|
Shifty Pony posted:It is huge... a huge loss. New Hampshire where he currently enjoys a 23 point lead is actually the easiest place for him
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 07:48 |
|
|
 Rubio within 2% of Trump
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
13 delegates
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
euphronius posted:I'm tired please tell me who has won. Iowa
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
greatn posted:All you Clinton people reacting about Bernouts really seem to be the ones freaking the gently caress out, this is basically a tie which should be embarrassing for Clinton. The demographics in Iowa are extremely in favor of Bernie and him not doing well would have been embarrassing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:It is huge... a huge loss. See I don't know because Iowa is a old state and olds are going for Hillary supposedly. I think this is might tip some people from the "I like Bernie, but he is unelectable," to "Holy crap he is electable!"
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Grem posted:O'Malley is dropping out in 25 minutes. Why do candidates wait until certain points like the Iowa Caucus to drop out? Like I get why Rubio is still around, or even any Republican in such a large field, but drat man, you had two people running against you and you polled abysmally low. Did you not see until now that you're really not going to win? Get yourself on camera as much as possible, secure yourself a future VP slot/cabinet position by endorsing the winner.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
a cop posted:Joementum, I have a question for you, given that you are likely the only person here who could answer it. Yes
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Uhh guys, Rubio only 2.1% behind Trump now. It's... happening??
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:These poor people on Twitter saying "BUT IT'S STILL CLOSE!" Yes, if the last precincts all go 100% for Bernie, he could pull it off. Hillary will win in a stastical tie. A great result for the Inevitable Slay Queen Candidate vs. a radical Independent senator from Vermot
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:It is huge... a huge loss. vermont is as easy as it gets. new hampshire is second-as easy as it gets. iowa is closer to third- than fiftieth- but if he really wanted to get things rolling he probably needed a bigger majority than he could possibly get if every undeclared delegate went to him at this point
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
a cop posted:Joementum, I have a question for you, given that you are likely the only person here who could answer it. You are assigned.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:Hillary winning Iowa is obviously good for her, but Bernie is so close that even if (when?) he loses it makes him look like a viable competitor instead of a kooky guy with limited appeal. He's polling really well in New Hampshire, so if he wins there then this whole thing is far, far, far from over. Until Super Tuesday that is
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Grem posted:O'Malley is dropping out in 25 minutes. Why do candidates wait until certain points like the Iowa Caucus to drop out? Like I get why Rubio is still around, or even any Republican in such a large field, but drat man, you had two people running against you and you polled abysmally low. Did you not see until now that you're really not going to win? Becauae Iowa determines if candidates meet the minimal threshold for being viable. MOM, santorum, huckabee, fiorina and Carson are not.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
detectivemonkey posted:Lady on CSPAN initially said 35 to lay writing. Writing lady sounded surprised so reading lady double-checked and it was actually 0. Well those numbers do look extremely similar!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Trump not in 1st? Perish the thought. Some of us might have been suggesting something so sacrilegious for sometime.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:gently caress you bernie idiots I think you may need to walk away and blow of some steam there, friend guy
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
fade5 posted:you're enjoying this, aren't you? Extremely.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:The Stumping of Trump by the Coward Ted Cruz
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:The demographics in Iowa are extremely in favor of Bernie and him not doing well would have been embarrassing. This is the kind of mental gymnastics the guy you're responding to is talking about. What has happened is equivalent to an expansion team from Vermont meeting the Patriots in the Super Bowl and only losing by a field goal.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Who do O'Malleys 6 delegates go to, they could decide who "wins" this
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
greatn posted:All you Clinton people reacting about Bernouts really seem to be the ones freaking the gently caress out, this is basically a tie which should be embarrassing for Clinton. But some part of me also hopes that Hillary Clinton is having a nice day. I’ve come to believe that saying nice things about Hillary Clinton can be a subversive act.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
euphronius posted:I'm tired please tell me who has won. Cruz / Hillary (albeit hillary by a crazy narrow margin)
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
God the book on the election is going to own
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Grem posted:O'Malley is dropping out in 25 minutes. Why do candidates wait until certain points like the Iowa Caucus to drop out? Like I get why Rubio is still around, or even any Republican in such a large field, but drat man, you had two people running against you and you polled abysmally low. Did you not see until now that you're really not going to win? Martin O'Malley was arguably never running for President. Also, as far as Iowa is concerned, it is possible he was counting on the two viable candidates giving him something in return for the support of his followers to influence delegate math.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Rubio 1.7% behind Trump. Please let us enter a new frontier of stumping.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:Hillary winning Iowa is obviously good for her, but Bernie is so close that even if (when?) he loses it makes him look like a viable competitor instead of a kooky guy with limited appeal. He's polling really well in New Hampshire, so if he wins there then this whole thing is far, far, far from over. This is the opposite of true. NH is a free win for him (as is VT), and anything short of a convincing Iowa victory is the death of the Bern.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
PUNDITS KNEW
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
blue squares posted:Hey Boosted are you switching to Cruz or Rubio? If Trumps hold onto at least 1% of his 22% lead in NH and wins there, he will get my vote in SC. If Trump loses to Cruz or Rubio, I'll vote for Cruz. Ugh. He's slime, but Open Border Marco Amnesty Rubio would ensure no more GOP presidents after him (or SCOTUS nominations) for a LOOOONG time and also more economic suffering for Americans.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Mr Hootington posted:So Hillary and Bernie nearly having a tie is huge for Bernie isn't it? It seems huge. Not really. There's only a couple states where the demographics are more favorable to Bernie than Iowa. One of them is New Hampshire. If he can only barely squeak out a tie in Iowa, it doesn't bode well for how well he'll do in other states -- but he'll be certainly trying to ride the momentum to improve his numbers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
who cares about the dems anymore it's essentially a tie i'm all about rubio now just because i want to see trump's head explode and for him to shoot off into 3rd party candidate land
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
a cop posted:Joementum, I have a question for you, given that you are likely the only person here who could answer it. quote:Who can participate in the caucuses? So college kids that don't change their address can go to their parent's home and caucus there, as per the busing strategy previously mentioned.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
quote:[–]NoiseyI [score hidden] just now 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
etalian posted:MOM took out a 500k loan to keep his campaign afloat and also even before the campaign started had a 0 dollar net worth due to lots of education loans. Who gives out those loans? What does he even have for collateral?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
greatn posted:All you Clinton people reacting about Bernouts really seem to be the ones freaking the gently caress out, this is basically a tie which should be embarrassing for Clinton. Yes Hillary getting a tie in a race in which everyone but like 7 people are white lefties clearly points to Bernie being viable on a national stage. He needed to win by like 5 to have a chance.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:This is the kind of mental gymnastics the guy you're responding to is talking about. What has happened is equivalent to an expansion team from Vermont meeting the Patriots in the Super Bowl and only losing by a field goal. How is it mental gymnastics to state that Iowa has typically leaned more far left than other primary states.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
drat
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
XyrlocShammypants posted:This is the kind of mental gymnastics the guy you're responding to is talking about. What has happened is equivalent to an expansion team from Vermont meeting the Patriots in the Super Bowl and only losing by a field goal.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Trump's loss will make YCS great again
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 07:48 |
|
|
Venom Snake posted:The demographics in Iowa are extremely in favor of Bernie and him not doing well would have been embarrassing. Thats a crazy statement when you look at polls in other states. Looks like Hillary supporters are the ones shedding tears at this point. Especially when you take into account polls mostly showing Hillary ahead by way more than 2%. Doorknob Slobber has issued a correction as of 04:13 on Feb 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|