Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Sir Kodiak
May 14, 2007


Snowglobe of Doom posted:

He must have had so much insurance and OH&S paperwork to fill out after all those employee deaths in the workplace, it's no wonder he's miffed. Those forms probably didn't have a checkbox for 'alien invasion'.

Bruce Wayne's insurance claim is denied, listing "Act of God(s)" as the reason. He pulls on his cowl and thinks to himself, "we'll see about that."

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Sir Kodiak posted:

Bruce Wayne's insurance claim is denied, listing "Act of God(s)" as the reason. He pulls on his cowl and thinks to himself, "we'll see about that."

"Your insurance doesn't cover acts of god. He must be a god, he crashed through all those buildings and didn't shed a drop of blood."
"Stay right there, I'm gonna go check something ..."
/dons Bat-armor

MacheteZombie
Feb 4, 2007
"Jake from State Farm was found tied up and branded with bat symbols this morning" - Vicki Vale

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK
Never lie to Batman about what type of pants you're wearing.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Xeremides posted:

If he didn't experience empathy, or had a reduced ability to experience empathy, I don't think he'd be Batman. This is a guy who feels emotion so strongly that a single event has defined his entire life. He isn't trying to stop his parents from being murdered. He's trying to stop it from ever happening to someone else. This is a man who goes out of his way night after night to protect and save people, both directly and indirectly,
This is a very charitable view of why he's Batman.

quote:

and he did it because he elected to not trust law enforcement to do it.
FTFY

quote:

If someone can misconstrue that to mean Batman is being entirely selfish in his one-man war against crime, I think that says more about that person than a make believe character.
What do you think it says about someone that they mistrust a crazy person who dresses as a bat and uses ninja skills and a massive high tech arsenal with no oversight? What character flaw does that reveal?

quote:

He's absolutely a crazy person, but his insanity has less to do with his inability, or a retarded ability, to empathize with others and more to do with his obsession and singular focus on the concept of justice.
So he cares more about an abstract concept than people, but he doesn't have an empathy issue.

quote:

Batman is crazy, and has a constant fear that his crazy will make him something like The Joker, and tries his best to maintain that line, while believe he can redeem people that have crossed it. The Joker is the opposite, on the other side of that line ,basically.
The joker is Batman. He's his opposite. Just as random chance selected Bruce and made him Batman, random chance selected a nobody and made him the Joker. Batman directly created him, but also created him by existing. He's the result of an equation balancing itself.

Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 20:26 on Dec 5, 2015

Drifter
Oct 22, 2000

Belated Bear Witness
Soiled Meat
God, everything you've said is like a first year english/philosophy student trying to BS their way through their first midterm report.

Snowman_McK posted:

What do you think it says about someone that they mistrust a crazy person who dresses as a bat and uses ninja skills and a massive high tech arsenal with no oversight?

The only difference between modern day law enforcement like the CIA and NSA and FBI is that they don't wear bat-outfits, and Batman's track record of hurting innocent people is much lower. They both have effectively no oversight, and at least the public doesn't pay Batman's salary.

To the comic, Gotham is an extremely violent and corrupt place. Batman exists there because the government has violated its contract with the people it professes to serve. Batman as Bruce runs several charities and many other programs dedicated to help the lower-income elements, and to also restore the city.

He's a tragic hero, not an anti-one. It's like you guys are thinking Batman and Punisher are the same character in different outfits.

Drifter fucked around with this message at 20:40 on Dec 5, 2015

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Drifter posted:

God, everything you've said is like a first year english/philosophy student trying to BS their way through their first midterm report.


The only difference between modern day law enforcement like the CIA and NSA and FBI is that they don't wear bat-outfits, and Batman's track record of hurting innocent people is much lower. They both have effectively no oversight, and at least the public doesn't pay Batman's salary.
Why would you assume I trust those agencies and think their complete lack of oversight is a good thing? Why would you think I'd be okay with them if I had a problem with that as represented by a fictional character? Is your defence of Batman "well, there are worse things in the real world, why do you have to be so hard on Batman?"

quote:

THE MIDDLE EAST is an extremely violent and corrupt place. THE CIA/NSA exist there because the government has violated its contract with the people it professes to serve/CEASED TO EXIST. THE CIA/NSA DONATES AID and many other programs dedicated to help the lower-income elements, and to also restore the UNSTABLE COUNTRY.
Since we're quoting real world equivalents...

quote:

He's a tragic hero, not an anti-one. It's like you guys are thinking Batman and Punisher are the same character in different outfits.
Batman has added levels of class prejudice and, depending on the run, less self awareness.

His no-kill rule is a leash he put on himself to keep justifying it to himself. The Punisher is honest about what he is.

Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 20:53 on Dec 5, 2015

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK
Yes, everyone knows how the CIA&NSA are simply native to the Middle East. Growing up there and reacting to the ills of the area from the perspective of a native son, not an outsider.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Gyges posted:

Yes, everyone knows how the CIA&NSA are simply native to the Middle East. Growing up there and reacting to the ills of the area from the perspective of a native son, not an outsider.

Considering Wayne is a billionaire, living in a massive mansion barely in the city limits, or in a penthouse hundreds of metres above it, and the criminals of Gotham are primarily poor, this isn't the slam dunk you think it is.

If you need a 1:1 analogue, because inference is hard, look at the terrible, lovely justifications for heavy handed policing in the US. Or the fact that those agencies operate, frequently illegally, against US citizens.

Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 21:17 on Dec 5, 2015

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit

Drifter posted:

The only difference between modern day law enforcement like the CIA and NSA and FBI is that they don't wear bat-outfits, and Batman's track record of hurting innocent people is much lower. They both have effectively no oversight, and at least the public doesn't pay Batman's salary.
The CIA and the NSA aren't law enforcement, they are civilian intelligence agencies with no powers of arrest.

The FBI is a proper law enforcement agency, but they are at least constrained by the laws. If the FBI wasn't, it could have busted the Mafia and the Communists instantly. J Edgar Hoover would have only had to tell his agents to arrest them all just because he felt like it. Batman doesn't have to worry about things like warrants or standards of evidence when he wants to gently caress someone up. He fucks up whoever he feels like.

Kurzon fucked around with this message at 21:15 on Dec 5, 2015

Xeremides
Feb 21, 2011

There Diomedes aimed and stabbed, he gouged him down
his glistening flesh and wrenched the spear back out
and the brazen god of war let loose a shriek, roaring,
thundering loud as nine, ten thousand combat soldiers
shriek with Ares' fury when massive armies clash.

Snowman_McK posted:

This is a very charitable view of why he's Batman.
FTFY

What do you think it says about someone that they mistrust a crazy person who dresses as a bat and uses ninja skills and a massive high tech arsenal with no oversight? What character flaw does that reveal?

So he cares more about an abstract concept than people, but he doesn't have an empathy issue.
The joker is Batman. He's his opposite. Just as random chance selected Bruce and made him Batman, random chance selected a nobody and made him the Joker. Batman directly created him, but also created him by existing. He's the result of an equation balancing itself.

1) You didn't fix poo poo. You're forgetting how corrupt the police department was when Batman first hit the scene. You're forgetting how much power the various mafia families had in the city prior to him donning the costume. A big part of Gotham's story is regarding cops being on the take, cops being untrustworthy, cops being unwilling to make the necessary moves because they want to go home to their families at night rather than end up at the bottom of the river. Then you have dirty politicians, dirty judges, the justice system being broken, etc. All huge incentives for Batman to say, "Alright, gently caress you guys. I'll do it." And then what happens? He does his vigilante thing, befriends Gordon, who then goes on to clean up the GCPD, and suddenly Batman and law enforcement are on the same side most of the time. Amazing.

2) You're not mistrusting "someone". You're mistrusting the motivations of a comic book character, who's motivations have been firmly established for over half a century. If you can't believe that Batman isn't a sociopath who feels nothing for people, that says to me that you're either an idiot, or projecting your sociopathic tendencies onto a comic book character.

3) Holy poo poo, no. He can chew bubblegum and walk at the same time. He's the goddamn Batman. He can be utterly consumed with administering justice, and still manage to care about the people of Gotham, or in the case of BvS, his employees in Metropolis. If anything, his obsession with justice only heightens his ability to empathize with the people of his city.

4) The Joker isn't Batman. The Joker is what Batman could become if Batman didn't have his crazy self-imposed rules. That's the entire point. The Joker wants Batman to break his own rules, to commit murder, and to give in to his psychosis. If they were the same, there'd be no conflict. And no, this isn't the goddamn Matrix. There is no equation balancing itself out.

Xeremides fucked around with this message at 21:54 on Dec 5, 2015

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit
Are we talking about The Dark Knight Returns, BvS, or Batman stories in general?

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Snowman_McK posted:

Considering Wayne is a billionaire, living in a massive mansion barely in the city limits, or in a penthouse hundreds of metres above it, and the criminals of Gotham are primarily poor, this isn't the slam dunk you think it is.

If you need a 1:1 analogue, because inference is hard, look at the terrible, lovely justifications for heavy handed policing in the US. Or the fact that those agencies operate, frequently illegally, against US citizens.

Wayne is indeed a richass fucker from the isolated enclaves of power. That's still oceans apart from the CIA, NSA, or any Western, let alone American, intelligence agency operating in the Middle East. If you want to make a lovely comparison between Batman and the Intelligence apparatus go for something like the CIA in Canada or perhaps Mexico.

Sorry that your usage of a foreign invasion of autonomy was a lovely rejoinder to Batman and Gotham, but that's really not others missing your wondrous point through lack of inference. Especially since Batman isn't an active agent of destroying Gotham for personal, short sighted gain, because he loves that sweet loving oil.

Gyges fucked around with this message at 22:17 on Dec 5, 2015

Martman
Nov 20, 2006

Snowman_McK posted:

The joker is Batman. He's his opposite. Just as random chance selected Bruce and made him Batman, random chance selected a nobody and made him the Joker. Batman directly created him, but also created him by existing. He's the result of an equation balancing itself.
I disagree. Random chance got Batman's parents killed, but beyond that (and being lucky to be super wealthy) I think the real fantasy of Batman is that he chooses to make himself into Batman. Lots of people have terrible things happen to them but Bruce Wayne decides to turn that experience into something good.

I would argue that what you're saying is really the Joker's point of view on the situation.

Drifter
Oct 22, 2000

Belated Bear Witness
Soiled Meat

Kurzon posted:

Are we talking about The Dark Knight Returns, BvS, or Batman stories in general?
Batman was pretty empathetic in TDKR and most Batman stories in general. Heck, in TBAS he's a fuckin' puppydog so long as you're not a criminal. And TBAS is one of the best iterations of Batman.

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit
Holy Christ, this discussion is dumb. Is this normal for CineD?

VAGENDA OF MANOCIDE
Aug 1, 2004

whoa, what just happened here?







College Slice

Kurzon posted:

Holy Christ, this discussion is dumb. Is this normal for CineD?

It's normal for Batman.

Hat Thoughts
Jul 27, 2012

Kurzon posted:

Holy Christ, this discussion is dumb. Is this normal for CineD?

U could try reading a thread that isn't the Beavis thread

Terrorist Fistbump
Jan 29, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo

Kurzon posted:

Holy Christ, this discussion is dumb. Is this normal for CineD?

Lurk more.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Martman posted:

I disagree. Random chance got Batman's parents killed, but beyond that (and being lucky to be super wealthy) I think the real fantasy of Batman is that he chooses to make himself into Batman. Lots of people have terrible things happen to them but Bruce Wayne decides to turn that experience into something good.

I would argue that what you're saying is really the Joker's point of view on the situation.

The drive to become Batman, to master himself physically and pour resources into the task, comes directly from the death his parents. Otherwise, he would have been decent, probably altruistic man. The random murder directly leads to him becoming Batman. It's important that it's a random murder. It's also important that, prior to the accident, the joker is a nobody. He's not a super-soldier or a genius scientist. He's just some dude. Then he falls into acid and is turned into something terrible.


Gyges posted:

Wayne is indeed a richass fucker from the isolated enclaves of power. That's still oceans apart from the CIA, NSA, or any Western, let alone American, intelligence agency operating in the Middle East. If you want to make a lovely comparison between Batman and the Intelligence apparatus go for something like the CIA in Canada or perhaps Mexico.

I didn't bring those agencies up. I used them because someone else did, as if their actual existence as terrible, oversight free entities somehow made Batman's existence as a terrible, oversight free entity beyond reproach.

Xeremides posted:

1) You didn't fix poo poo. You're forgetting how corrupt the police department was when Batman first hit the scene. You're forgetting how much power the various mafia families had in the city prior to him donning the costume. A big part of Gotham's story is regarding cops being on the take, cops being untrustworthy, cops being unwilling to make the necessary moves because they want to go home to their families at night rather than end up at the bottom of the river. Then you have dirty politicians, dirty judges, the justice system being broken, etc. All huge incentives for Batman to say, "Alright, gently caress you guys. I'll do it." And then what happens? He does his vigilante thing, befriends Gordon, who then goes on to clean up the GCPD, and suddenly Batman and law enforcement are on the same side most of the time. Amazing.
By the exact same token, the countries that those agencies have chosen to intervene in do have enormous problems with their state apparatus one way or another. Almost like both are using lovely rhetoric to justify giving themselves more power.

quote:

2) You're not mistrusting "someone". You're mistrusting the motivations of a comic book character, who's motivations have been firmly established for over half a century. If you can't believe that Batman isn't a sociopath who feels nothing for people, that says to me that you're either an idiot, or projecting your sociopathic tendencies onto a comic book character.

3) Holy poo poo, no. He can chew bubblegum and walk at the same time. He's the goddamn Batman. He can be utterly consumed with administering justice, and still manage to care about the people of Gotham, or in the case of BvS, his employees in Metropolis. If anything, his obsession with justice only heightens his ability to empathize with the people of his city.
Batman is very lucky that he has you to speak for his character. I don't actually think he's a sociopath who feels nothing for people, and explicitly that. He's a messed up dude though. I like the idea that he's so messed up he doesn't even know why he's doing it any more. It's just sunk cost. He started out trying to clean up a town with a crime problem, now it has a super-crime problem. But he's gotta keep going. Sisyphus' boulder wasn't going to roll itself up thehill.

quote:

4) The Joker isn't Batman. The Joker is what Batman could become if Batman didn't have his crazy self-imposed rules. That's the entire point. The Joker wants Batman to break his own rules, to commit murder, and to give in to his psychosis. If they were the same, there'd be no conflict. And no, this isn't the goddamn Matrix. There is no equation balancing itself out.
So, he isn't Batman, but he is a dark mirror of Batman. That's a really important distinction that isn't just different phrasing for the exact same concept and I'm glad you took the time to make it. It was a good use of your time.

Even the guy who loving loves Batman and, more recently facism, Frank Miller, positions the Joker as an existential response. He has that theory put forward in story by a character who is a big dumb liberal idiot(tm), but the text of the story has the Joker go dormant once Batman retires, and has him awaken the very day Batman comes back. They justify each other and, while they hate each other, they also understand each other's drive. The Joker calls Batman his playmate, and means it. He's at least honest about their relationship.

Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 00:44 on Dec 6, 2015

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit
Why does Batman have to be insane and not Green Arrow or Batgirl or Mr Terrific or Hawkeye?

Kurzon fucked around with this message at 00:41 on Dec 6, 2015

teagone
Jun 10, 2003

That was pretty intense, huh?

Kurzon posted:

Why does Batman have to be insane and not Green Arrow or Batgirl or Mr Terrific or Hawkeye?

Because he's the god drat Batman.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

broken clock opsec posted:

It's normal for Batman.

And Superman, especially Man of Steel. This loving movie is, what, three or four months away? And already this thread is insane.

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

Kurzon posted:

Why does Batman have to be insane and not Green Arrow or Batgirl or Mr Terrific or Hawkeye?

Because in the case of most of those characters they are shown as being capable of having a normal life and not being utterly consumed by their role. (This may not apply to Arrow Green Arrow, I don't watch it.)

Hawkeye is an exception in that he is kind of a human garbage fire a lot of the time

Jimbot
Jul 22, 2008

ImpAtom posted:

Because in the case of most of those characters they are shown as being capable of having a normal life and not being utterly consumed by their role. (This may not apply to Arrow Green Arrow, I don't watch it.)

Hawkeye is an exception in that he is kind of a human garbage fire a lot of the time

Not if Dan Didio has anything to say about it, at least on DC's side of things. If you have Bat in your name, you have to be carbon copies of Batman. Period.

MeatwadIsGod
Sep 30, 2004

Foretold by Gyromancy
EDIT - Wrong thread.

I'm hoping that they go whole hog with parademons and boom tubes and all the crazy Darkseid stuff in these movies.

Snowglobe of Doom
Mar 30, 2012

sucks to be right

Drifter posted:

The only difference between modern day law enforcement like the CIA and NSA and FBI is that they don't wear bat-outfits, and Batman's track record of hurting innocent people is much lower. They both have effectively no oversight, and at least the public doesn't pay Batman's salary.

Batman's "salary" is paid by the invisible hand of the free market via Wayne Enterprises. The justice he hands out to street punks is similarly unregulated and based on the supply and demand created by criminal activities in the local market after Batman chose to bypass the government's barriers to market entry on the justice exchange and brought the justice enterprise back into private ownership. This may have incentived certain supervillains to maximize productivity of injustice to meet the new demands but Batman almost always manages to return the market to equilibrium via aggressive headpunch trading.

Superman represents a threat to the justice industry oligopoly in that he could gain a monopoly via unfair market advantages. Batman has no choice but to respond aggressively.


Edit: I'm clearly talking bullshit but someone who knows what they're talking about could probably give a genuine Keynesian review of Batman v Superman.

Detective No. 27
Jun 7, 2006

DCAU Batman built the Justice League Watchtower (a loving space station) in secret using change he found in the R&D division's couch.

Neo Rasa
Mar 8, 2007
Everyone should play DUKE games.

:dukedog:
"If the sick were too dumb to buy health insurance even after I rƎVO˩utionized digital currency with BatCoin they may as well die in the streets." ~The World's Greatest Detective™

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit

Drifter posted:

The only difference between modern day law enforcement like the CIA and NSA and FBI is that they don't wear bat-outfits, and Batman's track record of hurting innocent people is much lower. They both have effectively no oversight, and at least the public doesn't pay Batman's salary.
To nitpick here, the CIA and NSA are civilian intelligence agencies who have no powers of arrest, whereas the FBI is a law enforcement agency. Also, these guys are all constrained by laws. If they weren't, for example, the FBI would have wiped out the Mafia decades ago because J Edgar Hoover would have just told his agents to go round up every mobster without charge or evidence. Unlike Batman, Hoover had a little army at his disposal and could have done so easily had he been allowed to. Batman, however, is an outlaw who fucks with whoever he feels like.

Detective No. 27 posted:

DCAU Batman built the Justice League Watchtower (a loving space station) in secret using change he found in the R&D division's couch.
He didn't literally build it. He may have bankrolled it, and I suppose Superman helped haul parts into space, but Batman had to contract the work out to a bunch of corporations to do it. And somehow nobody managed to follow the money trail from the massive project back to Bruce Wayne.

Yoshifan823
Feb 19, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Kurzon posted:

Why does Batman have to be insane and not Green Arrow or Batgirl or Mr Terrific or Hawkeye?

Because there is an inciting incident for his tragedy, and because he's rich. Hawkeye and Batgirl are not rich, and Mr Terrific and GA had different reasons for becoming superheroes.

The best comparison to him is probably Iron Man, but the main differences between the two are personality and the reason they became a superhero. Batman's reason for being Batman is ultimately about a random act, whereas Iron Man's was a direct result of his actions. Batman is obsessed with finding the most just answer to a random, cruel world, and because he is rich, has plenty of time to work towards that. Iron Man, on the other hand, was captured while selling war weapons, which is a direct result of his being a weapons manufacturer. So, his inciting incident is trying to right the wrongs that he caused. Batman is essentially trying to fight the random nature of the world, hence why The Joker is his arch nemesis. Not so much a mirror as a response; the world is telling Batman to gently caress off in human form.

Also, you don't honestly think Batman wouldn't use his powers as much if not more than Superman if he had them? If he had those powers when his parents were killed, he would have essentially had the same response, but Batman with all the money in the world and superpowers would be a nightmare. He'd start by stopping smaller crimes, then eventually reason that the most just thing to do would be to stop all crime in Gotham all the time. And eventually he'd take it further, because you can't stop all crime, all the time, and of course there are random tragedies to think about. Batman isn't knowingly scared of Superman's power used by himself, but by an average person. Why should we think that he isn't an average person? He's rich, of course, but that's more likely to make you an rear end in a top hat. He's obviously got some sort of trauma, but again, that's more likely to make you an evil god-like fascist, not less. He can't fully see that, and would never admit it, but he knows it deep down.

As you can tell, I have kind of a negative opinion of Batman. Call it a distrust of the rich and powerful, but Batman to me is constantly one slip away from being a super villain. If his idea of justice gets perverted in any way, he could very easily fall. Look at Dark Knight: He makes his crazy cell phone spying thing, but if he were just a little more unhinged, or got pushed a little further, who's to say he wouldn't keep using it?

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit

Yoshifan823 posted:

Because there is an inciting incident for his tragedy, and because he's rich. Hawkeye and Batgirl are not rich, and Mr Terrific and GA had different reasons for becoming superheroes.
People don't go crazy because of one bad day, unless said bad day resulted in brain damage. Lots of kids get orphaned and grow up well-adjusted. In any case Bruce Wayne is actually a sane, well-adjusted guy in 90% of Batman stories. He's not psychotic, at least.

Yoshifan823 posted:

As you can tell, I have kind of a negative opinion of Batman. Call it a distrust of the rich and powerful, but Batman to me is constantly one slip away from being a super villain. If his idea of justice gets perverted in any way, he could very easily fall. Look at Dark Knight: He makes his crazy cell phone spying thing, but if he were just a little more unhinged, or got pushed a little further, who's to say he wouldn't keep using it?
I hate Batman too because he is a badly written emo Mary Sue.

Kurzon fucked around with this message at 08:12 on Dec 6, 2015

Immortan
Jun 6, 2015

by Shine

Wow, this looks horrible. I don't know which looks dumber: hipster Lex Luthor, autistic monster Zod, or another vaporization of an entire city killing millions.

Pirate Jet
May 2, 2010
I literally can't believe people try and use that last point as a flaw.

Hat Thoughts
Jul 27, 2012

Immortan posted:

Wow, this looks horrible. I don't know which looks dumber: hipster Lex Luthor, autistic monster Zod, or another vaporization of an entire city killing millions.

Not teh frigging hipsters

The MSJ
May 17, 2010

Immortan posted:

autistic monster Zod

How can you post in CineD and not wish to see Superman punch this monster to death while crying?

Kurzon
May 10, 2013

by Hand Knit

Immortan posted:

autistic monster Zod
What does autism look like?

Corek
May 11, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Kurzon posted:

What does autism look like?

Wasn't Brainiac an autistic kid Superman had to kill in that one "pitch" posted here all those years ago?

Harime Nui
Apr 15, 2008

The New Insincerity
"Tell me about the trains, Kal..... will there be trains?"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The MSJ
May 17, 2010

Corek posted:

Wasn't Brainiac an autistic kid Superman had to kill in that one "pitch" posted here all those years ago?

You might be confusing the "punch a retard to death" Bizarro story pitch with this promo for the recent animated movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYSxN4ezhO4

  • Locked thread