Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

The Vosgian Beast posted:

The story of Alexander Hamilton, but with a mostly black or Latino cast.

You can see why they'd be pissy.

"B-b-but it's not historically accurate!!" *ignores every single american movie depicting foreign language as just having a British accent, Jesus as a white european, vikings with horns on their hats, Abraham Lincoln's smooth deep sexy voice...*

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Merdifex
May 13, 2015

by Shine

The Vosgian Beast posted:

The story of Alexander Hamilton, but with a mostly black or Latino cast.

You can see why they'd be pissy.

I don't see how that necessarily translates into screaming bloody murder about white genocide.

Smiling Knight
May 31, 2011

Merdifex posted:

That's what led to Mencius "I think like a philosopher :smuggo:" Moldbug. I mean, coming up with testable hypotheses is an alien concept to NRx altogether.

Is there any place where he explains why he chose Mencius (Mengzi) as his screen name? Because Mengzi is a really chill dude who is big on the inherent capability of every person to improve themselves, and is in favor of governments not waging war and instead making sure everyone has their basic needs taken care of. He's also the closest thing classical Confucianism has to a democrat; he explicitly states that a king is legitimated by the consent of the masses, and has been read to endorse popular uprising against unjust rulers. So it's seems he is pretty much the opposite of the NRx guys.

If anyone, you'd think that they'd latch on to Xunzi or Han Feizi; they're the guys who think humans are inherently bad and need strong laws to keep them in line.

Smiling Knight has a new favorite as of 02:24 on Nov 23, 2015

point of return
Aug 13, 2011

by exmarx
Also what sort of name is "Moldbug" anyways

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

point of return posted:

Also what sort of name is "Moldbug" anyways

It's the kind of name a villain in a lovely western fantasy RPG from the 90's would have so I always assumed he got it from one of those.

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

Merdifex posted:

On another hand, does anyone know what this Hamilton musical is about? Tumblr white supremacists are blowing their collective lid over it, Wesley in particular.

the neoreactionaries are particularly annoyed because the rest of the Tumblr Rationalsphere is totally in love with it and can't stop talking about it.

Merdifex posted:

I don't see how that necessarily translates into screaming bloody murder about white genocide.

white erasure, dude

we will never mind nydwracu's previous detailed delineations between strains of white person and why they can't possibly get along

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

How do these people define whiteness? Are Swedes white to them? Brazilians?

Luigi's Discount Porn Bin
Jul 19, 2000


Oven Wrangler

Silver2195 posted:

Roxana Alexander
@veryblockable
Sedevacantist Catholic. Homeschool advocate. National socialist. Hates Jews. Trump 2016.
I love that this style of self-description (Short phrases. Periods separating. Combative.) has become standard for NRx, because I can't read it as anything other than a tumblr-type laundry list of fandoms and preferred pronouns.

Thal/Melonhead crossbreed. Gendertrump. White/white/whiteself. Sedevacantist. Omegaverse.

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

Luigi's Discount Porn Bin posted:

Gendertrump. White/white/whiteself

I'm so stealing this.

Merdifex
May 13, 2015

by Shine
http://urbit.org/docs/theory/network-goals

Moldbug writes a thousand or so words for urbit; a service that no one is going to use.

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

Merdifex posted:

http://urbit.org/docs/theory/network-goals
Moldbug writes a thousand or so words for urbit; a service that no one is going to use.

Networked Intercal with bitcoins.

There are lucid people working on Urbit, I am told. And apparently it does things (unspecified). Whether it does things that make money is another matter, but Thiel is bankrolling it.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

Jack Gladney posted:

How do these people define whiteness? Are Swedes white to them? Brazilians?

It grows and contracts to fit whatever point they are currently making.

Oligopsony
May 17, 2007
Hofstadter uses white/whiteself in a short essay as a reductio against gendered pronouns, IIRC.

Luigi's Discount Porn Bin posted:

Thal/Melonhead crossbreed.

Oh man I had almost forgotten about that particular variety of crazy.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

Oligopsony posted:

Hofstadter uses white/whiteself in a short essay as a reductio against gendered pronouns, IIRC.


Oh man I had almost forgotten about that particular variety of crazy.

I'm sure the people who temporarily embraced it would also like you to forget it.

Merdifex
May 13, 2015

by Shine
Even hacker news isn't drinking the koolaid https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10508935

BobHoward
Feb 13, 2012

The only thing white people deserve is a bullet to their empty skull

Merdifex posted:

Even hacker news isn't drinking the koolaid https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10508935

One of the funnier things about Clarkhat is that he drank all of the koolaid and thinks it proves Moldbug is some kind of visionary genius technologist

Merdifex
May 13, 2015

by Shine

BobHoward posted:

One of the funnier things about Clarkhat is that he drank all of the koolaid and thinks it proves Moldbug is some kind of visionary genius technologist

Yeah I remember that post. Clark figured out absolutely nothing about hoon or urbit that was useful but concluded that Moldbug was an incomprehensible genius.

Munin
Nov 14, 2004


BobHoward posted:

One of the funnier things about Clarkhat is that he drank all of the koolaid and thinks it proves Moldbug is some kind of visionary genius technologist

Clark is one of these strange people who seems to have drunk all the koolaids.

BobHoward
Feb 13, 2012

The only thing white people deserve is a bullet to their empty skull

Merdifex posted:

Yeah I remember that post. Clark figured out absolutely nothing about hoon or urbit that was useful but concluded that Moldbug was an incomprehensible genius.

Well we are talking about an intellect so vast it whines about leftist intellectual cowardice and censorship when blog owners rapidly conclude that it's a troll and block it from commenting.

(I wouldn't be entirely surprised if Clarkhat is some kind of long term performance art troll ala TobleroneTriangular, but if so, he doesn't really match up to the master. It amazes me that Ken White puts up with him.)

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!

BobHoward posted:

(I wouldn't be entirely surprised if Clarkhat is some kind of long term performance art troll ala TobleroneTriangular, but if so, he doesn't really match up to the master. It amazes me that Ken White puts up with him.)

"why does Ken put up with Clark" is one of the mysteries for the ages. Ken is a right-wing libertarian, but he's like coherent and comprehensible and partakes of consensus reality.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

divabot posted:

"why does Ken put up with Clark" is one of the mysteries for the ages. Ken is a right-wing libertarian, but he's like coherent and comprehensible and partakes of consensus reality.

Ken killed someone and Clark was the only witness.

eschaton
Mar 7, 2007

Don't you just hate when you wind up in a store with people who are in a socioeconomic class that is pretty obviously about two levels lower than your own?
The events of the past several days have me wondering how the NRx assholes are reacting.

And then I started to wonder if any of them participated in the planning, given that pastebin showing an email chain of white supremacists explicitly planning to show up to Black Lives Matter protests armed with the intent of antagonizing, confronting, and shooting protestors.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow
Probably not, other than "maybe one of the white supremacists reads Jim sometimes"

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

eschaton posted:

The events of the past several days have me wondering how the NRx assholes are reacting.

And then I started to wonder if any of them participated in the planning, given that pastebin showing an email chain of white supremacists explicitly planning to show up to Black Lives Matter protests armed with the intent of antagonizing, confronting, and shooting protestors.

If any of them kill anyone, rest assured that they will be characterized as mentally ill loners and their participation in reactionary discourse will be ignored in the press and minimized by their peers.

Merdifex
May 13, 2015

by Shine

Jack Gladney posted:

If any of them kill anyone, rest assured that they will be characterized as mentally ill loners and their participation in reactionary discourse will be ignored in the press and minimized by their peers.

Just like the media ignored Dylann Roof's connections to internet white nationalism as long as they could help it. There's no way there are entire networks of like-minded people who may commit such acts in the future and aren't Islamists.

Pussy Cartel
Jun 26, 2011



Lipstick Apathy

Jack Gladney posted:

If any of them kill anyone, rest assured that they will be characterized as mentally ill loners and their participation in reactionary discourse will be ignored in the press and minimized by their peers.

I wouldn't put it past Clark to be openly smug and preening about it. The likes of nydwracu using a whole lot of purple prose to excuse it.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Pussy Cartel posted:

I wouldn't put it past Clark to be openly smug and preening about it. The likes of nydwracu using a whole lot of purple prose to excuse it.

What did they say about that fucker who photographed himself with a gun and the Rhodesian flag before shooting up a church? The freep crowd unanimously declared him a false flag attack secretly planned by Obama.

divabot
Jun 17, 2015

A polite little mouse!
A nice piece from quoms on Tumblr:

quoms posted:

one of the most fascinating and underexamined contradictions in neoreaction is their contention that society should simultaneously be set up with a ‘monarchic’ political form and with preservation of the family (and of the race) as some kind of teleological goal; that is, that it should be both king-centered and kin-centered. i am pretty sure you can’t do this. if you look at the actual functioning of monarchies it’s only the noble class that have an incentive to care a lot about their family and the composition and continuity thereof, since under the feudal system that’s how property works. the people with very little or no property could give a poo poo

feudalism, if you view it as a historical progression from ‘simpler’ clan societies (which in much of europe reasonably seems to have been the case), progresses to that state through a series of alienations away from kin-centeredness, destroying in the process some of the basic elements of clan society which allow it to remain kin-centered in a way that feudalism is not. firstly, the feudal state subjugates many kin groups to a single kin group, creating rigid hierarchies which are family-external rather than family-internal (in this case both violating the previously existing principle of the clans as independent actors and undermining the authority of the clan patriarch). secondly, feudalism necessitates the existence of a class of people whose labor is extracted for the benefit of others and who may even be entirely without property of their own, which while it may be the case in clan societies is conceptualised and instrumentalised very differently from the way it is under feudalism. for feudalism to work, particular forms of independence integral to clan societies have to be eliminated, which also eliminates the incentive for most people in society to really give a poo poo about family in the way that neoreactionaries want them to

so with resolving this contradiction in mind it’s no wonder that moldbug would like the UAE, which despite being a ‘monarchy’ in name and contemporary political form is really a bizarre chimera that’s a result of the british deliberately misinterpreting what the word ‘sheikh’ means in order to grant a few different people nominal monarch status so they could turn a relatively uncontrolled part of the arabian peninsula into a formal british colonial dominion, and then when the sheikhs became independent emirs they just happened to be entitled to some big-rear end oil reserves (i.e. unlimited free money) that let them settle all the other clans and consolidate their rule in a really remarkably short period of time - only a few decades

there’s no reason to imagine this arrangement is stable, that both the form of absolute monarchy and the traditional kin-centeredness of gulf arab society will perpetuate themselves indefinitely under this new system, but i guess if you look at it from a completely ahistorical point of view it seems like a society which combines both of those principles could be in some way natural or reasonable. but you really gotta have your horse blinders on

Reactionaries are Hyacinth Bucket in the general case. They cannot conceive of a world in which aping the upper classes is not the only way to live. In this case a fantasy upper class where their ideas lead to monarchy that leads a stable society and not to centuries of war and Carlos II. Also, history is for picking examples from that support your ideas and not in any way for double-checking for hints that any of your ideas might not hold.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Merdifex posted:

the media ignored Dylann Roof's connections to internet white nationalism as long as they could help it.
Can you somehow quantify or corroborate this?

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

Cingulate posted:

Can you somehow quantify or corroborate this?

Can you somehow go gently caress yourself?

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Cingulate posted:

Can you somehow quantify or corroborate this?

You don't remember the "debate" about how he was really targeting Christians and not black people? Also the common refrain about mental health?

EDIT: didn't see the poster. Go gently caress yourself.

The Vosgian Beast
Aug 13, 2011

Business is slow

divabot posted:

A nice piece from quoms on Tumblr:


Reactionaries are Hyacinth Bucket in the general case. They cannot conceive of a world in which aping the upper classes is not the only way to live. In this case a fantasy upper class where their ideas lead to monarchy that leads a stable society and not to centuries of war and Carlos II. Also, history is for picking examples from that support your ideas and not in any way for double-checking for hints that any of your ideas might not hold.

Reactos like to go on about how they're choosing reals over feels and learning horrifying facts everyone else is too PC to see, but they tend to end up fairly well off in their ideal state.

Show me someone who says that in an ideal society, they themselves would be subhuman chattel or utterly eliminated, then I'll listen.

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

Jack Gladney posted:

You don't remember the "debate" about how he was really targeting Christians and not black people? Also the common refrain about mental health?

EDIT: didn't see the poster. Go gently caress yourself.

I'm gonna pull a cingulate here and point out that cingulate is from not-america and probably doesn't actually have regular exposure to the American media that did this.

ArchangeI
Jul 15, 2010

Parallel Paraplegic posted:

I'm gonna pull a cingulate here and point out that cingulate is from not-america and probably doesn't actually have regular exposure to the American media that did this.

He also believes the yellow press is above all criticism as criticizing them is horribly elitist. So if something like Fox News says something it really should just be accepted as a fact.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

ArchangeI posted:

He also believes the yellow press is above all criticism as criticizing them is horribly elitist. So if something like Fox News says something it really should just be accepted as a fact.
I guess how much you're inclined to believe this is an accurate representation vs. a terrible distortion of my position much better predicts your opinion of me than anything I might say here.

Maybe I, like Scott, take center-left discourse to be more dominant than it is, but I never came upon any articles about Roof that didn't simply take for granted that the guy who shot a bunch of black people after posting a manifesto explaining in great detail why and how he hates blacks and how they should be murdered was, in fact, motivated by racism.

Peel
Dec 3, 2007

I saw (but didn't read) articles with titles about 'Christianity under attack' or words to that effect, but they were from right-wing outlets rather than 'the media' as a whole. However I'm also not American.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy

Parallel Paraplegic posted:

I'm gonna pull a cingulate here and point out that cingulate is from not-america and probably doesn't actually have regular exposure to the American media that did this.
Thank you, but I think my media consumption actually wouldn't change much if I actually were living in the US - I'd still read the NYT and The Guardian, and maybe stream The Daily Show on the web, and largely disregard anything to the right of, uh, MSNBC. I think it's more political than national.
Maybe.

You're 100% spot-on that I don't have regular exposure to mainstream US media though.

Peel posted:

I saw (but didn't read) articles with titles about 'Christianity under attack' or words to that effect, but they were from right-wing outlets rather than 'the media' as a whole. However I'm also not American.
Yeah I don't doubt a bunch of people would phrase it as that, but yes, I too am surprised by the claim that "the media" generally did that.

Merdifex
May 13, 2015

by Shine
I made no claim about The Media™ denying Roof's racism, but rather obfuscating his connections to the white supremacist and white nationalist movements in America and on the internet.

Dangerous far-right ideology thriving on the internet and in the fringes of America rarely enters into the discourse when it comes to Roof and his racist murders.

Cingulate
Oct 23, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
Ah okay. Makes sense, I misread you.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Twerkteam Pizza
Sep 26, 2015

Grimey Drawer

Cingulate posted:

Ah okay. Makes sense, I misread you.

I love that we can still be civil :)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply