Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*
Weird that the times would cover that story. Jerry Falwell being a piece of poo poo isn't exactly news.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.

Aerox posted:

HOW IS JEB! SO BAD AT THIS!?!??!

https://vine.co/v/iWPBPK2UpgX
Jeb sux, but that sound is made up:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/03/politics/jeb-bush-hillary-clinton-whoop/
e: beaten

America Inc. fucked around with this message at 10:18 on Dec 6, 2015

moller
Jan 10, 2007

Swan stole my music and framed me!

ohgodwhat posted:

Ah, yes, people with money betting on politics - those are the opinions I'm really missing out on.

How otherwise could we possibly glean the timbre of the political "speech" of the investment class?

Filthy Hans
Jun 27, 2008

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 10 years!)

The Puppy Bowl posted:

Weird that the times would cover that story. Jerry Falwell being a piece of poo poo isn't exactly news.

nm, didn't realize this was Jerry Falwell Jr.

Filthy Hans fucked around with this message at 11:57 on Dec 6, 2015

The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*
I've always been of the opinion that Jr. is just the latest incarnation of Master Lich Jerry Falwell.

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

The Puppy Bowl posted:

I've always been of the opinion that Jr. is just the latest incarnation of Master Lich Jerry Falwell.

He's Liberty University's Uga, when one croaks just replace him.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

alpha_destroy posted:

Wait, what the gently caress? Delta Green isn't a secret conspiracy anymore? The gently caress is the point then? The best part of playing Delta Green was trying to come up with conceivable cover stories for why a postal agent, an immigration agent, and some motherfucker from the CDC would be snooping around that would fool both civilians and overzealous budgetary administrators.

Second edition. The relationship with the Grays fell apart, Alphonse is dead, MJ12 leadership was mostly wiped out with the exception of an ex-DG agent. Most of them were brought into the fold as part of the new government sanctioned DG, but there's still a bunch of people who are leery of the government being involved operating on the outside, led by the new Alphonse, formerly agent Charlie. It looks like a big part of 2e is going to be playing up the tensions between the Program and the Cowboys over who the real DG is.

The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*
Article's a little old but...

quote:

...

In eastern Kentucky and other former Democratic bastions that have swung Republican in the past several decades, the people who most rely on the safety-net programs secured by Democrats are, by and large, not voting against their own interests by electing Republicans. Rather, they are not voting, period. They have, as voting data, surveys and my own reporting suggest, become profoundly disconnected from the political process.

The people in these communities who are voting Republican in larger proportions are those who are a notch or two up the economic ladder — the sheriff’s deputy, the teacher, the highway worker, the motel clerk, the gas station owner and the coal miner. And their growing allegiance to the Republicans is, in part, a reaction against what they perceive, among those below them on the economic ladder, as a growing dependency on the safety net, the most visible manifestation of downward mobility in their declining towns.

These are voters like Pamela Dougherty, a 43-year-old nurse I encountered at a restaurant across from a Walmart in Marshalltown, Iowa, where she’d come to hear Rick Santorum, the conservative former Pennsylvania senator with a working-class pitch, just before the 2012 Iowa caucuses. In a lengthy conversation, Ms. Dougherty talked candidly about how she had benefited from government support. After having her first child as a teenager, marrying young and divorcing, Ms. Dougherty had faced bleak prospects. But she had gotten safety-net support — most crucially, taxpayer-funded tuition breaks to attend community college, where she’d earned her nursing degree.

She landed a steady job at a nearby dialysis center and remarried. But this didn’t make her a lasting supporter of safety-net programs like those that helped her. Instead, Ms. Dougherty had become a staunch opponent of them. She was reacting, she said, against the sense of entitlement she saw on display at the dialysis center. The federal government has for years covered kidney dialysis treatment in outpatient centers through Medicare, regardless of patients’ age, partly on the logic that treatment allows people with kidney disease to remain productive. But, Ms. Dougherty said, only a small fraction of the 54 people getting dialysis at her center had regular jobs.

“People waltz in when they want to,” she said, explaining that, in her opinion, there was too little asked of patients. There was nothing that said “‘You’re getting a great benefit here, why not put in a little bit yourself.’ ” At least when she got her tuition help, she said, she had to keep up her grades. “When you’re getting assistance, there should be hoops to jump through so that you’re paying a price for your behavior,” she said. “What’s wrong with that?”

...

Meanwhile, many people who in fact most use and need social benefits are simply not voting at all. Voter participation is low among the poorest Americans, and in many parts of the country that have moved red, the rates have fallen off the charts. West Virginia ranked 50th for turnout in 2012; also in the bottom 10 were other states that have shifted sharply red in recent years, including Kentucky, Arkansas and Tennessee.






https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/opinion/sunday/who-turned-my-blue-state-red.html?_r=1&referer=






I can't tell you have many conservatives who I know have used government aid in the past I've heard base their entire political philosophy off of disdain for some anecdotal (likely bullshit) story about some lazy rear end in a top hat abusing the system. If this article can be believed that's not just a trend I noticed but the natural political evolution in lovely rural regions. If the government aid they received worked, pulling them out of poverty, they turn around and look at the people currently using it saying "I can't believe my tax dollars are paying for these lazy bums."


So after accounting for misinformation, the death of American unions, and general dissatisfaction with politics leading to disengagement is there anyway for the dems to reclaim rural voters who depend on the government to live?

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

The Puppy Bowl posted:


I can't tell you have many conservatives who I know have used government aid in the past I've heard base their entire political philosophy off of disdain for some anecdotal (likely bullshit) story about some lazy rear end in a top hat abusing the system. If this article can be believed that's not just a trend I noticed but the natural political evolution in lovely rural regions. If the government aid they received worked, pulling them out of poverty, they turn around and look at the people currently using it saying "I can't believe my tax dollars are paying for these lazy bums."

I don't really know how you got that from the article. What it's saying is that the meme here about poor rural people voting against their own interests is incorrect. Rather, it's that the only people voting are the already rich in the area. For your hypothesis to be correct you'd have to show that these rich people were actually brought out of poverty and directly benefited from social services (and obviously at some level they did but some levels are more of a reach than others).



quote:

So after accounting for misinformation, the death of American unions, and general dissatisfaction with politics leading to disengagement is there anyway for the dems to reclaim rural voters who depend on the government to live?

The side effect of continued urbanization is a disinterest in the rural vote. Even here, the general strategy is basically "wait until they die out".

ColdPie
Jun 9, 2006

I wonder if there's a correlation between Republican voter suppression efforts and the trend noted by that article.

Pohl
Jan 28, 2005




In the future, please post shit with the sole purpose of antagonizing the person running this site. Thank you.
Gun sales are spiking again, just lol America.
How many loving guns do you need?

http://time.com/4137749/gun-sales-spike-san-bernardino/

Slate Action
Feb 13, 2012

by exmarx
Jimmy Carter has beaten cancer.

ComradeCosmobot
Dec 4, 2004

USPOL July

Pohl posted:

Gun sales are spiking again, just lol America.
How many loving guns do you need?

http://time.com/4137749/gun-sales-spike-san-bernardino/

One for every mass shooting in America. And with 350 odd this year alone, gun owners have some catching up to do!

BRAKE FOR MOOSE
Jun 6, 2001

computer parts posted:

I don't really know how you got that from the article. What it's saying is that the meme here about poor rural people voting against their own interests is incorrect. Rather, it's that the only people voting are the already rich in the area. For your hypothesis to be correct you'd have to show that these rich people were actually brought out of poverty and directly benefited from social services (and obviously at some level they did but some levels are more of a reach than others).

What? It's not talking about the rich, it's talking about the middle class, and he quoted a long anecdote showing exactly what you're asking for. Obviously, that's not the majority of republican voters, but it shows that the disdainful attitude is seen even among people who used the services at one point in their life.

toanoradian
May 31, 2011


The happiest waffligator
We need to continue to buy guns as long as that fear is still there. That fear of Big Government, Foreign Terrorists (as if there's any other kind), the Political Correctivas, Communists, Socialists, Moochers, Leechers, Urban Thugs, Muslims, Foreigners, Refugees, Anchor Babies, Encroaching Death, Thieves, Mass Shooters, Bombers, Muggers, Noisy Buggers, Suspicious Persons, Drug-Addled Youths, Freedom Haters

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

BRAKE FOR MOOSE posted:

What? It's not talking about the rich, it's talking about the middle class, and he quoted a long anecdote showing exactly what you're asking for. Obviously, that's not the majority of republican voters, but it shows that the disdainful attitude is seen even among people who used the services at one point in their life.

Well, rich is a bit of a stretch, but that doesn't change my underlying point - the people actually on food stamps aren't voting Republican. They're not voting against their best interests.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

At this point I'm pretty sure Carter is just waiting to finish out a second term as president before dying.

Mo_Steel
Mar 7, 2008

Let's Clock Into The Sunset Together

Fun Shoe

This is the happiest politics related news I've heard in a long time. Good on you Jimmy. :unsmith:

The Iron Rose
May 12, 2012

:minnie: Cat Army :minnie:

This is some excellent news I was not expecting

Full Battle Rattle
Aug 29, 2009

As long as the times refuse to change, we're going to make a hell of a racket.

:yeah:

blue squares
Sep 28, 2007


What in the gently caress? I knew this guy was an rear end in a top hat when it comes to gays, but I thought he was always a Bible literalist, which would mean non-violent.

Moktaro
Aug 3, 2007
I value call my nuts.

Luigi Thirty posted:

Aha, it's considered a binary options prediction market. The DoD tried to make one to predict terrorism once. They have an official "we cool" letter from the CFTC.

I had a thought the other day about finding someone (Paddy Power?) who would give you odds on a polling place shooting if Trump got the nom, I could totally see some more /pol/ jerks trying to start poo poo.

Grand Theft Autobot
Feb 28, 2008

I'm something of a fucking idiot myself

blue squares posted:

What in the gently caress? I knew this guy was an rear end in a top hat when it comes to gays, but I thought he was always a Bible literalist, which would mean non-violent.

Hahahahaha

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


What I want to know is why the gently caress does Liberty University still have a tax exemption?

SirKibbles
Feb 27, 2011

I didn't like your old red text so here's some dancing cash. :10bux:

blue squares posted:

What in the gently caress? I knew this guy was an rear end in a top hat when it comes to gays, but I thought he was always a Bible literalist, which would mean non-violent.

What? These a part of the bible where after a city falls the kill all the adult men and sell most of the women and children into slavery or taken as wives, what bible are you reading? Being a bible literalist would mean being pretty drat violent even if you exclude the old testament

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!

blue squares posted:

What in the gently caress? I knew this guy was an rear end in a top hat when it comes to gays, but I thought he was always a Bible literalist, which would mean non-violent.

:lol:

Maybe that sort of biblical literalism exists somewhere but certainly not here in good old 'Merica.

Teriyaki Koinku
Nov 25, 2008

Bread! Bread! Bread!

Bread! BREAD! BREAD!

Pohl posted:

Gun sales are spiking again, just lol America.
How many loving guns do you need?

http://time.com/4137749/gun-sales-spike-san-bernardino/

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd believe gun manufacturers are setting up more and more mass shootings to drive up revenue even further. :tinfoil:

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005

Shifty Pony posted:

What I want to know is why the gently caress does Liberty University still have a tax exemption?

Same reason the Church of Scientology has one - suing (or threatening to sue) the IRS into submission.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd believe gun manufacturers are setting up more and more mass shootings to drive up revenue even further. :tinfoil:

They kinda are but entirely unintentionally:

1. Oppose gun control measures
2. Easy availability of guns causes another mass shooting
3. Make gun nuts hulk out over gun control
4. Profit

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd believe gun manufacturers are setting up more and more mass shootings to drive up revenue even further. :tinfoil:

It's not a conspiracy theory, loose gun regulations lead to more sales and a side effect is more mass shootings. These regulations are created in an environment where they spend millions (billions?) in lobbying paid for by more sales. It's like any other positive feedback loop.

mandatory lesbian
Dec 18, 2012

Shifty Pony posted:

What I want to know is why the gently caress does Liberty University still have a tax exemption?

well, the lynchburg city council just sucks liberty's dick nonstop, so the city won't do anything to make them mad, and i guess the fed probably doesn't care or knows they wouldn't win a court case or whatever

Hollismason
Jun 30, 2007
An alright dude.
For it to be a conspiracy it'd have to be a hidden agenda. It's pretty obvious that Gun Manufacturers lobby for less gun control, which gives easier access to guns which lead to more mass shootings.

They even start advertising heavily after Mass Shootings and encourage sales and drop prices.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Shifty Pony posted:

What I want to know is why the gently caress does Liberty University still have a tax exemption?

Why shouldn't they?

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Shifty Pony posted:

What I want to know is why the gently caress does Liberty University still have a tax exemption?

As long as they don't back a specific candidate or speak for or against a specific candidate's policies they keep their tax-exempt status.

Moktaro posted:

I had a thought the other day about finding someone (Paddy Power?) who would give you odds on a polling place shooting if Trump got the nom, I could totally see some more /pol/ jerks trying to start poo poo.

The DoD used to operate one of these but for predicting upcoming terrorist attacks. They shut it down once they realized how bad of an idea it was to incentivize terrorism.

Jonas Albrecht
Jun 7, 2012



Santa got my letter!

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Luigi Thirty posted:

As long as they don't back a specific candidate or speak for or against a specific candidate's policies they keep their tax-exempt status.

They can endorse whomever they want and keep their tax status. They're an accredited university, not a church.

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005

Joementum posted:

They can endorse whomever they want and keep their tax status. They're an accredited university, not a church.

According to Section 501(c)(3), that's not correct:

quote:

(3)Corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities or equipment), or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation (except as otherwise provided in subsection (h)), and which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.

Teriyaki Koinku
Nov 25, 2008

Bread! Bread! Bread!

Bread! BREAD! BREAD!

HootTheOwl posted:

It's not a conspiracy theory, loose gun regulations lead to more sales and a side effect is more mass shootings. These regulations are created in an environment where they spend millions (billions?) in lobbying paid for by more sales. It's like any other positive feedback loop.

No I mean literally people like Syed Farouk being paid by Smith and Wesson Co. behind the scenes to commit mass shootings behind the scenes to drive up sales then cover it up with a facade of Islamic extremism as a false flag operation, not merely cause and effect.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

ThirdPartyView posted:

According to Section 501(c)(3), that's not correct:

Thanks for the correction.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lote
Aug 5, 2001

Place your bets

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

No I mean literally people like Syed Farouk being paid by Smith and Wesson Co. behind the scenes to commit mass shootings behind the scenes to drive up sales then cover it up with a facade of Islamic extremism as a false flag operation, not merely cause and effect.

You mean its a false flag attack paid for by Obama to take our guns. Something something Queen of England.

  • Locked thread