|
This is a pretty good parody of Milo's writing style http://www.pointandclickbait.com/2016/03/milo-yiannopoulos-locked-out-of-car/ It's going to be amusing in the general seeing Trump try to court evangelicals.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 21:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:14 |
|
twistedmentat posted:This is a pretty good parody of Milo's writing style This is perfect The dig at the end about him not being verified anymore is great
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 21:47 |
MaxxBot posted:I had previously thought that the evangelical Trump voters just liked how he packaged economic populism with nationalism and didn't care as much about Trump's personal life. I was listening to Mike Gallagher this morning and he was talking about how some of his devout evangelical friends voted Trump for the same reason I voted for him, to completely and utterly destroy the GOP. Some of these guys hate the GOPe so much that they have made a calculated decision to go with Trump over Cruz to just burn this motherfucker down. They understand that Trump personally is a sleazy person but are simply using him as a means to a desired end, like the ironic Trump voters here have. It would be interesting to know how much of the evangelicals are actually pro-Trump and how many are spite voting. I suspect that the vast majority of Trump's voters are spite voters to at least some extent. Like, 90%+.
|
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 21:52 |
|
Intel&Sebastian posted:Does anyone here really believe that Obama wouldn't have been attacked, with about the same fervor, if he had attended? Something something photo op argle bargle.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 21:56 |
|
Celador posted:A friend of mine posted this on Facebook: Because it is indirectly connected to Regan (Hallowed be His name) and it's both an election year and he's trying to put in a replacement Supreme Court Justice.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 21:57 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:I suspect that the vast majority of Trump's voters are spite voters to at least some extent. Like, 90%+. But what percent of that is spite for the GOP and not just general spite against their own country?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 22:02 |
|
Intel&Sebastian posted:But what percent of that is spite for the GOP and not just general spite against their own country? A whole lot or even most, I would say. Open defiance of Reagan-Thatcher movement conservatism is a real and growing ideological undercurrent, I think. The bigots were sold a bill of goods by Reagan and Bush and are finally fed up
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 22:05 |
|
It has nothing to do with Reagan and everything to do with Obama. Pretty much every incidental thing Obama does or doesn't do is an offense to these people, no matter how many other presidents did or didn't do those exact same things. Will there be a Pizzagate when President Trump eats a pizza with a fork and knife? I somehow doubt it.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 22:07 |
|
Zanzibar Ham posted:Will there be a Pizzagate when President Trump eats a pizza with a fork and knife? I somehow doubt it. NEVER because he eats it with his LARGE HANDS like A MAN
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 22:24 |
|
twistedmentat posted:This is a pretty good parody of Milo's writing style This is heartwarmingly good.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 22:30 |
|
This is quite possibly the most amazing article I've seen on a right wing media site. It manages to link the left and acceptance of transgender people with furries, the WTO protests in 1999 and the Arab spring. Its a thing of incoherent beauty. http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/the-latest-deviancy-theyre-trying-to-mainstream/#AhlcMtFRmOy3hRlg.99 quote:That is, after all, what the push toward societal acceptance – be it for furries, “otherkin,” “bronies,” transgenders, or some other sexually delusional perversion – is all about. If masculinity is the fuel on which society runs, on which innovation occurs, on which industries are built and on which wars are fought to protect a free people, then feminism, liberalism, furries, bronies, transgenders and the Star Wars cantina of progressive freaks with body image issues and self-esteem deficits is the sugar in society’s gas tank. Progressives hate themselves, so they invent new sexual personas and new deviancies to keep themselves entertained. Liberals hate families and decency, so they champion sexual perversion and child molestation while holding it up as viable “other” sexuality.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 22:56 |
|
I'm starting to hear radio ads for something called a Squatty Potty. The premise of the ad is that Hillary Clinton is late joining a debate with Sanders and Trump because she had trouble peeing. This loving election.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:04 |
|
Epic High Five posted:This is perfect Yea, that's the cherry on the sundae. There's that cartoon of the woman falling over and going "Patriarchy!"; It's more like a guy falling over going 'Feminists!'. This is Milo's way of looking at things. This keeps popping up on Facebook http://gizmodo.com/lawmakers-in-west-virginia-celebrate-legalization-of-ra-1763798946 Wasn't it 2008 where people wanted Raw Milk added to the official Republican Party platform? I can understand hippy dippy "it came from mother earths womb so its good for me" kinds saying that raw milk helps realign your vibrations to the indigo spectrum, but what makes right wingers so obsessed with it? It it because its free from big evil food safety regulations which take away the taste of freedom (and E. Coli)?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:06 |
|
Shalebridge Cradle posted:This is quite possibly the most amazing article I've seen on a right wing media site. It manages to link the left and acceptance of transgender people with furries, the WTO protests in 1999 and the Arab spring. Its a thing of incoherent beauty. I wonder what name he uses when he posts in gbs.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:08 |
|
Republicans posted:I'm starting to hear radio ads for something called a Squatty Potty. The premise of the ad is that Hillary Clinton is late joining a debate with Sanders and Trump because she had trouble peeing. But the squatty potty is for pooping.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:12 |
|
Hulk Krogan posted:But the squatty potty is for pooping. And it works well
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:20 |
|
Sharkie posted:I wonder what name he uses when he posts in gbs. That's where I found the link
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:20 |
|
How is Crowder taking Fiorina's endorsement of Trump?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:26 |
|
baw posted:How is Crowder taking Fiorina's endorsement of Trump? Probably pretty well since she's endorsing Cruz.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:49 |
|
Oh good for him!
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:52 |
|
Bless his heart
|
# ? Mar 9, 2016 23:52 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:thats horrible but it doesnt make senses? to me at least. its probaly something awful. Seriously, a better example of "no way could they make a show like that today" would be All in the Family, a show famous primarily for it's portrayal of a conservative, lower middle class, bigoted, close minded conservative Christian. Archie Bunker sounds a lot like modern RWM figures and even some GOP political candidates. Here's his stance on gun control and airline safety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lDb0Dn8OXE I could imagine that coming out of the mouths of at least half of the GOP field. FuzzySkinner posted:They always back track and go That or "why should 'group x' get special rights? I hear that one a lot. And by "special", they're referring o the same basic rights afforded to any human being. BiggerBoat fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Mar 10, 2016 |
# ? Mar 10, 2016 00:08 |
|
Celador posted:A friend of mine posted this on Facebook: It's a very small group of 44 members (oddly enough, with the remarriages while in office the numbers balance out for all the unmarried/widowed presidents!), so "Traditional" is a bit more of a guideline than a rule. That said, yep, for Recent History sitting presidents don't attend FL funerals. Former presidents can and have attended, however, as do Sitting First Ladies.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 00:08 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc1hL6ikq9Q
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 00:34 |
|
So in Canada, we are starting to have a Tea Party of our own. http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/moose-calls-and-misspelled-signs-what-i-learned-at-the-kudatah?utm_source=vicefbca Yes, they call themselves the Kudatah, because they're ignorant white people from rural Alberta, they don't realize that its spelt coup d'etat. Lucky we don't have a serious right wing media, outside of the Sun, which will always choose the bigoted side of any argument.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 00:50 |
|
twistedmentat posted:So in Canada, we are starting to have a Tea Party of our own. Fun fact, Tea Partiers down here originally called themselves Tea Baggers. They get mad when you call them that now.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 01:18 |
|
twistedmentat posted:This is a pretty good parody of Milo's writing style I have spread this to my buddies on Twitter and now many more people are knowing the joy of this. Thank you so much, friend.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 01:23 |
|
MizPiz posted:Whenever I hear "classy" I always picture a mcmansion filled with animal print furniture and gold painted decorations. I have nothing else to add to that. This is pretty much it. Levin was fellating St. Reagan's corpse a few days back, and it was stunning how he bent over backwards to depict Jimmy Carter being down to earth and humble as a negative thing. "People don't want a President that carries their own luggage." Also, somehow Jimmy Carter managed to ruin the interior of the White House or something. I think that was the conservative justification for the Reagans needing to redecorate everything. Mostly it was just that the Carters didn't see the point in spending the money to re-do poo poo they felt was perfectly serviceable and elegant already. Don't believe anyone who tries to tell you that Nancy Reagan had good taste or a good eye or something, though. That's hagiographic bullshit. She had fairly pedestrian rich old lady taste, and she felt entitled to spew it all over the White House. Such class! Such style! Silver TV trays and overstuffed everything. Apparently Nancy Reagan was a big fan of the classic Hitchcock film, The Birds. The caption that goes with this reads, in part, "Bill and Hillary Clinton were not a fan of this wallpaper." quote:Of course, not everyone was enamored with Reagan and Graber’s West Coast taste. Longtime White House Curator Clement Conger once told The Washington Post that the Yellow Oval Room on the second floor used to be “an extremely beautiful room,” decorated by Jacqueline Kennedy with fine French antiques, which the Nixons augmented with “even finer furnishings” appropriate to the Federal era. ErIog fucked around with this message at 01:39 on Mar 10, 2016 |
# ? Mar 10, 2016 01:34 |
|
ErIog posted:This is pretty much it. Levin was fellating St. Reagan's corpse a few days back, and it was stunning how he bent over backwards to depict Jimmy Carter being down to earth and humble as a negative thing. "People don't want a President that carries their own luggage." The horror... the horror!
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 01:46 |
|
As garish as the decor is I still think they look like a cute couple in the former picture and hope I can look the same in 40 years.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 01:53 |
|
Klaus88 posted:The horror... the horror! I don't really give a poo poo about White House decor, either, but I think it's a useful demonstration of the fact that the entire Nancy Reagan narrative is just conservatives desperately wanting their own Jackie Kennedy figure. I don't know how you square, "She brought class back to the white house." with pictures of her and Ronnie eating from loving TV trays with her feet on the chair. Yeah, it's a cute photo, but it's not the version of the Reagans the right wing has spent the last 30 years peddling. If that photo depicted the Obamas, with modern decor, you know the entire right wing would waste a week in a tantrum about how the Reagans would have never been so classless as to eat anywhere but the dining room dressed in their Sunday best with finishing school posture and etiquette that would make Emily Post jealous. ErIog fucked around with this message at 02:00 on Mar 10, 2016 |
# ? Mar 10, 2016 01:53 |
|
ErIog posted:
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 02:02 |
|
twistedmentat posted:It's going to be amusing in the general seeing Trump try to court evangelicals.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 02:03 |
|
Spun Dog posted:Fun fact, Tea Partiers down here originally called themselves Tea Baggers. They get mad when you call them that now. A fitting name, since they are the angry ethnic slur shouting 12-year-olds of our democracy.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 02:11 |
|
loving Bill O'Reilly talking about how Trump is being painted as a fascist by liberals which is hurting the right despite the fact that the Right's been fascist for decades, it's only now that we're actually calling them out on the fact thanks to Trump exposing their true nature to the public.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 02:16 |
|
Chimera-gui posted:loving Bill O'Reilly talking about how Trump is being painted as a fascist by liberals which is hurting the right despite the fact that the Right's been fascist for decades, it's only now that we're actually calling them out on the fact thanks to Trump exposing their true nature to the public. On a related note Rubio is on MSNBC right now poo poo talking Sanders because he's a socialist, saying if you want a socialist America then vote D, while oblivious to the fact that America is already largely socialist & has been for many decades.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 02:25 |
|
So I'm currently arguing with a guy who is sending me links from Prager "University"'s youtube channel. Other than the fact that its neither a University and is run by David Prager, any good criticisms I can level?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 02:44 |
|
Donald Trump Mocks NBC’s Peter Alexander: ‘You’re So Beautiful’ http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/donald-trump-mocks-nbcs-peter-alexander-youre-so-beautiful/286780 "Oh, you’re so politically correct. You’re so beautiful. Oh, look at you. Awwww. Aw, he’s so. Oh, I know. You’ve never heard a little bad, a little off, language. I know, you’re so perfect. Aren’t you perfect. Aren’t you just a perfect young man. Give me a break. You know what? It’s stuff like that that people in this country are tired of. It’s stuff like that." https://www.facebook.com/nbcnightlynews/ Trump basically questioned for swearing on the trail in his latest ad and he responds with that. What the hell. "Yo Shinzo you slant eyed mother fucker, hows it going?" "Putin, you fucker - im coming for ya!" "David Camerson - you English fag" "...hey hey, it's so PC, it's so PC"
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 03:00 |
twistedmentat posted:This keeps popping up on Facebook You are largely correct, Big Government and Industrial Farms with their Harmful Pasteurization. Pasteurization does reduce the vitamin content of some foods, but not in a way or to a degree that's signficant for human consumers.
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 03:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:14 |
|
Vintersorg posted:Donald Trump Mocks NBC’s Peter Alexander: ‘You’re So Beautiful’ Somewhere, a democratic staffer in charge of attack ads is looking at the growing list of Trump material and quietly weeping.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 03:21 |