|
Perhaps the only thing better than a win for each candidate tonight would be for Cruz to sweep tonight.
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 02:58 |
|
|
If those late decider numbers are right Kasich needs to be within 7-8 with early deciders. Really, really doubt that was the case. Looks like a 10 point trump win to me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
thethreeman posted:Interesting for Kasich MI, but not sure that lead is enough? Hard to tell without knowing what % that represents and whether it's the last few days, last week etc.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
It's going to be Kasich/Cruz/Trump in Michigan. I don't know this with facts, I know it with my gut. Catch the wave! #kasichmentum
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Kasich/Cruz/Trump would be great for my bank account
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
So I've got 200 shares of Kasich Yes in Michigan, 384 in the queue for Rubio in Idaho, and I'm waiting on Cruz to do well early to finish out my arbitration in Hawaii where I should be guaranteed at least $120 if I get the Cruz NO I'm asking for. If Kasich somehow wins Michigan and Hawaii I'm having a fantastic night.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
That poll of late deciders, how much of the electorate did that make? Trump's lost among late deciders in every single race so far (or just about).
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
Well I think Trump also tends to get the "most certain of their decision" voters in those polls, though; something like 80% of Trump voters say they are unswayable.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
JosefStalinator posted:That poll of late deciders, how much of the electorate did that make? Trump's lost among late deciders in every single race so far (or just about). unclear but the last week was 37%, which if you do the math on that most broad interpretation of late deciders, it suggests kasich needs to be within single digits of trump among non late deciders
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 01:24
|
|
|
Sitting tonight out except for a small trump.no in MI, gla
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
well here's hoping those ms exit polls are off
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
Abel Wingnut posted:well here's hoping those ms exit polls are off
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
wow, I just bailed hard on Cruz in Mississippi
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
Hillary in Michigan is on sale
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
HOLY poo poo MICHIGAN AGGGGGGGGHHHHH
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
Michigan Hillary YES down to 70 cents. I'm not dumb in thinking that's easy money right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
Ohh boy....don't let me down hilldog
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
Looking good for Trump in MI /MS tbqh.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Michigan Hillary YES down to 70 cents. I'm not dumb in thinking that's easy money right? Probably free money. Mostly rural precincts reporting.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Michigan Hillary YES down to 70 cents. I'm not dumb in thinking that's easy money right? No, she'll probably win. But maybe it'll be closer, and could be a nailbiter.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Honestly, you guys should be getting in MO for Trump. He has rolled in the South and the Ozarks are likely to go heavily for him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
L-Boned posted:Honestly, you guys should be getting in MO for Trump. He has rolled in the South and the Ozarks are likely to go heavily for him.  Racism = Trump prevails again.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
a cop posted:
It's ok if it makes me money. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
L-Boned posted:Honestly, you guys should be getting in MO for Trump. He has rolled in the South and the Ozarks are likely to go heavily for him. Yeah, I bet against Trump today (  Michigan), and am betting for Trump in Missouri
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
On the other hand, if Kucinich somehow pulls this off...
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
I have several hundred shares of bernie yes in michigan. praise be
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
Guess I should've waited til the MI results started coming in to max out. Vox Nihili calling it for Sanders in the comments section with 5% in.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
Sylink posted:I have several hundred shares of bernie yes in michigan. Uhhhh...
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
I'm flipping Bernie Michigan shares like 
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:40
|
|
|
should i buy more bernie NO
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
Just like other states, Bernie-friendly results are coming in first from small rural precincts. Detroit and Flint will come in last and Hillary will dominate those. Think Bernie's lead right now is far too narrow to survive that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
FourLeaf posted:should i buy more bernie NO I've been very risk adverse so I'm not, but probably. A way disproportionate number of votes are from Oakland county and Detroit and Flint are not reporting yet.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
the only thing preventing me from dumping everything into trump yes MO is rubio dropping out before then
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
Peachstapler posted:Guess I should've waited til the MI results started coming in to max out. You and me both. There's not even any meaningful Wayne co vote yet, and I could have made so much more
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
I forgot I had a bunch of Bernie No in Michigan. Too bad I didn't wait to buy it until tonight.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
Just made 550 dollars on Hillary in Michigan. Flipping is the poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:49
|
|
|
Idaho was an incredible steal at 15 yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 02:49
|
|
|
welp my Cruz MS and Kasich MI lottery tickets failed me tonight
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
DDHQ calls Michigan for Hillary https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/707385496826093569
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 02:58 |
|
|
FourLeaf posted:DDHQ calls Michigan for Hillary and yet bernie prices still rise. lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2016 03:02
|
|