|
divabot posted:Just five paragraphs and my brain wants a shower. Amazing. Yes Jim, that is the loving point of them, nobody just says their safeword for funsies you loving sociopath.
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 15:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 00:01 |
|
|
The presence of seatbelts and airbags in cars is not an indication that all is well, etc.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
I'm not the kind of guy to have exciting leather sex, but isn't not having safe words really bad and basically doing it wrong?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 15:50
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:I'm not the kind of guy to have exciting leather sex, but isn't not having safe words really bad and basically doing it wrong? Apparently, there's some BDSM subcultures where it's not a thing, and there's much more pressure on the dom rather than the sub to keep things safe and fun. I'm 100% sure that's not why this guy is objecting, though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 15:56
|
|
|
A lot of people also have sex with strangers without protection and birth control and that I assume also kind of leads to pressure on everyone involved.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 16:02
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:I'm not the kind of guy to have exciting leather sex, but isn't not having safe words really bad and basically doing it wrong? In BDSM trust and consent are really, really important and safe words ensure it doesn't suddenly turn into rape if one member misjudges the responses of the other. So yeah.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 16:05
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:I'm not the kind of guy to have exciting leather sex, but isn't not having safe words really bad and basically doing it wrong? Only if you think it's bad when someone is about to graduate from violent sex to serial murder.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 16:07
|
|
|
"I don't want to use safewords or negotiate boundaries" is a great big flashing red "I'm a rapist looking for victims" sign.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
Pope Guilty posted:"I don't want to use safewords or negotiate boundaries" is a great big flashing red "I'm a rapist looking for victims" sign. So is "I'm a dark enlightenment MRA"
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 16:32
|
|
|
https://ask.fm/St_Rev/answers/110089961214 In which the beliefs of a paranoid schizophrenic are reached through routes other than paranoid schizophrenia. Remember: The Patriarchy is a conspiracy theory, but Cthulhu is real, and strong, and is my enemy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ClarkHat/status/677484294336589824
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 17:39
|
|
|
Ah yes, Pharma Bro is good guy
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
Twerkteam Pizza posted:Ah yes, Pharma Bro is good guy Someone said it before but god these guys are the edgiest edgelords in the edgiverse, find any even moderately popular opinion or idea and they'll take the farthest opposite stance of it they can. Also they linked this: http://www.threefeloniesaday.com/Youtoo/tabid/86/Default.aspx which, besides being a fundamental misunderstanding of how the legal system works, is pretty hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 18:04
|
|
|
Yes, it's selective prosecution, please ignore the fact that he's been under investigation for multiple years before the drug price hikes got him into the news,
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 18:08
|
|
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Someone said it before but god these guys are the edgiest edgelords in the edgiverse, find any even moderately popular opinion or idea and they'll take the farthest opposite stance of it they can. Any website about arbitrary laws and prosecutions needs to begin and end with "driving while black" and the countless variants of "doing normal thing while black" that end up with black people dead, in jail, or with a criminal record. Otherwise, it comes across as whining that, like, my cousin did this thing once, and they got away with it, and it's so not fair that I get arrested for doing the same thing. This is a free country! My taxes pay for you people!
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
By the way, I've just had it pointed out to me ... Clark's name and twitter are no longer on the PopeHat masthead, since Randazza joined or so. Clark's last post was Nov 18. Think Ken finally had enough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 19:51
|
|
|
Darth Walrus posted:Apparently, there's some BDSM subcultures where it's not a thing, and there's much more pressure on the dom rather than the sub to keep things safe and fun. gently caress it, I'll bite. BDSM comes in two primary flavours when it comes to consent, since saying 'no' and 'stop' and the like can't always be taken literally. Some people are looking for that kind of thing, in a simulated way. There's SSC, Safe, Sane and Consensual, which means there is a safe word (which should never need to be used) and the dominant partner is expected to check in with their partner regularly to make sure they're still into it. Then there's RACK, Risk-Aware Consensual Kink, where there's no safe word but both partners share all tastes, limits and fetishes ahead of time. RACK is seen by most folks in the community as insanely risky and likely to be predatory. Jim is going for a third way involving no negotiation or discussion, which is pretty much certain to turn into outright rape.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 20:08
|
|
|
jesus christ how did you run across this guy, I looked at his twitter homepage for thirty seconds and the first link I found was him trumpeting a story about how Baltimore is Doomed because those "dindus" are gonna get mad over the Freddie Gray trial
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 20:52
|
|
|
Somfin posted:gently caress it, I'll bite. Real maestros have been known to go up to 5 levels deep. It's like tantra, but with more whipping. (Maybe it's thoughts like this that explain why I have so much time to post about internet racists instead of having exciting sex with interesting people though.)
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 21:01
|
|
|
MizPiz posted:It makes sense when you realize that when they say "cuckold" they mean "race traitor." I think they really mean "porn I jerk off to way too frequently".
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
Anarcho-tyranny is just tyranny. Right?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 23:06
|
|
|
Somfin posted:gently caress it, I'll bite. The Ted Bundy Way.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 23:21
|
|
|
I admit, the "he should have been buying influence instead of Wu-Tang albums" tweet down the line was pretty good. Also, if you're interested in the topic of BDSM, consent, and the issues the former has had with the latter, there was an extremely good (but extremely long) series on it called "There's A War On" that was posted a few years back. Not sure if things have changed or not since then.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 00:12
|
|
|
Holy gently caress. Scott is arguing with Fredrik DeBoer over whether nerds are as oppressed as Black people. This is Scott's argument: http://pastebin.com/7s98agpv quote:Going to try to say this at greater length to avoid misintepretations. And the whole thread: https://twitter.com/freddiedeboer/status/677939766982279169
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
Shoot me and my family in the face if I ever fall so far as to want to read an argument between Scott Alexander and DeBoer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
The Time Dissolver posted:Shoot me and my family in the face if I ever fall so far as to want to read an argument between Scott Alexander and DeBoer. I, on the other hand, feel like Christmas came early.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 23:17
|
|
|
Merdifex posted:Holy gently caress. Scott is arguing with Fredrik DeBoer over whether nerds are as oppressed as Black people. The argument is tone deaf to the extent of bordering on the insulting of the descendants of slaves so hard that graffiti artists from insulting-land regularly create great works of art on the insulting-land-facing walls of non-insulting-land houses, but it is quite clearly not "nerds are as oppressed as Black people" or even "nerds are oppressed".
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
The superior move of course would be to bring up intersectionality.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:If you honestly read the pastebin as implying "Scott is arguing ... nerds are as oppressed as Black people", you are stupid. Source your quotes motherfucker
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:If you honestly read the pastebin as implying "Scott is arguing ... nerds are as oppressed as Black people", you are stupid. I feel that you should know Scott well enough to know that when he's implicitly arguing for something, or that when he claims that a debate or argument is not motivated by something, that said debate or argument is motivated by that this. In this case, by Scott's dearly held belief in nerd oppression. Or you could, you know, read the thread on twitter. It would be better than taking only Scott's word. Unless you're OK with comparing oppression against blacks as equivalent to oppression against nerds? It was Scott who brought that point up, after all, so if you want to defend it, go ahead. Merdifex has a new favorite as of 01:01 on Dec 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:The superior move of course would be to bring up intersectionality. Libertarianism is the end-game of intersectionality I have no idea what words mean. Promiscuous apples feverishly magenta convoys
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 02:02
|
|
|
Merdifex posted:I feel that you should know Scott well enough to know that when he's implicitly arguing for something, or that when he claims that a debate or argument is not motivated by something, that said debate or argument is motivated by that this. In this case, by Scott's dearly held belief in nerd oppression. I am saying this because the pastebin states rather unambiguously that "oppressed" is not the word its author would use to describe the situation of nerds. If you do not understand this, you are
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Promiscuous apples feverishly magenta convoys Someone mspaint this right now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Libertarianism is the end-game of intersectionality Intersectionality is so flawed, it rarely takes into account neurodivergent technolibertarian nerds and how oppressed we are that our personal posts are criticized on the internet  Cingulate posted:I should have specified that my claim was not about intelligence, but reading comprehension. In that vein: I'm not saying Scott's thoughts are this or that. (For what it's worth, I do believe there is little reason to assume he does think nerds are oppressed to the degree Black people are.) What I am saying is: If you honestly read the pastebin as implying "Scott is arguing ... nerds are as oppressed as Black people", your reading comprehension is bad. I don't care, but if you bring up Black people when you catch just a whiff of someone, just perhaps, not believing that nerds are an oppressed group, that's some kind of absurd poo poo that this thread is made to laugh at. Merdifex has a new favorite as of 02:58 on Dec 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Merdifex posted:Intersectionality is so flawed, it rarely takes into account neurodivergent technolibertarian nerds and how oppressed we are that our personal posts are criticized on the internet Which is good, because your original post was stupid.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 03:24
|
|
|
Merdifex posted:Intersectionality is so flawed, it rarely takes into account neurodivergent technolibertarian nerds and how oppressed we are that our personal posts are criticized on the internet Are you talking about that one Bay Area techn-libertarian's personal post on Tumblr where I popped up and said being a techno-libertarian was bad? Because my activity feed is only just now recovering from that. (So. Much. Whining.) I wasn't planning for half of the post-rationalist Tumblrsphere to censure me today, but I suppose I deserve it for opening my big fat mouth like that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
Curvature of Earth posted:Are you talking about that one Bay Area techn-libertarian's personal post on Tumblr where I popped up and said being a techno-libertarian was bad? Because my activity feed is only just now recovering from that. (So. Much. Whining.) Nothing but. They're so accustomed to holding all sorts of (frankly evil) opinions, and in a space where you're guaranteed to never have said ideas criticized. But of course when some random "social justice" person says something about safe spaces then you're correct to decry that as being immoral and irrational. Even if this is a tumblr thing, it's ridiculous because these "post-rationalists" are used to criticizing people (sometimes personally) from all over the internet in a context in which they could never really respond. But I've noticed that they're fine with others on tumblr criticizing them if they're neoreactionaries. (if those doing the criticizing are NRx, that is, the opposite is ridiculous and irrational) Merdifex has a new favorite as of 04:23 on Dec 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
Curvature of Earth posted:Are you talking about that one Bay Area techn-libertarian's personal post on Tumblr where I popped up and said being a techno-libertarian was bad? Because my activity feed is only just now recovering from that. (So. Much. Whining.) I was particularly delighted with the bit where Ozy was outraged you'd say that about a post by an autistic person. How dare you!
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 13:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 00:01 |
|
|
Boo on talking about this without links, boo I say.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 14:21
|
|