|
xlevus posted:802.11ac. A wifi standard that can do gigabit+ speeds, and 8channel MIMO. Got it, thanks. I haven't looked for this stuff in so long I'm totally out of the loop on the hot new standards haha. I don't even have any ac-capable devices at the moment so I'm not really worried about it - my desktop is wired anyway and the wireless is mostly for using the laptop for simple stuff or for visitors. Looks like the RB951G-2HnD will be a Christmas present to myself!
|
# ? Dec 3, 2015 20:19 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 09:08 |
|
I finally got around to making a good canary script, which tells me how long something has been down. Let me know if any of you guys have any input on it. Obviously edited out some things:code:
|
# ? Dec 3, 2015 20:33 |
|
If you're monitoring via snmp, just watch the uptime counter and alarm if it's under 30min or so. It's remarkable how much that catches things and doesn't rely on mail servers/dns and such working from the remote side, but will catch the 15 second reboots, and bonus - works cross platform.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2015 16:53 |
|
unknown posted:If you're monitoring via snmp, just watch the uptime counter and alarm if it's under 30min or so. We do monitor via SNMP but my boss wants to know every little power outage that happens due to caring way too much.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2015 19:09 |
|
I meant just monitor the snmp oid: .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 for mikrotik - it returns uptime in centiseconds, (yes - so divide by 6000 for minutes), and if that value is low, alarm away as you just had a reboot/power outage (or the counter cycled after a few months). Nicely integrates with a monitoring system that can do snmp queries and removes any dependency on mailservers/dns and people reading said mailbox. This also works with everything else that has a similar uptime counter.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 20:27 |
|
Observium does this. But you have to pay something like, $250/year to get the pro version if you want to do email alerting. EDIT: I should clarify. Observium does fantastic SNMP monitoring on Mikrotik and Ubiquiti devices. It will monitor/graph temps, voltages, uptime, etc... and you can build alerts based on any of it. I have it tell me on my dashboards if any devices have less than 24 hours of uptime.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 20:32 |
|
Yay, massive new OS update, with only a minor version number change. It's the Latvian way!Mikrotik posted:
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 17:08 |
|
The Dude abides
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 22:04 |
|
What can I use to monitor bandwidth consumption? I have a Linux box, no Windows. I was using NefFlow and nTop, I've used logstash + Kabana + elasticsearch to some limited success. Just wondering what else people use. Edit: s/Why/What/ Boner Wad fucked around with this message at 07:12 on Dec 11, 2015 |
# ? Dec 10, 2015 21:35 |
|
Mikrotiks have MRTG built in. I use that.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2015 22:07 |
|
Does anyone know a way to have a router/dhcp server become the Master Browser. Tomato used to have a simple clickbox to enable this and I loved it. Now that I use Mikrotik's I have no idea how to accomplish this... might not be possible because I think you need to use Samba.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2015 19:04 |
|
redeyes posted:Does anyone know a way to have a router/dhcp server become the Master Browser. Tomato used to have a simple clickbox to enable this and I loved it. Now that I use Mikrotik's I have no idea how to accomplish this... might not be possible because I think you need to use Samba. I don't see any options for it and searching the wiki reveled absolutely nothing. You're probably right.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2015 19:55 |
|
Mug posted:Mikrotiks have MRTG built in. I use that. I use that too but it doesn't list how much bandwidth I've used per day/month/year etc. That's kind of what I'm looking for.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2015 23:11 |
|
code:
|
# ? Dec 15, 2015 18:41 |
|
Until you have the box (or it's peers) reset and become a routing blackhole/mess for 10min as BGP re-converges with that many routes since the bgp daemon isn't multithreaded (and won't be until v7).
|
# ? Dec 15, 2015 22:45 |
|
So far it's been about 2 minutes for re-convergence. We're looking at table sizes of 25k to 50k routes with a default that should prevent blackhole. We're still in testing but surprised that it hasn't fallen over. Anyone know the (actual) command to kill old ssh sessions to the router? edit: anyone else look at the reg dates on this page? looks like we're some sort of time capsule.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2015 03:44 |
|
Heheh, greybeard goons griping about Latvian routing equipment. Good times.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2015 20:05 |
|
So, I adjusted my P2P link with 2 RB SXT G-5HPacD units over 500ish feet and set the TX gain to 17(which btw am I going to hurt something?) . NV2.. achieved 80-90MB/s sustained throughput or basically 800-866mbps over 2 windows file servers realtime file transfer. Frankly my face just fell off and flew away. I had no clue this stuff was possible now. TX/RX CCQ on my end is 93/99% baby, 45db signal.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2015 06:10 |
|
redeyes posted:So, I adjusted my P2P link with 2 RB SXT G-5HPacD units over 500ish feet and set the TX gain to 17(which btw am I going to hurt something?) . NV2.. achieved 80-90MB/s sustained throughput or basically 800-866mbps over 2 windows file servers realtime file transfer. Frankly my face just fell off and flew away. I had no clue this stuff was possible now. TX/RX CCQ on my end is 93/99% baby, 45db signal. You can probably turn the tx down as low as possible (below 0) and still get a good rate. You likely want to mess with the channel width at 30 or 40mhz too if you haven't already. Anything in the 50db range is good. The lower signal with good rate will work just as well or better and won't be blasting the airwaves with unnecessary signal.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2015 21:39 |
|
falz posted:You can probably turn the tx down as low as possible (below 0) and still get a good rate. You likely want to mess with the channel width at 30 or 40mhz too if you haven't already. I set the rates to 'Default' instead of fixed rate at 17 gain. Speeds are slightly more actually, CCQ is 99% now, 90-100MB/s realtime transfer speed. Sounds good to me, thanks for the tip.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2015 22:21 |
|
I bought one of the ~$200 2x SFP+ Cloud Router Switches, and I am about to do a few bandwidth tests (with CCRs on either end of it) to see if this sucker and push a lot of data on that switch chip. We're running out of ports on our main access switch for our VLANs, and we're thinking of putting this 2x SFP+ switch (with 10G going in and out) as a man in the middle, upstream from our current switch. Hopefully it works well! My boss is super hesitant since it was only 200$ versus like our current $3k+ HP switch.
|
# ? Dec 30, 2015 22:26 |
|
A test not from some insane third world ISP would be nice. I thought they had a switch chip per 5 ports but the block diagram just shows one big rear end chip
|
# ? Dec 30, 2015 23:58 |
|
I have a CCR1009 and a CCR1036 to test on either side of the SFP+ ports, as doing bandwidth tests need a lot of CPU to not max out easily. I should have some good results by tomorrow.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2015 00:29 |
|
Anyone know when the hAP AC and Lite will show up? They were both announced for the third quarter of 2015, but I know Latvian calendars work about as well as Latvian software QA.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2015 05:15 |
|
Weird Uncle Dave posted:Anyone know when the hAP AC and Lite will show up? They were both announced for the third quarter of 2015, but I know Latvian calendars work about as well as Latvian software QA. I was wondering the same since my UAP AC PRO order was delayed until May. Any thoughts on the throughput or other differences between a UAP vs hAP AC?
|
# ? Dec 31, 2015 05:59 |
|
Boner Wad posted:I was wondering the same since my UAP AC PRO order was delayed until May. Any thoughts on the throughput or other differences between a UAP vs hAP AC? Curious on this as well. I have been waiting for a UAP AC LITE to come back in stock, doesn't seem like it will ever happen.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2015 16:07 |
|
Weird Uncle Dave posted:Anyone know when the hAP AC and Lite will show up? They were both announced for the third quarter of 2015, but I know Latvian calendars work about as well as Latvian software QA. I don't know if the hAP AC will have more than 866mbps but this http://www.amazon.com/Mikrotik-RB91...ywords=mikrotik is what I just bought because I got tired of waiting. Thing works flawless. Price is great.
|
# ? Dec 31, 2015 16:24 |
|
I really need the dual band support because I have some gear that's older than God and is 2.4 only. The hAP AC Lite is starting to show up at some resellers, but at this point I'd rather wait for its big brother. I'm looking to replace a router I bought in 2008, so I tend to think of gear as more of a long term investment.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2016 00:39 |
|
Weird Uncle Dave posted:I really need the dual band support because I have some gear that's older than God and is 2.4 only. Yeah the AC lite is single chain 5Ghz AC and isn't gigabit. I got an hAP lite to cover dual chain 2.4Ghz BGN for my stuff.. still came in under 100 bux.
|
# ? Jan 1, 2016 03:02 |
|
I have my two RB2011s (upstairs, downstairs) connected together with a flaky Powerline adapter that seems to cut out occasionally and things don't seem to work well after that happens. So I've set a watchdog on the upstairs device to reboot if it can't talk to the downstairs device. This seems to handle the cut out issue. Buuut. When the upstairs device restarts, all the WiFi clients reconnect to the downstairs device and never switch back to the upstairs device. Currently, the wifi is just configured so that everything's on the same SSID/Channel, which I suspect is the problem, will WDS solve this? Is there a guide on how to configure WDS over an ethernet link? I've only seen ones concerning WDS over wireless.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2016 13:06 |
|
Run another script that disables/enables the radios on the downstairs AP when the upstairs one's uptime goes backwards
|
# ? Jan 27, 2016 14:17 |
|
I've got a client who needs to occasionally allow remote access to a server on their network. Currently they're getting by with Teamviewer but that gives the outside guys access to their desktop to then access the server - not ideal. I'd like the client to be able to use a shortcut on their Windows system to temporarily open a port on the Mikrotik outside interface that will dstnat to the right server. I'm not even fussed about opening it only to a specific outside ip, just opening it is OK (they've got ssh and goodish security to hold out random attempts for the 20odd minute periods the port will be open for). Port knocking seemed like the obvious solution since the shortcut could just telnet the Mikrotik on one or more ports from the inside, which would (in theory) open the port on the outside interface. Unfortunately, all of the port knocking solutions I've found will only then open access to the inside client, which is no good. I'm currently looking at hacking together a local website with php tied into the RouterOS API but something tells me there has to be something I've missed. Any ideas?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2016 21:12 |
|
You can make a somewhat crippled user account that can be telnet'd into via the batch file script on the client computer, then open the port in the firewall-- which is a simple command line within the Mikrotik. Something like set disabled=no on: /ip firewall nat add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Port forward for RDP to Client" dst-address=<PUBLIC_IP> dst-port=3389 to-addresses=<INTERNAL_IP> to-ports=3389 jeeves fucked around with this message at 21:54 on Jan 27, 2016 |
# ? Jan 27, 2016 21:52 |
|
OmniCorp posted:So far it's been about 2 minutes for re-convergence. We're looking at table sizes of 25k to 50k routes with a default that should prevent blackhole. We're still in testing but surprised that it hasn't fallen over. The network engineers at my last place set up a couple of these to handle our peering arrangements and they were pretty flaky under any real load.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2016 06:09 |
|
http://routerboard.com/RB962UiGS-5HacT2HnT HAP AC page is up on routerboard.com, seen prices on streakwave for 106 + shipping.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2016 20:28 |
|
Atreus posted:http://routerboard.com/RB962UiGS-5HacT2HnT How are those going to compare to the new UniFi UAP-AC-PROs? I have two on order since December and I have no clue when I'll get them.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2016 22:00 |
|
We won't know until someone gets both. Interesting to see the SFP port is not on the switch chip like the RB2011. thebigcow fucked around with this message at 22:47 on Feb 9, 2016 |
# ? Feb 9, 2016 22:45 |
|
Atreus posted:http://routerboard.com/RB962UiGS-5HacT2HnT quote:We have two versions available.
|
# ? Feb 13, 2016 04:24 |
|
First of all, heres my config: http://pastebin.ca/3372338 ether1 is the WAN port. I'd like to limit the bandwidth on that port, like QoS. So far I've tried: /queue simple add max-limit=69M/420M name=queue1 target=ether1 /interface ethernet set bandwidth=100M/100M The first one doesnt work I've been told because the port is switched, or because of NAT masquerade. The second one doesn't work because the switch chip in the RB3011 doesnt support it. (i cant go above 10M/10M, but it /does infact/ work at those settings... i bet its just a bug) Is there any other way I can do this? Preferably w/o mangle and using a queue tree?
|
# ? Feb 13, 2016 05:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 09:08 |
|
Looking to create a simple wireless bridge across a distance of about 200m. I am looking at the SXT 5 AC for each end, or is there a better option? http://routerboard.com/RBSXTG-5HPacD
|
# ? Mar 7, 2016 16:24 |