|
This week I am starting Hoyer in all 3 leagues, over Bortles, Matty Ice, Bortles, and... Tom Brady. Because the saints suck.
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 18:35 |
|
|
Just had a trade randomly sent to me. What do you guys think? I definitely want to sell high on Langford if possible but I'm not sure if this is selling high or... just selling. My Langford for his Jeremy Hill, Stefon Diggs and TY Hilton. Here's my team currently: RB: Lacy, Stewart, Yeldon, Langford WR: Marshall, Robinson, Benjamin, Cooks, Matthews (lol why is he still on my team?) From the way I see it I'm not getting any actual upgrades really. I'm getting rid of someone who might be irrelevant very soon, but.. I drafted Hill and he's super annoying to deal with, also picked up Diggs off the WW then traded him.. and Hilton I don't really give a gently caress about. Maybe counter offer? Here's his team: RB: McFadden, Charmander, Ingram, Hill, Ware WR: Julio, AB84, Amendola, Diggs, Hilton, Emannuel Sanders I don't really see any good trades here honestly. Maybe I'm missing something? Maybe I'm overthinking this, the espn 'trade evaluator' seems to weigh that trade heavily in my favor. zeldadude fucked around with this message at 05:19 on Nov 26, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
zeldadude posted:Just had a trade randomly sent to me. What do you guys think? I definitely want to sell high on Langford if possible but I'm not sure if this is selling high or... just selling. poo poo I'd pull the trigger on that so fast...
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 05:48
|
|
|
zeldadude posted:Just had a trade randomly sent to me. What do you guys think? I definitely want to sell high on Langford if possible but I'm not sure if this is selling high or... just selling. Is it a keeper league and who would you drop to make room?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 05:51
|
|
|
24-7 Urkel Cosplay posted:Is it a keeper league and who would you drop to make room? Not a keeper league, I'd be dropping Jordan Matthews and one of Kelce/Jordan Reed. Think I'm going to go hit accept right after I post this. Way over thinking it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
zeldadude posted:Not a keeper league, I'd be dropping Jordan Matthews and one of Kelce/Jordan Reed. Think I'm going to go hit accept right after I post this. Way over thinking it. Oh yeah, if it's not a keeper league, definitely.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
zeldadude posted:Not a keeper league, I'd be dropping Jordan Matthews and one of Kelce/Jordan Reed. Think I'm going to go hit accept right after I post this. Way over thinking it. Accept, drop who you say you're dropping, but also do not start any of the players that you're trading for unless absolutely necessary. It's a bizarre trade, but it improves your depth.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:09
|
|
|
coronaball posted:Accept, drop who you say you're dropping, but also do not start any of the players that you're trading for unless absolutely necessary. It's a bizarre trade, but it improves your depth. Yeah that's what I was thinking, haha. Thanks! Would you guys rather have Reed or Kelce ROS?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:20
|
|
|
zeldadude posted:Yeah that's what I was thinking, haha. Thanks! Would you guys rather have Reed or Kelce ROS? Kelce because his yards per target is so high that he can basically only regress upwards. He's also crazy due for some TDs. Note that I am not saying these things WILL happen, just that from a purely statistical perspective they are likely.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:27
|
|
|
Jordan Reed because extrapolating what Travis Kelce should be able to do in a laboratory environment with perfect conditions has only led to heartbreak and it's not like he'll suddenly get 10 TDs in the second half of the season to even out the fact that he hasn't... and Jordan Reed actually produces when healthy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:31
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Jordan Reed because extrapolating what Travis Kelce should be able to do in a laboratory environment with perfect conditions has only led to heartbreak and it's not like he'll suddenly get 10 TDs in the second half of the season to even out the fact that he hasn't... and Jordan Reed actually produces when healthy. This.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
Although Jordan Reed is dealing with an MCL injury so maybe pay attention to it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:46
|
|
|
Would anyone drop Matt Ryan for Bortles to be Carson Palmer's backup? Someone just dropped him (Bort) and Ryan has been pretty miserable this year.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:48
|
|
|
I would rather have Bort, yes, especially given his cupcake schedule the rest of the way and Ryan playing Carolina twice.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 07:54
|
|
|
The Sanchize is starting.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 14:33
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:I would rather have Bort, yes, especially given his cupcake schedule the rest of the way and Ryan playing Carolina twice. Yeah, this. The only thing that might save Ryan is if Freeman is out for a game or two and the Falcons offense becomes almost exclusively Ryan -> Julio.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 15:51
|
|
|
Martellus Bennett surprise inactive
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 16:04
|
|
|
not much action in the sit/start would you rather go Dalton or Hoyer this week? Dalton has been pretty matchup proof with the exception of primetime games.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 16:12
|
|
|
I'm rolling out Tyler Lockett this week over Landry just for the home run potential. Playing the #1 (I'm the #2) and I am the only person to beat him this year so far(first week of the season). Is this crazy talk?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 16:25
|
|
|
TommyGun85 posted:not much action in the sit/start Hoyer for sure. New Orleans sucks. Nuke is going to turn that secondary into glass.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
Psikotik posted:I'm rolling out Tyler Lockett this week over Landry just for the home run potential. Playing the #1 (I'm the #2) and I am the only person to beat him this year so far(first week of the season). Is this crazy talk? Yeah, that's dumb
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 16:34
|
|
|
Should I pull the trigger on starting Funchess @ Dallas this afternoon over Charmander (who looks like he might not even play)? edit: other flex options are Boldin or Baldwin Hazo fucked around with this message at 17:08 on Nov 26, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 17:06
|
|
|
Hazo posted:Should I pull the trigger on starting Funchess @ Dallas this afternoon over Charmander (who looks like he might not even play)? I am playing funchess because Cam is rocking it right now
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 17:11
|
|
|
Hazo posted:Should I pull the trigger on starting Funchess @ Dallas this afternoon over Charmander (who looks like he might not even play)? If you start Funchess today and Charmander ends up being active, who would you have to bench in order to play him?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
Gobias Ind. posted:If you start Funchess today and Charmander ends up being active, who would you have to bench in order to play him?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 17:25
|
|
|
Hazo posted:Yeldon vs SD or Gore vs TB I'd lean towards starting Funchess today and replacing Gore with Charmander if he plays (looks like he might not though).
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 17:28
|
|
|
Thanks Gobias and Sweeper, I'll make the swap. My opponent has Ware so even if Charmander does play it'll help me drain some carries from him. Plus I'm in Charlotte anyway so it's all the more reason to get hype 
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 17:44
|
|
|
Here's a new blurb about Forte and Langford.quote:NFL Network's Ian Rapoport said Matt Forte (knee) will be the "starter in name only" the rest of the season. How much of a bump does this news give Langford? I was planning on using Theo Riddick as my Flex (he's in the early game today) in a PPR league, but if the Bears are planning on giving Langford extended run, I'm thinking he might be a better choice.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
Freeman is OUT for Sunday. Edit: nevermind, the tweet was deleted. Edit2: It was changed to "Not optimistic" Chernabog fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Nov 26, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
Someone convince me that I really don't need to keep Romo since his SOS isn't all that fantastic compared to Dalton, Bortles, or Alex Smith. My team is currently 11-0 and at this point I'm going for a clean sweep. It's a 10 team, half PPR, 3WR league. QB: Dalton, Romo, Bortles RB: Gurley, Rawls, Gore, Ingram WR: Julio, Hopkins, Robinson, Bryant, Diggs TE: Reed, Kelce D/ST: Chiefs I'm thinking I can drop Romo for a DST to stream on Week 13 (Dolphins vs BAL or Texans @Buf). Although for reasons that make no sense to me whatsoever someone dropped Matt Ryan as well. Hoyer is also available for streaming today. I loving hate QBs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 18:11
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Someone convince me that I really don't need to keep Romo since his SOS isn't all that fantastic compared to Dalton, Bortles, or Alex Smith. My team is currently 11-0 and at this point I'm going for a clean sweep. It's a 10 team, half PPR, 3WR league. There's no reason to hold Romo. Stashing a DST to complement KC makes infinitely more sense for you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Someone convince me that I really don't need to keep Romo since his SOS isn't all that fantastic compared to Dalton, Bortles, or Alex Smith. My team is currently 11-0 and at this point I'm going for a clean sweep. It's a 10 team, half PPR, 3WR league. I wouldn't hold Romo either. Dalton has CLE, PIT, SF in weeks 13-15 and Bortles has good matchups with SD and NO weeks 12 and 16. I don't think Romo gets the start over either of those guys in those weeks even with Dez back.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
Eli Manning or Bortles in a PPR league? I'm leaning Eli.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
Good news, everyone! I stuck with Riddick.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
Zypher posted:Martellus Bennett surprise inactive They announced that yesterday afternoon, how is it a surprise?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 19:16
|
|
|
I've just been offered an intriguing trade. I'm 10-1 and cruising to our playoffs, which are weeks 15-17. As a result I'm open to trading away Cam in case the Panthers clinch home field and he is rested wk17. It's a 14 team league with very few qbs on the wire so I'm not confident I can stream wk17 if it comes to it. I have been offered Roethlisberger and Eifert for Cam and Demaryius Thomas. My team overall is: Cam and Carr Ivory, L Murray, Rawls and Ajayi Julio, Allen Robinson, Megatron, Stevie Johnson and DT Delanie Walker I'm tempted as I don't really need DT, and Roethlisberger has great matchup week 16 and 17. Eifert is a plus, though Walker's not too shabby. Should I accept and hope the commissioner OKs it before the Panthers game? (likely)
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
Azhais posted:They announced that yesterday afternoon, how is it a surprise? picked up Zach Miller and shot Eric Ebron out of a cannon.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
DeepDickPizza posted:Good news, everyone! I stuck with Riddick. Keep us updated on his chronicles. I'm busy watching my Calvin Johnson get outscored by his Caleb Sturgis. e: counter-jinx successful spacejung fucked around with this message at 20:01 on Nov 26, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
Dandy Kaiser posted:I don't care how wrong I was about anything this season, the only thing that I care about I was 100% right on: 4th/5th round Olsen is scoring better than a lot of WR1s drafted before him, and is possibly the #1 reason im in the playoffs due to the positional advantage. His totals are somewhere between Robinson and Hurns and is horribly consistent in PPR.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 20:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 18:35 |
|
|
Zypher posted:Martellus Bennett surprise inactive Is it really a surprise? This was what I was figuring when I was saying Miller was an appealing play this week despite having Reed with a great matchup. Bennett doesn't play + Reed banged up = Worth considering, anyways.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 20:10
|
|
