|
doesn't the grand prix start tomorrow it's just side events/last chance gpts (do they still do those) today
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 19:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 18:10 |
|
|
Zoness posted:doesn't the grand prix start tomorrow Well, it wont' be streamed this weekend regardless. People have been crying about this on reddit for weeks.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 19:58
|
|
|
I am all for them skipping boring GPs if that means a better job on the ones they do stream. Not sure that's happening yet but I'm hopeful.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 19:59
|
|
|
MiddleEastBeast posted:Delirium being the only apparent payoff for self-mill is kind of unexciting (for limited), given that we're going back to the plane that had flashback last time. I mean, we only have like 40 cards spoiled, so its kind of weird to say that Delirium either isn't exciting or is the only payoff. Not to mention that some of the Delirium payoffs are really good, e.g. Topplegeist.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
http://imgur.com/gallery/KAx5C
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
Sickening posted:Well, it wont' be streamed this weekend regardless. People have been crying about this on reddit for weeks. They did an extra poo poo job last time they covered a team event, like 30 min of dead airtime between games poo poo. They probably want to fix this and accidentally figured out it's going to take more than $50K and five minutes so the coverage team in charge is probably rolling around on the ground covered in BBQ sauce or some dumb poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
sol ring at uncommon is an obvious fake, other stupid things notwithstanding
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:03
|
|
|
That stasis reprint better be the original art.  Yeah and damnation at rare?... I don't really have much faith in that. That is something that makes sense and totally not something WOTC would ever do even for a small print run thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:04
|
|
|
Having the normal retinue of backup matches to cut dead time in normal coverage is a great upscale in the number of cameras/tables they'd need to bring. I'm not sure if wotc would send their own team or have scg live do it but either way I don't think they'd bring the level of equipment they used for the world magic cup to a GP.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:07
|
|
|
Finally I can play Sea Stompy! Also lol at mythic Ichorid and uncommon Sol Ring. Totally believable.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
Zoness posted:sol ring at uncommon is an obvious fake, other stupid things notwithstanding Yeah, this list seems a little wonky and doesn't even look like there is any sealed/draft synergy. I would love to see Serendib come back, however.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
Oh yeah also Ivory Tower at common  This would definitely allow for playable limited.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
Zoness posted:Oh yeah also Ivory Tower at common holy poo poo that's fuckin wow does that card serve any purpose at all
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:12
|
|
|
Bolt at U, Chain Lightning at R, seems legit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:12
|
|
|
"Let's put Mana Crypt at Mythic and Sol Ring at Uncommon." Seems legit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:holy poo poo that's fuckin I mean did you look at what the low cost creatures in the list do.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
Zoness posted:I mean did you look at what the low cost creatures in the list do. no because autocard doesn't register on images
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
It at least has more rhyme or reason than the last one. And the shittiness of Green's list kind of matches early Magic (I thought I was the only person who remembered Crush of Wurms  ) But I'll believe it when I see it.E: Just noticed all the UG Madness cards in there, God that would be so sweet to draft. C-Euro fucked around with this message at 20:25 on Mar 11, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:19
|
|
|
Oldschool sliver subset with Overlord would be my jam if it was real
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:20
|
|
|
Savannah Lions at Uncommon, clearly fake. Edit: Can't force dredge, no bridge from below 
Thisuck fucked around with this message at 20:35 on Mar 11, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:(I thought I was the only person who remembered Crush of Wurms That was the foil I opened in a pack of judgement, not cabal therapy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:32
|
|
|
I'd be shocked at any list with Sol ring in it at all. It's so game breakingly powerful in limited it probably couldn't be at less than mythic(Which Vintage Masters agrees with). But they've printed it 4 years in a row or whatever at "uncommon" in Commander so it would be a pretty terrible rarity bump. If commander decks had never been printed and this was the first run since the ol' days maaaaybe. But as is I don't see it being a good card to put in the set.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Nothing says Eternal Masters like Mage Ring Bully
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:38
|
|
|
Fish Of Doom posted:Nothing says Eternal Masters like Mage Ring Bully Yeah aside from that one card this looks pretty convincing. Mage-Ring Bully is baffling.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
Channel kaervek's torch just sounds wrong.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
Cactrot posted:Channel kaervek's torch just sounds ftfy 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
Chainer's Edict at uncommon would be very disappointing cuz it's a staple pauper card on MODO that has never been common in paper. If they aren't going to print duals the only usefulness of this set is to help introduce paper players to the best format, Pauper, and they should take every opportunity to harmonize the online and paper rarities. Also reprint big money common Oubliette, thanks. And while you're at it reprint Cuombajj Witches because they are surely next on the mad money pauper investment hitlist.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 20:59
|
|
|
Elvish Archer and Serendib Efreet at rare? lol Even ignoring some of the hella dumb poo poo like Sol Ring and Channel that's just so goddamn obviously fake it isn't even funny.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:(I thought I was the only person who remembered Crush of Wurms Like okay, I sure don't mind you passing by my BoP or Exalted Angel or any of the other actual value cards of the time for a 50c foil. Second and third did the same thing, pulling Vampiric Dragon and Braids.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:10
|
|
|
To anyone saying it's fake because of baffling design decisions, lol have you ever looked at the previous masters sets?
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
Loving the painlands at uncommon. Hope this list is real.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:14
|
|
|
Another unbelievably fake setlist.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:16
|
|
|
Yawgmoth posted:I remember back in Scourge I ran a draft with prizes being a pick out of my trade binder, and first place decided to pull a foil Crush of Wurms. Back in the day crush was my favorite ramp payoff spell. I started loving Wurms with arrogant wurm and roar of the wurm in u/g madness. What's better than 1 wurm? 3 Wurms at the same time! Someone mail me a foil Crush of Wurms
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:18
|
|
|
little munchkin posted:To anyone saying it's fake because of baffling design decisions, lol have you ever looked at the previous masters sets? There's bad design decisions and then there's french vanilla rares and cards that are banned in all eternal formats.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
just rust posted:Chainer's Edict at uncommon would be very disappointing cuz it's a staple pauper card on MODO that has never been common in paper. Pretty sure that you can use uncommon printings as long as the card was at one point printed at common in mtgo pauper. edit: sorry, I misread you.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:25
|
|
|
Terrible Horse posted:Pretty sure that you can use uncommon printings as long as the card was at one point printed at common in mtgo pauper. I think this is normally correct but also unclear. Last paper pauper event I went to followed paper-only commons, so no cards like tangle or chainers edict. Something like eternal masters would be a great no-effort way to clear up the few differences between paper and modo for pauper.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
Story chat! I don't understand why there's so much mystery around what happened between Nahiri and Sorin, as it seems really obvious: - Sorin (the ancient vampire) convinces Nahiri (the newly-sparked Kor) to bind the Eldrazi to her home plane. - Vampires (gee I wonder where they could have come from) help weaken the Eldrazi prison, Nahiri leaves to find out what the deal is. - The Eldrazi are accidentally freed by a bunch of other planeswalkers. - As far as Nahiri has seen, these planeswalkers just show up at her home, ruin everything, then bail and leave her to clean up the mess. - Nahiri is super-pissed and is luring Emrakul to Sorin's plane, just as Sorin lured Emrakul to Nahiri's plane. Why do they need to have had some kind of falling out? I feel like "while you and your buddies traipse around the multiverse loving things up I'm stuck here protecting my home from a mess you helped cause, how about I show you what that feels like?" is a good enough reason.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
Thisuck posted:What if the moon is actually just Emrakul, but looking from the top, so the weird jellyfish head thing looks round, then we can have Tammy going "That's no moon!" on Emrakul 2.0's flavor text. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
oh my god I remember this episode
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 18:10 |
|
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:Why do they need to have had some kind of falling out? I feel like "while you and your buddies traipse around the multiverse loving things up I'm stuck here protecting my home from a mess you helped cause, how about I show you what that feels like?" is a good enough reason. They never explicitly state Sorin caused vampires to happen on Zendikar (and hope springs eternal that Creative is... creative enough to introduce the plot twist that it wasn't Sorin's doing), also in your version of events there's no reason for Sorin to be dodgy to Ugin about the whereabouts of Nahiri.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2016 21:59
|
|