|
MC Nietzche posted:That gibberish wasn't Spanish, which makes it even more hilarious. I didn't see that part, but that's hilarious if true. Never mind a scummy as hell debate tactic. Though given that Cruz's campaign falsified reports about Carson dropping out that's not all that surprising. Are any news agencies reporting on that yet? That seems like the sort of thing that'd go unnoticed by most people. And would even give Cruz a boost if it isn't reported on since it makes Rubio look like a dick. Archonex fucked around with this message at 05:15 on Feb 14, 2016 |
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 10:35 |
|
MC Nietzche posted:That gibberish wasn't Spanish, which makes it even more hilarious. wait seriously? Lmfao if true
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:12 |
|
If Cruz's Spanish was actually nonsense that will be a huge narrative.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:13 |
|
Twitter is saying that it was spanish. Just extremely mangled to the point of being incomprehensible. Which kind of says that Rubio was right, actually.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:14 |
|
https://twitter.com/TheDemocrats/status/698720035657883648
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:14 |
|
Meg From Family Guy posted:wait seriously? Lmfao if true https://twitter.com/aurabogado/status/698706493084794880
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:14 |
|
Kro-Bar posted:If Cruz's Spanish was actually nonsense that will be a huge narrative. In a general election, yeah. But in a primary with the current GOP base it's a positive boon.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:15 |
|
Amazing. I'll go back to posting "X is not wrong" tomorrow but this debate was too juicy to pass up on
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:16 |
|
Let's focus on the issues here. https://twitter.com/grovernorquist/status/698715976351797248
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:20 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:Let's focus on the issues here. Did I fall alseep and miss 10 million Americans becoming superheroes? That seems like it would at least make CNN.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:21 |
|
Kro-Bar posted:If Cruz's Spanish was actually nonsense that will be a huge narrative. He said "Why don't you say it again now"
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:21 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/davesterrett/status/698723291884748802 Interesting if this narrative catches on.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:22 |
|
Goddamnit, I forgot about the debate tonight. Will have to find a youtube upload. Also, good loving riddance Scalia
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:24 |
|
Hope they get Biden out on the talk shows talking about he confirmed Reagan's SC nominee in early 1988. What kind of pressure is going to be applied to blue/purple state GOP senators? I've got to think that the Maine GOP senators, Kirk and etc can't get away with blocking an Obama SC nomination if the messaging is done correctly by Obama.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:27 |
|
Mitt Romney posted:Hope they get Biden out on the talk shows talking about he confirmed Reagan's SC nominee in early 1988. Does it even matter? Grassley and McConnell can keep any nomination from ever reaching the floor of the senate.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:30 |
|
Trump told everyone Jeb was going to moon them. Now, if you didn't watch the debate, you might think I am making a humorous quip here. I am not https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfc0okwA2OM&t=110s by the way, Trump making GBS threads on Jeb earlier in that video is great too
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:32 |
|
smg77 posted:Does it even matter? Grassley and McConnell can keep any nomination from ever reaching the floor of the senate. I'm assuming that Senators will still be held accountable for not publicly stating/asking McConnell to bring up the confirmation. In CO, WI, IL, NV, KY I am hopeful it can be damaging for their reelection prospects to even be a GOP senator during the blocking. Mitt Romney fucked around with this message at 05:35 on Feb 14, 2016 |
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:33 |
|
Mitt Romney posted:I'm assuming that Senators will still be held accountable I mean I wish we lived in a country where that was true but congressional approval ratings have been scraping the bottom of the barrel for years and there's no sign of it improving any time soon. I guess those senators could make some half-hearted noise but if McConnell wants to obstruct that's not going to be enough to stop him.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:45 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:Let's focus on the issues here.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:45 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:He said "Why don't you say it again now" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bk4pCXwkbY quote:Cruz said this to Rubio in Spanish: "Marco, si quiere, díselo ahora mismo, ahora mismo díselo ahora, en español, si quiere." Good Cuban accent.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:49 |
|
This fuckin' election man. This is just all so insane. Writers for The Onion have basically given up trying to make up outlandish poo poo to skewer political reality. The Scalia piece was funny, don't get me wrong, but they just can't out-crazy the crazies anymore with their articles. All they've got left is hanging on for the wild ride and making comments about what is actually happening. Even white hot sphere of pure rage isn't absurd anymore, it's just a description of reality.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:53 |
|
Yeah, missed it on first play but on that replay it's pretty good spanish. Surprised, since Cruz has claimed his spanish is terrible when he was running for senate. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1678902735001/ted-cruz-on-spanish-debate/#sp=show-clips (1:00 mark)
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:53 |
|
Mitt Romney posted:Hope they get Biden out on the talk shows talking about he confirmed Reagan's SC nominee in early 1988. He's technically President of the Senate. I want him at every Senate session in the President's chair making WTF expressions when there isn't call to confirm Obama's nominee.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 05:54 |
|
Interesting. I wonder why Spanish speaking pundits said it was gibberish, maybe it was mangled just enough live.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:00 |
|
smg77 posted:Does it even matter? Grassley and McConnell can keep any nomination from ever reaching the floor of the senate. I wish Grassley hadn't gone full shithead. Just like every grandpa in Iowa.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:02 |
|
MC Nietzche posted:Interesting. I wonder why Spanish speaking pundits said it was gibberish, maybe it was mangled just enough live. It was mangled because Cruz kept referring to himself as "he" and instead of I or me.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:05 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:It was mangled because Cruz kept referring to himself as "he" and instead of I or me. Ah, so the grammar was bad. Thanks.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:05 |
|
dimelo not diselo, yeah e: unless it's "tell them"
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:06 |
|
At this point in time, I have precisely no idea what will end up happening in the GOP primary, and I love that.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:07 |
|
SCALIA'S DEAD SCALIA'S DEAD I DON'T CARE THAT YA'LL WERE POSTING ABOUT IT TWENTY PAGES AGO I JUST GOT HOME FROM WORK AND SCALIA'S FUKKEN DEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:07 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:It was mangled because Cruz kept referring to himself as "he" and instead of I or me. Depends. If he was referring to the moderator that might be more correct. Still, it's passable. 1stGear posted:SCALIA'S DEAD SCALIA'S DEAD I DON'T CARE THAT YA'LL WERE POSTING ABOUT IT TWENTY PAGES AGO I JUST GOT HOME FROM WORK AND SCALIA'S FUKKEN DEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:08 |
We need a Scalia's greatest hits post or two, you know in celebration.
|
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:09 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:dimelo not diselo, yeah Nah. Rubio said "You don't even speak spanish! How could you tell if I was lying?" Cruz tried to say "Marco, why don't you ask me again right now? Ask me again in Spanish if you want to." Instead he said, "Marco, if you like, say it to him right now, right now say to him, in Spanish, if you like."
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:09 |
|
OAquinas posted:Now we know why so many others died earlier this year. Scalia would not go cheaply. This is the universe paying us back after so cruelly taking David Bowie
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:13 |
|
Mitt Romney posted:I'm assuming that Senators will still be held accountable for not publicly stating/asking McConnell to bring up the confirmation. I think you will be surprised how little voters will respond to claims that the GOP is blocking a SCOTUS nomination.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:15 |
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:I think you will be surprised how little voters will respond to claims that the GOP is blocking a SCOTUS nomination. We know.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:16 |
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:We know. I know I've repeated myself a number of times on the issue, but people continue to hold out hope otherwise.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:18 |
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:I think you will be surprised how little voters will respond to claims that the GOP is blocking a SCOTUS nomination. I'm not so certain. "GOP is doing procedural bad thing" ok sure. But tie it to abortion, that whoever sits in that chair will either push the anti choice movement back a generation or be one to effectively end Roe v Wade, do it in an election where we've already got the topic so hyped people are being murdered after rhetoric from candidates, and have a woman at the top of the ticket for one party then I think it can matter a lot to get turnout going.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:22 |
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:I know I've repeated myself a number of times on the issue, but people continue to hold out hope otherwise. For like the vast majority of America the biggest beacon of social change, for better or for worse, has been rulings from the SCOTUS. All you need to say is 'these fucks wanna wait a YEAR to get the 9th seat filled because they think that means they'll be sure to get an anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-voting rights, and anti-union guy in it.'
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:27 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 10:35 |
|
This is neither here nor there, but good for some perspective. While I think it's a great thing that Scalia has passed, the posters in this thread are such hypocritical assholes when it comes to people dying and their moral highgrounds. I don't think you'd have to go back very far in previous threads to find a dogpile about someone being happy that someone died, and it happened to me once.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2016 06:28 |