outlets and think tanks can shape government and place limits on the scope and extent of government policy. I think it's simplistic and even a bit naive to claim "conservatives" have no influence on policy when the commanding heights of our economy are overwhelmingly controlled by conservative-leaning individuals. You also ignore the extent to which our national and international institutions have been molded along neoconservative / neoliberal lines since the 1970s: progressives may have scored some victories when it comes to accepting alternative forms of sexuality, but our economic debates are all framed in fundamentally conservative language and ideas.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
Apparently Montreal police arrested someone in connection with that nut who said he'd kill one Arab per week in that online video. That's good!

DariusLikewise
Oct 4, 2008

You wore that on Halloween?

Jordan7hm posted:

Uhhhh

It's in an "opinions" section called "Globe Debates - Canada’s leading forum for world-class opinion and debate".

Should have included this. Considering most people won't read past the headline, there isn't much to show that one is an opinion piece and one is an article.

Postess with the Mostest
Apr 4, 2007

Arabian nights
'neath Arabian moons
A fool off his guard
could fall and fall hard
out there on the dunes

Helsing posted:

What values? I see a government that practices corporate boosterism, toleration of alternative lifestyles and immigrants, support of the state institutions that benefit it's core supporters, pro-American foreign policy and free trade. Their primary lever for effecting the economy are corporate handouts and boutique tax cuts for the middle class (which a minor adjustment to the tax code thrown in as an election-winning plank).

There are some key differences between them and the outgoing Conservatives but I wouldn't say it's like night and day.


First, I find progressive to be such a meaningless term that it's barely a useful label. I certainly don't identify as a progressive myself, even if I occasionally slip into using the term out of sheer convenience.

Second, you're ignoring the extent to which the decisions of private businesses, banks, media outlets and think tanks can shape government and place limits on the scope and extent of government policy. I think it's simplistic and even a bit naive to claim "conservatives" have no influence on policy when the commanding heights of our economy are overwhelmingly controlled by conservative-leaning individuals. You also ignore the extent to which our national and international institutions have been molded along neoconservative / neoliberal lines since the 1970s: progressives may have scored some victories when it comes to accepting alternative forms of sexuality, but our economic debates are all framed in fundamentally conservative language and ideas.

For values, let's compare health ministers, that's a spot where values particularly matter. One one hand, we had Ayn Rand loving, pro-life Rona Ambrose. On the other, we have the family doctor who spent 9 years volunteering in Niger, Jane Philpott. At the risk of invoking the thread's irrational disdain for doctors, I would call that about as night and day of a value set as you'll see in Canadian politics.

Look, I just had a showerthought that it was notable, especially in the last two years, that Canadians had pretty well rejected Conservative politicians from coast to coast. The banks and private companies aren't making political decisions, politicians are and the huge majority of those politicians are not branded as conservatives. It will be an interesting couple of years for us to find out how the political system behaves when Conservative politicians are removed from it.

Risky Bisquick
Jan 18, 2008

PLEASE LET ME WRITE YOUR VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT SO I CAN FURTHER DEMONSTRATE THE CALAMITY THAT IS OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.



Buglord
Well what Canada is electing is veiled conservatism that the provincial Liberal parties have drifted towards. They are generally progressive on social issues, but conservative on economic ones.

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Melian Dialogue posted:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-iraq-trainers-military-1.3322288

People's thoughts on increasing the training mission? It'll be interesting to see how large the component is going to be. More like the Ukraine training mission (<200 pers) or more like the 2011 Afghan training mission (~800-1,000 trainers)?.

As well how many people will view this as "ground troops" being deployed? Probably a lot, even if the trainers are in Kirkut somewhere teaching Kurds not to shoot each other.

Honestly, the best ground contribution we could do is robust combat service support, and other headquarters type enablers (intelligence, psyops, cimic, artillery, coordination centres) rather than dropping a whole battle group ala Afghanistan (which I doubt we currently could even sustain in terms of budget and force projection). The fighting on the ground is very much a maneouvre, force-on-force type deal right now, which is honestly the only good thing the CAF excels on (those who keep harping on our so-called "peacekeeping" ability need to realize we've never had that ability. Our combat arms training and manouevre doctrine is still strictly for the other type of missions. We still suck at COIN and peace support ops).

I'm kinda split on the training mission.

I root for the Kurds, and of course despise IS, and wish the Kurds luck.

However, while they're secular, they're not exactly nice people, as a whole. They've already been evicting arabs from their villages, burning homes, and generally being racist dicks. The Kurds territorial claims include areas that were "arabized" under Saddam. The Kurds have a lot of motivation to drive these arabs back and try and reclaim some of that territory. Plus, the various Kurdish groups have a poor history of getting along; a brutal civil war was fought in Iraqi Kurdistan only in the 90s.

My worry with training them is that they'll use their training not just against IS, but against whatever enemies they come across in the future, which could include basically anyone/everyone they live close to. Training militias in the middle east has a long and proud history of backfiring, and I'm not keen to have Canada play a big role in that.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

Ikantski posted:

A fun new game I came up with today is when you hear Left Wing politicians talk about how they're planning to pull out of the fight against ISIS, replace what they're saying with "I want to see young children and women die in horrible ways"

It's getting tedious how similar the religious left and right are.

I don't understand the fascination with conservative facebookers and saskatchewan though, they have zero power. We have a federal Liberal majority. BC, Ontario, Quebec, NS, NB and PEI all Liberal majorities. NDP majorities in Alberta and Manitoba. You've done it, progressives make every major decision in the country now no matter how much conservatives bellyache on facebook. :toot:

Okay

Dr. Stab
Sep 12, 2010
👨🏻‍⚕️🩺🔪🙀😱🙀

bunnyofdoom posted:

You forgot the NL&L is very likely going red too.

Newfoundland and Labrador and Labrador?

Risky Bisquick
Jan 18, 2008

PLEASE LET ME WRITE YOUR VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT SO I CAN FURTHER DEMONSTRATE THE CALAMITY THAT IS OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.



Buglord

Count Roland posted:

My worry with training them is that they'll use their training not just against IS, but against whatever enemies they come across in the future, which could include basically anyone/everyone they live close to. Training militias in the middle east has a long and proud history of backfiring, and I'm not keen to have Canada play a big role in that.

Funny you mention this, the US spent some time training Iraqi forces on how to secure their own country (from AQI) and some were even provided with special forces type training. These forces then proceeded to join alongside the radical extremists :angel:

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

Dr. Stab posted:

Newfoundland and Labrador and Labrador?

NewfoundLand and Labrador.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Whiskey Sours
Jan 25, 2014

Weather proof.

Count Roland posted:

I'm kinda split on the training mission.

I root for the Kurds, and of course despise IS, and wish the Kurds luck.

However, while they're secular, they're not exactly nice people, as a whole. They've already been evicting arabs from their villages, burning homes, and generally being racist dicks. The Kurds territorial claims include areas that were "arabized" under Saddam. The Kurds have a lot of motivation to drive these arabs back and try and reclaim some of that territory. Plus, the various Kurdish groups have a poor history of getting along; a brutal civil war was fought in Iraqi Kurdistan only in the 90s.

My worry with training them is that they'll use their training not just against IS, but against whatever enemies they come across in the future, which could include basically anyone/everyone they live close to. Training militias in the middle east has a long and proud history of backfiring, and I'm not keen to have Canada play a big role in that.

Western governments arm and train the Kurds.

The Kurds declare war on Turkey, a member of NATO.

Western governments declare war on the Kurds.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply