|
If Bernie can't win Iowa, he's hosed and this is exactly why.
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 08:15 |
|
|
1.6% between Trump and Rubio now. Come on, Rubio, drink up those votes like a bottle of water during a speech vital to your political career!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Emanuel Collective posted:uhh Bernie has like a 30 point average lead in New Hampshire dude he should have said that both iowa and new hampshire are as easy as it gets (and a few others, like vermont). Look at the polling for any state with a sizeable minority population and you'll see why states like Iowa are Bernie's best shot.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Christie in 10th place out of 11. He's just ahead of Santorum.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
CNN idiot: "Sanders is really good at tapping into voters...with his ideas!!!"
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
I thought Trump was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. What the gently caress happened?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Back to 1.2%
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
rscott posted:Who do O'Malleys 6 delegates go to, they could decide who "wins" this It's 0.6% of the total delegates to the county caucuses. They're still O'Malley people, but nobody is bound on the Democratic side so they can work with whomever they like at the county caucuses. They're unlikely to be chosen for the district level caucuses though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Chris Matthews eyes get more lifeless every election cycle its creepy
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Clinton not even campaigning on public option should kill her, but we live in a bullshit world.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
I'm so happy I didn't invest in any prediction markets for Trump.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
 Workers at the Des Moines Tractor Factory have voted in Sanders as General Secretary of the Central Committee.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
As someone who has a vested interest in Literally Any Democrat winning in November: Clinton & her campaign, get your loving poo poo together
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Reason posted:Thats a crazy statement when you look at polls in other states. Looks like Hillary supporters are the ones shedding tears at this point. How is stating facts shedding tears
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
shiksa posted:and trump got loving railroaded compared to the last polls I believe you meant to say Trump got Schlonged
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:I thought Trump was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. His supporters didn't show up. I'll be really interested in seeing how he spins the results tonight.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:I thought Trump was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. Shy Anti-Fascists
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:I thought Trump was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. Margin of error fuckery. Rubio took from Cruz, and Cruz is about where he was expected to be.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Did Chris Matthews just say HOG CASTRATION?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:If Bernie can't win Iowa, he's hosed and this is exactly why. He needs to go balls-out in the debate this week
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Where do I go to look at delegate counts?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:I thought Trump was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. His supporters did not caucus.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:If Bernie can't win Iowa, he's hosed and this is exactly why. rip
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:How is stating facts shedding tears They're angry tears, at the Bad Reddit Website people
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
walgreenslatino posted:CNN idiot: "Sanders is really good at tapping into voters...with his ideas!!!" was the pause so I wouldthink "penis"?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
I knew Cruz was going to take Iowa but I was surprised by Rubio's late surge. The question becomes does this translate into a consolidation of support for Rubio in NH and SC?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
memy posted:PUNDITS KNEW
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:I thought Trump was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. People played along with the joke or wanted to give the "establishment" a fright or were otherwise angry at the GOP and then it came time to vote and they said,"Oh right, I'm voting for the guy I want to actually stand for President for real."
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/694357677971996672 rupert must be a happy motherfucker right now
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Can Bernie make up 0.7% with the remaining 19% precincts?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
The next Republican debate is going to be so loving great
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
axeil posted:Becauae Iowa determines if candidates meet the minimal threshold for being viable. MOM, santorum, huckabee, fiorina and Carson are not.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Mr Hootington posted:See I don't know because Iowa is a old state and olds are going for Hillary supposedly. I think this is might tip some people from the "I like Bernie, but he is unelectable," to "Holy crap he is electable!" I don't think this changes any minds on Bernie being electable. The doubt stems from people who don't believe he will hold up to Republican attack ads painting him as self-declared socialist who everyone needs to fear. Clintons only redeeming quality is the fact that she is Teflon to Republican attacks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:I thought Biggest rear end in a top hat was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. Trump supporters are lazy fucks. Is anyone surprised?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
memy posted:PUNDITS KNEW
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:I thought Trump was polling extremely high in Iowa and winning there seemed like an inevitability. the various places polling had two main methods of polling some polled people likely to vote tonight and others polled more than just that
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Joementum posted:His supporters did not caucus. Bill Kristol curse
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:The demographics in Iowa are extremely in favor of Bernie and him not doing well would have been embarrassing. Well good thing he did incredibly well then
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Where do I go to look at delegate counts? Front page of the NYTimes.com site is showing them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 08:15 |
|
|
The most interesting thing imo is where does Carson's 10% end up? Cruz I would think?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:13
|
|