|
Lumpy the Cook posted:Lmfao MSNBC just said it was 3 coin tosses
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 10:54 |
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:
Seems a weird thing to mention when there's probably a handful of votes left.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:41
|
|
|
Hillary and money love each other deeply
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:42
|
|
|
lol I get it Bernie you want $2700 jeez
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
Guys HIllary is just the Master Chief, its fine.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
What's stopping Hillary's ground team from going to the undecided caucus precincts right now and offering everyone new cars if they switch to Hillary
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
Dr.Mrs.The Monarch posted:Guys HIllary is just the Master Chief, its fine. Do not take Master Chief's name in vain. Fucker
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
Eat poo poo you white trash rednecks. Do you even have semblance of an educational thought in the Midwest? Bunch of inbred retards ready to throw away the nation because they're too dumb to realize they're supporting an illegal immigrant who is bought by the banks!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:44
|
|
|
Pragmatica posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/43sq2a/i_was_caucusing_in_ames_district_13_the_organizer/ This is why Hillary's going to win!
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:What's stopping Hillary's ground team from going to the undecided caucus precincts right now and offering everyone new cars if they switch to Hillary They're not there anymore, the numbers just haven't been reported all the way up the chain yet.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
This black guy on MSNBC is literally a more somnambulant speaker than Carson.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:45
|
|
|
Hillary is basically Maverick
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:46
|
|
|
Master Chief ended the great race war of his time. Hillary's going to start it
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:47
|
|
|
a cop posted:This is why Hillary's going to win! Because a contested precinct had a landslide result for Bernie?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:49
|
|
|
a cop posted:This result owns so loving much, on the Republican side. It means that Trump will be highly underrepresented in the political futures markets, even though he's clearly going to sweep the next few primaries. what the gently caress is a political futures market
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:50
|
|
|
EVERYONE BE QUIET THIS IS IMPORTANT quote:Jeb Bush 2.7%
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:50
|
|
|
The whole caucus system is loving stupid just do a regular vote with proportional share determining the delegates.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:50
|
|
|
etalian posted:The whole caucus system is loving stupid just do a regular vote with proportional share determining the delegates. But then who will stand in the corner? We need to stand in corners to elect people who will then elect other people to elect the nominee! NOTHING ELSE MAKES SENSE.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:51
|
|
|
More on the coins:
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:51
|
|
|
Iowa: America's troll.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:51
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:EVERYONE BE QUIET Hey, he managed to get a delegate! Not too shabby. Things are starting to look up for the ol' Jebster.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
538 sucks
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
Iowa, literally a mystery that everyone cares about for a day every four years
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
tekz posted:what the gently caress is a political futures market http://www.predictit.org
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:EVERYONE BE QUIET I wish I'd registered as an independent just so I could be a Jeb Bush pity vote.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
Yudo posted:Iowa: America's troll. Plow Shalt Not Pass
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
back to .2% with 1635/1683
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
 ENTEN.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
Jumpingmanjim posted:EVERYONE BE QUIET isn't the threshold on the (R) side 3.3%? if so, hahhahahahhahahahahaha motherfucking ha
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:Iowa, literally a mystery that everyone cares about for a day every four years Meanwhile, in rural Western New York... 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
It really bugs me that CNN continues to round 49.6 down to 49.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
BACK TO 0.2%
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
Nanomashoes posted:Eat poo poo you white trash rednecks. Do you even have semblance of an educational thought in the Midwest? Bunch of inbred retards ready to throw away the nation because they're too dumb to realize they're supporting an illegal immigrant who is bought by the banks! So progressive.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Meanwhile, in rural Western New York... sup Buffalo buddy
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:55
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:BACK TO 0.2% Look dude. There's no reason to hold out hope. Clinton "won" Iowa. But Sanders is still going to be awarded virtually half of the delegates.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:55
|
|
|
etalian posted:The whole caucus system is loving stupid just do a regular vote with proportional share determining the delegates. Iowa caucuses because they want to be the first to vote but New Hampshire has a law that they need to be first and move theirs ahead of whoever tries. Iowa gets around this by having a 'caucus' instead of a vote.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:55
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:Yea SCOTUS is important. But again, unless you are in one of like 10 counties in like 8 states, you have zero influence on that nomination. You keep saying this and I am not sure why, because it isn't true. The swing state part is, but why do you keep tacking on that bit about the counties?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:56
|
|
|
WugLyfe posted:back to .2% with 1635/1683 Yeah I saw this as well. 1,633 of 1,681 precincts reporting Last updated: 11:52 p.m. Visit HuffPost Pollster for survey results from before the race. Although i think it's over for Sanders. Cause Polk is still reporting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:56
|
|
|
a cop posted:Look dude. There's no reason to hold out hope. Clinton "won" Iowa. But Sanders is still going to be awarded virtually half of the delegates. And you "won" a spot on my block list
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 10:54 |
|
|
Valliantstu posted:But then who will stand in the corner? We need to stand in corners to elect people who will then elect other people to elect the nominee! NOTHING ELSE MAKES SENSE. It's such a dark concept and doesn't allow convenient things like mail in ballots.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:56
|
|