Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Codependent Poster
Oct 20, 2003

straight up brolic posted:

but tbh i agree that the fact that what pacman did and what burfict did are tantamount in the eyes of the NFL illuminates the fact that they don't take player safety seriously at all. if you want to eliminate hits like that, make a defenseless/leading with the crown of the helmet hit a full field penalty...i bet people wouldn't do it if it was.

It's really hard to believe Burfict wasn't thrown out for that hit. And yeah, the penalty for that being the same as Jones' is stupid.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

a new study bible!
Feb 2, 2009



BIG DICK NICK
A Philadelphia Legend
Fly Eagles Fly


ALFbrot posted:

You keep characterizing it like Porter went to Cincy's sideline and started jawing. He was escorting Brown off of the field and pushed Burfict's arm when he put his hand on Brown's shoulder. #95 ran up and bumped Porter, separating him from the Brown group, and several other Bengals came to surround him. Dickheads all around, but nothing flagrant or worth a flag.

Then Pacman came flying at him and tried to flail through three refs to get him.

Why was Porter instigating the contact in the first place?

Giodo!
Oct 29, 2003

WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:

Clearly Porter was on the field attending to Brown

https://streamable.com/v94e

If all we're going by is what we see in that clip and nothing that happened before, I don't see porter even open his mouth or get in anyone's face.

v2vian man
Sep 1, 2007

Only question I
ever thought was hard
was do I like Kirk
or do I like Picard?
he was cursing? stop the dang presses

The 7th Guest
Dec 17, 2003

Giodo! posted:

If all we're going by is what we see in that clip and nothing that happened before, I don't see porter even open his mouth or get in anyone's face.
it's not a very good angle, it crops out half of the scene

ALFbrot
Apr 17, 2002

WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:

Why was Porter instigating the contact in the first place?

Because Burfict was touching Brown. I can't imagine anyone from the Steeler sideline was very thrilled with Burfict at that moment, and they probably weren't willing to accept it as a gesture of apology

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Codependent Poster posted:

Yes or no, it's okay for an assistant coach to go on the field and confront the other team and start cursing them out?

If he had gone onto the field solely and expressly for the purpose of instigating a conflict, sure. But that is not what happened. As football zebras and others had said, he was allowed to be on the field, and he was tending to a player who was injured. He let emotions get the better of him and mouthed off as far as we can tell, but that series of events is far different from him heading out to the biggest group of bengals he could find to try and get someone to shove him, which seems to be what you are implying.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

ALFbrot posted:

Because Burfict was touching Brown. I can't imagine anyone from the Steeler sideline was very thrilled with Burfict at that moment, and they probably weren't willing to accept it as a gesture of apology

It's really unfair if this excuses Porters behavior.

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend
The NFL probably needs to get a lot less bashful about ejecting players, that will get some of them to work on their decision making pretty quick. The NCAA's targeting rule is stupid, but only because it doesn't allow for any subjectivity. The heart of it, that ejection is by far a more effective deterrent than anything else, is sound.

Phobeste
Apr 9, 2006

never, like, count out Touchdown Tom, man

Mel Mudkiper posted:

Come on you know you are deliberately stretching things here now

taunting is a very specific penalty and isn't "mean words"

Hell, you're right, it's extra mean words that are even meaner in context, or alternatively dances that go on slightly too long or involve too many people

shazier should have been flagged and burfict was rightly flagged but the pacman thing should have been offsetting or just dealt with without flags, when poo poo like that is happening you have to understand that you need to defuse the situation, not dole out random punishments. yes this is hard: being a ref is hard. there are what, about 40 people who are qualified nfl officials? it's a hard job no poo poo

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Bengals lost the game because Porter was on the field. Hilarious if true.

ALFbrot
Apr 17, 2002

CharlestheHammer posted:

It's really unfair if this excuses Porters behavior.

Joey Porter, secret ISIS leader, deserved a flag for not allowing Burfict to lay hands on the man whose brain he just liquefied.

The 7th Guest
Dec 17, 2003

Frackie Robinson posted:

The NFL probably needs to get a lot less bashful about ejecting players, that will get some of them to work on their decision making pretty quick. The NCAA's targeting rule is stupid, but only because it doesn't allow for any subjectivity. The heart of it, that ejection is by far a more effective deterrent than anything else, is sound.
No kidding. I know that they're squeamish because such ejections can impact entire games, but it seems like it would only take one in a game to calm both sides out for the remainder.

by the way, what I really didn't like about what burfict did is the fact that he knew brown didn't complete the pass, and he threw his elbow out in the process of making his hit. Like, he made his move to make the hit, knowing full well that the catch was incomplete and the player was defenseless. i mean it's a lot faster in real time speed but he knew.

tk
Dec 10, 2003

Nap Ghost

Mel Mudkiper posted:

If he had gone onto the field solely and expressly for the purpose of instigating a conflict, sure. But that is not what happened. As football zebras and others had said, he was allowed to be on the field, and he was tending to a player who was injured. He let emotions get the better of him and mouthed off as far as we can tell, but that series of events is far different from him heading out to the biggest group of bengals he could find to try and get someone to shove him, which seems to be what you are implying.

I wonder if you can find where in this you describe something that could be an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

ALFbrot posted:

Joey Porter, secret ISIS leader, deserved a flag for not allowing Burfict to lay hands on the man whose brain he just liquefied.

I agree with this Porter should not have involved himself at all.

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

tk posted:

I wonder if you can find where in this you can find describe that could be an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty.

I said earlier if Jones hadn't responded Porter could have easily found himself getting penalized but in a violent game when one person says mean words and the other one lays hands you do not call unsportsmanlike conduct on both, you call it on the person who escalated it to physical contact.

a new study bible!
Feb 2, 2009



BIG DICK NICK
A Philadelphia Legend
Fly Eagles Fly


ALFbrot posted:

Because Burfict was touching Brown. I can't imagine anyone from the Steeler sideline was very thrilled with Burfict at that moment, and they probably weren't willing to accept it as a gesture of apology

Obviously Cincy made their own bed, but Porter shouldn't be instigating conflict. Opposing players pat each other all the time; we see it nearly every dead ball. Coaches don't get to cross that line, especially when Burfict's initial conflict was just a pat on the back.

riht
Dec 13, 2004

i knew u were trouble when u tossed int
Cincy fans making me want to defend Pittsburgh and referees. What has this world come to?

Codependent Poster
Oct 20, 2003

Mel Mudkiper posted:

If he had gone onto the field solely and expressly for the purpose of instigating a conflict, sure. But that is not what happened. As football zebras and others had said, he was allowed to be on the field, and he was tending to a player who was injured. He let emotions get the better of him and mouthed off as far as we can tell, but that series of events is far different from him heading out to the biggest group of bengals he could find to try and get someone to shove him, which seems to be what you are implying.

Regardless of why he went out there, he obviously at some point was not tending to the injured player and became an instigator.

So either flag both teams, or don't flag anyone and get the people where they're supposed to be.

ALFbrot
Apr 17, 2002

CharlestheHammer posted:

I agree with this Porter should not have involved himself at all.

Would you be more okay with it if it was a steelers trainer who pushed Burfict's hand away?

GOOD TIMES ON METH
Mar 17, 2006

Fun Shoe

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I said earlier if Jones hadn't responded Porter could have easily found himself getting penalized but in a violent game when one person says mean words and the other one lays hands you do not call unsportsmanlike conduct on both, you call it on the person who escalated it to physical contact.

Which would be Porter?

a new study bible!
Feb 2, 2009



BIG DICK NICK
A Philadelphia Legend
Fly Eagles Fly


I mean I know Mike Tomlin is allowed to cross that line when other players are streaking up the sidelines... but other coaches arent.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:

Obviously Cincy made their own bed, but Porter shouldn't be instigating conflict. Opposing players pat each other all the time; we see it nearly every dead ball. Coaches don't get to cross that line, especially when Burfict's initial conflict was just a pat on the back.

Actually considering the amount of stupid players on the bengals, instigating conflict was the thing to do.

Regnevelc
Jan 12, 2003

I'M A GROWN ASS MAN!

WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:

Obviously Cincy made their own bed, but Porter shouldn't be instigating conflict. Opposing players pat each other all the time; we see it nearly every dead ball. Coaches don't get to cross that line, especially when Burfict's initial conflict was just a pat on the back.

I figure the initial conflict was taking Brown's head off.

buddhanc
Feb 16, 2010

riht posted:

Cincy fans making me want to defend Pittsburgh and referees. What has this world come to?

More fans should throw poo poo at Ben more often IMO.

He might've wanted a beer anyways

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

ALFbrot posted:

Would you be more okay with it if it was a steelers trainer who pushed Burfict's hand away?

I honestly don't think anyone should have done anything there unless he sincerely believed
Burlict was gonna murder him. Which is silly.

Codependent Poster
Oct 20, 2003

ALFbrot posted:

Would you be more okay with it if it was a steelers trainer who pushed Burfict's hand away?

It was the trainer that did that, wasn't it? I thought he did, because he looked really pissed and he should have been.

Destoration
Apr 30, 2012


posting this here too....stolen from twitter :v:

PsychoInternetHawk
Apr 4, 2011

Perhaps, if one wishes to remain an individual in the midst of the teeming multitudes, one must make oneself grotesque.
Grimey Drawer
Now I'm curious, does the NFL have specific rules in place for player/nonplayer interactions?

You'd think this would be a thing, but it's the NFL so :shrug:

Truther Vandross
Jun 17, 2008

Codependent Poster posted:

Regardless of why he went out there, he obviously at some point was not tending to the injured player and became an instigator.

So either flag both teams, or don't flag anyone and get the people where they're supposed to be.

At some point, you have to realize that your opinions on Joey Porter's thing that he did mean absolutely loving nothing and he didn't violate any rules, right?

tk
Dec 10, 2003

Nap Ghost

Mel Mudkiper posted:

I said earlier if Jones hadn't responded Porter could have easily found himself getting penalized but in a violent game when one person says mean words and the other one lays hands you do not call unsportsmanlike conduct on both, you call it on the person who escalated it to physical contact.

Two wrongs make the first one right? Why does the penalty go away because he got what he wanted?

The 7th Guest
Dec 17, 2003

WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:

Obviously Cincy made their own bed, but Porter shouldn't be instigating conflict. Opposing players pat each other all the time; we see it nearly every dead ball. Coaches don't get to cross that line, especially when Burfict's initial conflict was just a pat on the back.
also, that Porter reacted to Burfict that way is exactly what I'm talking about with the high level of emotion. any observer from beyond the sidelines would know burfict was making a gesture of apology/condolence, but on the field it was seen as hostile. that's why, again, i say the refs need to know what the state of emotions are on the field, and keep bengals players away from brown, keep steelers players away from the bengals, and let the coaches/trainers work on brown and get him off the field

people are reacting to me like i'm saying they should babysit or that i'm treating the players like kids. i'm treating them like a group of people that just saw one of their own get their head taken off, and another group of people who just saw a personal foul wipe out an incomplete pass and potentially cost them the game. they were all pissed off!

The 7th Guest fucked around with this message at 07:32 on Jan 10, 2016

Schwack
Jan 31, 2003

Someone needs to stop this! Sherman has lost his mind! Peyton is completely unable to defend himself out there!

PsychoInternetHawk posted:

Now I'm curious, does the NFL have specific rules in place for player/nonplayer interactions?

You'd think this would be a thing, but it's the NFL so :shrug:

Don't push/lunge at anybody between plays. I'm guessing that's generally laid out in the rule book.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Seriously Lewis has so many players who do stupid poo poo and theres zero accountability. Should have been a penalty for that idiot who ran into the locker room.

Oh wait he lost them the game after that nm.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

sportsgenius86 posted:

At some point, you have to realize that your opinions on Joey Porter's thing that he did mean absolutely loving nothing and he didn't violate any rules, right?

Talking poo poo can violate the rules depending on how trigger happy the ref is. Unsportsmanlike conduct and all that. It's rather vague tho.

v2vian man
Sep 1, 2007

Only question I
ever thought was hard
was do I like Kirk
or do I like Picard?
there should have been a penalty on everyone, for playing the modern bloodsport and giving the whole world CTE

Codependent Poster
Oct 20, 2003

PsychoInternetHawk posted:

Now I'm curious, does the NFL have specific rules in place for player/nonplayer interactions?

You'd think this would be a thing, but it's the NFL so :shrug:

From what I could find, Rule 13 article 8.

quote:

Article 8. Non-Player Personnel

Non-player personnel of a club (e.g., management personnel, coaches, trainers, equipment men) are prohibited from making unnecessary physical contact with or directing abusive, threatening, or insulting language or gestures at opponents, game officials, or representatives of the League.

http://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/2015-nfl-rulebook#rule-13.-non-player-conduct

GOOD TIMES ON METH
Mar 17, 2006

Fun Shoe

blablablabla posted:

Seriously Lewis has so many players who do stupid poo poo and theres zero accountability. Should have been a penalty for that idiot who ran into the locker room.
???

a new study bible!
Feb 2, 2009



BIG DICK NICK
A Philadelphia Legend
Fly Eagles Fly


Regnevelc posted:

I figure the initial conflict was taking Brown's head off.

I forgot about all those other times when players got called for targeting and other coaches ran down the field to lay hands on opposing football players.

That excuses it.

Remember that time Marvin Lewis did it when Gio was targeted?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mel Mudkiper
Jan 19, 2012

At this point, Mudman abruptly ends the conversation. He usually insists on the last word.

Goetta posted:

Which would be Porter?

When did Porter touch Jones?

tk posted:

Two wrongs make the first one right? Why does the penalty go away because he got what he wanted?

This isn't grade school, we are not talking about two wrongs making a right. A player putting hands on coaching staff is objectively worse than the coaching staff saying mean things and its absurd to think they should receive the same penalty. If both people commit similar offenses, you offset the penalties. If one party escalates the offense beyond what was done by the other, you punish the one who escalated.

  • Locked thread