Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS
JQA replaced his VP with one that’s who’s somewhat less bad, but still pretty bad.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

atelier morgan
Mar 11, 2003

super-scientific, ultra-gay

Lipstick Apathy

Carrasco posted:

I can't believe someone would stoop so low as to characterize Andrew Jackson as a bloodthirsty maniac.

I agree, it's an insult to mere bloodthirsty maniacs.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



Andrew Jackson will never be President of this Republic :colbert:

CuwiKhons
Sep 24, 2009

Seven idiots and a bear walk into a dragon's lair.

GreyjoyBastard posted:

The only problem with JQA I'm seeing is his misguided foray into protectionism. :colbert:

Well, and maligning Jackson's wife, I guess.

JQA actually attacked Jackson's wife so much that she died shortly after this election and Jackson claimed it was because of the stress of harassment (she had a heart attack based on Jackson's description of her symptoms). Jackson was devastated.

I'm still voting for JQA though because Jackson is a monstrosity and JQA is the lesser of the two evils.

lambeth
Aug 31, 2009

QuoProQuid posted:

I am writing this from a borrowed tablet at a friend's house, so I am sure there are typos throughout the above. If you notice any errors, either grammatical or factual, let me know and I will correct after I get home.

The entire DMV is shut down until Monday.

You have Calhoun as president instead of vice president (a horrifying idea). Also, JQA's accomplishments are missing that he was president.

Also, yes, this is a terrible election. I don't think I can ignore Jackson/Calhoun's actions from a historical point-of-view, and JQA/Rush's platforms suck. Poor Rachel Jackson, that was low.

When did white male universal suffrage happen?

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Adams/Rush '28, down with slavery!

Alfred P. Pseudonym
May 29, 2006

And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss goes 8-8

Get it, John Quincy

karmicknight
Aug 21, 2011

Carrasco posted:

I can't believe someone would stoop so low as to characterize Andrew Jackson as a bloodthirsty maniac.

Some people like to use the truth to describe someone, despite fears that Andrew Jackson might personally try and kill them. These people are suicidal.

Vavrek
Mar 2, 2013

I like your style hombre, but this is no laughing matter. Assault on a police officer. Theft of police property. Illegal possession of a firearm. FIVE counts of attempted murder. That comes to... 29 dollars and 40 cents. Cash, cheque, or credit card?

memy posted:

What an awful loving election

:stonk:

Can I vote for Biden? Please?

tatankatonk
Nov 4, 2011

Pitching is the art of instilling fear.
gently caress the South
gently caress Andrew Jackson
JQA 4 Life

oystertoadfish
Jun 17, 2003

every election is awful. voting jqa

protectionism is also 'good', the brits used it to build up their national industries and only began advocating free trade when they needed to flood other people's markets with cheaply produced goods. after things like the american system protected american industry in its growth phase, of course, we began advocating free trade as well. protectionism is necessary to avoid becoming an export-oriented banana republic. either way you're in the 19th century and everything is awful - child labor is a given in either situation for example

i guess you can argue that industrial workers have a greater ability than agricultural workers to unionize and use the vote to create things like any labor laws at all and a social safety net. importing, industrial countries tend to control the governments of exporting, agricultural countries and not vice versa which means the working class of the former at least only have one set of elites holding them down

oystertoadfish has issued a correction as of 21:52 on Jan 24, 2016

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Vavrek posted:

:stonk:

Can I vote for Biden? Please?

lol. I hope you are ready for 1832.

SpRahl
Apr 22, 2008

QuoProQuid posted:

lol. I hope you are ready for 1832.

Im predicting an Anti Masonic Party upset for that.

fade5
May 31, 2012

by exmarx

QuoProQuid posted:

Not even Jackson’s marriage to Rachel Donelson has been safe from attack. When Rachel married Jackson, both believed that she had been properly divorced from her first husband. When it was revealed that the papers were improperly filled, Adams turned the matter into a political scandal. He has accused Rachel of being a bigamist, an adultereress, and a prostitute. He has accused Jackson as being insufficiently Christian to serve as President.
Still voting for John Quincy Adams, but I will loving hate his guts as I do it, because of this right here.

quote:

Platform: After the so-called “corrupt bargain” of 1824, Andrew Jackson finds himself at the head of a political revolution against entrenched elites. Having witnessed first-hand the willingness of party leaders to fulfill their interests above the interests of the nation at large, Jackson promises to abolish every political unjust restriction. He advocates universal suffrage for all white males and the removal of all tax or property requirements. He promises an end to the corrupt patronage system and promises to personally oversee reform efforts. He promises an end to the corrupt Bank of the United States, which enriches the wealthiest citizens at the expense of the most poor. He even promises to expand the country’s borders, which have been unjustly constrained by wealthy aristocrats who are afraid of free men. Jackson promises a return to constitutional law and will work tirelessly to ensure that government serves the common man. Jackson tepidly supports Clay’s proposed American System, which seeks to build a self-sufficient national economy, and is especially interested in using it to improve national transportation. He worries, however, about the program’s potential to be tyrannous and to disproportionately benefit the North. He supports mild tariffs as a way of supporting this system, despite its unpopularity in the South. Jackson is an avid proponent of slavery and national expansion. He views the native tribes as an active threat to American civilization that must be crushed.
Hi Donald Trump, nice to see you again.:v:

I can definitely see how Andrew Jackson was so popular, even if he was a world-class rear end in a top hat. If it wasn't for the slavery and Native American stuff I'd almost be tempted to vote for him, he really is/was the first real populist.

galagazombie
Oct 31, 2011

A silly little mouse!
I find it interesting to compare the Candidates views on slavery in this election to those at the first way back at the threads beginning. Back then some of the candidates are outright opponents of slavery or work to end it. Even those who themselves are slave-owners will admit they should stop or even like John Jay take efforts to eliminate it. Here on the other hand everyone either likes slavery, or if they don't, shuts up about it. It kind of shows a flaw in the conventional narrative of a linear upwards history. It in fact seems to show that the nation was less racist at it's founding and slid further and further down that racism slope till the Civil War happened.

Corek
May 11, 2013

by R. Guyovich

SpRahl posted:

Im predicting an Anti Masonic Party upset for that.

Wild Willie Wirt is the only non-slavelover of the bunch, so I agree. (he's also not a Natural Born Citizen, but I digress)

Corek has issued a correction as of 00:48 on Jan 25, 2016

Lord of Pie
Mar 2, 2007


lol that the anti-Masonic party picks a Mason for their candidate though

Corek
May 11, 2013

by R. Guyovich

Lord of Pie posted:

lol that the anti-Masonic party picks a Mason for their candidate though

The vice presidential candidate of the Nullifiers was not a Nullifier. Just a guy from Massachusetts who didn't like tariffs.

SpRahl
Apr 22, 2008

Corek posted:

Wild Willie Wirt is the only non-slavelover of the bunch, so I agree. (he's also not a Natural Born Citizen, but I digress)

That didn't stop Chester Arthur :v:.

Corek
May 11, 2013

by R. Guyovich

SpRahl posted:

That didn't stop Chester Arthur :v:.

Also Albert Gallatin was a vice presidential candidate even though he was born in Switzerland to Swiss parents and immigrated to America as an adult. (Nathaniel Macon replaced him by the time of the election though)

Proposition Joe
Oct 8, 2010

He was a good man
If we vote for John Quincy Adams another two times, will we get another Adams for President in the future?

Lord of Pie
Mar 2, 2007


Proposition Joe posted:

If we vote for John Quincy Adams another two times, will we get another Adams for President in the future?

Jeb! Adams

Grand Theft Autobot
Feb 28, 2008

I'm something of a fucking idiot myself
Voting Jackson this time. Jackson owns so unbelievably hard.

foobardog
Apr 19, 2007

There, now I can tell when you're posting.

-- A friend :)
If only Jackson did not over look non-white men.

JQA for ever.

Harold Stassen
Jan 24, 2016
I haven't picked the winner once

foobardog
Apr 19, 2007

There, now I can tell when you're posting.

-- A friend :)

Harold Stassen posted:

I haven't picked the winner once

Good choice of user name.

oystertoadfish
Jun 17, 2003

galagazombie posted:

I find it interesting to compare the Candidates views on slavery in this election to those at the first way back at the threads beginning. Back then some of the candidates are outright opponents of slavery or work to end it. Even those who themselves are slave-owners will admit they should stop or even like John Jay take efforts to eliminate it. Here on the other hand everyone either likes slavery, or if they don't, shuts up about it. It kind of shows a flaw in the conventional narrative of a linear upwards history. It in fact seems to show that the nation was less racist at it's founding and slid further and further down that racism slope till the Civil War happened.

the economic benefits from slavery ramped up hugely in the decades we've been covering and everything, from politics to culture to opinions about race, responded to that. the people who opposed slavery, including john adams, were not at all race-neutral - his celebrated defense of the british soldiers in the boston massacre was partly based on calling the rioters a bunch of mulattoes. i mentioned earlier that hamilton casually mentioning 'their faculties are no worse than ours' is about the best you're gonna get. part of the anti-slavery argument right past the lincoln-douglass debates was that black people corroded american society by their very presence.

also, 1865-1877, reconstruction, was a blip on the radar. it has been argued for generations that the 1877-1901 period, roughly, is the period in which american race relations were worst of all

another fun (note: not fun) thing in grant's memoirs was him saying, in the context of it having been a mistake to give black people the vote (argued with 'white man's burden' style stuff about how they'd be ready someday once we'd educated them), that he wished he had annexed the dominican republic as president, made it a state, and sent all the blacks there, from which i guess he would've deigned to allow them to continue sending republican congressmen. a very interesting perspective, written during the nadir of american race relations

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.
Why couldn't we have elected Paine as President For Life?

He's the only guy involved in this whole "brand new country" business that seemed to be a genuinely good person.

Oh wait, answered my own question there.

Corek
May 11, 2013

by R. Guyovich

GlyphGryph posted:

Why couldn't we have elected Paine as President For Life?

He's the only guy involved in this whole "brand new country" business that seemed to be a genuinely good person.

Oh wait, answered my own question there.

ENGLISHMAN thomas paine

Jai Guru Dave
Jan 3, 2008
Probation
Can't post for 16 hours!
All the way with JQA - sorry if someone posted that already

karmicknight
Aug 21, 2011

Corek posted:

ENGLISHMAN thomas paine

Englishman, Shmenglishman. If any London drunk embodies the American Spirit (Prior to the Communist Manifesto sends us off the deep end into L'Internationale) It's "Common Sense" Tommy Paine.

babypolis
Nov 4, 2009

oystertoadfish posted:

immediately after the war southerners used vagrancy laws and unilateral contracts to tie black workers to the land, but reconstruction gave the freed slaves the vote, which resulted in the real but meager gain of escaping gang labor and allowing individual black families to operate as economic units, with parents deciding how much their kids would labor, even if they were still living on the same master's land and stuck in debt slavery paying him more for food than he paid them for their cotton.

that's sharecropping, and it worked - by 1870 america was already growing more cotton than it had in 1860 - partly because poor white southerners who had been subsistence farmers before the war became cotton growers just like the black sharecroppers on the former plantations. it took some investments in bureaucracy, transportation infrastructure, and bringing things like those vagrancy laws in to use the state as an overseer - it's not a victory of free labor, it's a victory of modern forms of coercion over the forms used in slavery, as we can see by the descent of poor whites into pretty close to the same situation the former slaves were in. soon, southern white terrorism overcome the northern appetite for military occupation and black political rights were extinguished in the south for almost a century, freezing the sharecroppers in place basically until the great migrations of the early 20th century

that's the impression i get from this book empire of cotton. here's some more context of what i can understand from memory, having read the chapter about this last night:

the blacks had wanted to become subsistence farmers, which made most of their former northern supporters cast them off as 'lazy' (not all, thaddeus stevens and a few other radical republicans were willing to accept lower cotton profits), but the same processes that drew poor whites into the cotton trade made it impossible for blacks to stay out. from what i can understand, new railroads and the expanding market economy allowed poor farmers to sell lots of cotton with low transportation costs, but also led to them going into debt buying both consumer goods and the food they weren't growing for themselves any more. meanwhile, the price of cotton dropped with increasing supply but southern farmers couldn't grow anything else their creditors would accept as collateral because cotton was still reliably saleable, so the farmers kept falling behind, their debt increased, and as time went on more and more farmers dropped from owning or leasing land to being pure agricultural wage laborers

at the same time the former plantation owners and now major landlords remained locally rich but lost pace with elites from other regions. cotton manufacturers paid less money for more cotton and held more and more debt from the farmers they were buying from. it made the south poorer but kept the world cotton industry running on southern cotton, which no-one had expected when emancipation first hit

the same thing happened to farmers in india, egypt, and the ottoman empire. in egypt the landlords' mortgaged their farms to british creditors on a massive scale, which led to the british occupying the country for about forty years to guarantee their investments.

probably not totally accurate, but it's what i can remember

i loved this post btw. oystertoadfish is a forums treasure

von Metternich
May 7, 2007
Why the hell not?

fade5 posted:

Still voting for John Quincy Adams, but I will loving hate his guts as I do it, because of this right here.

To be fair, Jackson accused Adams of, among other things, pimping out American girls for the Czar of Russia. These two elections were pretty dirty all around.

Fritz Coldcockin
Nov 7, 2005
Thing is, most of the things Jackson said about Adams were false...the stuff Adams said about Jackson was mostly true (even the accusations against Rachel Jackson were technically true, scummy as it was for the Adams people to bring up the subject at all).

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Lies, slander, and libel are part and parcel for early elections. John Adams was accused of being a hermaphrodite. The Federalists published obituaries of Thomas Jefferson to convince voters that he had died. It's only fitting that John Quincy Adams be accused of selling American women into prostitution and Jackson's marriage be torn to shreds.

lambeth posted:

When did white male universal suffrage happen?

That would be the era we are discussing right now. When the Jacksonians swept into power, they tore down most of the arbitrary restrictions on (white male) voters and abolished the most obviously undemocratic elements of govrenment. In 1820, for example, almost half of the states had their legislatures allocate electoral votes in presidential elections. By 1830, only South Carolina still distributed votes according to the Legislature.

And thanks, the fixes to the background have been made.

QuoProQuid has issued a correction as of 02:33 on Jan 31, 2016

oystertoadfish
Jun 17, 2003

babypolis posted:

i loved this post btw. oystertoadfish is a forums treasure

oh hey thanks

fantastic in plastic
Jun 15, 2007

The Socialist Workers Party's newspaper proved to be a tough sell to downtown businessmen.

QuoProQuid posted:

Lies, slander, and libel are part and parcel for early elections. John Adams was accused of being a hermaphrodite. The Federalists published obituaries of Thomas Jefferson to convince voters that he had died. It's only fitting that John Quincy Adams be accused of selling American women into prostitution and Jackson's marriage be torn to shreds.


That would be the era we are discussing right now. When the Jacksonians swept into power, they tore down most of the arbitrary restrictions on (white male) voters and abolished the most obviously undemocratic elements of govrenment. In 1820, for example, almost half of the states had their legislatures allocate electoral votes in presidential elections. By 1830, only South Carolina still distributed votes according to the Legislature.

And thanks, the fixes to the background have been made.

It's not our fault that the Adams Cosa Nostra is ruled by a senile hermaphrodite and involved in pimping out the flower of American womanhood to decadent Europeans. We need a Congressional committee to investigate why Quincy kept his diplomatic correspondence in a private notebook rather than the same one the rest of the foreign service uses.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Thank you for voting in the Election of 1828. In another landslide, His Elective Majesty John Quincy Adams has been re-elected President of the United States. John Quincy Adams thanks his wealthy backers for resisting the contemptible masses and ensuring that power remains in the hands of the educated few.

Serving at John Quincy Adams’s side is Richard Rush who is excited for the chance to thwart abolitionism from the Vice Presidency.

RESULTS BREAKDOWN:

Most Popular Ticket:
John Quincy Adams / Richard Rush (National Republican) - 56 votes (77.8%)
Andrew Jackson / John Caldwell Calhoun (Democratic) - 16 votes (22.2%)

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

ELECTION OF 1832
:siren: Click here to vote in the Election of 1832! :siren:


Background:

In 1832, Jackson stood for re-election, giving American voters an opportunity to reflect back on the Age of Jackson. While Jackson had swept to power thanks to his personal popularity and public anger with corruption, by 1832 issues emerged that threatened to upend the Democratic Party.

The future of the Bank of the United States is one of the most important debates of this election. In January 1832, Nicholas Biddle, President of the Bank, submitted to Congress a renewal of the Bank’s Charter four years before it was due to expire, hoping to smooth out any political issues before the Bank became defunct. Though the bill easily passed the House and Senate, who believed the Bank to be essential to the American economy, Jackson loathed the institution, believing it to be fundamentally corrupt and run by foreigners. When asked to approve the Charter, Jackson instead vetoed it. The decision immediately earned the ire of Henry Clay, who re-assembled the National Republican Party to prevent the abolition of the Bank. Clay has turned the Bank into a political matter and hopes that he can be elected in order to preserve it as part of the American System.

As a Senator and Presidential candidate, Jackson had supported the American System of economic development proposed by Henry Clay. Though widely hated in the South, Jackson had voiced support for the system on national grounds, hoping that it would make America self-sufficient and fix the vulnerabilities in infrastructure that the British had exploited in 1812. However, Clay’s actions during the “Corrupt Bargain” and the use of improvements and tariffs as political tools during the Adams administration soured Jackson on the entire program. In 1830, Jackson announced his opposition to the American System and vetoed every bill relating to federally funded improvement projects. In 1831, Jackson went further by renouncing protectionism and demanding Congress nullify its tariff policy.

Unfortunately, Jackson’s demands would inspire politicians in a different part of the country to nullify the law. After several years of deep recession, South Carolina’s government was taken over by radicals who blamed federal tariff policies for their problems. With Vice President Calhoun stoking these fires, South Carolina renounced the tariff, calling it an unconstitutional exercise in congressional power, and attempted to unilaterally nullify the law. Though many expected Jackson to support this demonstration, Jackson, surprisingly, threw support to Congress. Although sympathetic, Jackson believes that “our federal Union… must be preserved” at all cost. There are rumors that Jackson might soon send troops down to South Carolina to enforce the law.

If nullification had not already driven a wedge between Vice President Calhoun and Jackson, then foreign affairs and the Eaton Affair did. Under Secretary of State Martin Van Buren, the United States had avoided clashing with the French government over impressment and instead signed a treaty in which the French government would send reparations. As the only other Cabinet member of any standing, Calhoun feared that Martin Van Buren would challenge Calhoun’s dreams of becoming President. To avoid a potential enemy, Calhoun committed himself to destroying Van Buren’s career, and eventually thwarted Jackson’s attempt to appoint Van Buren as Ambassador to the United Kingdom. The incident was hugely embarrassing for Van Buren and Jackson. Calhoun also set himself apart from Jackson on relations with Mexico. While Jackson was interested in purchasing the rebellious territory of Tejas from the Mexican government, he appointed a former army friend, who spoke no Spanish and had no diplomatic experience, as the chief negotiator in this deal. When Jackson’s appointee bribed Mexican officials and meddled in Mexico’s government, Calhoun mocked the entire affair. He then resigned from the Vice Presidency and was promptly appointed as a Senator. There, he stands as an opponent to Jackson and a supporter of states' rights.

Lastly, the election is notable for introducing the national nominating convention as a way of selecting Presidential candidates. The National Republicans and Anti-Masons have held large public gatherings, with formal addresses by nominees. The Democrats have met together in Baltimore, where they formally offered Jackson and Martin Van Buren positions on the ticket.

The Candidates:

DEMOCRATIC PARTY CANDIDATES:


Presidential Nominee: Andrew Jackson
  • Party Affiliation: Democratic Party
  • Notable Positions: President of the United States, Military Governor of Florida, United States Senator from Tennessee, United States Representative from Tennessee, General in the American Army
  • Biography: Andrew Jackson is the first “self-made man” of the United States and the first Westerner with a real chance of winning the White House. Born in Waxhaw, South Carolina to Scotch-Irish immigrants, Jackson spent his early life fighting in the Revolutionary War and studying law. In 1788, he moved to Nashville, Tennessee, where he fell in love with Rachel Donelson Robards, who had been abandoned by her husband. A prosecutor, judge, congressman, and senator, Jackson distinguished himself within Tennessee as an advocate of the people. It was only in the Battle for New Orleans in 1814, however, that he became known nationally. Hoping to use the victory to support themselves, Madison and Monroe elevated the battle in almost mythic proportions. Consequently, Jackson has become a type of modern George Washington. In 1824, Jackson lost the Presidential Election despite winning the popular vote. This injustice has further increased his fame.
  • Platform: Jackson remains the leader of the Jacksonian Revolution, a man committed to popular democracy and opposed to all forms of corruption. Having witnessed first-hand the willingness of party leaders to exchange federal funding for political favors, Jackson has come out against the American System and the Bank of the United States. He sees both projects as a thinly veiled patronage program and its leader, Henry Clay, as a man who will defraud the poor to enrich the American aristocracy. If re-elected, Jackson will abolish the Bank and the tariff regime instuted by Clay. Jackson and his supporters have worked to ensure the common man’s place in political society and has been involved in abolishing various tax, literacy, and property restrictions on voting rights. In foreign affairs, Jackson is committed to American expansionism. Jackson was the main driver behind the Indian Removal Act, which allowed the President to relocate southern Indian tribes west of the Mississippi River. While many political elites were horrified by the brutality of Jackson’s actions, and have labeled the forced removal as the “Trail of Tears,” these actions have been applauded by lower class citizens who see Indians as a threat to their communities, families, and personal security. Jackson himself thinks the Indians are a threat to Western civilization. Jackson has also tried to expand the United States into Mexico, with little success. If re-elected, Jackson hopes to convince Mexico to sell Texas and formally admit it into the Union. Since becoming President, Jackson has become increasingly opposed to abolitionism and sees the movement as a threat to the Union. He has recently recommended Congress prohibit the circulation of anti-slavery texts in the South to avoid “painful excitement.”


Vice Presidential Nominee: Martin Van Buren
  • Party Affiliation: Democratic Party
  • Notable Positions: United States Ambassador to the United Kingdom, United States Secretary of State, Governor of New York, United States Senator from New York
  • Biography: A member of America’s insular Dutch community, Van Buren gained fame for his ability to interact with people from multiple, ethnic, income, and societal groups. An accomplished lawyer, political organizer, and multi-linguist, Van Buren first came to public attention at the age of 18, when he was selected as a delegate for the Democratic-Republican Party convention in Troy, New York. Afterward, Van Buren made a name for himself by leading the “Bucktails,” a faction dedicated to thwarting the corrupt Governor of New York, DeWitt Clinton, and his Erie Canal Project. In 1821, Van Buren joined the United States Senate, where he supported Andrew Jackson and avoided involving himself in the Corrupt Bargain. As a result, Jackson considers Van Buren a close friend. Calhoun’s attempts to destroy Van Buren’s career has only strengthened their partnership. Many partymen believe Van Buren will be Jackson’s successor.
  • Platform: Van Buren’s relationship with the American System is complicated, reflecting his often convoluted political alliances. When he was appointed to the United States Senate in 1821, it was because he had positioned himself as an opponent to DeWitt Clinton and his internal improvement programs. After joining, however, he aligned himself with Clay in supporting road repairs and canal construction. At one point in his career, Van Buren embraced Monroe’s recommendation that the Congress pass a constitutional amendment explicitly allowing internal improvement projects, before deciding that an amendment was unnecessary. Though he voted for tariffs in 1824 and 1828, he later abandoned protectionism in favor of free trade. In 1832, Van Buren stands as a loyal Jacksonite, firmly opposed to federally-funded internal improvement projects, the Bank of the United States, and the American System. He also sides with Jackson on the Indian Removal Act and in opposing Nullification. In foreign affairs, Van Buren supports closer ties with America’s traditional ally, France, and improved relations with the country as Secretary of State. He has also been ceaseless in his attempts to open up foreign markets to American goods and was integral in opening the Middle East to American trade. Though many fear that Van Buren is a crypto-abolitionist, Jackson has assured the party that Van Buren will do nothing to oppose its expansion. While Van Buren has opposed Jackson in the matter of replacing political appointees with loyal Jacksonians, Van Buren has secretly been filling the State Department with his personal allies.


NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY CANDIDATES:


Presidential Nominee: Henry Clay
  • Party Affiliation: National Republican Party
  • Notable Positions: Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, United States Representative from Kentucky, United States Senator from Kentucky, President of the American Colonization Society
  • Biography: Henry Clay is one of the most influential men in the country and the leading figure of the post-Macon United States Congress. Born in Hanover County, Virginia, Clay unexpectedly joined the planter class at age four when his father died, leaving him and his brother with two slaves each. Using his family’s connections, Clay became friends with George Wythe, who was a mentor to Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, and many other prominent Virginians, and was eventually admitted to the bar. Known for his oratory and legal skills, Clay was admitted to the United States Senate despite being under the constitutionally required age of thirty. Clay’s support for the War of 1812 allowed him to accelerate his career and achieve the Speakership. Under Clay, the position has evolved from a mere parliamentarian to one of political power second only to the President. In 1824, Clay orchestrated the Corrupt Bargain, which denied Jackson the Presidency. Jackson has hated Clay ever since.
  • Platform: Henry Clay has presented himself as a defender of a strong economy and national unity. Since 1816, Clay has advocated loudly on behalf of the American System, a federally-funded internal improvements project intended to make America self-sufficient. Rooted in the ideas of Alexander Hamilton, the American System uses tariffs and the national bank to support better infrastructure and, principally, a national road and canal network. However, the benefits of this program have mainly been felt along the eastern seaboard and in the manufacturing sector, leading many Jacksonians to accuse Clay of corruption. In his speeches, he urges the country for patience and to avoid poorly conceived impulses, like abolishing the Bank of the United States or nullifying federal laws. In foreign policy, Clay is known as a jingoist and has frequently called the country to assist in revolutions abroad. He was a key figure in supporting the War of 1812, an early supporter of the independence movements in Latin America, and has recently taken on the cause of Greek independence from the Ottoman Empire. Though he strongly supports slavery, and rarely goes anywhere without one or two slaves accompanying him at all times, Clay reluctantly supported the Missouri Compromise as a way of ensuring national unity. Though he believes that the Native Americans are lower lifeforms who can never be assimilated into the American nation, he believes that their right to land should be respected.



Vice Presidential Nominee: John Sergeant
  • Party Affiliation: National Democratic Party
  • Notable Positions: United States Representative from Pennsylvania
  • Biography: John Sergeant comes from a long line of American politicians and political thinkers. The son of Jonathan Dickinson Sergeant, a representative of New Jersey at the Second Continental Congress, John has enjoyed has enjoyed the privileges of his family’s prominence. In 1800, Sergeant was appointed deputy attorney general for Philadelphia, despite having just having been admitted to the bar. In 1808, John Sergeant joined the Federalist Party and was one of the few remaining Federalists still in power when the party collapsed. Recently, he has aligned himself with Henry Clay.
  • Platform:Sergeant is an avid proponent of Henry Clay’s American System and the Bank of the United States and has done everything within his power to support both. When the Jacksonians began their attack on the bank in 1823 for being too generous to foreign borrowers, Sergeant travelled to Europe and personally renegotiated loans to the Bank. When Jackson vetoed the American System, Sergeant tried various parliamentary maneuvers to try and overcome his veto. Aside from his support of the American System, Sergeant is a notable abolitionist who voted against the Missouri Compromise because it expanded slavery. He is involved in several anti-slavery societies in New Jersey.


INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT PARTY CANDIDATES:


Vice Presidential Nominee: John Floyd
  • Party Affiliation: Independent Democrat Party
  • Notable Positions: Governor of Virginia, United States Representative from Virginia, Member of the Virginia House of Delegates
  • Biography: The Floyd family seems to embody the principles of the American nation. John Floyd’s father was a famous pioneer who helped settle Kentucky before being killed by native tribes and his cousins participated in the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Despite this fame, Floyd has spent most of his childhood in intense poverty and was only able to escape hardship by joining the U.S. military as a surgeon during the War of 1812. Disgusted by the disorganization he saw in the field, Floyd first joined politics as a strong nationalist who believed cooperation was necessary to ensure independence. Though Floyd remained a committed nationalist in foreign policy and military affairs, various domestic issues slowly turned him toward the national government. When Jackson failed to act against tariffs immediately and instead announced that he would be running with a Northern merchant-abolitionist, Floyd became a symbol of Southern defiance. Many hope that Floyd will throw the election of Vice President to the Senate as a way of preventing Van Buren’s election.
  • Platform: While Jackson sees the national government as the most effective vehicle to oppose the tyrannous American System, the Independent Democrat Party view the individual states as the best way to stop tyranny. Created by Vice President Calhoun to oppose the Tariff of Abominations, the Independent Democrat Party, also known as the Nullifiers, believe that individual states have the power to nullify federal laws within their borders and are a revival of old Anti-Federalist ideals. Though Floyd does not deny that the United States needs internal improvements, Floyd embraces subsidiarity and argues that the states, not the national government, can most competently distribute resources and need to spearhead internal improvement projects. Unlike other Nullfiers, who have joined the party to save slavery, Floyd opposes the institution on economic grounds, calling it insufficient and unsustainable. Following the Nat Turner slave rebellion, Floyd urged Virginia to discuss gradual abolition but failed to follow up on the proposal when it was narrowly voted down by the assembly. In foreign affairs, Floyd is a jingoist who wanted America to aggressively pursue land in the Oregon territory and against the all other imperial powers. He hopes to align America with the newly independent republics in South America, though many suspect that there are ulterior motives for this. Since 1832, most of Floyd’s family has converted to Catholicism. Many Southerners fear that Floyd himself is a crypto-Catholic who only seeks ties with South America as a way of promoting Papism in the United States.


Vice Presidential Nominee: Henry Lee
  • Party Affiliation: Federalist Party
  • Notable Positions: Adviser to Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin
  • Biography: Henry Lee is a prominent American economist who affiliates with the Ricardian economics, which rejects mercantilism and instead embraces the theories of comparative advantage and specialization. Though not well-known in his native Massachusetts, Lee is popular in England, where he provides an American perspective on British economic policy. In 1830, Lee ran unsuccessfully for a seat in the House of Representatives. His opponent, Nathan Appleton, later wrote the Tariff of 1832.
  • Platform: Reflecting the disorganization of the Nullifier Party, Henry Lee is not aware that he has been nominated and disagrees with John Floyd on almost every policy issue. Floyd is a Northerner who opposes slavery and a Federalist, who believes in a robust, centralized national government. Lee’s only credential for the party is his opposition to tariffs. During the Adams and Jackson administrations, Henry Lee advocated for free trade and assisted Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin articulate his opposition to the American System. His position on all other issues is unknown.

ANTI-MASONIC PARTY CANDIDATES:


Presidential Nominee: William Wirt
  • Party Affiliation: Anti-Masonic Party
  • Notable Positions: United States Attorney General, Member of the Virginia House of Delegates
  • Biography: William Wirt is an unusual figure in the United States but has been nationally prominent since the early 1800s. In 1807, Wirt was appointed to be the prosecutor in Aaron Burr’s trial for treason by President Jefferson, who knew him personally. Though Burr was found not guilty, Wirt’s actions, which included an eloquent four hour monologue, made Wirt a prominent legal figure. In 1816, Wirt was appointed as the United States Attorney General. Though many expected Wirt to struggle in such a small position, Wirt single-handedly transformed the position into a position of major authority and power within the United States government. He is currently the longest serving Attorney General in American history. In his private life, Wirt is known as a “country gentlemen” and has often taken advantage of others’ hospitality. Despite his party affiliation, Wirt is a former Freemason and considers many Masons to be "intelligent men of high and honourable character."
  • Platform: In 1826, a little-known writer named William Morgan threatened to reveal the hidden secrets of the Freemasons and the shadowy leaders who ran it. When Morgan mysteriously vanished, a wave of populist anger and fear was unleashed against the shadowy Freemasons, who seemed to dominate positions of power across the country. Though initially a single-issue party, dedicated to removing all Masons from public office, the organization has gone through a peculiar evolution over the past few years. After winning the Governorship in Vermont, the Anti-Masonic Party mysteriously attracted many of Clay’s wealthy supporters, including former President John Quincy Adams. Under the watch of these patrons, the Anti-Masonic Party has become a major weapon against Andrew Jackson, who is a Freemason, and Jacksonian Democracy, because Anti-Masons believe that the Freemasons will manipulate low-information voters into supporting the Order. Also mysterious is William Wirt’s approach to Freemasonry. Though the party’s platform highlights its opposition to secret organizations, Wirt, himself, seems to have no problems with Freemasonry and prefers to highlight his support for the American System. Wirt is also notable for his support of Indian tribes. Wirt has argued that the Cherokee Nation is a sovereign nation and not subject to state or federal laws. Wirt opposes slavery on moral grounds, but has previously owned slaves. He once tried to form a personal colony in Florida, which he dubbed “Wirtland,” using severely underpaid German immigrants as an alternative to slaves. The project failed.


Vice Presidential Nominee: Amos Ellmaker
  • Party Affiliation: Anti-Masonic Party
  • Notable Positions: Founder of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Pennsylvania Attorney General Member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives
  • Biography: Amos Ellmaker is a lawyer and political figure little known outside of Pennsylania. Born in 1787 to a middle-class family, Ellmaker attended Princeton College under the supervision of Pennsylvania Attorney General Thomas Elder. Ellmaker briefly served in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives before volunteering to serve in the state’s militia in the War of 1812. Though he was offered an appointment as Secretary of War by James Monroe, Ellmaker refused the position as it would mean leaving the state. Ellmaker is one of the founders of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.
  • Platform: Ellsworth is a little-known politician but committed to removing all Masons from political office. He believes in internal improvement projects, particularly in the need to improve the country’s roadways and canals. He does not own slaves but has made no statements about the issue.

QuoProQuid has issued a correction as of 23:14 on Jan 31, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

UrbicaMortis
Feb 16, 2012

Hmm, how shall I post today?

Jesus. This election is such a clusterfuck. I guess i'm going anti-masonic because Wirt seems least worst.

  • Locked thread