|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 22:25 |
|
|
dayum, exploitable
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 20:33
|
|
|
InsanityIsCrazy posted:dayum, exploitable 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 21:21
|
|
|
You're as bad at photo manips as your candidate is at politics.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 22:00
|
|
|
Trump is extremely good at politics though so now I'm confused.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
he's good at polls we don't know if he's good at votes yet the whole conversation is really just loving around until we get to find out the second part. nobody's really gonna have anything new to add until shortly before the votes start getting cast, i don't think
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 22:48
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:Trump is extremely good at politics though so now I'm confused. Bernie Panders must be enviously jerking himself off at Trump's success.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 23:42
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Bernie Panders must be enviously jerking himself off at Trump's success. dude is swimming in communist college pussy, no way he's jerking off
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 00:02
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Bernie Panders must be enviously jerking himself off at Trump's success. is there a moment of the day you're not thinking about bernie sanders? this is the trump thread, if you love sanders so much why dont you marry him? jus sayin
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 00:04
|
|
|
katlington posted:is there a moment of the day you're not thinking about bernie sanders? this is the trump thread, if you love sanders so much why dont you marry him? jus sayin Okay, Trump verbally murders documented Clinton donor George Stephanopoulos for 13 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXDSJCdfX8k
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Okay, Trump verbally murders documented Clinton donor George Stephanopoulos for 13 minutes: What a genius.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 02:18
|
|
|
the howling madness is finally coming for me, I can't tell ifa cop posted:What a genius. is being said sarcastically, or to whom
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 03:42
|
|
|
This whole election is intellectually recursive. Immortan is setting off my Poe's Law detection to the point where I am lost.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 04:23
|
|
|
Immortan is not serious.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 04:37
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
it is a beauty
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 05:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 05:44
|
|
|
He's right.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:He's right. Yeah he's just stating the obvious.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 06:22
|
|
|
VladimirLeninpest posted:poo poo, I live in Cedar Rapids. I went to see Star Wars instead of Trump. I was planning on being there for this. too bad we need to add you to the list of terrorist supporters to be shipped out when our great leader reigns.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 07:01
|
|
|
thank god hes such a fat goony goon that you an literally insert him into anything with ease. InsanityIsCrazy posted:the howling madness is finally coming for me, Just let it take you over all your worries go away and life is so much easier when you give in. You don't even fear Trump anymore you welcome it. Microwaves Mom has issued a correction as of 07:05 on Dec 21, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 07:02
|
|
|
mike12345 posted:communist college pussy In 2015, there are a lot of ways this could turn out to be not what you planned on.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 09:43
|
|
|
Holy kmao phyllis schlafly is still alive?
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 10:50
|
|
|
So with this lady in Vegas that went on a carmageddon spree, aren't we supposed to kill her 3 year old now or something?
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 15:31
|
|
|
get the 3 yr old overseas first maybe
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 15:59
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:Yeah yeah they'll threaten to vote third party but that's a threat that always comes but never happens. Why wouldn't Trump run third-party?
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 18:14
|
|
|
I agree. But Logikv9 (in the dem thread) was saying that the GoP will push him out of the nomination, which I agree with, and implying that Trump wouldn't run 3rd party, which I disagree with.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:I agree. But Logikv9 (in the dem thread) was saying that the GoP will push him out of the nomination, which I agree with, and implying that Trump wouldn't run 3rd party, which I disagree with. I never implied that he wouldn't run third-party. I never said anything of the sort. On that particular question, I personally don't know. He's indicated that he wouldn't as long as the process is "fair" in his eyes, but fair can mean anything. My post said that the voters wouldn't vote third-party, because despite all their empty threats they are straight-ticket republicans at heart.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
Jeb really doesn't want to do this any more but he can't quit until the first primary because of all the money he's taken.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:I never implied that he wouldn't run third-party. I never said anything of the sort. On that particular question, I personally don't know. He's indicated that he wouldn't as long as the process is "fair" in his eyes, but fair can mean anything. Ah. Maybe you are right about the voters, but it would still ruin the GoP's already small chance to win the general. Which is why if the GoP fucks trump during the RNC convention, I think he will run third-party out of spite.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
Haven't some GOP honchos already been talking about the GOP itself doing a third-party run should Trump get the nom? Because if so 
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
Thump! posted:Haven't some GOP honchos already been talking about the GOP itself doing a third-party run should Trump get the nom? They also talked about switching the format to a brokered convention in order to stump the Trump
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Yea my claim is that unless Trump get's significantly stumped before the convention, which is possible, then the GoP will have to do what he says, the way he says, or risk fracturing the GoP.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 19:59
|
|
|
I hope the GOP tears itself apart at the convention and the general election ends up being between Hillary and Bernie
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 21:09
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:Why wouldn't Trump run third-party? i thought someone had said he's already missed a lot of filing deadlines (too many, numerically) to be on a state ballot as a 3rd party, plus on top of that since he's primarying as R right now, some states have sore-loser laws which means he can't just do a 3rd party run in a state in which he loses an R primary. was that all speculation or would a 3rd party run basically be an untenable vanity project at this point (the definition of the man, i know)?
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
Fullhouse posted:I hope the GOP tears itself apart at the convention and the general election ends up being between Hillary and Bernie To hope, mayhap to dream. homeless poster posted:i thought someone had said he's already missed a lot of filing deadlines (too many, numerically) to be on a state ballot as a 3rd party, plus on top of that since he's primarying as R right now, some states have sore-loser laws which means he can't just do a 3rd party run in a state in which he loses an R primary. I think he has qualified for all presidential ballots so far. But it's hard to look this info up because the internet sucks for actually searching for data.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 21:17
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:I never implied that he wouldn't run third-party. I never said anything of the sort. On that particular question, I personally don't know. He's indicated that he wouldn't as long as the process is "fair" in his eyes, but fair can mean anything. What are you talking about? I worked on the Obama campaign, both times, and I would again. In 2016, I am voting Trump. There are a lot of people like me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
At this point if Trump gets betrayed by the GOP he wouldn't worry about ballot access - he would tell people to write him in and would keep campaigning.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 21:24
|
|
|
McDowell posted:At this point if Trump gets betrayed by the GOP he wouldn't worry about ballot access - he would tell people to write him in and would keep campaigning. i've always wondered about that too, from a logistical perspective. sure, donald trump is a fairly uncommon name, but what happens if there's even one other native born US citizen over the age of 35 with no felony convictions with the legal name donald trump? or what would happen if the name was much more common, like david smith? the whole "or you can write-in your guy" seems to be a vestigial thing from our original elections when only land-owning men could vote, so it was a pretty narrow field of who you were voting for when you wrote in a name. is writing in a name still a real thing you could do? what other info would you have to include to prove that your write-in vote went to the correct person?
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 22:25 |
|
|
It's up to the state election board to determine who the vote was issued for. In this case Donald Trump, Don Trump, and probably a bunch of creative variations like Doneld Trump, The Don, TRUNP, etc, would most likely all be scored for the same person. And lets be honest, if this election is for some reason an unprecedented case in American history, and there are are millions of write in votes for some variation of Donald Trump, it's not really a question who they mean.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2015 21:33
|
|