Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
HackensackBackpack
Aug 20, 2007

Who needs a house out in Hackensack? Is that all you get for your money?

happyhippy posted:

If only Hitler said that, that he was just camping OUTSIDE of France and not actually occupying it.

Hilter was not occupying France anymore than it should be.

Like, what does that last line mean? We aren't occupying it anymore than it should be. It should be occupied, but they aren't occupying it more than necessary?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Fionnoula posted:

New York TImes reporter spoke to David Fry. They are indeed camping outside in order to PROVE that they aren't actually occupying the refuge (because apparently only the buildings matter?) and therefore hey aren't actually hostile. Just camping.


Okay, even if that was true, when the nice man from the FBI tells you to get out, you're supposed to actually listen.

Fionnoula
May 27, 2010

Ow, quit.
Shawna Cox was apparently released on bail. Aaaand immediately started doing phone-in interviews with her version of the attempted mass murder by law enforcement (spoiler alert: they were saved from the *hundreds of bullets* shot into the occupied truck by prayer) She did one last night on Periscope, this dude recorded it and put it on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdVfZyjVl4U

Apparently she's got plans to do more interviews tonight. In other news, her son in law was apparently killed in a house fire last night (or the night before? not sure) and now there's some wingnut plan to get a private plane to take her home because she's got not way to get on a commercial plane. The claim is that her i.d. was left behind at the refuge or something. Want to bet it's really that she's got court appearances and isn't actually allowed to leave the state? I bet her lawyer is thrilled with these shenanigans.

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc
The Clicen Bundy letter is really revealing in its use of the word "inspired", a word that has clear implications in fundamentalist circles.

He's basically stating that the US constitution is divinely inspired by God. It's a common idea that America is here to be THE godly nation in some interpretations, but claiming "inspiration" is apart the same thing as calling the constitution scripture.

Which says a lot, really.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Fionnoula posted:

Shawna Cox was apparently released on bail. Aaaand immediately started doing phone-in interviews with her version of the attempted mass murder by law enforcement (spoiler alert: they were saved from the *hundreds of bullets* shot into the occupied truck by prayer) She did one last night on Periscope, this dude recorded it and put it on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdVfZyjVl4U

Apparently she's got plans to do more interviews tonight. In other news, her son in law was apparently killed in a house fire last night (or the night before? not sure) and now there's some wingnut plan to get a private plane to take her home because she's got not way to get on a commercial plane. The claim is that her i.d. was left behind at the refuge or something. Want to bet it's really that she's got court appearances and isn't actually allowed to leave the state? I bet her lawyer is thrilled with these shenanigans.

Her kid died last night? drat, she may be an insurrectionist moron, but that's hosed up.

stubblyhead
Sep 13, 2007

That is treason, Johnny!

Fun Shoe
Guess what, they believe it is.

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

Mr Interweb posted:

Her kid died last night? drat, she may be an insurrectionist moron, but that's hosed up.

Son in law. And whether it happened or not it's just an excuse to flee.

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.
Yeah, pretty sure when you're released on bail you're not really supposed to go very far. I mean, it's basically just a promise to return for the hearing/trial, but getting a "don't go anywhere" condition is probably a given for this bunch.

Plus the whole "they may actually be on the no-fly list" thing now.

ShadowCatboy
Jan 22, 2006

by FactsAreUseless
Man I've been binging through some of the recent news articles and I am savoring some of the sweetest schadenfruit:

Bail denied to militia leaders claiming that the occupation was totes peaceful and was never meant to be armed.

quote:

Over the past two days, Bundy has also issued statements through his lawyers asking the remaining militants to leave the refuge.

“I have asked those people at the refuge to go home,” Bundy told the court. “This was never about an armed standoff.”

Ultimately, Judge Beckerman was not convinced. She said Bundy and the occupiers knowingly broke the law and only left the Malheur Refuge after they were arrested.

“There are no conditions I could impose that would guarantee the safety of the community or that he would come back to the district of Oregon for trial,” Beckerman said. “I reject the argument that this was just a peaceful occupation.”

After the ruling, Bundy stood up. While walking toward the door leading back to detention, he looked over his shoulder to his wife, Lisa Bundy, in the second row, her eyes filled with tears.


Ammon Bundy's wife does 180, now pleading for militants to surrender.

quote:

Earlier this week, Lisa Bundy released an audio recording to the Oregonian, also urging an end to the occupation, now in it’s 28th day.

Lisa Bundy has changed her position on the occupation over the past week.

Shortly after her husband was arrested, she wrote on the Bundy Ranch Facebook page, “Ammon would not have called for the patriots to leave. We have lost a life but we are not backing down. He didn’t spill his life in vain. Hold your ground…ranchers come and stand!”


Low on supplies, militants are losing the war of attrition.

quote:

He said the four had eaten scrambled eggs for breakfast, and had spoken with their families Wednesday night.

“They don’t want us to die. They’re begging us to come home. Go to prison, for five years, is what they’re saying,” said Fry.

Fry said people leaving the refuge had taken most of the food and supplies, but that many guns had been left behind.


ISIS supporter and antisemite David Fry nervous about "weird" stuff happening to him in prison. Butt stuff.

quote:

“If they come in to arrest then they’re going to throw us behind bars where weird poo poo would happen,” Fry said.


David Fry is a crazy, crazy rear end in a top hat.

quote:

Online, Fry is quick to engage with anyone willing to listen, and even some of those who are not. A believer in vast conspiracies, especially those centered in his ancestral home of Japan, Fry comes off as bombastic, paranoid and angry. In defending his anti-Semitic posts, he wrote on his Google+ account, “ZIONIST JEWS ARE NOT TRUE JEWS!”

That angry, provocative and explosive tone is a major character of Fry’s personality, according to members of his family.

“He’s had his problems, some of which he’s brought on himself,” his paternal grandfather, William Fry, told OPB. “He gets pulled over for busted taillights, and instead of just rolling down his window and handing over his insurance, he screams at the officer, ‘What the [expletive] do you want?’ And right there, a regular thing turns into him in handcuffs.”

Hermetic
Sep 7, 2007

by exmarx

Turtle Sandbox posted:

They really believe rancher is something more than a profession don't they?

You can't be any geek off the street. Gotta be handy with the constitution if you know what I mean, earn your tarp. :clint:

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

Is David Fry the fat guy in that "last dance" video?

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"

Anosmoman posted:

In many ways they seem to be lost in time. The premise that all wealth is created from land and freeing it for exploitation will usher in a golden age in rural nowhere is about 50 years out of date.

The New Yorker had a great article about this, called "Bundynomics".

quote:

Ammon Bundy, the leader of the armed militia that stormed the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, in Oregon, has a simple solution for fixing the economy of the West: get the federal government out of the way. His group’s chief demand is that the federal government hand over all of Malheur to local control. The ultimate goal, he says, is “to get the logger back to logging, to get the rancher back to ranching, to get the miner back to mining.” Bundy’s tactics make him easy to dismiss as a kook, but his ideology is squarely in the mainstream of Western conservatism, with its hostility to government ownership, skepticism about environmental rules, and conviction that individual enterprise is being strangled by government regulations.

Such thinking has a long history in the region. At the turn of the last century, there was vehement opposition to the creation of national parks, which were seen as a waste of land that could be used for logging, mining, and ranching. Malheur itself, founded in 1908, was the site of serious political conflict in the nineteen-twenties: Oregonians wanted it closed down, so that Lake Malheur could be drained and the land sold off to farmers. In the seventies, during the so-called Sagebrush Rebellion, states across the region attempted to seize control of land from the federal government, which owns close to half of all land in the West. The Sagebrush Rebellion ultimately fizzled, but it helped instill the idea that federal land ownership is an economic blight, an idea that’s become more and more popular with Republicans as environmental regulations and restrictions on land use have proliferated. Organizations like the Koch-funded American Lands Council are working to help local governments reclaim some control of public land. Senator Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, sponsored an amendment last March supporting the selling, trading, and transfer of federal land to the states. Ted Cruz has said that the U.S. should be prohibited from owning more than fifty per cent of the land in any state.

The libertarian appeal of the “take back the land” rhetoric masks a fundamental contradiction: the West has flourished because of the federal government’s help, not in spite of it. No region’s economy has depended more on subsidies and taxpayer-funded investment. In the nineteenth century, the Homestead Act handed out free land to settlers, and the transcontinental railroad was built thanks to cheap land grants and huge government outlays. The federal government has played a vital role in managing the Western watershed, while investing billions of dollars in dams and other public infrastructure. As the historian Gerald Nash has shown, the West’s postwar boom was jump-started by money the government poured into the region during the Second World War.

Furthermore, Bundy’s beloved ranching, mining, and logging industries have been some of the biggest beneficiaries of government largesse. The grazing fees that the government charges ranchers have barely budged in forty years, thanks to the political power of the Western lobby. The Obama Administration did manage a rate hike last year, but, adjusted for inflation, the current price is still dramatically lower than it was in 1978. And the government is lenient about collecting fees. Bundy’s father, Cliven, was more than a million dollars in arrears before action was taken against him, last year, resulting in the first Bundy standoff.

Another irony is that it’s far from clear that local control would be an economic panacea for ranchers and loggers. Fees on state-owned land tend to be considerably higher than on federal land, in part because most state governments are legally required to maximize the value of their public land, and the federal government isn’t. And states would have to pay for all the upkeep the feds now handle, which is why a number of studies have concluded that reclamation would increase costs, rather than shrink them. A 2012 study, for instance, found that taking back federal land would cost Utah two hundred and seventy-five million dollars a year.

So much for rugged individualism. But the reclamation movement isn’t deluded just about the West’s reliance on the federal government. It also has a completely outdated vision of the Western economy. In its view, land is valuable primarily because of what you can take out of it—minerals, oil and gas, timber, food. But, while these industries were crucial to the development of the West, their importance is shrinking. Grazing on federal land, for instance, accounts for less than one per cent of total income and employment in most of the region, according to the economist Thomas Power. Meanwhile, recreation and tourism have become ever more important.


In that sense, it’s all too fitting that the Bundy group has targeted a wildlife refuge, a symbol of the new, service-based economy it’s so unhappy with. But the transformation of the West, though it’s been helped by federal policy, is ultimately the result of much bigger demographic, economic, and cultural shifts, which have moved the West (and, indeed, the U.S.) away from an economy based on extractive, environmentally damaging industries. Demonizing the federal government and trying to resuscitate the past may have its demagogic appeal. But the Old West is gone, and it isn’t coming back.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/01/25/bundynomics

Would calling these guys anarcho-Georgists work?

William Bear fucked around with this message at 19:48 on Jan 31, 2016

ShadowCatboy
Jan 22, 2006

by FactsAreUseless

Mr Interweb posted:

Is David Fry the fat guy in that "last dance" video?

Skinny guy in his late 20s with the mustauche. Has been compared to Kylo Ren. Moderately handsome but lanky enough that it'd probably be like making love to a bag of antlers if he became a prison wife (which is a terrible institutional problem in the American prison system and should be fixed).

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.

Mr Interweb posted:

Is David Fry the fat guy in that "last dance" video?

No, Fry is Kylo Meth.

GameCube
Nov 21, 2006

Mr Interweb posted:

Is David Fry the fat guy in that "last dance" video?

David Fry is the greasy Kylo Ren. The fat guy and his wife are Sean and Sandy Anderson (Andersen?). He's the guy who uses the same facebook account to declare war on the feds and follow sexy lady feet pages.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

ShadowCatboy posted:

Skinny guy in his late 20s with the mustauche. Has been compared to Kylo Ren. Moderately handsome but lanky enough that it'd probably be like making love to a bag of antlers if he became a prison wife (which is a terrible institutional problem in the American prison system and should be fixed).

I must admit I had not ruminated on what it would be like to have sex with David Fry.

stubblyhead
Sep 13, 2007

That is treason, Johnny!

Fun Shoe
How much is known about the fourth guy, Jeff something I think?

E-Tank
Aug 4, 2011

"Why should we have to face consequences for our actions!" ~ Party of personal responsibility.

How long until the three of them decide to eat the fat one for nourishment?

drilldo squirt
Aug 18, 2006

a beautiful, soft meat sack
Clapping Larry

E-Tank posted:

"Why should we have to face consequences for our actions!" ~ Party of personal responsibility.

How long until the three of them decide to eat the fat one for nourishment?

If they did that they wouldn't need to hang out in the woods anymore.

Rick_Hunter
Jan 5, 2004

My guys are still fighting the hard fight!
(weapons, shields and drones are still online!)

Hermetic posted:

You can't be any geek off the street. Gotta be handy with the constitution if you know what I mean, earn your tarp. :clint:

RANCHERS, mount up!

wontondestruction
Dec 3, 2012

I'm a piece of human waste who supports a culture of using gendered slurs, that leads to 78.1% of women in STEM fields experiencing sexual harassment
Is anyone else starting to wish the Feds would take a harder line? My sympathy....nowhere to be found anymore.

E-Tank
Aug 4, 2011

wontondestruction posted:

Is anyone else starting to wish the Feds would take a harder line? My sympathy....nowhere to be found anymore.

Again, the longer these four chucklefucks stay there, the longer everyone sees that the 'liberty' and 'militia' movements are too chickenshit to do anything. Here we have four men calling for backup, demanding to know where everyone else is, and asking them to pretty please with sugar on top to come and save their dumbasses. Every single jackass who has to fondle a gun and think about shooting a federal agent before he can get it up will now have to ask themselves if their so called allies will actually support them. If it was not good PR for the FBI to let them still keep on being there, they wouldn't be there. They're not only going to be arrested, they are going to be paraded around as proof that all these anti-government militias talk a big talk, but when put to the test they'll end up abandoning their 'comrades in arms' every time.

It's kind of ironic really, it's their idea of taxes and welfare but in terms of fighting. "People who need help should get help. . .Just not from my taxes." "Someone should go and support those brave patriots. . .Just not me."

Fionnoula
May 27, 2010

Ow, quit.
Twitter is afire with reports from Oregon Public Broadcasting that communications are going down. The Andersons' phones are bricks, David Fry is stating that his phone can receive but cannot make calls, no internet, and the landlines to the refuge buildings are supposedly dead as well.

ShadowCatboy
Jan 22, 2006

by FactsAreUseless

E-Tank posted:

Again, the longer these four chucklefucks stay there, the longer everyone sees that the 'liberty' and 'militia' movements are too chickenshit to do anything. Here we have four men calling for backup, demanding to know where everyone else is, and asking them to pretty please with sugar on top to come and save their dumbasses. Every single jackass who has to fondle a gun and think about shooting a federal agent before he can get it up will now have to ask themselves if their so called allies will actually support them. If it was not good PR for the FBI to let them still keep on being there, they wouldn't be there. They're not only going to be arrested, they are going to be paraded around as proof that all these anti-government militias talk a big talk, but when put to the test they'll end up abandoning their 'comrades in arms' every time.

It's kind of ironic really, it's their idea of taxes and welfare but in terms of fighting. "People who need help should get help. . .Just not from my taxes." "Someone should go and support those brave patriots. . .Just not me."

Yeah I've been wondering recently if the "we have a warrant out for Sean Andersen's arrest, the rest of you guys can leave" is mean to be some reverse-psychology FBI mindfuck to get them to park their asses and squat there even longer. The more this drags out the more sad and pathetic and small militia movements seem.

Sure it's bad for the locals who have to live in the county, but if your goal is to prevent further acts of sedition this is a masterstroke.

StandardVC10
Feb 6, 2007

This avatar now 50% more dark mode compliant

wontondestruction posted:

Is anyone else starting to wish the Feds would take a harder line? My sympathy....nowhere to be found anymore.

May as well wait them out. They're doing nothing but embarrassing themselves, and there's only so long they can hold out given that they insist on living outside in the winter. The chance that they hurt anybody if the FBI goes in seems pretty remote, but all the same it doesn't seem like there's really any point in taking it.

ChlamydiaJones
Sep 27, 2002

My Estonian riding instructor told me; "Mine munni ahvi türa imeja", and I live by that every day!
Ramrod XTreme

E-Tank posted:

Again, the longer these four chucklefucks stay there, the longer everyone sees that the 'liberty' and 'militia' movements are too chickenshit to do anything.

Recall also that there's a judge in Burns that has promised to charge each and every insurrectionist for the costs the town, county and state have endured. That was stated as $70,000.00 per day and I truly hope that each and every one of these assholes carries that financial obligation around with them until they've paid it off. Sure they probably don't pay taxes but a few hundred thousand per person accruing interest will make getting a new Walmark credit card more of a challenge and a court order can cost them a house or car without much difficulty.

eighty-four merc
Dec 22, 2010


In 2020, we're going to make the end of Fight Club real.

Lead out in cuffs posted:

Someone earlier in the thread posted an excerpt from Finicum's novel, in which the obvious self-insert has been apprehended and interrogated by the evil government agents, but manages to pull out a handgun and kill them all.

So yes, I think you're quite likely right.

Can someone quote this excerpt again? I was never able to find it.

RuanGacho
Jun 20, 2002

"You're gunna break it!"

Small note in reaction to the Cliven tirade, bureaucrats are the only thing that prevent massive government corruption. The fact that the definition of it on google includes the line particular "one perceived as being concerned with procedural correctness at the expense of people's needs" is something anyone that has even minor collectivism leanings needs to start fighting against yesterday.

They're far more vital to society than those who usually argue everyone should have a seat at the table in defining government policy. Sell all government assests and have no government regulation is not a sane deserves a seat at the table of policy discussion position, comparatively.

RuanGacho fucked around with this message at 20:29 on Jan 31, 2016

The Crotch
Oct 16, 2012

by Nyc_Tattoo

SLAMMYsosa posted:

Can someone quote this excerpt again? I was never able to find it.
Sure.



Originally saw it from Utah cartoonist/Local Hero Pat Bagley's Twitter account.

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
These people are retarded jerk-offs but they are just trying to do with guns what other business/land owners do to poor people with economics: Seize wealth for personal gain without regard for other people.

All the people buying into it are morons though, kind of like the people that buy into the idea that a politician cares about you or that your employer can be your friend.

These guys are essentially our society taken to the extreme and its never surprising when things like this happen.

Iowa Snow King
Jan 5, 2008
LaVoy Finnicum Memorial Butt Stuff

kartikeya
Mar 17, 2009


theflyingorc posted:

The Clicen Bundy letter is really revealing in its use of the word "inspired", a word that has clear implications in fundamentalist circles.

He's basically stating that the US constitution is divinely inspired by God. It's a common idea that America is here to be THE godly nation in some interpretations, but claiming "inspiration" is apart the same thing as calling the constitution scripture.

Which says a lot, really.

It's not uncommon among Mormons to believe the Founding Fathers were divinely inspired (thus, the Constitution, etc etc), although I've seen this kind of belief among plenty of religious people of other faiths. But, you know, if you believe all of that was divinely inspired, you should probably pay attention to that whole 'can amend the Constitution because we're not perfect' thing, which is something I've also seen brought up when Mormons are speaking of divine inspiration RE: the founding of the US and the writing of the Constitution/Declaration of Independence.

As far as Cliven Bundy's article there goes, just imagine a long, drawn out, tired, exasperated sigh from me. This loving guy.

Perfectly Safe
May 30, 2003

no danger here.

ChlamydiaJones posted:

Recall also that there's a judge in Burns that has promised to charge each and every insurrectionist for the costs the town, county and state have endured. That was stated as $70,000.00 per day and I truly hope that each and every one of these assholes carries that financial obligation around with them until they've paid it off. Sure they probably don't pay taxes but a few hundred thousand per person accruing interest will make getting a new Walmark credit card more of a challenge and a court order can cost them a house or car without much difficulty.

I hope something comes of this. Remembering at how much money pricks like Zimmerman and the Ferguson cop received in donations, it's heartening to think that any such cash on this occasion will go to undoing some of the damage that these idiots have done.

Geostomp
Oct 22, 2008

Unite: MASH!!
~They've got the bad guys on the run!~

kartikeya posted:

It's not uncommon among Mormons to believe the Founding Fathers were divinely inspired (thus, the Constitution, etc etc), although I've seen this kind of belief among plenty of religious people of other faiths. But, you know, if you believe all of that was divinely inspired, you should probably pay attention to that whole 'can amend the Constitution because we're not perfect' thing, which is something I've also seen brought up when Mormons are speaking of divine inspiration RE: the founding of the US and the writing of the Constitution/Declaration of Independence.

As far as Cliven Bundy's article there goes, just imagine a long, drawn out, tired, exasperated sigh from me. This loving guy.

It amuses me that these people so venerate a document that was argued over for months, was specifically written to allow amendments, and was intended to be revised every decade or so as the umpires word of God. That's not even getting into the many, many ways they misinterpreted it to justify their idiotic actions. I think they just keep on bringing it up in the hopes that someday it'll finally make anyone who questions them recoil in agony and flee like the vampires they're certain all liberals must be.

kartikeya
Mar 17, 2009


I finally decided to go see if I could find out if the Bundys are fringey members of the LDS Church, or part of one of the Mormon Fundamentalist breakoff groups. This article is pretty good if you want a decent overlook of things, and also seems to indicate that yeah, he's LDS (his reference to his bishop not having said anything against what he was doing, specifically) http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/01/04/3735830/bundy-mormonism/

It's worth a read for the curious.

Edit:

Geostomp posted:

It amuses me that these people so venerate a document that was argued over for months, was specifically written to allow amendments, and was intended to be revised every decade or so as the umpires word of God. That's not even getting into the many, many ways they misinterpreted it to justify their idiotic actions. I think they just keep on bringing it up in the hopes that someday it'll finally make anyone who questions them recoil in agony and flee like the vampires they're certain all liberals must be.

Well, yes and no. It's important to remember that Mormonism carries a gospel of continuing revelation, which basically just means 'God still speaks to people and helps those who ask to choose the right thing'. Believing someone was divinely inspired to write/create something doesn't necessarily carry the same weight of 'WORD OF GOD' as it might in other religions. It's difficult to explain when it's just something you've grown up understanding, but take, for instance, Mormon prophets. Mormons believe that God still chooses prophets to lead the faithful, and thus the title of 'Prophet' in the church means exactly that. However, Mormons do not believe that their prophets are infallible, or that everything they do or say is the direct Word of God You'd Better Listen. An LDS Prophet giving a sermon, for instance, is generally taken that way, but his personal politics or something he says to his grandkids on Christmas eve or something is not. Basically, Prophets are considered holy men, but still men, still imperfect, still entirely capable of bungling and making poor decisions. This goes right back to Joseph Smith; I've seen it repeatedly argued that 'hey, Joseph Smith did X thing, clearly this means he was a fraud and you're ignoring it', but Mormons don't believe Joseph Smith was perfect either. Far, far from it. In fact, there's a particular story about Joseph Smith that is very commonly cited as an instance in which he definitely did the wrong thing, and got into big trouble with God over it.

Basically, when Joseph Smith was first translating the Book of Mormon (the story is he was directed to find the golden plates, aka where the Book of Mormon comes from, by an angel after his initial vision of God and Jesus), one of the people who was helping him translate really really wanted to show a bunch of his friends what they'd been working on. Up until that point the translated pages had just been between Joseph Smith and this guy, Martin Harris. So Joseph prays and asks God, hey, can Martin go show this stuff to his buddies? And the answer he gets is no. So they go back to translating but Martin Harris just really really wants to show these pages around, and so Joseph asks God again. This goes on for a bit, with God answering no, until finally God goes 'fine, if you really want'. So Martin Harris takes the translated pages and shows them to his buddies...and they end up going missing. Joseph's pretty distraught, he goes to talk to God again, and God is pissed, because, you know, Joseph Smith just wasn't taking his initial 'no's for an answer, which is what he should have done, because he kept coming back and asking as if he knew better than God. This resulted in all translation stopping for a while, even the plates being taken away. Mormons believe what was lost was the Book of Lehi, basically the first 'book' of the Book of Mormon, which now starts with the Book of Nephi instead (God was basically so pissed that when translation began again, that part of the plates was 'sealed' and wasn't allowed to be translated again). This is basically just the first link that pops up about this story https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_116_pages

That's a lot of Mormon specific words to just say 'if you're not humble enough and think you know best, you can eventually get whatever answer you want from God, or at least think you've got that answer, because duh, humanity', but there you go. A Mormon specific story about why you shouldn't do that, and how Joseph Smith was a guy like anyone who made big mistakes even according to the LDS church.

Edit 2, sorry:

And all of that and it occurs to me that really, I think the clarification isn't that the Constitution and every word therein is divinely inspired, as believed by Mormons, but that the concept of it, the concepts within it, and the idea of a living document, was. Which is basically your generic American exceptionalism with a religious flavor (as if American exceptionalism doesn't have that in general).

kartikeya fucked around with this message at 21:17 on Jan 31, 2016

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

yeah. He sounds like a dumb idiot who bought it /pol/ and militia bullshit and is ready kill and maybe die for it. so basicaly kylo renn.

kazmeyer
Jul 26, 2001

'Cause we're the good guys.

ChlamydiaJones posted:

Recall also that there's a judge in Burns that has promised to charge each and every insurrectionist for the costs the town, county and state have endured. That was stated as $70,000.00 per day and I truly hope that each and every one of these assholes carries that financial obligation around with them until they've paid it off. Sure they probably don't pay taxes but a few hundred thousand per person accruing interest will make getting a new Walmark credit card more of a challenge and a court order can cost them a house or car without much difficulty.

I'm gonna laugh so loving hard if it turns out the holdouts are still running up the bill for the Bundys and the rest of them by refusing to leave.

trickybiscuits
Jan 13, 2008

yospos
A while back in this thread Prestor Jane said that militia/sovcits strategizing is like watching someone play chess who is totally unaware of half the pieces on the board. It's fascinating to realize that when poo poo started going down on Tuesday, people on this board had figured out the FBI's whole strategy and why they'd done it in a matter of hours. Meanwhile there are are people online still going "But the FBI doesn't put up roadblocks and then they put up another roadblock around a curve where it was impossible to see" who have no idea that the only unfair thing about the whole situation is that the FBI wouldn't dumb itself down to their level. Which is about as unfair as not handicapping yourself when playing a board game against a child who is threatening to kill people if they win.

Fionnoula posted:

New York TImes reporter spoke to David Fry. They are indeed camping outside in order to PROVE that they aren't actually occupying the refuge (because apparently only the buildings matter?) and therefore hey aren't actually hostile. Just camping.

Extended sleep deprivation can lead to temporary psychosis. I've had that happen to me and I do not envy David Fry right now.

1stGear
Jan 16, 2010

Here's to the new us.

Dapper_Swindler posted:

yeah. He sounds like a dumb idiot who bought it /pol/ and militia bullshit and is ready kill and maybe die for it. so basicaly kylo renn.

The only person in Oregon who was willing to die for the militia's ideology did so.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

Leofish posted:

By the way, on the wounding thing - I've read enough news articles about deadly force to know that one of the first things many people ask is "why didn't they just shoot him in the leg?" to which the reply is usually along the lines of "in a tense situation, you can't guarantee that kind of accuracy" or "police are trained to shoot to kill once a situation escalates to the point where a discharge is considered justified." In other words, the entire idea that they had this plan to expertly hit Finicum in the side, in order to make him reflexively reach toward his side, which could then be interpreted as "he's got a gun", justifying the use of deadly force, is all just more imaginary movie gun bullshit - at least in my opinion. Like, what a ridiculous plan! What if he didn't exit the vehicle, or the shot intending to wound missed its mark and hit him in the arm or foot, or even killed him? What if it missed entirely? Why would they need to invent some kind of bizarre plot that required precise, expert aim and timing?

Well, it's not just an accuracy thing, but you also have a main artery in that small space. a bullet tearing through there runs a high chance of nailing that and then be left to bleed out like he was anyways because the people in the truck didn't surrender immediately. Those movie scenes where someone takes multiple rounds and just limps around is kinda bullshit.

  • Locked thread