|
Joementum posted:Good on Hillary to list off all the stuff that wasn't mentioned tonight because Chuck and Rachel wanted to get to the bottom of whether Obama is a "progressive". Yeah I have only been able to watch parts of this debate but it seemed genuinely crap with really not about the issues questions
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 11:44 |
|
|
Who chose these questions, Chuck?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Bad Caller posted:why not do everything I don't trust that campaign finance reform can be done in a meaningful way that doesn't also exclude, say, collective spending by unions.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Rexicon1 posted:I'm just being realistic about my politics. Like I said, p. dramatic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Arkane posted:this makes no sense What, exactly, would be easy to do
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Joementum posted:I don't trust that campaign finance reform can be done in a meaningful way that doesn't also exclude, say, collective spending by unions. What unions?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:What, exactly, would be easy to do you can do anything, if you put your mind to it!
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Joementum posted:I don't trust that campaign finance reform can be done in a meaningful way that doesn't also exclude, say, collective spending by unions. I mean I'm fine with unions losing that power too, so long as companies get hampered. Unions should just mobilize their people to donate to the candidate they think they'd want. Companies could too with its employees, so long as there's no strongarming.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Don't screw up
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Bernie looked so happy when he saw his wife. How sweet. Haha...
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
"Political revolution" JESUS CHRIST EXPLAIN HOW THIS WILL HAPPEN BERNIE.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Well thank god that's over
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Joementum posted:I don't trust that campaign finance reform can be done in a meaningful way that doesn't also exclude, say, collective spending by unions. Basically yeah. A lot of campaign finance that is not hedge funds, wall street, etc, is collectivized spending that is very much in the spirit of socialist electioneering. Railing against all of it as a whole is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Joementum posted:I don't trust that campaign finance reform can be done in a meaningful way that doesn't also exclude, say, collective spending by unions. supreme court will take care of that in a few months
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
"good evening im crhis matthews" whgat thefuck
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Rynn posted:"Political revolution" young people go out and vote people make grassroots support for candidates BAM
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
Rynn posted:"Political revolution" VOTING, duh
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
This was a terrible loving debate. Thanks MSNBC.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Bad Caller posted:I mean I'm fine with unions losing that power too, so long as companies get hampered. Unions should just mobilize their people to donate to the candidate they think they'd want. Companies could too with its employees, so long as there's no strongarming. Unions are already being completely destroyed both inside and out, don't take that away from them too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Yudo posted:What unions? The many ones that exist, and would be also hurt by broad 'campaign finance reform'. Bad Caller posted:I mean I'm fine with unions losing that power too, so long as companies get hampered. Unions should just mobilize their people to donate to the candidate they think they'd want. Companies could too with its employees, so long as there's no strongarming. Yea unions need less weight in politics in America, they should just take the hit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Rynn posted:"Political revolution" 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
we need a better  like a crying vehicle part, or a country without a written language until the late 19th century.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Rynn posted:"Political revolution" Well first we throw up some guillotines, and then anyone in a three piece suit get's a nice neck rest
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Rynn posted:"Political revolution" remeber the regan revolution? The gingrich revolution? its nothing new, its just only the conservatives do it
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Rynn posted:"Political revolution" 500,000 people with pitchforks outside of Mitch McConnel's office 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:Unions are already being completely destroyed both inside and out, don't take that away from them too. I mean in a Bernie government union strengthening would hopefully happen before you crushed union lobbying
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Chuck Todd bragging about how they did 30 days' debate prep work in 5 days. No, Chuck, I don't think you did.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
So who won?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:Seriously, I want you to answer this question honestly: Joementum hasn't uncomfortably pushed the idea of "lanes" when discussing the Republican race, so no.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
I'm voting based on hotness of wives.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Can't wait to hear Chris Matthews tell me how much Hillary swept the floor with Bernie for ambiguous reason.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Yudo posted:remeber the regan revolution? The gingrich revolution? its nothing new, its just only the conservatives do it Oh so he's going to be supporting downticket races even during the presidential race? Uh...someone should...tell him...
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Prorat posted:I'm voting based on hotness of wives. post bill in drag please
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Pick posted:This was a terrible loving debate. Combed Thunderclap posted:Chuck Todd bragging about how they did 30 days' debate prep work in 5 days.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Demonachizer posted:So who won? MSNBC
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Rexicon1 posted:Can't wait to hear Chris Matthews tell me how much Hillary swept the floor with Bernie for ambiguous reason. "HES A GOD drat SOCIALIST"
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Just an unreal level of poo poo in the questions, lighting, shooting, the whole bit
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Rynn posted:"Political revolution" Well, first you go out and vote. Thats basically it. Voter turnout is in the toilet in this country. Maybe wear red when you cast your vote so you can feel a little subversive? blue squares posted:VOTING, duh This but without sarcasm.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
Fix posted:Joementum hasn't uncomfortably pushed the idea of "lanes" when discussing the Republican race, so no. True, but maybe he's just throwing us off the trail. He loves the Iowa Caucuses and election history and random historical government facts.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 11:44 |
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Yea unions need less weight in politics in America, they should just take the hit. bring em back to the blair mountain glory days
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 05:10
|
|