Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to
This is a pretty good parody of Milo's writing style
http://www.pointandclickbait.com/2016/03/milo-yiannopoulos-locked-out-of-car/

It's going to be amusing in the general seeing Trump try to court evangelicals.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



twistedmentat posted:

This is a pretty good parody of Milo's writing style
http://www.pointandclickbait.com/2016/03/milo-yiannopoulos-locked-out-of-car/

It's going to be amusing in the general seeing Trump try to court evangelicals.

This is perfect

The dig at the end about him not being verified anymore is great

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

MaxxBot posted:

I had previously thought that the evangelical Trump voters just liked how he packaged economic populism with nationalism and didn't care as much about Trump's personal life. I was listening to Mike Gallagher this morning and he was talking about how some of his devout evangelical friends voted Trump for the same reason I voted for him, to completely and utterly destroy the GOP. Some of these guys hate the GOPe so much that they have made a calculated decision to go with Trump over Cruz to just burn this motherfucker down. They understand that Trump personally is a sleazy person but are simply using him as a means to a desired end, like the ironic Trump voters here have. It would be interesting to know how much of the evangelicals are actually pro-Trump and how many are spite voting.

I suspect that the vast majority of Trump's voters are spite voters to at least some extent. Like, 90%+.

Hulk Krogan
Mar 25, 2005



Intel&Sebastian posted:

Does anyone here really believe that Obama wouldn't have been attacked, with about the same fervor, if he had attended?

Something something photo op argle bargle.

Geostomp
Oct 22, 2008

Unite: MASH!!
~They've got the bad guys on the run!~

Celador posted:

A friend of mine posted this on Facebook:


I'm too lazy to fact check it because, like most people, I don't give a gently caress about events the President does or does not attend. Also, it seems that it's the sitting First Lady that traditionally attends First Lady funerals. This time is different because

Because it is indirectly connected to Regan (Hallowed be His name) and it's both an election year and he's trying to put in a replacement Supreme Court Justice.

Intel&Sebastian
Oct 20, 2002

colonel...
i'm trying to sneak around
but i'm dummy thicc
and the clap of my ass cheeks
keeps alerting the guards!

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

I suspect that the vast majority of Trump's voters are spite voters to at least some extent. Like, 90%+.

But what percent of that is spite for the GOP and not just general spite against their own country?

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Intel&Sebastian posted:

But what percent of that is spite for the GOP and not just general spite against their own country?

A whole lot or even most, I would say. Open defiance of Reagan-Thatcher movement conservatism is a real and growing ideological undercurrent, I think. The bigots were sold a bill of goods by Reagan and Bush and are finally fed up

Zanzibar Ham
Mar 17, 2009

You giving me the cold shoulder? How cruel.


Grimey Drawer
It has nothing to do with Reagan and everything to do with Obama. Pretty much every incidental thing Obama does or doesn't do is an offense to these people, no matter how many other presidents did or didn't do those exact same things.

Will there be a Pizzagate when President Trump eats a pizza with a fork and knife? I somehow doubt it.

Mc Do Well
Aug 2, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

Zanzibar Ham posted:

Will there be a Pizzagate when President Trump eats a pizza with a fork and knife? I somehow doubt it.

NEVER because he eats it with his LARGE HANDS like A MAN

Takoluka
Jun 26, 2009

Don't look at me!



twistedmentat posted:

This is a pretty good parody of Milo's writing style
http://www.pointandclickbait.com/2016/03/milo-yiannopoulos-locked-out-of-car/

It's going to be amusing in the general seeing Trump try to court evangelicals.

This is heartwarmingly good.

Shalebridge Cradle
Apr 23, 2008


This is quite possibly the most amazing article I've seen on a right wing media site. It manages to link the left and acceptance of transgender people with furries, the WTO protests in 1999 and the Arab spring. Its a thing of incoherent beauty.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/the-latest-deviancy-theyre-trying-to-mainstream/#AhlcMtFRmOy3hRlg.99

quote:

That is, after all, what the push toward societal acceptance – be it for furries, “otherkin,” “bronies,” transgenders, or some other sexually delusional perversion – is all about. If masculinity is the fuel on which society runs, on which innovation occurs, on which industries are built and on which wars are fought to protect a free people, then feminism, liberalism, furries, bronies, transgenders and the Star Wars cantina of progressive freaks with body image issues and self-esteem deficits is the sugar in society’s gas tank. Progressives hate themselves, so they invent new sexual personas and new deviancies to keep themselves entertained. Liberals hate families and decency, so they champion sexual perversion and child molestation while holding it up as viable “other” sexuality.

Republicans
Oct 14, 2003

- More money for us

- Fuck you


I'm starting to hear radio ads for something called a Squatty Potty. The premise of the ad is that Hillary Clinton is late joining a debate with Sanders and Trump because she had trouble peeing.

This loving election.

twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to

Epic High Five posted:

This is perfect

The dig at the end about him not being verified anymore is great

Yea, that's the cherry on the sundae.

There's that cartoon of the woman falling over and going "Patriarchy!"; It's more like a guy falling over going 'Feminists!'. This is Milo's way of looking at things.

This keeps popping up on Facebook
http://gizmodo.com/lawmakers-in-west-virginia-celebrate-legalization-of-ra-1763798946
Wasn't it 2008 where people wanted Raw Milk added to the official Republican Party platform? I can understand hippy dippy "it came from mother earths womb so its good for me" kinds saying that raw milk helps realign your vibrations to the indigo spectrum, but what makes right wingers so obsessed with it? It it because its free from big evil food safety regulations which take away the taste of freedom (and E. Coli)?

Sharkie
Feb 4, 2013

by Fluffdaddy

Shalebridge Cradle posted:

This is quite possibly the most amazing article I've seen on a right wing media site. It manages to link the left and acceptance of transgender people with furries, the WTO protests in 1999 and the Arab spring. Its a thing of incoherent beauty.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/the-latest-deviancy-theyre-trying-to-mainstream/#AhlcMtFRmOy3hRlg.99

I wonder what name he uses when he posts in gbs.

Hulk Krogan
Mar 25, 2005



Republicans posted:

I'm starting to hear radio ads for something called a Squatty Potty. The premise of the ad is that Hillary Clinton is late joining a debate with Sanders and Trump because she had trouble peeing.

This loving election.

But the squatty potty is for pooping.

Senf
Nov 12, 2006

Hulk Krogan posted:

But the squatty potty is for pooping.

And it works well :colbert:

Shalebridge Cradle
Apr 23, 2008


Sharkie posted:

I wonder what name he uses when he posts in gbs.

That's where I found the link :furcry:

baw
Nov 5, 2008

RESIDENT: LAISSEZ FAIR-SNEZHNEVSKY INSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY
How is Crowder taking Fiorina's endorsement of Trump?

Rick_Hunter
Jan 5, 2004

My guys are still fighting the hard fight!
(weapons, shields and drones are still online!)

baw posted:

How is Crowder taking Fiorina's endorsement of Trump?

Probably pretty well since she's endorsing Cruz.

baw
Nov 5, 2008

RESIDENT: LAISSEZ FAIR-SNEZHNEVSKY INSTITUTE FOR FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY
Oh good for him!

Rick_Hunter
Jan 5, 2004

My guys are still fighting the hard fight!
(weapons, shields and drones are still online!)
Bless his heart

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Dapper_Swindler posted:

thats horrible but it doesnt make senses? to me at least. its probaly something awful.


I think he means people would lose there poo poo and get offended by it online. but i doubt that since there are much more "vulgar" shows out there nowa days and no one gives a poo poo except for few peon prudes on both sides of the fence, crowder included.

Seriously, a better example of "no way could they make a show like that today" would be All in the Family, a show famous primarily for it's portrayal of a conservative, lower middle class, bigoted, close minded conservative Christian. Archie Bunker sounds a lot like modern RWM figures and even some GOP political candidates. Here's his stance on gun control and airline safety:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lDb0Dn8OXE

I could imagine that coming out of the mouths of at least half of the GOP field.

FuzzySkinner posted:

They always back track and go

"Well I believe that it's the state's right to decide"

That or "why should 'group x' get special rights? I hear that one a lot. And by "special", they're referring o the same basic rights afforded to any human being.

BiggerBoat fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Mar 10, 2016

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.

Celador posted:

A friend of mine posted this on Facebook:


I'm too lazy to fact check it because, like most people, I don't give a gently caress about events the President does or does not attend. Also, it seems that it's the sitting First Lady that traditionally attends First Lady funerals. This time is different because

It's a very small group of 44 members (oddly enough, with the remarriages while in office the numbers balance out for all the unmarried/widowed presidents!), so "Traditional" is a bit more of a guideline than a rule.

That said, yep, for Recent History sitting presidents don't attend FL funerals. Former presidents can and have attended, however, as do Sitting First Ladies.

Push El Burrito
May 9, 2006

Soiled Meat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc1hL6ikq9Q

twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to
So in Canada, we are starting to have a Tea Party of our own.

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/moose-calls-and-misspelled-signs-what-i-learned-at-the-kudatah?utm_source=vicefbca

Yes, they call themselves the Kudatah, because they're ignorant white people from rural Alberta, they don't realize that its spelt coup d'etat.

Lucky we don't have a serious right wing media, outside of the Sun, which will always choose the bigoted side of any argument.

Spun Dog
Sep 21, 2004


Smellrose

twistedmentat posted:

So in Canada, we are starting to have a Tea Party of our own.

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/moose-calls-and-misspelled-signs-what-i-learned-at-the-kudatah?utm_source=vicefbca

Yes, they call themselves the Kudatah, because they're ignorant white people from rural Alberta, they don't realize that its spelt coup d'etat.

Lucky we don't have a serious right wing media, outside of the Sun, which will always choose the bigoted side of any argument.

Fun fact, Tea Partiers down here originally called themselves Tea Baggers. They get mad when you call them that now.

Xanderkish
Aug 10, 2011

Hello!

I have spread this to my buddies on Twitter and now many more people are knowing the joy of this. Thank you so much, friend.

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:

MizPiz posted:

Whenever I hear "classy" I always picture a mcmansion filled with animal print furniture and gold painted decorations. I have nothing else to add to that.

This is pretty much it. Levin was fellating St. Reagan's corpse a few days back, and it was stunning how he bent over backwards to depict Jimmy Carter being down to earth and humble as a negative thing. "People don't want a President that carries their own luggage."

Also, somehow Jimmy Carter managed to ruin the interior of the White House or something. I think that was the conservative justification for the Reagans needing to redecorate everything. Mostly it was just that the Carters didn't see the point in spending the money to re-do poo poo they felt was perfectly serviceable and elegant already.

Don't believe anyone who tries to tell you that Nancy Reagan had good taste or a good eye or something, though. That's hagiographic bullshit. She had fairly pedestrian rich old lady taste, and she felt entitled to spew it all over the White House.


Such class! Such style! Silver TV trays and overstuffed everything.


Apparently Nancy Reagan was a big fan of the classic Hitchcock film, The Birds. The caption that goes with this reads, in part, "Bill and Hillary Clinton were not a fan of this wallpaper."

quote:

Of course, not everyone was enamored with Reagan and Graber’s West Coast taste. Longtime White House Curator Clement Conger once told The Washington Post that the Yellow Oval Room on the second floor used to be “an extremely beautiful room,” decorated by Jacqueline Kennedy with fine French antiques, which the Nixons augmented with “even finer furnishings” appropriate to the Federal era.

“Mrs. Reagan and her decorator, Ted Graber, who knew nothing about American period houses, turned the Yellow Room and most of the second floor into ‘California rooms,’ ” Conger said. “They replaced many antiques with 20th-century overstuffed sofas, which are not correct for the room, and, as everybody knows, are too low and hard to get out of.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...1910_story.html

ErIog fucked around with this message at 01:39 on Mar 10, 2016

Klaus88
Jan 23, 2011

Violence has its own economy, therefore be thoughtful and precise in your investment

ErIog posted:

This is pretty much it. Levin was fellating St. Reagan's corpse a few days back, and it was stunning how he bent over backwards to depict Jimmy Carter being down to earth and humble as a negative thing. "People don't want a President that carries their own luggage."

Also, somehow Jimmy Carter managed to ruin the interior of the White House or something. I think that was the conservative justification for the Reagans needing to redecorate everything. Mostly it was just that the Carters didn't see the point in spending the money to re-do poo poo they felt was perfectly serviceable and elegant already.

Don't believe anyone who tries to tell you that Nancy Reagan had good taste or a good eye or something, though. That's hagiographic bullshit. She had fairly pedestrian rich old lady taste, and she felt entitled to spew it all over the White House.


Such class! Such style! Silver TV trays and overstuffed everything.


Apparently Nancy Reagan was a big fan of the classic Hitchcock film, The Birds. The caption that goes with this reads, in part, "Bill and Hillary Clinton were not a fan of this wallpaper."

The horror... the horror!

Rick_Hunter
Jan 5, 2004

My guys are still fighting the hard fight!
(weapons, shields and drones are still online!)

As garish as the decor is I still think they look like a cute couple in the former picture and hope I can look the same in 40 years. :3:

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:

Klaus88 posted:

The horror... the horror!

I don't really give a poo poo about White House decor, either, but I think it's a useful demonstration of the fact that the entire Nancy Reagan narrative is just conservatives desperately wanting their own Jackie Kennedy figure. I don't know how you square, "She brought class back to the white house." with pictures of her and Ronnie eating from loving TV trays with her feet on the chair. Yeah, it's a cute photo, but it's not the version of the Reagans the right wing has spent the last 30 years peddling.

If that photo depicted the Obamas, with modern decor, you know the entire right wing would waste a week in a tantrum about how the Reagans would have never been so classless as to eat anywhere but the dining room dressed in their Sunday best with finishing school posture and etiquette that would make Emily Post jealous.

ErIog fucked around with this message at 02:00 on Mar 10, 2016

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually

ErIog posted:


Apparently Nancy Reagan was a big fan of the classic Hitchcock film, The Birds. The caption that goes with this reads, in part, "Bill and Hillary Clinton were not a fan of this wallpaper."
It looks like loving Shelob's Lair from Lord of the Rings.

TheOneAndOnlyT
Dec 18, 2005

Well well, mister fancy-pants, I hope you're wearing your matching sweater today, or you'll be cut down like the ugly tree you are.

twistedmentat posted:

It's going to be amusing in the general seeing Trump try to court evangelicals.
Trump is already winning with evangelicals; just look at his results in the deep South. One of the things that we're learning about evangelicals this election is that they don't give a gently caress about Christianity--they just vote for the guy who's most openly racist. I don't think they're the people Trump needs to court.

Xand_Man
Mar 2, 2004

If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous


Spun Dog posted:

Fun fact, Tea Partiers down here originally called themselves Tea Baggers. They get mad when you call them that now.

A fitting name, since they are the angry ethnic slur shouting 12-year-olds of our democracy.

Chimera-gui
Mar 20, 2014
loving Bill O'Reilly talking about how Trump is being painted as a fascist by liberals which is hurting the right despite the fact that the Right's been fascist for decades, it's only now that we're actually calling them out on the fact thanks to Trump exposing their true nature to the public.

beatlegs
Mar 11, 2001

Chimera-gui posted:

loving Bill O'Reilly talking about how Trump is being painted as a fascist by liberals which is hurting the right despite the fact that the Right's been fascist for decades, it's only now that we're actually calling them out on the fact thanks to Trump exposing their true nature to the public.

On a related note Rubio is on MSNBC right now poo poo talking Sanders because he's a socialist, saying if you want a socialist America then vote D, while oblivious to the fact that America is already largely socialist & has been for many decades.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
So I'm currently arguing with a guy who is sending me links from Prager "University"'s youtube channel.

Other than the fact that its neither a University and is run by David Prager, any good criticisms I can level?

Vintersorg
Mar 3, 2004

President of
the Brendan Fraser
Fan Club



Donald Trump Mocks NBC’s Peter Alexander: ‘You’re So Beautiful’

http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/donald-trump-mocks-nbcs-peter-alexander-youre-so-beautiful/286780

"Oh, you’re so politically correct. You’re so beautiful. Oh, look at you. Awwww. Aw, he’s so. Oh, I know. You’ve never heard a little bad, a little off, language. I know, you’re so perfect. Aren’t you perfect. Aren’t you just a perfect young man. Give me a break. You know what? It’s stuff like that that people in this country are tired of. It’s stuff like that."

https://www.facebook.com/nbcnightlynews/

Trump basically questioned for swearing on the trail in his latest ad and he responds with that. What the hell.

"Yo Shinzo you slant eyed mother fucker, hows it going?"

"Putin, you fucker - im coming for ya!"

"David Camerson - you English fag"

"...hey hey, it's so PC, it's so PC"

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

This does not make sense when, again, aggregate indicia also indicate improvements. The belief that things are worse is false. It remains false.

twistedmentat posted:

This keeps popping up on Facebook
http://gizmodo.com/lawmakers-in-west-virginia-celebrate-legalization-of-ra-1763798946
Wasn't it 2008 where people wanted Raw Milk added to the official Republican Party platform? I can understand hippy dippy "it came from mother earths womb so its good for me" kinds saying that raw milk helps realign your vibrations to the indigo spectrum, but what makes right wingers so obsessed with it? It it because its free from big evil food safety regulations which take away the taste of freedom (and E. Coli)?

You are largely correct, Big Government and Industrial Farms with their Harmful Pasteurization. Pasteurization does reduce the vitamin content of some foods, but not in a way or to a degree that's signficant for human consumers.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Xanderkish
Aug 10, 2011

Hello!

Vintersorg posted:

Donald Trump Mocks NBC’s Peter Alexander: ‘You’re So Beautiful’

http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/donald-trump-mocks-nbcs-peter-alexander-youre-so-beautiful/286780

"Oh, you’re so politically correct. You’re so beautiful. Oh, look at you. Awwww. Aw, he’s so. Oh, I know. You’ve never heard a little bad, a little off, language. I know, you’re so perfect. Aren’t you perfect. Aren’t you just a perfect young man. Give me a break. You know what? It’s stuff like that that people in this country are tired of. It’s stuff like that."

https://www.facebook.com/nbcnightlynews/

Trump basically questioned for swearing on the trail in his latest ad and he responds with that. What the hell.


Somewhere, a democratic staffer in charge of attack ads is looking at the growing list of Trump material and quietly weeping.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply