|
The Management posted:lmao, I can't believe they did it again. this is a fundamental design flaw of the somehow people still think it can be fixed in software "My hunch is that the Android team still hasn’t figured out how to take real advantage of all that power out of Nvidia’s silicon"
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2015 13:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 08:45 |
|
|
this isn't much of an issue with android but that nvidia arm chips are poo poo
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 01:15
|
|
|
Celexi posted:this isn't much of an issue with android but that nvidia arm chips are poo poo google designs and sells device with 486 sx 25mhz must be the 486's fault that its so slow
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 06:10
|
|
|
The Management posted:lmao, I can't believe they did it again. this is a fundamental design flaw of the why would you translate ARMv8 code, it's made to be pretty clean as-is EDIT: the whitepaper makes it look like a pretty standard 4xA57/4xA53 setup http://international.download.nvidia.com/pdf/tegra/Tegra-X1-whitepaper-v1.0.pdf big shtick energy fucked around with this message at 06:57 on Dec 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 06:54
|
|
|
DuckConference posted:why would you translate ARMv8 code, it's made to be pretty clean as-is oh poo poo, you're right. nvidia's custom core used to do instruction translation but it looks like they dumped that (because it was so bad) and went with standard arm cores. that was an epic waste of resources. so it looks like I found the problem: quote:Intelligent algorithms analyze workloads presented by the operating system to dynamically switch between the high performance and low performance cores to deliver optimal performance and power efficiency. they tried this with their stupid companion core back with cortex a9 and it was a miserable failure. they ended up disabling it and always running on the fast cores and burning a ton of power. their big and little cores don't share an L2, so every transition will require a full cache clean and fill. A53/57 don't support hardware migration so they would need to do a full core shutdown and power up. basically their algorithm would try its best not to switch cores because it's a huge perf hit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
DuckConference posted:why would you translate ARMv8 code, it's made to be pretty clean as-is the reason they did this is so that they could design a fast in-order core and push the task of instruction reordering and dependency tracking to software. this worked about as well as you imagine
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 16:33
|
|
|
The Management posted:lmao, I can't believe they did it again. this is a fundamental design flaw of the looks like they abandoned the denver core so who the gently caress knows why it's stuttering besides being android The Pixel C is the first device we've come across to run Nvidia's Tegra X1 SoC. The X1 dumps Nvidia's "Denver" CPU and goes with off-the-shelf cores from ARM, so you get a 64-bit 1.9Ghz processor with four high-power Cortex-A57 cores and four low-power Cortex-A53 cores. In benchmarks, it scores about as high as a Snapdragon 810, another chip made with off-the-shelf ARM cores.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 20:14
|
|
|
it's probably the 4+4 core setup with low and high power cores. iirc several phone manufacturers tried that with their phones back in 2012-2013, found it didn't appreciably improve battery life but did cause performance issues and dropped it from phones that had it for the asian and european markets before they went on sale in the american market you're pretty much always better off with a single set of cores and them being configured to smoothly clock down as needed, rather then making full jumps between different sets of cores
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
quote:Here’s a map of Google’s insane NY holiday party happening tonight  https://twitter.com/jaredbkeller/status/675012703740633088
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 21:05
|
|
|
i wonder how many escorts have been hired for it
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 21:11
|
|
|
fishmech posted:it's probably the 4+4 core setup with low and high power cores. yeah after doing a deep dive in the big.little shitshow it seems clear that proper dvfs and power gating managed mostly in hardware is the best approach, and big.little is more of a hack to try to get better efficiency from cores that can't manage their power consumption very well Intel is very good at this, which is one of the bright spots in their mobile nightmare
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
do they still think the mascot costumes are clever
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 21:53
|
|
|
Google spellcheck still broken I see.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 22:13
|
|
|
le chine zen reading room
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 22:40
|
|
|
prefect posted:i wonder how many escorts have been hired for it
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 22:56
|
|
|
ufarn posted:"all uber for sex workers, please report to eric schmidt's fuckfest penthouse" soundproof fuckfest penthouse
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 23:12
|
|
|
computer parts posted:soundproof fuckfest dungeon
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 23:21
|
|
|
f i'm ever unaccountably rich i think i would want to build a dungeon but wouldn't because people would assume it was a sex dungeon and i'd have to always be all "no, it's a normal dungeon, there's no sex in the dungeon" but nobody would believe me. i don't think i could deal with that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 23:21
|
|
|
just build two, the sex dungeon and the non-sex dungeon. you don't have to use the former.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
soundproof walls make for good neighbors
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:f i'm ever unaccountably rich i think i would want to build a dungeon but wouldn't because people would assume it was a sex dungeon and i'd have to always be all "no, it's a normal dungeon, there's no sex in the dungeon" but nobody would believe me. i don't think i could deal with that. then put them in the loving dungeon. which you don't use for loving.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:f i'm ever unaccountably rich i think i would want to build a dungeon but wouldn't because people would assume it was a sex dungeon and i'd have to always be all "no, it's a normal dungeon, there's no sex in the dungeon" but nobody would believe me. i don't think i could deal with that. there's no sex in the champagne dungeon.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 09:08
|
|
|
please use the proper name, "the disruption dungeon"
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 09:36
|
|
|
im the romance room
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:f i'm ever unaccountably rich i think i would want to build a dungeon but wouldn't because people would assume it was a sex dungeon and i'd have to always be all "no, it's a normal dungeon, there's no sex in the dungeon" but nobody would believe me. i don't think i could deal with that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
Dubstep Jesus posted:im the romance room
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
The chirldren's room doesn't look big enough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 20:03
|
|
|
Dubstep Jesus posted:im the romance room this was one of the first replies to that tweet lol 
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 20:12
|
|
|
Tatsujin posted:this was one of the first replies to that tweet lol rofl
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
Tatsujin posted:this was one of the first replies to that tweet lol 
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:36
|
|
|
thank you scott
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:58
|
|
|
google is removing the feature that let you record from a webcam directly to youtube with no processing delay prepare for the death of lovely reaction vids
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 13:50
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:google is removing the feature that let you record from a webcam directly to youtube with no processing delay RIP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOn1htjSZic
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 15:48
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 16:01
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:google is removing the feature that let you record from a webcam directly to youtube with no processing delay okay, so google isn't all bad
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 16:31
|
|
|
google are colluding to make pewdiepie a monopoly
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 16:48
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKOdnDDN_5s 4:29
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
5
|
|
#
?
Dec 28, 2015 21:58
|
|
|
I was driving today and came to an intersection at the same time as a google self driving car. it had the right of way, but I realized that it will defer if I make a move, so I just went ahead and took his turn. and it's not like there's a driver inside who is getting upset at what a dick I've been, so everybody wins.
The Management fucked around with this message at 05:51 on Dec 29, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2015 05:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 08:45 |
|
|
speaking of which, I saw one the other day create a deadlock by refusing to go over a speed bump until the car in the opposing lane crossed it. but that car was waiting on the car in front of it to turn left, which it could have if the idiot Google car kept driving and let the cars behind it clear the lane.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2015 06:03
|
|