|
A.o.D. posted:Well Geese, what you do is you look at the list of CW planets, and next to those planets' names will be a number XX(in red)/XX (in blue) Red are attackers and blue are defenders. Bigger numbers are better (on both sides) for getting a match quickly as a solo. ...wow, I feel like an idiot now. Dunno how I overlooked that list. Thanks.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 00:23 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 23:46 |
|
Oh Snapple! posted:
This whole thread will end up in the OP someday.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 00:35 |
|
Unboxing Day posted:...wow, I feel like an idiot now. Dunno how I overlooked that list. Thanks. maybe next time don't whiff a raging storm when someone has a power geyser ready to rock.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 00:36 |
|
Washout posted:Huh, no matter which side is blown off it will still do well, kinda interesting. But I'd change the lasers around to only have med pulses, 2 CT and 2 in each LT and RT. I gave this some thought too and you're probably right, but in practice the only time i actually used the CT guns was when I was poking a stationary target outside 350m.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 00:42 |
|
Ever since i played the Dads, i cant resist puttin srm6 on everything. loving Stalker has 2-4 missile slots for the Nahverteidigungswaffe, and 4 LLas would serve as main guns. Its so tempting...
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 00:56 |
|
"Victasha Deiner Kavion Sterensky" is a just-fit! Victasha Keiner Stavion Derensky? I need some feedback here mechwarriors, I only get to do this once.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 01:02 |
|
About CW what does destroying the station while counterattacking as the defenders do? I thought it'd win the match or something but you still gotta come up ahead on KOs.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 01:02 |
|
Drakes posted:About CW what does destroying the station while counterattacking as the defenders do? If you don't do it and time runs out then you lose.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 01:08 |
|
Unboxing Day posted:If I am - heaven forbid - soloing CW, what's the best way to find a match and get in a game quickly? Look for planets that are near (but under) a multiple of 12. That means a full company is close to being formed and entered into the queue.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 01:10 |
|
Yolomon Wayne posted:Ever since i played the Dads, i cant resist puttin srm6 on everything. 3 LPL and 4 SRM4+A and 3 tons of ammo would probably fit easily.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 01:27 |
|
Washout posted:3 LPL and 4 SRM4+A and 3 tons of ammo would probably fit easily. That, with an xl 300 engine is what I use on my warhammer 7s. It's highly effective.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 02:20 |
|
Great Beer posted:Was anyone actually upset about the current map vote system? Gaming the vote multiplier system is mildly amusing and harmless. are upset and hurt about the fact that the playerbase can now actively avoid their dogshit maps and choose from the ones that are actually half decent. People consistently avoiding particular pieces of content comes dangerously close to admitting to a mistake for even if it's by proxy, and as we all know does not make mistakes
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 02:29 |
|
Banano posted:are upset and hurt about the fact that the playerbase can now actively avoid their dogshit maps and choose from the ones that are actually half decent. that doesn't make any sense
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 02:39 |
|
Yeah. People will still vote to avoid maps they don't like, so that will still be a thing. Far more likely it's people whining on the forums about people saving up their multipliers to troll with.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 02:41 |
|
The proper way to play is to use cool mechs and always force hot maps.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 02:44 |
|
Baudin posted:The proper way to play is to use cool mechs and always force hot maps. Mechwarrior Online: Cool Mechs & Hot Maps
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 02:47 |
|
Roki B posted:Mechwarrior Online: Cool Mechs & Hot Maps sorry, it's not twerkingurbanmech.gif
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 03:02 |
|
A.o.D. posted:sorry, it's not twerkingurbanmech.gif twerkingurbanmech kerensky
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 03:09 |
|
Someone take TwerkenMech Kerensky.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 03:27 |
|
Pooncha posted:Someone take TwerkenMech Kerensky. What about Tetatae Twerkenmech Kerensky
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 03:44 |
|
Astroniomix posted:twerkingurbanmech kerensky Urbanmech Twerkensky
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 04:06 |
|
Tetamech Urbansky. So many glorious names but only one name change.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 04:08 |
|
does anyone have any battletech novels handy? I'm looking for heroically terrible bits of prose, a para will do
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 04:40 |
|
sebmojo posted:does anyone have any battletech novels handy? I'm looking for heroically terrible bits of prose, a para will do Hit me up when i get off work. What are you looking for? Also: Twerkenmech Kerensky St Lord
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 04:43 |
|
Star Colonel Twerking Into Battle
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 04:43 |
|
Is the Battlemaster 1S still worth picking up now that the IS range quirks are a thing next patch? I have the 2C and 3S already
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 04:53 |
|
sebmojo posted:does anyone have any battletech novels handy? I'm looking for heroically terrible bits of prose, a para will do Some poo poo battletech novel posted:But he surprised her, the 'Mech coming through the same buildings she had. First came an almighty crashing and banging, and suddenly there it was, looming up nine times the size of life in a giant cloud of dust and debris. The Wolverine was raising its autocannon-hand even as it appeared. And so begins the story of a giant mary sue who disdains piloting battlemechs in favor of destroying them HAND TO HAND!
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 05:35 |
|
Marshall Louis posted:Hit me up when i get off work. What are you looking for? I'm going to disagree with the 'terrible' angle on Battletech fiction. It is absolutely still just my opinion, but I have enough qualifications that I can state that it is - on the whole - a good series with some degree of expertise; I possess advanced degrees in several writing-intensive fields, have guest-lectured at universities, and taught advanced high school literature courses. In my view, when compared to a great deal of 'ordinary' series-based science fiction, Battletech - from the better authors - is absolutely of a fairly high standard. In the better series and novels, such as the original Gray Death Legion series or Warrior Trilogy, the main characters are well-rounded with failings as well as strengths, the imagery and setting are given careful attention, and the plot arc follows a standard but well-developed form. There's really very little to take issue with. The clear subtext of Battletech as an allegory for the Cold War of the 80's is very evident as well as a poignant choice, and there's plenty of social commentary on gender roles, racism and xenophobia, and the role of the individual in society. It must also be stated that the various tech readouts and field manuals (such as those detailing the major factions) are also superb reads; these voluminous tomes contain hundreds of pages of background ranging from socio-political history to food preferences of a given entity, or in the case of the tech readouts, rich lore-driven background on the history of all of the battlemechs in the franchise. This combines to establish a level of canonical depth that you won't find in virtually any other sci-fi or fantasy series. No, this is not Asimov-level science fiction, but it's deep, very engaging (why else would we be playing a derivative three decades later?) and most of it is well-written.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 06:00 |
|
sebmojo posted:No, this is not Asimov-level science fiction, but it's deep, very engaging (why else would we be playing a derivative three decades later?) and most of it is well-written. Stockholm syndrome and because there hasn't been a good Heavy Gear game in 17 years
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 06:15 |
|
I just thought I'd chime in here:
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 06:45 |
|
Washout posted:And so begins the story of a giant mary sue who disdains piloting battlemechs in favor of destroying them HAND TO HAND! Those continue to be my least favorite "trilogy" of BT novels. Especially in the last one where she PILOTS a loving mech, then cripples the enemy commanders, ejects, and climbs into his mech to pull him out.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 07:07 |
|
Alexandsr ~HeLioS~ Kerensky
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 07:31 |
|
TeeMerk posted:Alexandsr ~HeLioS~ Kerensky So kawaii desu
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 07:33 |
|
Alejandro DB Kerensky
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 07:35 |
|
Kelly Zmakerensky
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 07:44 |
|
PoptartsNinja posted:
Ooh, I didn't realize that. That might make it the go-to Clan assault. Interesting.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 08:11 |
|
Bolow posted:Is the Battlemaster 1S still worth picking up now that the IS range quirks are a thing next patch? I have the 2C and 3S already The 1s is insanely strong and the quad lpl build will barely be hurt by it. It's only the quad ERLL build that will be hurt and ERLL's are honestly dog poo poo anyway against an opponent with a pulse. I made this video like six months ago but this mech is definitely still capable of it, and will be even with some range tweaks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ1eZ3KdP-c Also XL engine is the way to go with the 1S, you have giant arms to shield with while you twist. Being fast in a mech that can hill hump better than almost anything else and fire for days is great paired with the short burn time of LPLs. Tim Pawlenty fucked around with this message at 09:20 on Feb 1, 2016 |
# ? Feb 1, 2016 08:24 |
|
Tujague posted:
So I like that build but statistically my highest performing and the one I decided to stick on my (I) variant is 2xUAC10 on the right and 5xERSL on the left. If you get into knife-fight range prioritize the small lasers. It works really well for me personally so I'd recommend trying it out.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 09:51 |
|
I've reconfigured my Hellbringer to pack 1 large laser and four medium lasers, with 14 heat sinks and ECM. Is this an ideal build?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 10:35 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 23:46 |
|
Laserburd the First 2x2 LLas for sniping, medlas+srm for oh poo poo situations. Faceburd Up close, personal. I love these things.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2016 10:49 |