Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
UFOTacoMan
Sep 22, 2005

Thanks easter bunny!
bok bok!

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

https://twitter.com/AthenaCNN/status/667393016210976768

Athena JonesVerified account
‏@AthenaCNN
On good friend & frequent tv spokesman Armstrong Williams, Carson says "he does not speak for me" & has nothing to do with his campaign.

Armstrong Williams, hmm that name sounds familiar...oh yeah, he's that guy!

quote:

"No Child Left Behind" controversy

In January 2005, USA Today reported that documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that Williams had been paid $240,000 to promote the controversial No Child Left Behind Act. USA Today claimed Williams was hired "to promote the law on his nationally syndicated television show and to urge other black journalists to do the same".

As part of the agreement, Williams was required "to regularly comment on NCLB during the course of his broadcasts," and to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots that aired during the show in 2004". The contract with Williams was part of a $1 million contract between the U.S. Department of Education and the public relations company, Ketchum Inc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong_Williams

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Guy A. Person posted:

Christ, this is the same exact meme as you see when there's talk about raising the minimum wage:

"Should these no-skill burger flippers be making more than ARE TROOPS?"

"Okay that's fine, let's spend more tax money on higher salaries for soldiers!"

"Oh er...well...."

It's loving despicable. I agree we need better help for all of our nation's homeless, including veterans. That means an increase in welfare spending geniuses, who do you think is the biggest obstacle to doing that? It ain't the loving Dems.

Not to mention that all of those look exclusively at base pay and utterly loving ignore the free healthcare and either free housing and food or, if of rank or dependent status not to be in barracks housing, substantial tax-free housing and food allotments. I wouldn't be very supportive of minimum wage hikes if all minimum wage jobs also gave out zip code-adjusted tax-free housing pay. The lowest rate in the military for brand-new military members in the cheapest part of the country is around $12,000 per year for rent and food. Tax free.

For a junior enlisted military member, if they live off post their housing/food allotment could easily exceed 50% of their total pay depending on where they live. And then there's the free tuition assistance and other benefits.

I get all kinds of irritated when military members essentially lie about their total compensation to try to put down low-pay workers.

Locobono
Nov 6, 2003

Pump Action

Some of this stuff actually looks good and ethical. Maybe this is what the right truly fears? They'd give up bacon way before exploitative financial maneuvering

mlmp08 posted:

Not to mention that all of those look exclusively at base pay and utterly loving ignore the free healthcare and either free housing and food or, if of rank or dependent status not to be in barracks housing, substantial tax-free housing and food allotments. I wouldn't be very supportive of minimum wage hikes if all minimum wage jobs also gave out zip code-adjusted tax-free housing pay. The lowest rate in the military for brand-new military members in the cheapest part of the country is around $12,000 per year for rent and food. Tax free.

For a junior enlisted military member, if they live off post their housing/food allotment could easily exceed 50% of their total pay depending on where they live. And then there's the free tuition assistance and other benefits.

I get all kinds of irritated when military members essentially lie about their total compensation to try to put down low-pay workers.

I love the irony of the mil / ex-mil crowd crowing obamacare nonsense while benefiting from the most centralized and subsidized pay and benefits system in the country. That said, there are significant downsides you don't get from a regular lovely job, like having no choice in where you live, what you do, and which mind altering substances you're allowed to use to escape all the horror.

Locobono fucked around with this message at 19:52 on Nov 19, 2015

fknlo
Jul 6, 2009


Fun Shoe
Trumps :godwin: pretty much confirms my thinking that he's nothing more than a troll trying to say more and more ridiculous poo poo to see how far it can go while magically still shooting up in polls. There's no other explanation.


zoux posted:

You tell that to This American Hero, Buddy.


Been seeing a lot of this myself. Plenty of stuff about POOR AND STARVING AMERICAN CHILDREN too. Funny how nobody seems to give a gently caress about them outside of this one instance. Wouldn't want those loving leeches getting MY TAX DOLLARS otherwise.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Pew released a study today that showed that more Mexicans actually left the US for Mexico than immigrated north in the past six years.

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

zoux posted:

Pew released a study today that showed that more Mexicans actually left the US for Mexico than immigrated north in the past six years.


They listened to Romney

The Aardvark
Aug 19, 2013


mlmp08 posted:

Not to mention that all of those look exclusively at base pay and utterly loving ignore the free healthcare and either free housing and food or, if of rank or dependent status not to be in barracks housing, substantial tax-free housing and food allotments. I wouldn't be very supportive of minimum wage hikes if all minimum wage jobs also gave out zip code-adjusted tax-free housing pay. The lowest rate in the military for brand-new military members in the cheapest part of the country is around $12,000 per year for rent and food. Tax free.

For a junior enlisted military member, if they live off post their housing/food allotment could easily exceed 50% of their total pay depending on where they live. And then there's the free tuition assistance and other benefits.

I get all kinds of irritated when military members essentially lie about their total compensation to try to put down low-pay workers.

The worst of them are the dual military couples that pull in all of these compensations twice and still say they get paid poo poo.

Like, two E-5s being married out here near Camp Pendleton can easily pull in over $7500 a month just off base pay and BAH.

Venuz Patrol
Mar 27, 2011

mlmp08 posted:

Not to mention that all of those look exclusively at base pay and utterly loving ignore the free healthcare and either free housing and food or, if of rank or dependent status not to be in barracks housing, substantial tax-free housing and food allotments. I wouldn't be very supportive of minimum wage hikes if all minimum wage jobs also gave out zip code-adjusted tax-free housing pay. The lowest rate in the military for brand-new military members in the cheapest part of the country is around $12,000 per year for rent and food. Tax free.

For a junior enlisted military member, if they live off post their housing/food allotment could easily exceed 50% of their total pay depending on where they live. And then there's the free tuition assistance and other benefits.

I get all kinds of irritated when military members essentially lie about their total compensation to try to put down low-pay workers.

i would be 100% in support of a minimum wage hike that also gave out zip code adjusted tax free housing

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

I once had a client who was on active duty who got sued for child support.

No one could figure out what he actually earned in the context of normal salaries and wages.

Moktaro
Aug 3, 2007
I value call my nuts.

Evil Fluffy posted:

He realizes it would boost his cred with the right wing base. Doesn't matter if he'd win or lose the debate, it'd only endear him further to the extreme right. It'd be dumb as hell for Obama to pay any attention to Cruz on this and they both know it.

I think a light-hearted scoffing would play well with people outside the bubble but yeah.

Or he could just let Biden mock his muscle porn. :v:

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
Apparently United Healthcare is threatening to withdraw from Obamacare due to 'lowered projected earnings'.

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。

CommieGIR posted:

Apparently United Healthcare is threatening to withdraw from Obamacare due to 'lowered projected earnings'.

Best healthcare system in the world.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
Walter Jones, the NC Rep who came up with "Freedom Fries" back in 2003, was one of those two "no" votes on the GOP side.

The bill wasn't conservative enough for his tastes, natch.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

CommieGIR posted:

Apparently United Healthcare is threatening to withdraw from Obamacare due to 'lowered projected earnings'.

Great news!

MODS CURE JOKES
Nov 11, 2009

OFFICIAL SAS 90s REMEMBERER
In the face of great pressure, the cowards become most obvious.

ex post facho
Oct 25, 2007

CommieGIR posted:

Apparently United Healthcare is threatening to withdraw from Obamacare due to 'lowered projected earnings'.

What does "withdraw from Obamacare" even mean? Are they just going to stop issuing insurance policies altogether?

:qq: a bloo bloo bloo we aren't making obscene profits off the sick anymore we're done with this!! :qq:

Evil Fluffy
Jul 13, 2009

Scholars are some of the most pompous and pedantic people I've ever had the joy of meeting.

zoux posted:

Pew released a study today that showed that more Mexicans actually left the US for Mexico than immigrated north in the past six years.


Why is there a 5 year gap and why two two of the data points include overlapping timeframes? :psyduck:

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

euphronius posted:

I once had a client who was on active duty who got sued for child support.

No one could figure out what he actually earned in the context of normal salaries and wages.

Sounds like he didn't feel like sharing his annual personal statement of military compensation. It tallies up your wages, tax savings, and some other benefits. It also splits up direct compensation vs indirect benefits like said tax savings, subsidized grocery items at the commissary, legal services, etc.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Oh no we had his stubs and tax returns.

pathetic little tramp
Dec 12, 2005

by Hillary Clinton's assassins
Fallen Rib

fknlo posted:

Trumps :godwin: pretty much confirms my thinking that he's nothing more than a troll trying to say more and more ridiculous poo poo to see how far it can go while magically still shooting up in polls. There's no other explanation.


People are way off on comparing Trump to Hitler, I mean there are definitely traces there, but just watch literally any documentary on Mussolini and halfway through you'll forget you're watching something about an Italian dictator from 90 years ago.

JT Jag
Aug 30, 2009

#1 Jaguars Sunk Cost Fallacy-Haver

a shameful boehner posted:

What does "withdraw from Obamacare" even mean? Are they just going to stop issuing insurance policies altogether?

:qq: a bloo bloo bloo we aren't making obscene profits off the sick anymore we're done with this!! :qq:
Move to company and non-subsidized premium plans only, I'd guess?

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
Note that 289 is one vote short of two thirds of the total vote count.

Pook Good Mook
Aug 6, 2013


ENFORCE THE UNITED STATES DRESS CODE AT ALL COSTS!

This message paid for by the Men's Wearhouse& Jos A Bank Lobbying Group

Joementum posted:

Note that 289 is one vote short of two thirds of the total vote count.

Doesn't matter, no way this is getting 66 votes in the Senate.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



Joementum posted:

Note that 289 is one vote short of two thirds of the total vote count.


Pook Good Mook posted:

Doesn't matter, no way this is getting 66 votes in the Senate.

Still, gently caress this Congress to the ends of the Earth.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Joementum posted:

Walter Jones, the NC Rep who came up with "Freedom Fries" back in 2003, was one of those two "no" votes on the GOP side.

The bill wasn't conservative enough for his tastes, natch.

The other Republican "no" vote on this was Steve King of Iowa. I'm gonna go waaaaaay out of a limb here and guess that he might want even more restrictions on refugees / immigrants.

Pook Good Mook
Aug 6, 2013


ENFORCE THE UNITED STATES DRESS CODE AT ALL COSTS!

This message paid for by the Men's Wearhouse& Jos A Bank Lobbying Group

Joementum posted:

The other Republican "no" vote on this was Steve King of Iowa. I'm gonna go waaaaaay out of a limb here and guess that he might want even more restrictions on refugees / immigrants.

Fun fact, Steve King has never had a sponsored bill ever get out of committee and put to a vote.

El Anansi
Jan 27, 2008

Locobono posted:

Some of this stuff actually looks good and ethical. Maybe this is what the right truly fears? They'd give up bacon way before exploitative financial maneuvering

Oh, no worries there, Islamic Banking is almost entirely a farce, you basically pay extra for a conventional banking service that they then go through a bunch of logical gymnastics to determine that it's not "interest" and pay a hideously wealthy scholar to sign off on it. Reading mainstream econ lit on it is hilarious, it's basically "it's good that these institutions are getting these superstitious simpletons to inject their capital into the glorious world economy, even if it's patently dishonest".

Raerlynn
Oct 28, 2007

Sorry I'm late, I'm afraid I got lost on the path of life.

JT Jag posted:

Move to company and non-subsidized premium plans only, I'd guess?

That's my take on it. /shrug

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
Quote of the day, “We’ll crucify them.” ~ Anonymous House GOP aide, on what they will do to Senate Democrats who oppose the refugees bill.

Maaaaaaaybe not the best word to use.....

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

zoux posted:

It's actually more like 50k. But homeless people are extremely difficult to count accurately.

Obama had some initiative to help get them off of the street that supposedly cut the previous number of homeless vets in half, but I never actually looked anything up about it.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Joementum posted:

Note that 289 is one vote short of two thirds of the total vote count.

Is this under a special rule or something? Or did it just work out to be almost a supermajority?

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.

zoux posted:

Is this under a special rule or something? Or did it just work out to be almost a supermajority?

It would certainly be vetoed, and a 2/3 majority would override.

But you need 2/3 in both houses, and the pox hasn't spread that far yet.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

OAquinas posted:

It would certainly be vetoed, and a 2/3 majority would override.

But you need 2/3 in both houses, and the pox hasn't spread that far yet.

Oh right duh.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

zoux posted:

Is this under a special rule or something? Or did it just work out to be almost a supermajority?

Well, turns out it was "veto-proof" anyway since only 426 members voted, but the vote on the rule passed earlier because the Democrats reached a compromise on attaching it to a softer proposal.

Monkey Fracas
Sep 11, 2010

...but then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you!
Grimey Drawer

pathetic little tramp posted:

People are way off on comparing Trump to Hitler, I mean there are definitely traces there, but just watch literally any documentary on Mussolini and halfway through you'll forget you're watching something about an Italian dictator from 90 years ago.

They even do the same sort of facial expressions/have the same-shaped head; it's great.

Also both fond of putting their personal symbols on the biggest buildings they can find/build.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Joementum posted:

Well, turns out it was "veto-proof" anyway since only 426 members voted, but the vote on the rule passed earlier because the Democrats reached a compromise on attaching it to a softer proposal.

Veto override is 2/3s of the total membership, not 2/3s of present voting members?

radical meme
Apr 17, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

lol house dems are pissed that Obama/WH wouldn't give them cover on the refugee bill

Joementum posted:

I also learned from this that the Blue Dog Caucus still exists and has 15 members!

This went right over my head. Is it a reference to the Democrats that wanted to vote for the bills? Did they really believe Obama was going to cover their rear end after what he said at the G20? Is there a news story on it; specifically about the 15 referenced by Jomentum? I found a Vox article but it I'd be interested in knowing more.

A Shitty Reporter
Oct 29, 2012
Dinosaur Gum
gently caress it, deport the Republicans and Blue Dogs to Syria, replace them with refugees.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Moktaro
Aug 3, 2007
I value call my nuts.

El Anansi posted:

Oh, no worries there, Islamic Banking is almost entirely a farce, you basically pay extra for a conventional banking service that they then go through a bunch of logical gymnastics to determine that it's not "interest" and pay a hideously wealthy scholar to sign off on it. Reading mainstream econ lit on it is hilarious, it's basically "it's good that these institutions are getting these superstitious simpletons to inject their capital into the glorious world economy, even if it's patently dishonest".

Source your quotes.

  • Locked thread