|
theultimo posted:add ons and possibly flash on mobile die fucktard (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 00:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 13:16 |
|
|
The FuckTard, The.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
Smythe posted:The FuckTard, The. igi
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
Ludwig van Halen posted:Oculus Founder: Rift will come to Mac if Apple ever releases a good computer oh no we will miss out on all of the rifts non-videogame applications such as
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
poty posted:oh no we will miss out on all of the rifts non-videogame applications such as porn
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 04:23
|
|
|
someone repost that link in 5 years so we can contrast it with pleas to allow third party hardware to be used with apple VR
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
Oculus Founder: I will wear shoes if anyone ever releases a good shoe
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 05:08
|
|
|
i'm really shocked that a system that's hemorrhaging money might try to save costs by not developing for a platform that doesn't have the hardware to support them anyway
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 06:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jamescomeyfbi/status/705527535044440064 (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
Larry Parrish posted:What's surprising, is that my desktop PC which has the resources to just keep a cached copy of my browser history from 5 minutes ago will reload a fresh page for no reason when I hit back, but my iPhone decides I really wanted to see whatever it wrote into the cache file last week instead of a fresh copy that I looked at 30 seconds ago You're probably holding it wrong because no iphone of mine ever did that
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
theultimo posted:trip report: safari with the easylist content blocker is by far the best but icab mobile is also good if you're a retard autist that needs a billion customization options for a goddamn web browser
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 08:19
|
|
puffin is such poo poo
|
bread and circuitses
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 08:22
|
|
|
Stux posted:i dont know why youd want a third party browser when mobile safari absolutely destroys any other mobile browser. chrome on android is so far behind its ridiculous. is the "find in page" functionality still in the loving address bar in safari? because that is the most idiotic ui decision ever anywhere.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 08:37
|
|
|
Wheany posted:is the "find in page" functionality still in the loving address bar in safari? because that is the most idiotic ui decision ever anywhere. no its in the share menu (or whatever it's actually called)
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 09:07
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:no it's in both actually also have no issue with using it from the address bar. honestly don't understand the complaint
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 13:40
|
|
|
Seeing as I have memorized every piece of UI or arcane hand motion in iOS, really don't see how anyone could complain. It's extremely intuitive when you never have to think about what to do, because your sperg retard brain has already memorized it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 13:41
|
|
|
Stux posted:also have no issue with using it from the address bar. honestly don't understand the complaint Well maybe not anymore, when you've learned the stupid god drat place they put the function in. But the first time you wanted to find something in the page and there just doesn't seem to be a button or menu entry for it and you have to google it. I mean i guess you could also bookmark pages by typing "bookmark this" into the address field and it would work fine. It would still be a dumb ui for it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 13:58
|
|
|
the first time i wanted to search for something on a page i typed it into the bar used for searching and it worked
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 14:11
|
|
|
"wait ur telling me i can also run a google search from the address bar without going to google.com first? this doesnt make any logical sense. my CPU is burning out at this ridiculously illogical idea. beep. boop." (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
nevermind that actually doing a search in safari for how to search on the same page will reveal the "on this page" section of the address bar as you're typing it in
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
Stux posted:nevermind that actually doing a search in safari for how to search on the same page will reveal the "on this page" section of the address bar as you're typing it in It doesn't make sense when Find is on text highlight in literally every other iOS app.
|
|
#
?
Mar 4, 2016 15:31
|
|
|
Stux posted:nevermind that actually doing a search in safari for how to search on the same page will reveal the "on this page" section of the address bar as you're typing it in shut up idiot its bad and you're bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 07:42
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:shut up idiot its bad and you're bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
it's actually fine though. that's like the nitpickiest thing to complain about
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:So anyone know anything else about the Transmission.app ransomware update? Because I'm just seeing that "an update installed ransomware" but nothing about why the and how widespread it is
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
lol i thought the update release notes sounded like bullshit just checked and im still on 2.8.4. the update to 2.9 is installed but i didnt restart it
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
btw macrumors says Users who updated within the app are fine. Only direct downloads from the site were affected.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2016 21:18
|
|
|
quote:WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday refused to review an appeals court’s determination that Apple had conspired with book publishers to raise the prices of digital books.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
eat poo poo, apple
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 17:00
|
|
|
I wish amazon hadn't caved to publishers wrt ebook pricing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 17:00
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:I wish amazon hadn't caved to publishers wrt ebook pricing. how did Amazon cave? they are in the supreme position here. Apple gave them a way out and they immediately hosed themselves
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 18:16
|
|
|
amazon was pricing ebooks themselves and now they let publishers price them
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 18:23
|
|
|
because the publishers were gonna pull their books which means that the ebook market isnt really that big or important really nothing else has taken off in the disruptive way that digital music has. even netflix has to fight tooth and nail for its content and its missing a ton of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 20:53
|
|
|
they weren't gonna pull their books and if they did amazon could just stop offering them in print outside of mass market paperback reselling.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
the absolute worst was hearing hack writers get up and stump for the publishers about how amazon was going to ruin books forever (by making them cheaper and more accessible then at any point in human history)
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
amazon folded because the publishers have more leverage. its really not that hard to find another shop on google when amazon doesnt have the book you want. hell and who knows maybe you like that other shop better and buy your books there from now on
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 21:48
|
|
|
i have no data on this but i believe that the amount of people who happen to buy a book on amazon just because its the first google result is a lot bigger than youd think
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
maybe. idk either. I do know I hate expensive ebooks
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
amazon also has an effective monopoly in the us on e-readers, is it even possible to put a google book on one of the e-ink kindles?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 13:16 |
|
|
if its any standard format you can.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2016 21:58
|
|