|
Calde posted:Thanks for this link, I've been debating with a good friend of mine who thinks that Sam Harris and Bill Maher aren't bigoted but Very Serious Athiests. This might have actually broken through the bias, it's just so ugly and gross. They are bigoted very serious atheists. Dawkins has said some dumb poo poo too - at this point Sam Harris is a verbose moron.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:03 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 16:14 |
|
Mr Interweb posted:Also, I think I officially have had enough of Sam Harris: Who?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:10 |
|
Pyroxene Stigma posted:They are bigoted very serious atheists. Dawkins has said some dumb poo poo too - at this point Sam Harris is a verbose moron. It's depressing that they keep trying to dress up their naked fear as if it's a reasoned and rational response. A pity atheist leaders believe poo poo like this, I truly expect better from them but they fail again and again.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:11 |
|
Here's that link about the 3%ers being everything but good people.quote:The scene last weekend on the steps of the Idaho state Capitol in Boise was a portrait of America in the wake of the Paris terrorism attacks: On one side, a gathering of interfaith allies voicing their support for refugees from Syria and the plans to help thousands of them resettle in the United States; on the other, a gathering of opponents, many of them clad in black clothing emblazoned with the logo of the antigovernment “III Percent” movement, shouting and chanting their opposition to the program. Thank you for being patient with me! I don't have a laptop or SA access on my work computer so it's phone posting all day every day.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:16 |
|
I'm so glad the guys on SGU, which I think I'd the best science news and skeptical podcast, don't give Harris or Dawkins the loving time of day or any lip service at all. It probably helped that Dawkins spend considerable time attacking their note former co-host for being uptight.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:21 |
|
greatn posted:I'm so glad the guys on SGU, which I think I'd the best science news and skeptical podcast, don't give Harris or Dawkins the loving time of day or any lip service at all. It probably helped that Dawkins spend considerable time attacking their note former co-host for being uptight. Seriously, militant atheists are just another form of reactionary. It makes sense that they'd see more in common with Rs than leftists or other liberals.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:25 |
|
Ron Jeremy posted:Worked for the cop that murdered Oscar grant. Gee, I thought it was my taser. Didn't realize til my clip was empty. Mehserle fired once, which is arguably a major reason that defense worked at all in terms of getting to involuntary manslaughter instead of something worse. It made it at least remotely plausible that he was mistaken.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:33 |
|
Lotka Volterra posted:Seriously, militant atheists are just another form of reactionary. It makes sense that they'd see more in common with Rs than leftists or other liberals. Yeah a lot of them, it seems the only thing they hate about conservative bullshit evangelism is the "going to church and praying" part. Hell sometimes just the "to do that you get up early on Sunday" part.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:35 |
|
Sam Harris, spawn of Dick Dorkins
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:40 |
|
Calde posted:It's depressing that they keep trying to dress up their naked fear as if it's a reasoned and rational response. A pity atheist leaders believe poo poo like this, I truly expect better from them but they fail again and again. yeah the skeptic movement is a lot like mensa, a lot of decently bright people who pat themselves and each other on the back for being profound geniuses until they start convincing each other how it's rational to do polyamory or to buy timeshares on the texas coast or whatever
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:43 |
|
Lotka Volterra posted:Seriously, militant atheists are just another form of reactionary. It makes sense that they'd see more in common with Rs than leftists or other liberals. Hitchens was the same way, too. They're so blinded by their crusade that they don't realize they've become camp-followers of the evangelical far right.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:43 |
|
Torpor posted:No, that fact is not 'facially indefensible'; of all of the facts of the incident that is not that surprising or interesting. Certainly his defense is going to incorporate some "you fire until the gun is empty" self-defense rhetoric, but it's hard to tell how that will play to the jury with exhibit A the same video we've all seen. There are also some indications of non-police witness testimony to the effect that Van Dyke paused but resumed firing when he saw movement--twice. Also he was apparently trying to reload when other officers waved him off. Hard to say what that will do under cross examination or if the prosecutor will even bother pursuing the case to that extent, but it's something. To be clear, I agree that there are plenty of avenues for the defense, I just think it will involve a lot more obfuscation and sophistry than just saying "it was a good shoot gently caress off".
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:46 |
|
Lotka Volterra posted:Seriously, militant atheists are just another form of reactionary. It makes sense that they'd see more in common with Rs than leftists or other liberals. This is why Im becoming slightly fond of some of the various satanic temple folks. If they say or do something insightful, I'm pleasantly surprised at the attempt; if they gently caress up and are just jerks I can brush it off as those crazy satanic guys. They occupy a political space similar to court jesters. For example: a satanic children's coloring book with pro-social messages inside in an attempt to force a school to allow it to be distributed to elementary kids alongside some biblically inspired books? that is pretty funny.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:55 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:yeah the skeptic movement is a lot like mensa, a lot of decently bright people who pat themselves and each other on the back for being profound geniuses until they start convincing each other how it's rational to do polyamory or to buy timeshares on the texas coast or whatever That's definitely the vibe I get from Sam Harris. His identity as a rational atheist means that a priori his beliefs are well-reasoned and not at all similar to those emotionally charged right-wingers. There's zero reflection, zero self-awareness.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:56 |
|
Also, it's doubly aggravating that Harris is using the stupidass right-wing talking point about how Obama's not "mad" enough in his speeches against ISIS. HE'S AUTHORIZED SIX THOUSAND AIR STRIKES But none of that matters cause Obama doesn't call ISIS names like Republicans do?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:56 |
|
Mr Interweb posted:Also, it's doubly aggravating that Harris is using the stupidass right-wing talking point about how Obama's not "mad" enough in his speeches against ISIS. i have rationally concluded that this dude is not freaking out enough, you see
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:58 |
|
Mr Interweb posted:Also, it's doubly aggravating that Harris is using the stupidass right-wing talking point about how Obama's not "mad" enough in his speeches against ISIS. They're all about the sound and fury, to hell if it signifies nothing.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 05:58 |
|
FAUXTON posted:They're all about the sound and fury, to hell if it signifies nothing.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 06:04 |
|
Personally, I'm embarrassed to have been a fan of Richard Dawkins and a follower of the New Atheist movement. I don't think it was destined to end up this way, but the Islamophobic and sexist side of the dispute was able to bully the more tolerant side out, and then tumbled into an echo chamber of fear and anger.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 06:20 |
|
Bullfrog posted:Personally, I'm embarrassed to have been a fan of Richard Dawkins and a follower of the New Atheist movement. I don't think it was destined to end up this way, but the Islamophobic and sexist side of the dispute was able to bully the more tolerant side out, and then tumbled into an echo chamber of fear and anger. Seemed pretty inevitable looking at the demographics. I think something like 85% of the movement was male (might've been during an /r/Atheism survey), and around that same proportion was white.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 06:21 |
|
computer parts posted:Seemed pretty inevitable looking at the demographics. I think something like 85% of the movement was male (might've been during an /r/Atheism survey), and around that same proportion was white. FAUXTON posted:Hitchens was the same way, too. They're so blinded by their crusade that they don't realize they've become camp-followers of the evangelical far right. Yea I don't see how they 'don't realize' this, it's a group of extremely reactionary people dominated pretty heavily by young white dudes, they were destined to be the target demo for the Pauls and poo poo of the world from the beginning.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 07:03 |
|
DemeaninDemon posted:Here's that link about the 3%ers being everything but good people. What I love about that quote is that by accepting refugees, they are acknowledging the world is really screwed up. Just they would rather do something about it.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 07:06 |
|
Torpor posted:This is why Im becoming slightly fond of some of the various satanic temple folks. If they say or do something insightful, I'm pleasantly surprised at the attempt; if they gently caress up and are just jerks I can brush it off as those crazy satanic guys. They occupy a political space similar to court jesters. The bad news is that most flavors of organized satanism are doctrinally super-Obectivism. EDIT: Okay, I'm dumb. http://thesatanictemple.com/faq posted:TST has its own guiding principles and tenets, distinct from the LaVeyan school, that we feel represents a natural evolution in Satanic thought. The overriding principle calls for utilizing the best scientific evidence available to make the most rational real world decisions. To that end, we reject LaVeyan social Darwinist rhetoric that fails to agree with what is currently known regarding social evolution, specifically as it relates to research in evolutionary biology, game theory, reciprocal altruism, cognitive science, etc. That's sort of a weird way of phrasing "we're not libertarians"/"don't be a dick" though. moller fucked around with this message at 07:21 on Nov 25, 2015 |
# ? Nov 25, 2015 07:18 |
|
Sam Harris is a lot like Ayn Rand, both in terms of the audience they attract and in the way they write as outsiders in serious disciplines but reject any kind of meaningful engagement with the larger field. Hopefully Sam Harris will write a novel soon.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 07:29 |
|
TST are liberal humanists using the banner of Satanism to troll conservatives. They're emphatically not LaVeyans.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 07:37 |
|
Pope Guilty posted:TST are liberal humanists using the banner of Satanism to troll conservatives. They're emphatically not LaVeyans. Right, although I feel the need to point out that LaVayans are and were using Satanism as a banner to troll as well, lest someone read your comment and think that there are/were "real" Satanists. Reading more of the FAQ I quoted above kind of makes them seem like some manner of anarchist or anarcho-syndicalist organization. It depends on how you interpret their tenets though. There's some room to rules-lawyer a state in there, but not a ton. http://thesatanictemple.com/about-us/tenets posted:
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 07:54 |
|
Mr Interweb posted:Also, I think I officially have had enough of Sam Harris: Cool, that's one vote cancelled out by someone who lets their kid punch ballots to "learn about democracy."
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 09:24 |
|
Torpor posted:It would be kind of odd for the officer to argue that he thought he had the facts necessary to shoot but only shot once and then stopped because that makes it sound like he didn't really have the facts present to shoot in the first place. I don't know man, seems to me like the situation and the reasonableness of a threat to your life changes somewhere between "dude is walking around with a knife" and "dude is writhing on the ground with 14 bullets in him already", and that should have some bearing on whether it's reasonable to fire that 15th shot
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 10:22 |
|
UsPol Nov 2015: #NegroProblems
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 12:29 |
|
Look he was just trying to do a Mozambique drill but his aim was really off. You weren't there you wouldn't understand.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 13:21 |
|
fade5 posted:(Partial Crosspost.) So there's been discussion about Donald Trump's ground game (or lack thereof). Wonder no longer: Okay, so after Trump gets the nomination, those of us who have been saying it's likely Trump would get the nomination since Jeb fumbled the ball all this time will get retorts of "No, but you see, nobody here has been saying Trump would never get the nomination..." and other revisionism here, right? Joementum posted:When you're sitting down for Thanksgiving dinner this week and that one unbearable relative starts talking, just remember: it could be worse. "Have you heard about this one called the Grand Mufti? Man, there's so much I could say about the guy, nasty piece of work..." Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 13:37 on Nov 25, 2015 |
# ? Nov 25, 2015 13:35 |
|
Not sure if this has already been posted but fun new facts from the Chicago shooting case were just broadcast on NPR: - one of the witnesses of the shooting was apparently taken to a holding cell and told she didn't see anything - the cop who went into the nearby Burger King to erase the surveillance video of the shooting...didn't erase the surveillance video of him erasing the surveillance video Hahahaaaaaaaa.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 14:25 |
I'm certainly sure that the year long investigation was building evidence against these blatant acts of subverting justice and surely not just biding time hoping that the video wasn't going to be released so it could be brushed under the rug as a Good Shoot! Seriously there really needs to be a federal police investigation group in the Department of Justice that solely investigates corrupt police and prosecutors. This "well they didn't obviously infringe on his constitutional right when they murdered him for no reason and the evidence was lost by the police department in question so there's nothing we can do other than release this report" is really, really not cutting it.
|
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 14:33 |
|
No doubt someone will be along in a moment to tell us that the footage could have been erased by mistake, thus by asking the cop to be charged with obstruction we're calling for an unconstitutional special standard for law enforcement, therefore it's a violation of the cops' rights to ever try them for this sort of thing, and so on and so forth.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 14:53 |
|
Combed Thunderclap posted:Not sure if this has already been posted but fun new facts from the Chicago shooting case were just broadcast on NPR: Holy moley
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 15:03 |
|
Are there any sites which give rundowns on all the terrible things candidates do/have done in the past/lie about? (Carson, Trump, Cruz) I know politifact and media matters but I was just curious if there's anything specifically geared towards giving you ammunition in explaining why these people are awful.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 15:04 |
|
Combed Thunderclap posted:Not sure if this has already been posted but fun new facts from the Chicago shooting case were just broadcast on NPR: reminder that none of this will ever change Well maybe this might do something but after a decade of politics the only response I can muster to anything is nihilism these days Luigi Thirty fucked around with this message at 15:08 on Nov 25, 2015 |
# ? Nov 25, 2015 15:05 |
|
My Imaginary GF posted:For context: 12 field staff is about what you'd have for a well-funded Congressional district. Position matters; are these 12 statewide coordinators, or 12 iowa-orientated coordinators? What is their past record? How many volunteers and local connections do they bring with them? Can they work well with finance side? All important campaign infrastructure questions. this is not correct. very few Congressional districts would have anywhere close to 12 full time paid staffers.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 15:08 |
|
Combed Thunderclap posted:Not sure if this has already been posted but fun new facts from the Chicago shooting case were just broadcast on NPR: It's a good thing genuine evil in real life is usually superbly stupid too.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 15:12 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 16:14 |
VitalSigns posted:No doubt someone will be along in a moment to tell us that the footage could have been erased by mistake, thus by asking the cop to be charged with obstruction we're calling for an unconstitutional special standard for law enforcement, therefore it's a violation of the cops' rights to ever try them for this sort of thing, and so on and so forth. This sort of thing really gets under my skin since it's obvious most of those types don't really give a poo poo when the justice system ignores the rights of non-police that is actually happening instead of some sort of "well we have to be super careful or a cop MIGHT be treated unconstitutionally which is why we can't change anything ever ". Eggplant Squire fucked around with this message at 15:17 on Nov 25, 2015 |
|
# ? Nov 25, 2015 15:14 |