Which non-Power of the Daleks story would you like to see an episode found from? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Marco Polo | 36 | 20.69% | |
The Myth Makers | 10 | 5.75% | |
The Massacre of St. Bartholomew's Eve | 45 | 25.86% | |
The Savages | 2 | 1.15% | |
The Smugglers | 2 | 1.15% | |
The Highlanders | 45 | 25.86% | |
The Macra Terror | 21 | 12.07% | |
Fury from the Deep | 13 | 7.47% | |
Total: | 174 votes |
This is brilliant, where is it from? egon_beeblebrox posted:Just reading this made me feel embarrassed for a second. I managed to read the whole thing and I've never made it more than twenty seconds into Doctor In Distress, objective proof that Chibnall > Levine
|
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 18:00 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 11:08 |
|
Clipperton posted:This is brilliant, where is it from? From who magazine in the 80s I am reliably informed. A quick Google will also get you this from the same sort of time : https://youtu.be/irIqTPQqgvQ
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 18:12 |
|
I also feel fairly pessimistic about Moffat's last series since it's being billed as a big event, and (with Day of The Doctor as the exception) I've never liked Moffat's big event stories. Also that doofy song is the best Who thing Chibnall has ever written.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 18:51 |
Fil5000 posted:From who magazine in the 80s I am reliably informed. A quick Google will also get you this from the same sort of time : I think that's what I posted last page Anyway just to be clear: the fact that Chibnall was a Briefcase Wanker thirty years ago should not automatically disqualify him from running Doctor Who. I do wonder though what Briefcase Wanker Chibnall would have made of Torchwood. "Doctor Who is not a kid's show!" "Doctor Who can be for adults!" "Doctor Who can be very adult, very dramatic!" (although I suppose that with Torchwood his whole remit was to make an 'adult, sexy Doctor Who', as mindbendingly stupid as that is)
|
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 18:55 |
|
CobiWann posted:Watching The Hand of Fear with the stepdaughter this morning... Don't worry, Deadly Assassin is next, and episode 3 is pure Robert Holmes practical nightmare fuel filler.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 19:20 |
|
You know, I'm all for this new guy if he brings Barrowman back.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:04 |
|
Carbon dioxide posted:You know, I'm all for this new guy if he brings Barrowman back. please no
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:09 |
|
Chibnall is alright
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:12 |
|
I hope Chibnall embraces a more room-driven direction for Doctor Who. I trust his technical expertise at Making A Show but don't have much faith in any of his creative ideas, so hopefully he doesn't try to ape the Moffat/RTD Showrunner model and instead takes a more distant approach. If he recognizes his own limitations he could easily bypass them by putting folks like Mathieson, Dollard, and even Harness in strong positions.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:16 |
|
Hey BTW does anyone happen to have copies of the BBC commentary tracks they used to host on the old DW site? You can still access the site, but the commentary tracks don't work anymore. I hope they aren't lost to time
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:24 |
|
DoctorWhat posted:I hope Chibnall embraces a more room-driven direction for Doctor Who. Or somebody could just shake him by the lapels and beg him not to foist five or six of his episodes on us every year.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:24 |
|
DoctorWhat posted:I hope Chibnall embraces a more room-driven direction for Doctor Who. It's a corridor show and will always be a corridor show.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:58 |
|
I think Cyberwoman sucked as much as the next guy, but I think I'd be more interested in seeing another bizarre failure like that than another very competent episode of Moffat's worn-out bag of well-worn tricks again (Heaven Sent excluded). It's been, what, 5 years? It's change, my dear. And it seems not a moment too soon.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 22:50 |
|
Maxwell Lord posted:It's a corridor show and will always be a corridor show. Your anti-quarry bias isn't helping!
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 22:52 |
|
After The War posted:Your anti-quarry bias isn't helping! The very opening of The Hand of Fear. Cobi and Stepdaughter - "QUARRY!"
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 23:13 |
|
Replace all corridors with aircars and powered walkways, all the time. Worked in The Pirate Planet!
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 23:47 |
|
Murray Gold already has his first remit for season 11. jng2058 posted:Okay, so where's the idea that Capaldi's leaving with Moffat coming from? I don't see any hard evidence of that anywhere. Indeed, given how Moffat himself said that it was extraordinarily difficult to handle becoming the new showrunner and inaugurating a new Doctor simultaneously, I'd expect him to do his best to get Peter to stay on for at least one season of Chibnall's run just to help smooth the transition. Sure, just like David Tennant promised he would! The real question is: will Moffat be involved in picking the new Doctor as opposed to letting Chibnall handle the casting, and if so, should he? I can see arguments either way: on the one hand it would be great to let Chibnall pick his own Doctor. On the other hand Moffat is 3 for 3 with amazing casting for the role.... Stabbatical posted:I think Cyberwoman sucked as much as the next guy, but I think I'd be more interested in seeing another bizarre failure like that than another very competent episode of Moffat's worn-out bag of well-worn tricks again (Heaven Sent excluded). It's been, what, 5 years? It's change, my dear. And it seems not a moment too soon. One thing about Cyberwoman which I'll ask--wasn't Torchwood RTD's show? Wasn't he the showrunner? I never watched the regular seasons, and I never saw Cyberwoman in particular and I'd wonder--if you ignore the stupid costume, was the writing that bad? I don't see how you can blame the writer for the choices of the director, costumer, set designer, actors, etc.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 00:47 |
|
Clipperton posted:I managed to read the whole thing and I've never made it more than twenty seconds into Doctor In Distress, objective proof that Chibnall > Levine That's not saying much, to be fair.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 01:26 |
|
Astroman posted:One thing about Cyberwoman which I'll ask--wasn't Torchwood RTD's show? Wasn't he the showrunner? I never watched the regular seasons, and I never saw Cyberwoman in particular and I'd wonder--if you ignore the stupid costume, was the writing that bad? I don't see how you can blame the writer for the choices of the director, costumer, set designer, actors, etc. Torchwood is too terrible, and staffed by too many otherwise competent people to place the blame at the feet of a single person, but Chibnail is one of the few who is also incompetent elsewhere, so it weighs more heavily on him. (And I like his two Series 7 episodes!)
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 01:28 |
Chibnaill was head writer and co-producer of Torchwood actually, so he would've had near final approval on everything, and unless Davis REALLY wanted a black lady in a silver bikini and fought for it then Chibnaill has at least half of the blame for approving it.
|
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 01:35 |
Stabbatical posted:It's been, what, 5 years? It's change, my dear. And it seems not a moment too soon. Oh it's definitely time for a change and I don't think even die-hard Moffat fans (like me) are clamouring for him to stick around. Just, you know. Chibnall.
|
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 01:46 |
|
Clipperton posted:Oh it's definitely time for a change and I don't think even die-hard Moffat fans (like me) are clamouring for him to stick around. Just, you know. Chibnall. Yeah, I think Moffat's getting a bit worn out in the showrunner position and it's time for a change, but the new showrunner announcement should make me go, "Oooh, what're they going to do with the show?!" not "Oh no! What are they going to do with the show!"
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 02:14 |
|
Series 9 is tied for best of the revival for me and I still think it's time for him to go. And this series, especially the Christmas episode, really did feel like Moffat might be done. I was really hoping, though, that staying on another season might give enough time for some of the newcomers like Harness and Mathieson to get a shot at the big chair. I'm excited for Series 10, though, because knowing that it's your last going in never hurts.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 02:29 |
|
It'll be alright under Chibnall. We'll see a return to Classic Who - wobbly sets, quarries, and more baddies made of tin foil and bubble wrap than you could shake a vaccum hose at! The BBC have released a sneak preview of his plans for the series. Really though, while I'm glad Moffat is stepping down, I can't say I'm too excited for Chibnall. But, he may surprise us. I don't know. It'll be interesting to watch anyway - be it failure, boon, or otherwise. Pesky Splinter fucked around with this message at 02:34 on Jan 24, 2016 |
# ? Jan 24, 2016 02:31 |
|
Rochallor posted:Series 9 is tied for best of the revival for me and I still think it's time for him to go. And this series, especially the Christmas episode, really did feel like Moffat might be done. I was really hoping, though, that staying on another season might give enough time for some of the newcomers like Harness and Mathieson to get a shot at the big chair. The only big chair Harness belongs in is the kind you'd find at Sing Sing.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 03:48 |
|
Oxxidation posted:The only big chair Harness belongs in is the kind you'd find at Sing Sing. Say that again in about four episodes' time. Ah, never mind, you'll probably hate them. I almost don't want Harness to eventually become showrunner because it would piss everybody off, but then I almost want Harness to eventually become showrunner just because it would piss everybody off.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:09 |
|
Pesky Splinter posted:
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:10 |
|
With Dr. Who being such a headliner of a show you'd figure the network would bother to air more than 5 episodes a year on average.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:12 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:With Dr. Who being such a headliner of a show you'd figure the network would bother to air more than 5 episodes a year on average. Always leave them wanting more.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:18 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:With Dr. Who being such a headliner of a show you'd figure the network would bother to air more than 5 episodes a year on average. This is British television where popular series have two seasons made three years apart of only six episodes, two specials that aired once and one of which spent half of it recapping the previous season, and a fifteen minute long radio drama from ten years ago that was promoted as tying up loose ends but in fact left on a massive cliffhanger. They're promising to get around to season three soon.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:23 |
|
Rochallor posted:Say that again in about four episodes' time. Ah, never mind, you'll probably hate them. nice
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:26 |
|
Toxxupation posted:nice It never stops being funny.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:27 |
|
I'm probably gonna end up buying Oxxipation or Toxxidation for maximum hilarity
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 04:53 |
|
You two are the Peter Harness two-parter of people.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 05:12 |
|
aw gently caress oxx we done got roasted
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 05:23 |
|
Carbon dioxide posted:You know, I'm all for this new guy if he brings Barrowman back. This but as Ra's Al Ghul. And they never mention the change, he just continues to be the same character as in Arrow and the Doctor rolls with it.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 06:34 |
|
Wait. Ra's Al Ghul. The batman villain of vaguely Arabic origin. Played by John loving Barrowman?!? How is that not absolutely terrible?
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 06:41 |
|
Why is Ra's even on a Green Arrow show?
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 06:43 |
|
Big Mean Jerk posted:Wait. I don't watch the show, but to my understanding Barrowman's character is the second Ra's Al-Ghul in the show, having received the role and title after the first one died. Before then, he was Dark Archer.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 06:54 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 11:08 |
|
Yeah Ra's was played by an appropriate actor but then died and Barrowman/Merlyn/Dark Archer seized control.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 06:58 |