|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 00:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:55 |
|
|
Trabant posted:Lowtax got a mention in one of the latest Imgur circlejerks: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
http://webm.host/c8a53/vid.webm
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 09:44
|
|
|
Trabant posted:Lowtax got a mention in one of the latest Imgur circlejerks: woah
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 11:35
|
|
|
idgi
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 12:02
|
|
|
Spudd posted:idgi It's not actually that esoteric. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephant_in_the_room
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 12:11
|
|
|
Memento posted:It's not actually that esoteric. Oh for fucks sake, I thought it was something like that but tumblr isn't meant to be clever
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 12:34
|
|
|
Spudd posted:idgi "Don't mention it" is a common reply to someone thanking you, to indicate that you don't require anything in return. An elephant in the room is an allegory for something you are aware of but avoid mentioning. Therefore "don't mention it" has a double meaning in the given context. E: Additionally, the joke itself becomes an "elephant in the room" when the first commenter does not understand it and doesn't get it explained to them, making it a triple-layered joke. Zulily Zoetrope has a new favorite as of 12:37 on Feb 1, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 12:35
|
|
|
That joke has Tim Vine written all over it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 13:16
|
|
|
PureRok posted:Beautiful More like "hi this is <every animal shelter/poor starving child advert ever> and we're going to ruin your holidays from October to January, during every commercial break, to guilt people into donating"
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 18:52
|
|
|
shame on you 
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 08:38
|
|
|
what episode is this
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 08:53
|
|
|
Ein cooler Typ posted:what episode is this I think it's one of the famed "Lost Episodes".
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 10:17
|
|
|
I keep seeing these two around the web, can someone explain?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
coleman francis posted:I keep seeing these two around the web, can someone explain? They tried to make a youtube video, but instead shat each other's pants.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 14:36
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:shat each other's pants.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 15:01
|
|
|
yeaahhhhh you complement that joke, tumblr hype man
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 16:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 16:52
|
|
|
 > mrw my poo poo just got hosed up e: Bonus Brendan 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 17:51
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, that poor man.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 19:15
|
|
|
That's shopped, right? RIGHT!?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 19:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpIu6OaLkh8
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 21:26
|
|
|
Good morning, doctor Freeman. I had a few messages for you, but we had a systems crash and I'm still trying to find my files.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 21:34
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
Didn't that game end up on Nintendo consoles? Did nobody sue?
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
Sinners Sandwich posted:Didn't that game end up on Nintendo consoles? Did nobody sue? quote:Thanks for reaching out and expressing your concerns. I tried to check out the thread, but since it's been archived you must pay $4.99 to view it. Also the Troll Face Guy got his IP lawyers on the dude
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmmQxXPOMMY
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
I just wanna say dat sum gud poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 22:50
|
|
|
Mogomra posted:
I feel for him. Wikipedia says the alimony payments are $900k a year and he hasn't had much notable work lately.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
Even if it's poo poo ironically, it's still poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 00:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
PLEASE STOP
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
coleman francis posted:I keep seeing these two around the web, can someone explain? They've made 80 trillion dollars from putting children in front of a TV and then prompting them to make wacky responses and then got steamed when everyone else on Youtube realized they could do the same thing
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
coleman francis posted:I keep seeing these two around the web, can someone explain? They're a lovely YouTube content factory that tried to copyright the concept of reaction videos and was sending takedown notices to people who have them on YouTube unless they gave them half of the ad money from it. This backfired horribly and they lost enough subscribers for their sponsors to take notice so they backpedaled with the usual "sorry you were offended" non-apology.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:55 |
|
|
It's like a visit to an Indian restaurant. Pure spiciness.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 01:55
|
|