|
Pohl posted:Burn Iowa to the ground. loving lol. loving Iowans, that's who. There's a reason the national party has been ramping up threats over the past few cycles to move Iowa further back into the year because they keep picking garbage evangelical candidates.
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 11:23 |
|
|
frankenfreak posted:
i hope its premature
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:53
|
|
at the thread title already being updated.
|
Jewel Repetition posted:If Rubio beats Trump I'm just going to stay in long enough to see Trump's meltdown, maybe wait until he's eclipsed on predictwise, then go back to blissful apathy about primaries. Rubio could actually win the General, so... The very idea makes my rear end clench up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:53
|
|
|
maybe it's the unfavorability?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:53
|
|
|
stoutfish posted:maybe it's the unfavorability? Maybe YOU'RE unfavorable.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
Louisgod posted:42 He said numbers not the metric tonnage of your jerky orders
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/samsteinhp/status/694351634680381442
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
oh it will be. he is gonna blow his loving top. hopefully literally.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:55
|
|
|
The silver lining.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:55
|
|
|
GILMORE IN DOUBLE DIGITS
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:55
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:Cruz, Rubio, Trump in that order.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:56
|
|
|
Stoat posted:GILMORE IN DOUBLE DIGITS !!! dont gently caress with my heart stoat
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:56
|
|
|
So does New Hampshire see this and think, as usual for them, "hey let's go completely the opposite way"?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:56
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:Maybe YOU'RE unfavorable. that is true...
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:56
|
|
|
Rubio also stinks, by the way. God, they all stink. Why does so much of the GOP stink?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:58
|
|
|
Rubio is now ahead of Trump on Predictit for the nomination, which means I officially have permission to stop giving a poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:59
|
|
|
fart blood posted:Rubio also stinks, by the way. because they all fart blood
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:59
|
|
|
Haha I guessed truthers and nwo conspiracy guys as volunteers might burn Trump with the speeches. Who knows if it did but if any of the nuts had the floor I can see people being embarrassed out of voting for Trump. I won't do a victory lap until the results are in but I'll be glad if open xenophobia loses. The rest of the field's bullshit is not a marked improvement but I'll accept not active regression over race relations and the such.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
Wonder if Trump could have boosted his numbers by preparing for and attending the debate instead of backing down from it to air a thing with far worse ratings he could have done another time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
This is now Rubio's race to lose... holy poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
TheTatteredKing posted:Haha I guessed truthers and nwo conspiracy guys as volunteers might burn Trump with the speeches. Who knows if it did but if any of the nuts had the floor I can see people being embarrassed out of voting for Trump. I won't do a victory lap until the results are in but I'll be glad if open xenophobia loses. The rest of the field's bullshit is not a marked improvement but I'll accept not active regression over race relations and the such. true. but Cruz is a theological nutjob(pretend or real) so he is probaly worse then trump.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
Piquai Souban posted:Wonder if Trump could have boosted his numbers by preparing for and attending the debate instead of backing down from it to air a thing with far worse ratings he could have done another time. Nah, skipping that debate was good for him.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
Piquai Souban posted:Wonder if Trump could have boosted his numbers by preparing for and attending the debate instead of backing down from it to air a thing with far worse ratings he could have done another time. We'll probably know what killed him tomorrow, but one thing I'm fairly sure of is it wasn't the debate skip.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:true. but Cruz is a theological nutjob(pretend or real) so he is probaly worse then trump. Cruz would die in a general. Trump would cause problems for Clinton. Rubio would do OK but run a conventional campaign.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
Why God. Why.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Oh wow a Bush started a war that allowed the insurgents take over. How novel
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Well I get to keep my Something Awful account, but what a pyrrhic victory.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
Piquai Souban posted:Wonder if Trump could have boosted his numbers by preparing for and attending the debate instead of backing down from it to air a thing with far worse ratings he could have done another time. This is a fantastic question and I would love to hear someone ask him that on television, especially if it's framed as "Your polling was up *here* but the caucus put you down *here*, do you think it would be a better showing if you attended the last debate?"
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
lol eat poo poo and wrap it up trumpailures
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:lol eat poo poo and wrap it up trumpailures basically.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Pohl posted:This is now Rubio's race to lose... holy poo poo. Neither Rubio nor Cruz is going to gain 25% in NH over the span of one week. Trump will take a hit there, and maybe a bit in SC, but I expect he'll maintain a double-digit lead in both states going into the weekend. Super Tuesday is a different story and about fifty weird things could happen between now and then.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Man, Donald Trump, what a loser that guy is. Says he's all about winning, can't even close the deal against a guy who's face is constantly trying to escape his body.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Vladimir Putin posted:Cruz would die in a general. Trump would cause problems for Clinton. Rubio would do OK but run a conventional campaign. this. rubio could theoreticaly make a dash to the middle, but he is stooge so he wont. trump also could but he would be shown as an rear end in a top hat. cruz will just run hard right and alienate everyone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
https://www.iagopcaucuses.com/#/state posted:The service is unavailable. The Service is Unavailable probably polls better than Gilmore or Jeb at this point.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
538 posted:Road No. 4: Cruz beats Trump, and Rubio does well
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:basically. Yes, because the 2008 and 2012 primaries were settled when Huckabee and Santorum both swept the nominations in ole Ioway. Fundies know how to work the caucus system well. NH will make or break Trump.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:lol eat poo poo and wrap it up trumpailures Have fun with President Ted Cruz.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
MaxxBot posted:Have fun with President Ted Cruz. Mitch McConnell will kill him in broad daylight before he allows that possibility to develop any further than it has tonight.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
mdemone posted:Neither Rubio or Cruz is going to gain 25% in NH over the span of one week. Trump will take a hit there, and maybe a bit in SC, but I expect he'll maintain a double-digit lead in both states going into the weekend. Polling in Iowa showed Trump with like a ~5 point lead and he may well end up in third loving place behind the two Hispanic candidates.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 11:23 |
|
|
Reporters wildly flip flopping between saying Iowa is super important and Iowa not really mattering because it didn't decide the last X nominations 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:14
|
|
