|
Barry Shitpeas posted:LSV and Paul are going to get paired in the last round I'm guessing Paul would concede, since only lsv would be a lock for top 8
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 21:55 |
|
|
What is Magnus Lantto running exactly? I see Death's Shadow and Lightning Helix.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:09
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Saw SoI spoilers. Invasive Surgery is actually a legit eternal format sideboard card because it exiles the other copies even if it doesn't counter the original, besides being a strict upgrade over the already-sees-some-play Envelop. How does it ever not counter the original but still resolve so that that the Delerium ability happens? The Delerium abulity doesn't happen unless Invasive Surgery resolves, it's not like it's a "when you cast this spell" triggered ability or something. I guess it lets you surgically extra the other copies of an uncounterable spell as they're casting it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:I'm guessing Paul would concede, since only lsv would be a lock for top 8 They already played eachother so it can't happen...
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Ramos posted:What is Magnus Lantto running exactly? I see Death's Shadow and Lightning Helix. Suicide Zoo
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Entropic posted:How does it ever not counter the original but still resolve so that that the Delerium ability happens? The Delerium abulity doesn't happen unless Invasive Surgery resolves, it's not like it's a "when you cast this spell" triggered ability or something. Supreme Verdict comes to mind.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
lockdar posted:They already played eachother so it can't happen... That was in Limited
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Ramos posted:What is Magnus Lantto running exactly? I see Death's Shadow and Lightning Helix. That's probably Suicide Zoo. It usually runs Bolt instead of Lightning Helix tho
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
Barry Shitpeas posted:That was in Limited Ah, I thought that it counted for the entire modern tournament aswell. Sorry bout that!
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
Twitch Chat Lethal has been called.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Supreme Verdict comes to mind. Or Bosejui mana. Well my point is it's a strict upgrade to Envelop which already sees play with some interesting implications.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Or Bosejui mana. It has implications but I honestly dislike the card - the last thing we need are more extirpate/surgical/etc effects at 1 mana.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:25
|
|
|
Skyl3lazer posted:It has implications but I honestly dislike the card - the last thing we need are more extirpate/surgical/etc effects at 1 mana. Why? Those cards don't harm anything as it is.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Why? Those cards don't harm anything as it is. They're very swingy cards as is - you can completely disable a deck's ability to function because you happened to draw your sideboard card - and that effect is already why modern sucks as a format. If the 'solution' your deck has to another is "remove a card from being a play option" then you either A)Have it and win hands down or B) Don't have it and have no way to win
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:36
|
|
|
How many Modern decks rely on sorceries that hard, though? It's gonna be more of a Legacy thing, where Storm and Miracles exist and it can rip out Show and Tell.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
LSV drew into T8. https://twitter.com/lsv/status/696101132553195520 Though he typed in wrong! 12-3-1!
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
Pascal Maynard is a loving cheat.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
Entropic posted:I like what this set has done to Standard. It's actually managed to make me interested in Standard again before rotation. Can you link the decklist please?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
Apparently something is on fire at the Chicago scg so they just sent all of us outside. Combined with the 30 minutes hoogland was arguing with a judge this next round is never going to start. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
Sickening posted:Pascal Maynard is a loving cheat. What happened?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Bugsy posted:Apparently something is on fire at the Chicago scg so they just sent all of us outside. Combined with the 30 minutes hoogland was arguing with a judge this next round is never going to start. Hahaha Jeff Hoogland is awful
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
BJPaskoff posted:What happened? He hosed up his math during his turn and tried to get the judge to back the game up but untapped and lied to him about activating inkmoth
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
BJPaskoff posted:What happened? Side creatures sideways for attack step then untapped them to try his main phase over again. Equipped a creature and then pretended like he didn't. Just everything about his last match was scummy as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
Whoever is making that clicking noise is driving me insane
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
It was kind of embarrassing (Pascal). Not sure what he was hoping to accomplish given an entire audience of 30k people saw him, and, if I'm not mistaken, there'd still be a game 3 if he lost.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:Whoever is making that clicking noise is driving me insane Better watch out or that one guy will come in here and call you autistic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
rabidsquid posted:Better watch out or that one guy will come in here and call you autistic. Why do you care when people do annoying things?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:It was kind of embarrassing (Pascal). Not sure what he was hoping to accomplish given an entire audience of 30k people saw him, and, if I'm not mistaken, there'd still be a game 3 if he lost.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:It was kind of embarrassing (Pascal). Not sure what he was hoping to accomplish given an entire audience of 30k people saw him, and, if I'm not mistaken, there'd still be a game 3 if he lost. So is he going to eat a ban for it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:So is he going to eat a ban for it? Not sure how he could, he didn't even get a game loss.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Yeah and he actually ended up winning that third game. Did he have a chance of winning that game even if he was allowed to undo?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
Wait.. wizards made a magic candy crush game? What in the ever loving gently caress...
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
KidDynamite posted:Can you link the decklist please? I posted it in the Brewhaus thread. http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3744659&pagenumber=8#post455933521 I'm basically just tweaking a list that's been showing up around the edges of top8s the last few weeks. There's a version without the colorless stuff, but I think the Matter Reshaper version of the list is better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:So is he going to eat a ban for it? No he just looked like an rear end in a top hat asking a judge what he'd done so far. What he meant is "can I take back activating this Inkmoth" and the judge ruled nope.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
So the art on Structural Distortion and Fiery Temper are both Nahiri/Avacyn, right? She looks exactly the same in Structural Distortion as in the art for Fiery Temper sans wings.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:Wait.. wizards made a magic candy crush game? What in the ever loving gently caress... Puzzle Quest series has been doing this sort of thing with different franchises for a while now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
Skyl3lazer posted:They're very swingy cards as is - you can completely disable a deck's ability to function because you happened to draw your sideboard card - and that effect is already why modern sucks as a format. If the 'solution' your deck has to another is "remove a card from being a play option" then you either A)Have it and win hands down or B) Don't have it and have no way to win TL;DR: I don't want people Surgicaling my Life from the Loams. Maybe don't play a deck that only functions if you have one specific card if you don't want to lose to extraction effects.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
They need to reprint Stop That in black border.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
If this PT was standard there is almost no way we'd see a breakout deck like this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 21:55 |
|
|
jassi007 posted:If this PT was standard there is almost no way Wed see a breakout deck like this. I'm most curious how the PT would look with twin still in
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 00:03
|
|