|
It's going to be really weird winning random encounters before the climax of the battle theme.
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 13, 2024 02:26 |
|
|
General Morden posted:steiner's thunder slash has like a 0% chance to hit pretty much all (with a few exceptions) enemies in the game, due to a bug in the way the move was programmed or something That bug is ridiculously specific and I love it. Somehow they managed to take thunder slash's accuracy and add it to another ability, Iai Strike. Which is (supposed to be) one of those low accuracy death attacks. Apparently they did fix it in some versions though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
McDragon posted:That bug is ridiculously specific and I love it. Somehow they managed to take thunder slash's accuracy and add it to another ability, Iai Strike. Which is (supposed to be) one of those low accuracy death attacks. Apparently they did fix it in some versions though. What do you mean by some versions, like different regions or the Greatest Hits re-release.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
Xavier434 posted:Dang dude. Relax. Sorry for the mild sarcasm, that was totally uncalled for. But seriously, why would they consider that an exploit? Tough enemies being super vulnerable to a specific spell happens all the time throughout the series. If they were going to fix anything it would be the cotton robe trick, since that was probably caused by someone hitting the 0 key too many times, but it's a single player game so who cares?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
Fister Roboto posted:Sorry for the mild sarcasm, that was totally uncalled for. It wouldn't be the first time that a single player game was patched because a certain enemy was unintentionally way too easy but it is rare. However, I think that you are absolutely correct in this case. Square Enix definitely has a history of being perfectly okay with that sorta stuff. Even when I originally asked the question, I did not think that the chances of them changing this was likely but I also did not take much of their history into consideration like that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 22:51
|
|
|
FromSoft is the company that loves nerfing single player experiences.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
Sakurazuka posted:I hope they make you climb all 500 sets of stairs Me too, that part is hilarious
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
Xavier434 posted:It wouldn't be the first time that a single player game was patched because a certain enemy was unintentionally way too easy but it is rare. However, I think that you are absolutely correct in this case. Square Enix definitely has a history of being perfectly okay with that sorta stuff. Even when I originally asked the question, I did not think that the chances of them changing this was likely but I also did not take much of their history into consideration like that. Also every single enemy in the desert palace has a multiple of 5 level. "Level 5 Death is actually usueful" is definitely not an exploit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:01
|
|
|
For any Level (X) Spell to be meaningful it has to be useful against at least a small handful of significant enemies it works on. Either high level foes or enemies with absurd defense or something.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:For any Level (X) Spell to be meaningful it has to be useful against at least a small handful of significant enemies it works on. Either high level foes or enemies with absurd defense or something. Or give the player some useful way to manipulate enemy levels, but that way lies the ownage-tier madness of FF5
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
The minimum storage requirement for FF9 is 20GB
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
I think the PS1 version is like 2GB
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
It's fine
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
Tempo 119 posted:The minimum storage requirement for FF9 is 20GB Maybe this means someone can mod the game to use the uncompressed pre-rendered backgrounds. A man can dream can't he?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
do they even exist
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
I screamed so hard blood shot out of every orifice I have. Looking forward to runnin through IX again. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
It's just the FFXV trailer uncompressed. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
voltcatfish posted:do they even exist I have no clue, but I remember some blog post a while back that had images of what the backgrounds looked like before they were scaled down for the PlayStation. Ever since then, I've dreamed of those uncompressed versions popping up somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
Oh I guess it's 20GB because of the dual audio voice acting
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Help Im Alive posted:Oh I guess it's 20GB because of the dual audio voice acting Lmao, thank you for this
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
Sakurazuka posted:I hope they make you climb all 500 sets of stairs I hope it's rereleased to be played on Vive so I can do this in VR.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
Help Im Alive posted:Oh I guess it's 20GB because of the dual audio voice acting quote:Vivie: Also motion capture Does this mean we have a man pretending to be a short stumpy clutz  ?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:Seven game boosters including high speed and no encounter modes. ffffffffffffffffffffff i was tryin to play 7-9 on psp so that i could get the Experience on the go and stop when i needed to but this is tempting Saint Freak posted:Hype for the great parts of Midgar like: yo real talk i wanna climb those stairs in hd
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
I hope Tifa still calls Barret a retard.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
 ff9 has a lesser known monster house
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
I'm loving playing final fantasy 7 while eating cheesy shell macaroni. I think I might be 12 again. Except I have beer and triple speed and a flat screen and a massage chair. gently caress yes. Thank you based god
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:yo real talk i wanna climb those stairs in hd Gonna petition for first person view and you have to alternate X and O to move up each step.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
commander nojj posted:So what's the consensus on Final Fantasy Explorers? I don't think I've spotted a thread for it yet. Popped in to ask this as well. There's some previews going up on some sites that are favorable, but they're based off of some early game impressions. I'm mostly worried that it'll end up like Ragnarok Odyssey where the endgame gets weird bullshit hard.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
FanaticalMilk posted:I have no clue, but I remember some blog post a while back that had images of what the backgrounds looked like before they were scaled down for the PlayStation. Ever since then, I've dreamed of those uncompressed versions popping up somewhere. Here's the link to the Neogaf post. Not the best image, but for the quickest comparison: Emulated PS1/Original background art.   FanaticalMilk posted:What do you mean by some versions, like different regions or the Greatest Hits re-release. It's fixed in the PAL version, at least. Not too sure about any of the other versions.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
Pesky Splinter posted:Here's the link to the Neogaf post. well poo poo now i hae a boner
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:39
|
|
|
 Wanna explore dat Alexandria.   Closest comparison I can see between the high res artwork and the steam screenshots, we're not getting the decompressed backgrounds 
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 10:58
|
|
|
It would be pretty dumb to patch out a grinding exploit that's already rendered moot by giving the player a bunch of booster stuff that would do the same thing in an instant. Why are people arguing about this?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 11:57
|
|
|
LightReaper posted:
It still looks a million times better than the original
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 12:04
|
|
|
In Training posted:I liked the first one but kinda petered off after a dozen or so hours, and I heard the sequel is better. So enjoy Thanks. I probably won't start it until the next trip I take Evil Fluffy posted:Suikoden 2's one of the best RPGs of that console generation and IIRC the PSN version is the one with bug/text fixes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 12:08
|
|
|
Tempo 119 posted:The minimum storage requirement for FF9 is 20GB Guess I need to buy a new phone and make it my FF9 phone
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 12:10
|
|
|
The models for IX PC look really good but it sorta makes the characters stand out that much more from the backgrounds. This is kinda the worst example of it PC  Emulated  But everything still looks really good so it's fine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 12:16
|
|
|
Yeah I was really resisting buying 9 a third time but gently caress it's so pretty
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 12:47
|
|
|
FanaticalMilk posted:What do you mean by some versions, like different regions or the Greatest Hits re-release. People don't talk about it much because it rarely matters but even back to the NES games games were getting patches and if you bought a game later on you'd often get a higher version number than if you bought it earlier. It wasn't usually as extensive patching as you get now in modern games but it existed and a lot of popular games had 6 or 7 minor differences. The biggest non-censorship one is that you may remember mario tanooki leaves being either green or brown depending on when you bought mario 3.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 14:44
|
|
|
Golden Goat posted:It would be pretty dumb to patch out a grinding exploit that's already rendered moot by giving the player a bunch of booster stuff that would do the same thing in an instant. It started because I posted this: Xavier434 posted:What do you think the odds are of them removing the ability to one shot Grand Dragons with the lvl5 Death spell in the steam version? I honestly did not expect the discussion to go beyond a post or two at the time much less it inspire a debate.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 13, 2024 02:26 |
|
|
Which is a better game in you guys' opinion, any of the Fire Emblems or Final Fantasy Tactics?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 17:26
|
|
