|
Gail Wynand posted:MIGF why didn't Preckwinkle run against Rahm Toni's support is like that of Mugabe: Wide but not deep. Rahm's in until he goes to DC. After Rahm, it's Madigan's turn.
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 10:15 |
|
|
 so, considering holding both house and senate, did they bungle these negotiations?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
Mulva posted:Ask and ye shall receive, looks like ISIS "wins".
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
I don't think Rahm's going to DC chances are very high right now, what with Hillary publicly rebuking him and all Though it was quite funny to see how fast he climbed down on the DOJ investigation once Hillary said something
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:24
|
|
|
zoux posted:No I don't think I am going to be fair to Ted Cruz, who I heard has a small dick. I also heard that Ted Cruz has a small penis. Can we discuss the manhoods of the Republicans contenders? Because I support a dick discussion derail in this thread.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
Gail Wynand posted:So 36% of all "private hosts" (a subset of the total hosts on Airbnb) in NYC (not Airbnb's only market) are evil landlords who should be expropriated and sent down to the countryside. In other words, a small minority of hosts seem to abuse the platform, not something anyone (including Airbnb) disputes and in other contexts they have been cooperative in cracking down on this. Once again you're still wrong. It isn't some small fraction, its a huge part of the hosts. quote:Most Short-Term Rentals Booked in New York Violated the Law. State and local laws in New York—including the Multiple Dwelling Law and the New York City Administrative Code— prohibit certain short-term rentals. During the Review Period, 72 percent of units used as private short- term rentals on Airbnb appeared to violate these laws. 72% of all units used in NYC appear to be illegal and 6% of owners make up 30%+ of the revenue. I wouldn't in fact be in favor of any company that's hiding tax evasion or allowing other businesses to avoid safety laws, even if I used their products. I am not as selfish as you I guess.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
Gail Wynand posted:I don't think Rahm's going to DC chances are very high right now, what with Hillary publicly rebuking him and all I think you will find that the DOJ investigation will reveal a "culture of corruption and racial bias" within CPD, enabled by the inactions of Anita Alvarez. It would only be the honorable thing for her to resign immediately for her crimes against black chicago.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:33
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Once again you're still wrong. It isn't some small fraction, its a huge part of the hosts. Turns out a good cost savings measure is to ignore all applicable local, state and federal regulations. Disrupt the market, until legislation catches up with you!
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:34
|
|
|
Fox Ironic posted:I also heard that Ted Cruz has a small penis. Can we discuss the manhoods of the Republicans contenders? Because I support a dick discussion derail in this thread. I heard that even Fiorina has a penis, but alas, it is a small one as well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:35
|
|
|
Fox Ironic posted:I also heard that Ted Cruz has a small penis. Can we discuss the manhoods of the Republicans contenders? Because I support a dick discussion derail in this thread. Rubio would like you to think that it's size which matters. Cruz knows that it isn't the size of your forces, its how you use them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:36
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:Rubio would like you to think that it's size which matters. Cruz knows that it isn't the size of your forces, its how you use them. Yet he seems all too willing to start a full scale war.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:Rubio would like you to think that it's size which matters. Cruz knows that it isn't the size of your forces, its how you use them. Ugh, now I'm thinking about Sexy Time Cruz and I don't want to be.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
karlor posted:I heard that even Fiorina has a penis, but alas, it is a small one as well. Still bigger than Cruz's. How about the pecker of our glorious frontrunner? What's the over-under on Trump's Stump?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
now I'm not saying I support thoughtcrime, but I'd be okay with expressing these thoughts being a crime
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
zoux posted:Turns out a good cost savings measure is to ignore all applicable local, state and federal regulations. Disrupt the market, until legislation catches up with you! Now can we stop having this autistic back-and-forth every page? It actually made me look forward to MIGF making GBS threads up the thread instead.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Once again you're still wrong. It isn't some small fraction, its a huge part of the hosts. quote:I wouldn't in fact be in favor of any company that's hiding tax evasion or allowing other businesses to avoid safety laws, even if I used their products. I am not as selfish as you I guess.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Ugh, now I'm thinking about Sexy Time Cruz and I don't want to be. I can't stop imagining his melty, grunting face.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
AmiYumi posted:Seriously. This, as well as their complete disavowal of their employees anytime something goes wrong, is why people in the thread are against Uber/Lyft/AirBNB/whatever other dumbass "disruptive" startup becomes prominent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZyQ9g2WTy8
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
joeburz posted:
So is this bill looking to get signed by Obama or not? It sounds like there is a lot of bad crap in here, including CISPA.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
zoux posted:Turns out a good cost savings measure is to ignore all applicable local, state and federal regulations. Disrupt the market, until legislation catches up with you!
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
GlitchThief posted:I feel bad for the poor sucker who is going to have to read all of Senator Cruz's personal e-mails now. "Ugh! Why is even his email moist?"
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:43
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:So is this bill looking to get signed by Obama or not? It sounds like there is a lot of bad crap in here, including CISPA. Does this bill even make it to his desk?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:44
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:now I'm not saying I support thoughtcrime, but I'd be okay with expressing these thoughts being a crime Hannity would fail the Voight-Kampff test in seconds.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:44
|
|
|
Fox Ironic posted:Still bigger than Cruz's. How about the pecker of our glorious frontrunner? What's the over-under on Trump's Stump? I'd bet Trump has a pretty generous hog. Maybe it's his cocksure attitude, inasmuch as that he's sure his cock would stand up favorably to scrutiny.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:44
|
|
|
Fox Ironic posted:I also heard that Ted Cruz has a small penis. Can we discuss the manhoods of the Republicans contenders? Because I support a dick discussion derail in this thread.  Entirely scientific survey http://www.cardsagainsthumanity.com/survey/
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:So is this bill looking to get signed by Obama or not? It sounds like there is a lot of bad crap in here, including CISPA. You talk like the bad things in CISA weren't pushed by the White House in the first place. I'd easily say that this bill will probably be signed by Obama (EDIT: assuming it hits his desk) I mean, these things can change, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:I'd bet Trump has a pretty generous hog. Maybe it's his cocksure attitude, inasmuch as that he's sure his cock would stand up favorably to scrutiny. Putting lipstick on the pig makes a surprising return for another election cycle.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
Obama will sign it because of 9/11 responders and Jon Stewart.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
Fox Ironic posted:Still bigger than Cruz's. How about the pecker of our glorious frontrunner? What's the over-under on Trump's Stump? Donald Trump would like to respond to aspersions that have been cast on the size and girth of his tumescence. Donald Trump would like everyone to know that not only is his manhood above average, but it has been certified by his family doctor to be "the largest of any patient he has ever had".
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:Press Release From The Desk Of Donald Trump "It's yuge. You're gonna love it. It's great."
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:50
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:Press Release From The Desk Of Donald Trump In the words of Trump's personal physician, Trump is "yoooogeeee"
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
ReidRansom posted:I'd bet Trump has a pretty generous hog. Maybe it's his cocksure attitude, inasmuch as that he's sure his cock would stand up favorably to scrutiny. See, I always figured he was overcompensating with the skyscrapers and putting his name is on everything. I think Trump's tool may be even smaller than Cruz's cock, but I am not quite as sure as I am about Ted Cruz having a small penis.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:52
|
|
|
Donald Trump probably does have a huge dick but that's because the world is poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
Gail Wynand posted:If I do business with a company I expect that they wouldn't just hand over my info to law enforcement at their beck and call if they think there is something wrong with the request. So you actually think companies shouldn't have to obey laws if they don't like them?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:56
|
|
|
Hey guys, have you ever stopped to consider the possibility that Donald Trump actually is the ubermensch: healthy as a track athlete teenager, has never been sick or suffered major injury, genius-level intellect, eidedic memory, 14 inch cock Have you ever thought that maybe that's actually true, huh, huh???
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:So you actually think companies shouldn't have to obey laws if they don't like them? Companies are free to disobey the law, just as government is free to catch and prosecute them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:So you actually think companies shouldn't have to obey laws if they don't like them?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
Gail Wynand posted:They followed the law by disputing the subpoena in court and reaching a settlement where they released a smaller set of data. That's why we have these things called "courts," to resolve legal disagreements. that's also why we have these things called "regulations", to provide appropriate guidelines for what behavior might end you up in one of these so called "courts"
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Hmm. Maybe perhaps because it has more in common with workplace violence than extremist jihadism? Liberals need this to be true so their worldview isn't proven wrong. It's as much workplace violence as 9/11 or OK City, in that it was violence that happened at a place of work.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 19:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 10:15 |
|
|
Gail Wynand posted:They followed the law by disputing the subpoena in court and reaching a settlement where they released a smaller set of data. That's why we have these things called "courts," to resolve legal disagreements. My Imaginary GF posted:Companies are free to disobey the law, just as government is free to catch and prosecute them. I too, feel that society functions better when we don't enforce the law and accept a settlement (bribe) in exchange for doing the less then the bare minimum. Look how well that's working out for police precincts in St. Louis, Chicago, and the Carolinas.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 19:14
|
|
